kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
	sandipan.das@amd.com, babu.moger@amd.com, likexu@tencent.com,
	like.xu.linux@gmail.com, groug@kaod.org, khorenko@virtuozzo.com,
	alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com, den@virtuozzo.com,
	davydov-max@yandex-team.ru, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
	dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, joe.jin@oracle.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, gaosong@loongson.cn,
	chenhuacai@kernel.org, philmd@linaro.org, aurelien@aurel32.net,
	jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, arikalo@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
	danielhb413@gmail.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	alistair.francis@wdc.com, liwei1518@gmail.com,
	zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org,
	david@redhat.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
	flavra@baylibre.com, ewanhai-oc@zhaoxin.com, ewanhai@zhaoxin.com,
	cobechen@zhaoxin.com, louisqi@zhaoxin.com, liamni@zhaoxin.com,
	frankzhu@zhaoxin.com, silviazhao@zhaoxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] target/i386/kvm: query kvm.enable_pmu parameter
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:05:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z/dRiyGTxb8JBE8v@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250331013307.11937-8-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>

Hi Dongli,

The logic is fine for me :-) And thank you to take my previous
suggestion. When I revisit here after these few weeks, I have some
thoughts:

> +        if (pmu_cap) {
> +            if ((pmu_cap & KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE) &&
> +                !X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
> +                ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, 0,
> +                                        KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE);
> +                if (ret < 0) {
> +                    error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
> +                                     "Failed to set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE");
> +                    return ret;
> +                }
> +            }

This case enhances vPMU disablement.

> +        } else {
> +            /*
> +             * KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY is introduced in Linux v5.18. For old
> +             * linux, we have to check enable_pmu parameter for vPMU support.
> +             */
> +            g_autofree char *kvm_enable_pmu;
> +
> +            /*
> +             * The kvm.enable_pmu's permission is 0444. It does not change until
> +             * a reload of the KVM module.
> +             */
> +            if (g_file_get_contents("/sys/module/kvm/parameters/enable_pmu",
> +                                    &kvm_enable_pmu, NULL, NULL)) {
> +                if (*kvm_enable_pmu == 'N' && X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
> +                    error_setg(errp, "Failed to enable PMU since "
> +                               "KVM's enable_pmu parameter is disabled");
> +                    return -EPERM;
> +                }

And this case checks if vPMU could enable.

>              }
>          }
>      }

So I feel it's not good enough to check based on pmu_cap, we can
re-split it into these two cases: enable_pmu and !enable_pmu. Then we
can make the code path more clear!

Just like:

diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
index f68d5a057882..d728fb5eaec6 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
@@ -2041,44 +2041,42 @@ int kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp)
     if (first) {
         first = false;

-        /*
-         * Since Linux v5.18, KVM provides a VM-level capability to easily
-         * disable PMUs; however, QEMU has been providing PMU property per
-         * CPU since v1.6. In order to accommodate both, have to configure
-         * the VM-level capability here.
-         *
-         * KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE doesn't change the PMU
-         * behavior on Intel platform because current "pmu" property works
-         * as expected.
-         */
-        if (pmu_cap) {
-            if ((pmu_cap & KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE) &&
-                !X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
-                ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, 0,
-                                        KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE);
-                if (ret < 0) {
-                    error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
-                                     "Failed to set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE");
-                    return ret;
-                }
-            }
-        } else {
-            /*
-             * KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY is introduced in Linux v5.18. For old
-             * linux, we have to check enable_pmu parameter for vPMU support.
-             */
+        if (X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
             g_autofree char *kvm_enable_pmu;

             /*
-             * The kvm.enable_pmu's permission is 0444. It does not change until
-             * a reload of the KVM module.
+             * The enable_pmu parameter is introduced since Linux v5.17,
+             * give a chance to provide more information about vPMU
+             * enablement.
+             *
+             * The kvm.enable_pmu's permission is 0444. It does not change
+             * until a reload of the KVM module.
              */
             if (g_file_get_contents("/sys/module/kvm/parameters/enable_pmu",
                                     &kvm_enable_pmu, NULL, NULL)) {
-                if (*kvm_enable_pmu == 'N' && X86_CPU(cpu)->enable_pmu) {
-                    error_setg(errp, "Failed to enable PMU since "
+                if (*kvm_enable_pmu == 'N') {
+                    warn_report("Failed to enable PMU since "
                                "KVM's enable_pmu parameter is disabled");
-                    return -EPERM;
+                }
+            }
+        } else {
+            /*
+             * Since Linux v5.18, KVM provides a VM-level capability to easily
+             * disable PMUs; however, QEMU has been providing PMU property per
+             * CPU since v1.6. In order to accommodate both, have to configure
+             * the VM-level capability here.
+             *
+             * KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE doesn't change the PMU
+             * behavior on Intel platform because current "pmu" property works
+             * as expected.
+             */
+            if ((pmu_cap & KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE)) {
+                ret = kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PMU_CAPABILITY, 0,
+                                        KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE);
+                if (ret < 0) {
+                    error_setg_errno(errp, -ret,
+                                     "Failed to set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE");
+                    return ret;
                 }
             }
         }




  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10  4:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-31  1:32 [PATCH v3 00/10] target/i386/kvm/pmu: PMU Enhancement, Bugfix and Cleanup Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] target/i386: disable PerfMonV2 when PERFCORE unavailable Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] target/i386: disable PERFCORE when "-pmu" is configured Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] kvm: Introduce kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu() Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] target/i386/kvm: set KVM_PMU_CAP_DISABLE if "-pmu" is configured Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] target/i386/kvm: extract unrelated code out of kvm_x86_build_cpuid() Dongli Zhang
2025-04-10  2:41   ` Zhao Liu
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] target/i386/kvm: rename architectural PMU variables Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] target/i386/kvm: query kvm.enable_pmu parameter Dongli Zhang
2025-04-10  5:05   ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2025-04-10 20:16     ` Dongli Zhang
2025-04-16  7:48     ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] target/i386/kvm: reset AMD PMU registers during VM reset Dongli Zhang
2025-04-10  7:43   ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-10 21:17     ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] target/i386/kvm: support perfmon-v2 for reset Dongli Zhang
2025-04-10  8:21   ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-10 21:19     ` Dongli Zhang
2025-03-31  1:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] target/i386/kvm: don't stop Intel PMU counters Dongli Zhang
2025-04-10  9:45   ` Zhao Liu
2025-04-10 22:25     ` Dongli Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z/dRiyGTxb8JBE8v@intel.com \
    --to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=arikalo@gmail.com \
    --cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=cobechen@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=davydov-max@yandex-team.ru \
    --cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=ewanhai-oc@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=ewanhai@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=flavra@baylibre.com \
    --cc=frankzhu@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=gaosong@loongson.cn \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
    --cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
    --cc=khorenko@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liamni@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=likexu@tencent.com \
    --cc=liwei1518@gmail.com \
    --cc=louisqi@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=silviazhao@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).