public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: LiamNioc <LiamNi-oc@zhaoxin.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org,  pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,  dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, LiamNi@zhaoxin.com,  CobeChen@zhaoxin.com,
	LouisQi@zhaoxin.com, EwanHai@zhaoxin.com,  FrankZhu@zhaoxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86:Cancel hrtimer in the process of saving PIT state to reduce the performance overhead caused by hrtimer during guest stop.
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 07:48:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-_xNpgsYDW0_4Jn@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <676ed22f-9c3f-4013-99d8-37c4c73bb9ac@zhaoxin.com>

On Tue, Mar 25, 2025, LiamNioc wrote:
> On 2025/3/17 21:38, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, Liam Ni wrote:
> > > When using the dump-guest-memory command in QEMU to dump
> > > the virtual machine's memory,the virtual machine will be
> > > paused for a period of time.If the guest (i.e., UEFI) uses
> > > the PIT as the system clock,it will be observed that the
> > > HRTIMER used by the PIT continues to run during the guest
> > > stop process, imposing an additional burden on the system.
> > > Moreover, during the guest restart process,the previously
> > > established HRTIMER will be canceled,and the accumulated
> > > timer events will be flushed.However, before the old
> > > HRTIMER is canceled,the accumulated timer events
> > > will "surreptitiously" inject interrupts into the guest.
> > > 
> > > SO during the process of saving the KVM PIT state,
> > > the HRTIMER need to be canceled to reduce the performance overhead
> > > caused by HRTIMER during the guest stop process.
> > > 
> > > i.e. if guest
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Liam Ni <liamni-oc@zhaoxin.com>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++++
> > >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > index 045c61cc7e54..75355b315aca 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > > @@ -6405,6 +6405,8 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_pit(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_pit_state *ps)
> > > 
> > >        mutex_lock(&kps->lock);
> > >        memcpy(ps, &kps->channels, sizeof(*ps));
> > > +     hrtimer_cancel(&kvm->arch.vpit->pit_state.timer);
> > > +     kthread_flush_work(&kvm->arch.vpit->expired);
> > 
> > KVM cannot assume userspace wants to stop the PIT when grabbing a snapshot.  It's
> > a significant ABI change, and not desirable in all cases.
> 
> When VM Pause, all devices of the virtual machine are frozen, so the PIT
> freeze only saves the PIT device status, but does not cancel HRTIMER, but
> chooses to cancel HRTIMER when VM resumes and refresh the pending task.
> According to my observation, before refreshing the pending task, these
> pending tasks will secretly inject interrupts into the guest.
> 
> So do we need to cancel the HRTIMER when VM pause?

The problem is that KVM has no real concept of pausing a VM.  There are a variety
of hacky hooks here and there, but no KVM-wide notion of "pause".

For this case, after getting PIT state, you should be able to use KVM_SET_PIT2 to
set the mode of channel[0] to 0xff, which call destroy_pit_timer() via
pit_load_count().

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-04 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-17  9:19 [PATCH] KVM: x86:Cancel hrtimer in the process of saving PIT state to reduce the performance overhead caused by hrtimer during guest stop Liam Ni
2025-03-17 13:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-25  6:10   ` LiamNioc
2025-04-04 14:48     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-04-07  2:19       ` LiamNioc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-_xNpgsYDW0_4Jn@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=CobeChen@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=EwanHai@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=FrankZhu@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=LiamNi-oc@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=LiamNi@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=LouisQi@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox