From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com,
Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>, Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] KVM: x86: Track possible passthrough MSRs in kvm_x86_ops
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 11:47:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z09gVXxfj5YedL7V@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241128164624.GDZ0ieYPnoB4u39rBT@fat_crate.local>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 01:57:54PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > The attached patch is compile-tested only (the nested interactions in particular
> > need a bit of scrutiny) and needs to be chunked into multiple patches, but I don't
> > see any obvious blockers, and the diffstats speak volumes:
>
> I'd like to apply this and take a closer look but I don't know what it goes
> against.
It applies cleanly on my tree (github.com/kvm-x86/linux.git next) or Paolo's
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git next).
> Btw, you could point me to some documentation explaining which branches in
> the kvm tree people should use to base off work ontop.
For KVM x86, from Documentation/process/maintainer-kvm-x86.rst:
Base Tree/Branch
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fixes that target the current release, a.k.a. mainline, should be based on
``git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git master``. Note, fixes do not
automatically warrant inclusion in the current release. There is no singular
rule, but typically only fixes for bugs that are urgent, critical, and/or were
introduced in the current release should target the current release.
Everything else should be based on ``kvm-x86/next``, i.e. there is no need to
select a specific topic branch as the base. If there are conflicts and/or
dependencies across topic branches, it is the maintainer's job to sort them
out.
The only exception to using ``kvm-x86/next`` as the base is if a patch/series
is a multi-arch series, i.e. has non-trivial modifications to common KVM code
and/or has more than superficial changes to other architectures' code. Multi-
arch patch/series should instead be based on a common, stable point in KVM's
history, e.g. the release candidate upon which ``kvm-x86 next`` is based. If
you're unsure whether a patch/series is truly multi-arch, err on the side of
caution and treat it as multi-arch, i.e. use a common base.
where kvm-x86 is the aforementioned github.com/kvm-x86/linux.git.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-03 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-27 20:19 [PATCH 00/15] Unify MSR intercepts in x86 Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: x86: Use non-atomic bit ops to manipulate "shadow" MSR intercepts Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 02/15] KVM: SVM: Use non-atomic bit ops to manipulate MSR interception bitmaps Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 03/15] KVM: SVM: Invert the polarity of the "shadow" " Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-03 21:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 04/15] KVM: SVM: Track MSRPM as "unsigned long", not "u32" Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 05/15] KVM: x86: SVM: Adopt VMX style MSR intercepts in SVM Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 06/15] KVM: SVM: Disable intercepts for all direct access MSRs on MSR filter changes Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 07/15] KVM: SVM: Delete old SVM MSR management code Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 08/15] KVM: SVM: Pass through GHCB MSR if and only if VM is SEV-ES Aaron Lewis
2024-12-03 21:21 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 09/15] KVM: SVM: Drop "always" flag from list of possible passthrough MSRs Aaron Lewis
2024-12-03 21:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 10/15] KVM: SVM: Don't "NULL terminate" the " Aaron Lewis
2024-12-03 21:30 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 11/15] KVM: VMX: Make list of possible passthrough MSRs "const" Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 12/15] KVM: x86: Track possible passthrough MSRs in kvm_x86_ops Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 21:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 16:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-03 19:47 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-12-05 17:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-05 18:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-12-06 15:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-06 16:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 13/15] KVM: x86: Move ownership of passthrough MSR "shadow" to common x86 Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 14/15] KVM: x86: Hoist SVM MSR intercepts to common x86 code Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:19 ` [PATCH 15/15] KVM: x86: Hoist VMX " Aaron Lewis
2024-11-27 20:56 ` [PATCH 00/15] Unify MSR intercepts in x86 Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z09gVXxfj5YedL7V@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox