From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f73.google.com (mail-pj1-f73.google.com [209.85.216.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30BE1FC0FD for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 22:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.73 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734559941; cv=none; b=FAkU6LD83SJ8qkKWS5qQ5eP7uXWf7VH/q/Y5aqx3oUGxnSJOCr8PM4jgGJ62lBYp+6lpXEloB8zwmdOvwNn8MMWv66mv4lm5pViEUc4JrWUeTjT6S8jJkWZvf9TvJq1IUjPdW/+asE8c0+Wz1DAM1jf/DkmoMeW9CCd8lfMOpns= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734559941; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9ElCmbEdpmXTkkl32gV25N180alLg2mTUaxIcxwRA9s=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=fC5kS1T4YH0ElSeLavpsHDmBcGoS3DG53B9cdlR0VQYI9rdblZ0tZH5i6vDkeRp4eanl33IqAduId/hm0uisYn1eeNMHi8urtio9hOXMWWHVV82y6zSqIw329ph12XP8bu6eTnC1S+5mWds8Dyywpts4FrXDcTcEmZRHVnP7iR0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=z0EBWwqX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.73 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="z0EBWwqX" Received: by mail-pj1-f73.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ee9f66cb12so130535a91.1 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:12:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1734559939; x=1735164739; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=H8/Bx7vVXdjG8Qup6CRv0EW1z1SiIeJxiXGSb6iiEaI=; b=z0EBWwqXMZj4T9d9nQxkYJbDWp7S1zrFN5n373gc7feuVX+CaqxsSuP1x2cIy4hDnV vlA26mWmkN0JQKYIGTqJsVOHCQ1YynIjHiANAg2j3VHMRC+F4t5JapRUoKbiYNrGVb6E StFOnG4zjjLx6bGwyB6ETkNxBXwQl39NbPe3drpAqMKjbJ1fwcwQertqhQ+kUHpdIL1+ PDgazaPYqzYyrgZEB+xmFUIsp89K8gtX7posg39rFqoivvkaZpcHSJw6r/81LNqftqMi /ZodtNkQgox4QinVR7RTUIKpOiAIR6KiCraj6/GJlitORvXF9k+iFEwP+tpaKtpKPVVX gmCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734559939; x=1735164739; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=H8/Bx7vVXdjG8Qup6CRv0EW1z1SiIeJxiXGSb6iiEaI=; b=oeIE0hA/9fJqYD55uooAG8xZIeKohVO6Tupjk/xPFcO+Uc/eGTUuJdQaqpysIR+VJK jNTBVfGH0p6wHTcaMg3LQT2kY/DuCpQC/dMzkJgr/MYB40/31J4v+DOwhTfo0LNnyuoz Gv0UGnNJdwYYHO2JbK9Im3mQ8IG/1Zi4wCdmEJ7S8VTYZv3vyX/gUVmsWXuK6GvAiEUz UGfgMFke5V3a3Bgf3XDImvJMbAjgsF/ugDoiO0X384CMYZV1WBavRSTLX9co7EPQ97+z dWI9rUtrvYbJlSp2oqhSSl0dObrmU0aR4wXWARtKxLcJ4x7vQl+jHXJMC/biOawJy669 jQew== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWpiCaTSbnVSeYHMWlEabwQV542ax0dOob44wDuxDI+UQmTj5oV4IF5O371age1Q/btYPk=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw/oHI7Vw2u+JHG3TQXlGdZPlaidZkM0HVteTo5Hwm5ze/bZc61 Lhk/wN4zEqNs9lny6aYk+BkegAsy017fbZjBtOhEpviZKdxYz05Bwl5SQf8hlqoLHFKyUOeFn25 ogg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IErnWAR5psGjYVEFgNdPO9Ra9c1ykxsWobkdL6749/rPBHLJQjHXddkE3dKVeRJv5MVr7RsZhgUpzE= X-Received: from pjuj8.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:90a:d008:b0:2ea:7d73:294e]) (user=seanjc job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:90b:134d:b0:2ea:37b4:5373 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f443ce8daamr1395725a91.10.1734559939355; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:12:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:12:18 -0800 In-Reply-To: <173455833964.3185228.5614329030867008316.b4-ty@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20241128005547.4077116-1-seanjc@google.com> <173455833964.3185228.5614329030867008316.b4-ty@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] KVM: selftests: "tree" wide overhauls From: Sean Christopherson To: Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Paolo Bonzini , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Jones , James Houghton , Muhammad Usama Anjum Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wed, Dec 18, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:55:31 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Two separate series (mmu_stress_test[1] and $ARCH[2]), posted as one to > > avoid unpleasant conflicts, and because I hope to land both in kvm/next > > shortly after 6.12-rc1 since they impact all of KVM selftests. > > > > mmu_stress_test > > --------------- > > Convert the max_guest_memory_test into a more generic mmu_stress_test. > > The basic gist of the "conversion" is to have the test do mprotect() on > > guest memory while vCPUs are accessing said memory, e.g. to verify KVM > > and mmu_notifiers are working as intended. > > > > [...] > > As I am running out of time before I disappear for two weeks, applied to: > > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux.git selftests_arch > > Other KVM maintainers, that branch is officially immutable. I also pushed a tag, > kvm-selftests-arch-6.14, just in case I pull a stupid and manage to clobber the > branch. My apologies if this causes pain. AFAICT, there aren't any queued or > in-flight patches that git's rename magic can't automatically handle, so hopefully > this ends up being pain-free. > > Paolo, here's a pull request if you want to pull this into kvm/next long before > the 6.14 merge window. Diff stats at the very bottom (hilariously long). Argh! I completely forget to build test this on non-x86, and missed that arm64 snuck in 75cd027cbcb1 ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Test ID_AA64PFR0.MPAM isn't completely ignored"). *sigh* Given that I just sent out mail, I'm going to cross my fingers and hope that no one has merged the above branch/tag. I've deleted the branch and tags from the remote, but kept the tag locally just in case. Please holler if you managed to grab the broken branch/tag. If no one screams, I'll assume I got luckly and will push a fixed version (with different names) later today.