From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [bug report] KVM: x86: Unify TSC logic (sleeping in atomic?)
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 07:36:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5OzjYqOVz7nrnJ1@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pfx63yk5euw6zsjmmpuetfuhhk7jcann3trlirp6y5u26lljn7@mtbwoswzoae3>
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 09:51:41AM -0800, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > That's not the problematic commit. This popped because commit 8722903cbb8f
> > ("sched: Define sched_clock_irqtime as static key") in the tip tree turned
> > sched_clock_irqtime into a static key (it was a simple "int").
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250103022409.2544-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com
>
> Thanks for the analysis, it's spot on. What a bad luck.
>
> Is there a precedent for static key switching in non-preemptible
> contexts?
Abuse static_key_deferred to push the patching to a workqueue?
> More generally, why does KVM do this tsc check in vcpu_load?
The logic triggers when a vCPU migrates to a different pCPU. The code detects
that the case where TSC is inconsistent between pCPUs, and would cause time to go
backwards from the guest's perspective. E.g. TSC = X on CPU0, migrate to CPU1
where TSC = X - Y.
> Shouldn't possible unstability for that cpu be already checked and decided at
> boot (regardless of KVM)? (Unless unstability itself is not stable property.
> Which means any previously measured IRQ times are skewed.)
This isn't a problem that's unique to KVM. The clocksource watchdog also marks
TSC unstable from non-preemptible context (presumably from IRQ context?)
clocksource_watchdog()
|
-> spin_lock(&watchdog_lock);
|
-> __clocksource_unstable()
|
-> clocksource.mark_unstable() == tsc_cs_mark_unstable()
|
-> disable_sched_clock_irqtime()
Uh, and sched_clock_register() toggles the static key on with IRQs disabled...
/* Cannot register a sched_clock with interrupts on */
local_irq_save(flags);
...
/* Enable IRQ time accounting if we have a fast enough sched_clock() */
if (irqtime > 0 || (irqtime == -1 && rate >= 1000000))
enable_sched_clock_irqtime();
local_irq_restore(flags);
> (Or a third option to revert the static-keyness if Yafang doesn't have
Given there are issues all over the place, either a revert or a generic fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-24 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 6:08 [bug report] KVM: x86: Unify TSC logic (sleeping in atomic?) Dan Carpenter
2025-01-17 17:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-24 10:34 ` Michal Koutný
2025-01-24 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-01-26 2:16 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z5OzjYqOVz7nrnJ1@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox