public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	 Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	 Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/11] KVM: Add lockless memslot walk to KVM
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 07:26:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z69gwTQjaeMLY7rM@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204004038.1680123-3-jthoughton@google.com>

It's not a lockless walk of the memslots.  The walk of memslots is already
"lockless" in that the memslots are protected by SRCU, not by mmu_lock.

On Tue, Feb 04, 2025, James Houghton wrote:
> It is possible to correctly do aging without taking the KVM MMU lock;
> this option allows such architectures to do so. Architectures that
> select CONFIG_KVM_MMU_NOTIFIER_AGING_LOCKLESS are responsible for
> correctness.
> 
> Suggested-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h |  1 +
>  virt/kvm/Kconfig         |  2 ++
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index f34f4cfaa513..c28a6aa1f2ed 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ struct kvm_gfn_range {
>  	union kvm_mmu_notifier_arg arg;
>  	enum kvm_gfn_range_filter attr_filter;
>  	bool may_block;
> +	bool lockless;
>  };
>  bool kvm_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
>  bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
> index 54e959e7d68f..9356f4e4e255 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ config KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER
>  
>  config KVM_ELIDE_TLB_FLUSH_IF_YOUNG
>         depends on KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER
> +
> +config KVM_MMU_NOTIFIER_AGING_LOCKLESS
>         bool

As noted by Stephen[*], this steals the "bool" from KVM_ELIDE_TLB_FLUSH_IF_YOUNG.

Looking at it with fresh eyes, it also fails to take a depenency on
KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER.

Lastly, the name is unnecessarily long.  The "NOTIFIER" part is superfluous and
can be dropped, as it's a property of the architecture's MMU, not of KVM's
mmu_notifier implementation. E.g. if KVM ever did aging outside of the notifier,
then this Kconfig would be relevant for that flow as well.  The dependency on
KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER is what communicates that its currently used only by
mmu_notifier aging.

Actually, I take "Lastly" back.  IMO, it reads much better as LOCKLESS_AGING,
because LOCKLESS is an adverb that describes the AGING process.

[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250214181401.4e7dd91d@canb.auug.org.au

TL;DR: I'm squashing this:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
index f0a60e59c884..fe8ea8c097de 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ config KVM_X86
        select KVM_COMMON
        select KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER
        select KVM_ELIDE_TLB_FLUSH_IF_YOUNG
-       select KVM_MMU_NOTIFIER_AGING_LOCKLESS
+       select KVM_MMU_LOCKLESS_AGING
        select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP
        select HAVE_KVM_PFNCACHE
        select HAVE_KVM_DIRTY_RING_TSO
diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
index 9356f4e4e255..746e1f466aa6 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
@@ -102,8 +102,10 @@ config KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER
 
 config KVM_ELIDE_TLB_FLUSH_IF_YOUNG
        depends on KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER
+       bool
 
-config KVM_MMU_NOTIFIER_AGING_LOCKLESS
+config KVM_MMU_LOCKLESS_AGING
+       depends on KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER
        bool
 
 config KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index e514e3db1b31..201c14ff476f 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -655,8 +655,7 @@ static __always_inline int kvm_age_hva_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
                .on_lock        = (void *)kvm_null_fn,
                .flush_on_ret   = flush_on_ret,
                .may_block      = false,
-               .lockless       =
-                       IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_MMU_NOTIFIER_AGING_LOCKLESS),
+               .lockless       = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_MMU_LOCKLESS_AGING),
        };
 
        return kvm_handle_hva_range(kvm, &range).ret;

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-14 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-04  0:40 [PATCH v9 00/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Age sptes locklessly James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 01/11] KVM: Rename kvm_handle_hva_range() James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 02/11] KVM: Add lockless memslot walk to KVM James Houghton
2025-02-14 15:26   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-02-14 19:27     ` James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 03/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out spte atomic bit clearing routine James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 04/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn() and kvm_age_gfn() James Houghton
2025-02-12 22:07   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-13  0:25     ` James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 05/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename spte_has_volatile_bits() to spte_needs_atomic_write() James Houghton
2025-02-12 22:09   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-13  0:26     ` James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 06/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip shadow MMU test_young if TDP MMU reports page as young James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 07/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Only check gfn age in shadow MMU if indirect_shadow_pages > 0 James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 08/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor low level rmap helpers to prep for walking w/o mmu_lock James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 09/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Add infrastructure to allow walking rmaps outside of mmu_lock James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 10/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Add support for lockless walks of rmap SPTEs James Houghton
2025-02-04  0:40 ` [PATCH v9 11/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Support rmap walks without holding mmu_lock when aging gfns James Houghton
2025-02-15  0:50 ` [PATCH v9 00/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Age sptes locklessly Sean Christopherson
2025-02-18 19:29 ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-02-19  1:13   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-19 18:56     ` James Houghton
2025-02-25 22:00     ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-02-26  0:50       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-26 18:39         ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-02-27  0:51           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-27  1:54             ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z69gwTQjaeMLY7rM@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox