public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	 Anthony PERARD <anthony@xenproject.org>,
	Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>,
	 "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
	Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,  Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	 kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i386/xen: Move KVM_XEN_HVM_CONFIG ioctl to kvm_xen_init_vcpu()
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 07:37:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6YoxFOaMdNiD_uv@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250207143724.30792-1-dwmw2@infradead.org>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2025, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> 
> At the time kvm_xen_init() is called, hyperv_enabled() doesn't yet work, so
> the correct MSR index to use for the hypercall page isn't known.
> 
> Rather than setting it to the default and then shifting it later for the
> Hyper-V case with a confusing second call to kvm_init_xen(), just do it
> once in kvm_xen_init_vcpu().

Is it possible the funky double-init is deliberate, to ensure that Xen is
configured in KVM during VM setup?  I looked through KVM and didn't see any
obvious dependencies, but that doesn't mean a whole lot.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07 14:37 [PATCH 1/2] i386/xen: Move KVM_XEN_HVM_CONFIG ioctl to kvm_xen_init_vcpu() David Woodhouse
2025-02-07 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw/xen: Add "mode" parameter to xen-block devices David Woodhouse
2025-03-07 10:38   ` Anthony PERARD
2025-02-07 15:37 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-02-07 21:06   ` [PATCH 1/2] i386/xen: Move KVM_XEN_HVM_CONFIG ioctl to kvm_xen_init_vcpu() David Woodhouse
2025-03-29  7:28 ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6YoxFOaMdNiD_uv@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=anthony@xenproject.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox