From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] KVM: SVM: Terminate the VM if a SEV-ES+ guest is run with an invalid VMSA
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 17:20:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z70a-hi6HDvjx2qg@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z70UsI0kgcZu844d@google.com>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > On 2/24/25 16:55, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > >> On 2/18/25 19:26, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > >>> -void pre_sev_run(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int cpu)
> > >>> +int pre_sev_run(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int cpu)
> > >>> {
> > >>> struct svm_cpu_data *sd = per_cpu_ptr(&svm_data, cpu);
> > >>> - unsigned int asid = sev_get_asid(svm->vcpu.kvm);
> > >>> + struct kvm *kvm = svm->vcpu.kvm;
> > >>> + unsigned int asid = sev_get_asid(kvm);
> > >>> +
> > >>> + /*
> > >>> + * Terminate the VM if userspace attempts to run the vCPU with an
> > >>> + * invalid VMSA, e.g. if userspace forces the vCPU to be RUNNABLE after
> > >>> + * an SNP AP Destroy event.
> > >>> + */
> > >>> + if (sev_es_guest(kvm) && !VALID_PAGE(svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa)) {
> > >>> + kvm_vm_dead(kvm);
> > >>> + return -EIO;
> > >>> + }
> > >>
> > >> If a VMRUN is performed with the vmsa_pa value set to INVALID_PAGE, the
> > >> VMRUN will fail and KVM will dump the VMCB and exit back to userspace
> > >
> > > I haven't tested, but based on what the APM says, I'm pretty sure this would crash
> > > the host due to a #GP on VMRUN, i.e. due to the resulting kvm_spurious_fault().
> > >
> > > IF (rAX contains an unsupported physical address)
> > > EXCEPTION [#GP]
> >
> > Well that's for the VMCB, the VMSA is pointed to by the VMCB and results
> > in a VMEXIT code of -1 if you don't supply a proper page-aligned,
> > physical address.
>
> Ah, good to know (and somewhat of a relief :-) ).
If anyone else was wondering, the behavior is described in the "VMRUN Page Checks"
table, which "Table 15-4" in the March 2024 version of the APM.
FWIW, knowing that VMRUN is supposed to handle this scenario does make me somewhat
tempted to skip this patch entirely. But I still don't like the idea of doing
VMRUN with a known bad address.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 1:26 [PATCH 00/10] KVM: SVM: Attempt to cleanup SEV_FEATURES Sean Christopherson
2025-02-19 1:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: SVM: Save host DR masks but NOT DRs on CPUs with DebugSwap Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 19:38 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-25 2:22 ` Kim Phillips
2025-02-25 14:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19 1:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: SVM: Don't rely on DebugSwap to restore host DR0..DR3 Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 20:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-24 22:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-19 1:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: SVM: Terminate the VM if a SEV-ES+ guest is run with an invalid VMSA Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 21:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-24 22:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-25 0:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25 1:20 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-02-25 14:42 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19 1:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: SVM: Don't change target vCPU state on AP Creation VMGEXIT error Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 21:31 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: SVM: Require AP's "requested" SEV_FEATURES to match KVM's view Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 21:46 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: SVM: Simplify request+kick logic in SNP AP Creation handling Sean Christopherson
2025-02-19 6:19 ` Gupta, Pankaj
2025-02-24 21:48 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: SVM: Use guard(mutex) to simplify SNP AP Creation error handling Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 21:49 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: SVM: Mark VMCB dirty before processing incoming snp_vmsa_gpa Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 21:58 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Use guard(mutex) to simplify SNP vCPU state updates Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 22:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: SVM: Invalidate "next" SNP VMSA GPA even on failure Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25 0:00 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-20 22:51 ` [PATCH 00/10] KVM: SVM: Attempt to cleanup SEV_FEATURES Tom Lendacky
2025-02-25 0:02 ` Tom Lendacky
2025-02-25 2:21 ` Kim Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z70a-hi6HDvjx2qg@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox