From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@163.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: avoid one cpu limit for kvm
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 22:55:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z748ZaNc9IclOUPi@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241224130952.112584-1-tjytimi@163.com>
* Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@163.com> wrote:
> I run kernel by kvmtool but only one cpu can start in guset now,
> because kvm use virt-ioapic and kvmtool set noapic cmdline for
> x86 to disable ioapic route in kernel, and the latest cpu topo
> code below makes cpu limitted just to one.
>
> For x86 kvm, noapic cmdline is reasonable, virt-ioapic don't
> need to init hardware ioapic, so change it for x86 kvm guest to
> avoid one num limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@163.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
> index 621a151ccf7d..a73847b1a841 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,9 @@ void __init topology_apply_cmdline_limits_early(void)
> unsigned int possible = nr_cpu_ids;
>
> /* 'maxcpus=0' 'nosmp' 'nolapic' 'disableapic' 'noapic' */
> - if (!setup_max_cpus || ioapic_is_disabled || apic_is_disabled)
> + if (!setup_max_cpus ||
> + (ioapic_is_disabled && (x86_hyper_type != X86_HYPER_KVM)) ||
> + apic_is_disabled)
> possible = 1;
>
> /* 'possible_cpus=N' */
> @@ -443,8 +445,10 @@ void __init topology_apply_cmdline_limits_early(void)
>
> static __init bool restrict_to_up(void)
> {
> - if (!smp_found_config || ioapic_is_disabled)
> + if (!smp_found_config ||
> + (ioapic_is_disabled && (x86_hyper_type != X86_HYPER_KVM)))
> return true;
> +
> /*
> * XEN PV is special as it does not advertise the local APIC
> * properly, but provides a fake topology for it so that the
Just to confirm that this bug got fixed, current kvmtool boots fine
with multiple CPUs, correct?
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-24 13:09 [PATCH RFC] x86: avoid one cpu limit for kvm Jinyu Tang
2025-02-25 21:55 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z748ZaNc9IclOUPi@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=apatel@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tjytimi@163.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox