From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool v2 1/2] cpu: vmexit: Handle KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN exit reason correctly
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:37:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9L7qH_Xv2Co4KM7@raptor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224091000.3925918-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Hi Aneesh,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:39:59PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
> The return value for kernel VM exit handlers is confusing and has led to
> errors in different kernel exit handlers. A return value of 0 indicates
> a return to the VMM, whereas a return value of 1 indicates resuming
> execution in the guest. Some handlers mistakenly return 0 to force a
> return to the guest.
>
> This worked in kvmtool because the exit_reason defaulted to
> 0 (KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN), and kvmtool did not error out on an unknown exit
> reason. However, forcing a VMM exit with error on KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN
> exit_reson would help catch these bugs early.
I think I understand what you're saying - if there's a bug in handle_exit()
in KVM that triggers an erroneous exit to userspace, exit_reason and the
exit information struct could still be at their default values, which are 0
from when kvm_run was allocated (in kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu()).
An exit_reason of 0 is interpreted by userspace as KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN, but
kvmtool on KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN resumes the guest instead of signalling the
error, thus masking the buggy KVM behaviour.
The patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Thanks,
Alex
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> ---
> kvm-cpu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kvm-cpu.c b/kvm-cpu.c
> index f66dcd07220c..7c62bfc56679 100644
> --- a/kvm-cpu.c
> +++ b/kvm-cpu.c
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ int kvm_cpu__start(struct kvm_cpu *cpu)
>
> switch (cpu->kvm_run->exit_reason) {
> case KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN:
> - break;
> + goto panic_kvm;
> case KVM_EXIT_DEBUG:
> kvm_cpu__show_registers(cpu);
> kvm_cpu__show_code(cpu);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 9:09 [PATCH kvmtool v2 1/2] cpu: vmexit: Handle KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN exit reason correctly Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-02-24 9:10 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 2/2] cpu: vmexit: Handle KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT in KVM_RUN ioctl return Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-03-13 15:37 ` Alexandru Elisei
2025-03-13 15:37 ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2025-04-17 12:07 ` [PATCH kvmtool v2 1/2] cpu: vmexit: Handle KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN exit reason correctly Will Deacon
2025-04-20 14:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-04-23 10:53 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9L7qH_Xv2Co4KM7@raptor \
--to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox