From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
andre.przywara@arm.com, jean-philippe@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC kvmtool 0/9] arm: Drop support for 32-bit kvmtool
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:10:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9jH-kMh1p0S4g3J@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <861puwnd5l.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 10:51:18AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:39:44 +0000,
> Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Oliver,
> >
> > I'm CC'ing Marc and Andre (Andre is the only person that I know for a fact
> > that ran 32 bit kvmtool).
Thanks Alex, forgot some folks :)
> > Haven't looked at the patches in detail, but as someone who ocassionally
> > contributes to kvmtool, I have to say it's always nice to have fewer things
> > to worry about. I, for one, never used 32 bit kvmtool, I just compiled for
> > 32 bit arm to make sure it doesn't break.
> >
> > If nobody objects to dropping support for 32 bit kvmtool, I'm planning to
> > review the patches.
>
> Frankly, the removal of 32bit support is long overdue. Every time I
> hack something in kvmtool (at least once a month), I have to wonder
> how to fit that in the 32bit code that I *know* to be dead code.
That's pretty much how I arrived at these patches, hacking on something
for arm64 and getting annoyed with the 32-bit stuff.
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-14 22:25 [RFC kvmtool 0/9] arm: Drop support for 32-bit kvmtool Oliver Upton
2025-03-14 22:25 ` [RFC kvmtool 1/9] Drop support for 32-bit arm Oliver Upton
2025-03-20 16:58 ` Alexandru Elisei
2025-03-25 17:08 ` Oliver Upton
2025-03-14 22:25 ` [RFC kvmtool 2/9] arm64: Move arm64-only features into main directory Oliver Upton
2025-03-14 22:25 ` [RFC kvmtool 3/9] arm64: Combine kvm.c Oliver Upton
2025-03-20 16:59 ` Alexandru Elisei
2025-03-14 22:25 ` [RFC kvmtool 4/9] arm64: Merge kvm-cpu.c Oliver Upton
2025-03-14 22:25 ` [RFC kvmtool 5/9] arm64: Combine kvm-config-arch.h Oliver Upton
2025-03-14 22:25 ` [RFC kvmtool 6/9] arm64: Move remaining kvm/* headers Oliver Upton
2025-03-14 22:25 ` [RFC kvmtool 7/9] arm64: Move asm headers Oliver Upton
2025-03-14 22:25 ` [RFC kvmtool 8/9] arm64: Rename top-level directory Oliver Upton
2025-03-14 22:25 ` [RFC kvmtool 9/9] arm64: Get rid of the 'arm-common' include directory Oliver Upton
2025-03-20 17:01 ` Alexandru Elisei
2025-03-25 17:02 ` Oliver Upton
2025-03-17 10:39 ` [RFC kvmtool 0/9] arm: Drop support for 32-bit kvmtool Alexandru Elisei
2025-03-17 10:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-03-18 1:10 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2025-03-19 14:18 ` Andre Przywara
2025-03-17 11:14 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9jH-kMh1p0S4g3J@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox