From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-170.mta0.migadu.com (out-170.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F49981749 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 01:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742260236; cv=none; b=Y/kb5ogElwKctkiuSd/23Z6LjrMFMpIGB5GB6/Nu7f6C66Rd+ibRVVNrE+fWD9hnulglR9K2TtXoKO05uVNlTDbevhOKpIxfJsVui9Sq7/O07xgaKH9mJGk2wJwp3/T6OgInsRZW8+YVKyRBzAgGE6IrR7ClDWCZmIiemirTXvQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742260236; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tM3HLjz53VhIBqvCJOALiWTgxizKnX4AgaioCYhWLFE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DddrJElCy3HRXxFmVusvhvd5Blso2HLKH7ZOyWSUjoiQ9M3mVPzG4jGeNkIREKVEKiP2CEfUAW5WWOpVxgaiweb0JpZ5YAVx6G/qcujwA07qL9PFKYBNgOUa5dkjcgVzBlSwqVPtXebnfhpTs6PyjAp7PkXylo/iJRW2BG5HNDs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=Csrm2rCG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="Csrm2rCG" Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:10:18 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1742260232; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=D7L5JaSSP7KqK5qtYW4DA5/1ty6PTPAOJlyJZwmruf0=; b=Csrm2rCGWFTdWIezj3W3zZ5fgYba7sjxzjrPa38VV69seaAQVibkYqZ+Wj2UYRMTLERN9I NtjFA9M/wQTXuHzRl4vCGmHEbSVLXUQymtMth568BHR8IBRX5+M/1u0379YJGUpVH0sGLh YrK4HLy5JRY20dGs5FU4035VDclzalk= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Alexandru Elisei , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , Julien Thierry , andre.przywara@arm.com, jean-philippe@linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC kvmtool 0/9] arm: Drop support for 32-bit kvmtool Message-ID: References: <20250314222516.1302429-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> <861puwnd5l.wl-maz@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <861puwnd5l.wl-maz@kernel.org> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 10:51:18AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:39:44 +0000, > Alexandru Elisei wrote: > > > > Hi Oliver, > > > > I'm CC'ing Marc and Andre (Andre is the only person that I know for a fact > > that ran 32 bit kvmtool). Thanks Alex, forgot some folks :) > > Haven't looked at the patches in detail, but as someone who ocassionally > > contributes to kvmtool, I have to say it's always nice to have fewer things > > to worry about. I, for one, never used 32 bit kvmtool, I just compiled for > > 32 bit arm to make sure it doesn't break. > > > > If nobody objects to dropping support for 32 bit kvmtool, I'm planning to > > review the patches. > > Frankly, the removal of 32bit support is long overdue. Every time I > hack something in kvmtool (at least once a month), I have to wonder > how to fit that in the 32bit code that I *know* to be dead code. That's pretty much how I arrived at these patches, hacking on something for arm64 and getting annoyed with the 32-bit stuff. Thanks, Oliver