kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, bgardon@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, jmattson@google.com,
	mizhang@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 03/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Track count of pages in KVM MMU page caches globally
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:18:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAecAbOfknV1gS/t@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHVum0eW+AKoMt2nB=52cDpvoVHX1A4tHmdV-4f21hV49c4o8g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:33 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vipin,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on kvm/queue]
> > [also build test WARNING on kvmarm/next linus/master v6.3-rc1 next-20230307]
> > [cannot apply to mst-vhost/linux-next kvm/linux-next]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > >> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:676: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
> 
> > vim +676 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> >
> >    674
> >    675  /**
> >  > 676   * Caller should hold mutex lock corresponding to cache, if available.
> >    677   */
> 
> I will fix it in the next version.

Don't bother reworking the code/comment, I will likely have feedback that results
in the demise of the comment altogether (comments that say "lock X must be held"
are almost always flawed).

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-07 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-06 22:41 [Patch v4 00/18] NUMA aware page table allocation Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 01/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Change KVM mmu shrinker to no-op Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 02/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove zapped_obsolete_pages from struct kvm_arch{} Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 03/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Track count of pages in KVM MMU page caches globally Vipin Sharma
2023-03-07 11:32   ` kernel test robot
2023-03-07 19:13     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-07 20:18       ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-03-07 12:13   ` kernel test robot
2023-03-08 20:33   ` Zhi Wang
2023-03-08 22:16     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-09  5:18       ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-03-09 12:52         ` Zhi Wang
2023-03-09 19:52           ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-09 15:37   ` Zhi Wang
2023-03-09 18:19     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-09 23:53   ` David Matlack
2023-03-10  0:28     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-10  0:55       ` David Matlack
2023-03-10  1:09         ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-10  0:22   ` David Matlack
2023-03-10  0:36     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 04/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Shrink shadow page caches via MMU shrinker Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 05/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Add split_shadow_page_cache pages to global count of MMU cache pages Vipin Sharma
2023-03-09 15:58   ` Zhi Wang
2023-03-09 19:59     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-10  0:05       ` David Matlack
2023-03-10  0:06         ` David Matlack
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 06/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Shrink split_shadow_page_cache via MMU shrinker Vipin Sharma
2023-03-09 16:01   ` Zhi Wang
2023-03-09 19:59     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 07/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Unconditionally count allocations from MMU page caches Vipin Sharma
2023-03-09 16:03   ` Zhi Wang
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 08/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Track unused mmu_shadowed_info_cache pages count via global counter Vipin Sharma
2023-03-30  4:53   ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-04-03 23:02     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 09/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Shrink mmu_shadowed_info_cache via MMU shrinker Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 10/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Add per VM NUMA aware page table capability Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 11/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Add documentation of " Vipin Sharma
2023-03-23 21:59   ` David Matlack
2023-03-28 16:47     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 12/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Allocate NUMA aware page tables on TDP huge page splits Vipin Sharma
2023-03-23 22:15   ` David Matlack
2023-03-28 17:12     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 13/18] KVM: mmu: Add common initialization logic for struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache{} Vipin Sharma
2023-03-23 22:23   ` David Matlack
2023-03-28 17:16     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 14/18] KVM: mmu: Initialize kvm_mmu_memory_cache.gfp_zero to __GFP_ZERO by default Vipin Sharma
2023-03-23 22:28   ` David Matlack
2023-03-28 17:31     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-28 23:13       ` David Matlack
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 15/18] KVM: mmu: Add NUMA node support in struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache{} Vipin Sharma
2023-03-23 22:30   ` David Matlack
2023-03-28 17:50     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-28 23:24       ` David Matlack
2023-04-03 22:57         ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 16/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Allocate numa aware page tables during page fault Vipin Sharma
2023-03-29  0:21   ` David Matlack
2023-03-29  0:28     ` David Matlack
2023-03-29 19:03     ` David Matlack
2023-04-03 22:54       ` Vipin Sharma
2023-04-03 22:50     ` Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 17/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Allocate shadow mmu page table on huge page split on the same NUMA node Vipin Sharma
2023-03-06 22:41 ` [Patch v4 18/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Reduce default mmu memory cache size Vipin Sharma
2023-03-07 18:19 ` [Patch v4 00/18] NUMA aware page table allocation Mingwei Zhang
2023-03-07 18:33   ` Vipin Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZAecAbOfknV1gS/t@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mizhang@google.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vipinsh@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).