From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: VMX: Avoid retpoline call for control register caused exits
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:38:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBI62RUnMB3ppRqO@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230201194604.11135-3-minipli@grsecurity.net>
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023, Mathias Krause wrote:
> Complement commit 4289d2728664 ("KVM: retpolines: x86: eliminate
> retpoline from vmx.c exit handlers") and avoid a retpoline call for
> control register accesses as well.
>
> This speeds up guests that make heavy use of it, like grsecurity
> kernels toggling CR0.WP to implement kernel W^X.
I would rather drop this patch for VMX and instead unconditionally make CR0.WP
guest owned when TDP (EPT) is enabled, i.e. drop the module param from patch 6.
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
> ---
>
> Meanwhile I got my hands on a AMD system and while doing a similar change
> for SVM gives a small measurable win (1.1% faster for grsecurity guests),
Mostly out of curiosity...
Is the 1.1% roughly aligned with the gains for VMX? If VMX sees a significantly
larger improvement, any idea why SVM doesn't benefit as much? E.g. did you double
check that the kernel was actually using RETPOLINE?
> it would provide nothing for other guests, as the change I was testing was
> specifically targeting CR0 caused exits.
>
> A more general approach would instead cover CR3 and, maybe, CR4 as well.
> However, that would require a lot more exit code compares, likely
> vanishing the gains in the general case. So this tweak is VMX only.
I don't think targeting on CR0 exits is a reason to not do this for SVM. With
NPT enabled, CR3 isn't intercepted, and CR4 exits should be very rare. If the
performance benefits are marginal (I don't have a good frame of reference for the
1.1%), then _that's_ a good reason to leave SVM alone. But not giving CR3 and CR4
priority is a non-issue.
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index c788aa382611..c8198c8a9b55 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -6538,6 +6538,8 @@ static int __vmx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, fastpath_t exit_fastpath)
> return handle_external_interrupt(vcpu);
> else if (exit_reason.basic == EXIT_REASON_HLT)
> return kvm_emulate_halt(vcpu);
> + else if (exit_reason.basic == EXIT_REASON_CR_ACCESS)
> + return handle_cr(vcpu);
> else if (exit_reason.basic == EXIT_REASON_EPT_MISCONFIG)
> return handle_ept_misconfig(vcpu);
> #endif
> --
> 2.39.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-15 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-01 19:45 [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: performance tweaks for heavy CR0.WP users Mathias Krause
2023-02-01 19:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Avoid indirect call for get_cr3 Mathias Krause
2023-02-01 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: VMX: Avoid retpoline call for control register caused exits Mathias Krause
2023-03-15 21:38 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-03-20 20:43 ` Mathias Krause
2023-02-01 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: x86: Do not unload MMU roots when only toggling CR0.WP Mathias Krause
2023-02-07 13:36 ` Zhi Wang
2023-02-08 9:52 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-15 21:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-15 22:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-20 21:13 ` Mathias Krause
2023-02-01 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: x86: Make use of kvm_read_cr*_bits() when testing bits Mathias Krause
2023-02-07 13:05 ` Zhi Wang
2023-02-08 9:11 ` Mathias Krause
2023-02-14 11:08 ` Zhi Wang
2023-03-15 22:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-20 21:34 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-21 15:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-01 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix comment typo Mathias Krause
2023-02-01 19:46 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit Mathias Krause
2023-03-15 22:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-20 21:31 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-06 6:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: MMU: performance tweaks for heavy CR0.WP users Mathias Krause
2023-03-06 18:07 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZBI62RUnMB3ppRqO@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@grsecurity.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).