From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E42C6FD1C for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 21:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229962AbjCWV3e (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 17:29:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231307AbjCWV3b (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 17:29:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x64a.google.com (mail-pl1-x64a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::64a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5611E10AAC for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x64a.google.com with SMTP id j18-20020a170902da9200b001a055243657so45581plx.19 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:29:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; t=1679606960; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4ktFGcSiHt+jLdAPoQ6LmqnUHuRqTjS55asz27iAOcw=; b=iK+aEL2C9Njh1WitU3wqrpF2LQHakK9r0Rxm8Zo387756xZ8TrO9C5jd1GeS1X7LIq xfWWamQHO8+dKWS4VRWjo4HZ0h8XtkN5MGE7eBbBPD3vhzNLpVE9FbU9atj1LwSBIoGK ZSAUN+tpOF5Wk2XBOME9Eg/dKAEWIKj17egB4k70kbzZT+vtX60uNkOjU7uB3OAyYxAq Sr7kZeARY8K254rghxLKxf5GghDzZNdrSEdkbG9QmBvp5Hz9mUWDz/9OYVVv9LCw7hq4 zMZi87cv7hexzuVY01wZQNUqyMKqJU/iEfXY36m1m4wjcLfAySKZIJyPVGi9wzBEu3p/ J1ug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679606960; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4ktFGcSiHt+jLdAPoQ6LmqnUHuRqTjS55asz27iAOcw=; b=NsQpwl11ucSDFvq2BCP1Wk/jUVNPIHfHYVkxHL02uopnZ9uVCWsPVO9IvEkXzfaMIy NqumhiMHuf7gDlxRl1mGscXMaNS5BCUM3Xxtq9MPvRZ5MQIkazA8k5TK+sazCYGdYLgf kcyAdwJCaWz63nUytuFBPdwfX1DDgDS7SuQLEjzTT4IjEhuFEdpCt/d139IeiCxO36Hp AcYKkn4I9Wc7lZEPS5+qXbfw6mcxHCKuBQUvWj42qsmNPOvTLcXEJk2RDcQXKWfhP4qD f0rboCOrl4eWlPbV9ZrDXvtQfpksLpnKJMKmUh5Ze2TwSsFodNqBFMvlQrNKtPHJLSza ZBoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUfsrfishVZfoavWj1KiYv2UfJuBjHrZ22daOZGqYbQAVgQzLT3 BbgehfzqYg6F+6W2dAqvEEisI8qztZI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9CtWinGv+eIeH2M+yGV2RfwUTysQoHidUub1I4ioPXUYri8JKVpMZ3Bbgt9UTHZhYsjRdBdyjPIIo= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a65:638d:0:b0:4eb:1c07:e5d7 with SMTP id h13-20020a65638d000000b004eb1c07e5d7mr2374165pgv.6.1679606959860; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:29:18 -0700 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20230224223607.1580880-1-aaronlewis@google.com> <20230224223607.1580880-3-aaronlewis@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: x86: Clear all supported MPX xfeatures if they are not all set From: Sean Christopherson To: Mingwei Zhang Cc: Aaron Lewis , kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, Mingwei Zhang wrote: > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > > #define ARCH_X86_KVM_X86_H > > > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include "kvm_cache_regs.h" > > @@ -325,7 +326,22 @@ extern bool enable_pmu; > > */ > > static inline u64 kvm_get_filtered_xcr0(void) > > { > > - return kvm_caps.supported_xcr0 & xstate_get_guest_group_perm(); > > + u64 supported_xcr0 = kvm_caps.supported_xcr0; > > + > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC != XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE_DATA); > > + > > + if (supported_xcr0 & XFEATURE_MASK_USER_DYNAMIC) { > > + supported_xcr0 &= xstate_get_guest_group_perm(); > > + > > + /* > > + * Treat XTILE_CFG as unsupported if the current process isn't > > + * allowed to use XTILE_DATA, as attempting to set XTILE_CFG in > > + * XCR0 without setting XTILE_DATA is architecturally illegal. > > + */ > > + if (!(supported_xcr0 & XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE_DATA)) > > + supported_xcr0 &= XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE_CFG; > > should be this? supported_xcr0 &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_XTILE_CFG; Doh, yes.