public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	Alejandro Jimenez <alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/amd: Don't block updates to GATag if guest mode is on
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:20:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCMF0ReWqG0Q7Zna@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cde77b1f-e612-2a9e-e437-8892f7f1fde9@oracle.com>

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023, Joao Martins wrote:
> [I was out sick, hence the delay]
> 
> On 24/03/2023 14:31, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, Joao Martins wrote:
> >> On 16/03/2023 21:01, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >>> Is there any harm in giving deactivate the same treatement?  If the worst case
> >>> scenario is a few wasted cycles, having symmetric flows and eliminating benign
> >>> bugs seems like a worthwhile tradeoff (assuming this is indeed a relatively slow
> >>> path like I think it is).
> >>>
> >>
> >> I wanna say there's no harm, but initially I had such a patch, and on testing it
> >> broke the classic interrupt remapping case but I didn't investigate further --
> >> my suspicion is that the only case that should care is the updates (not the
> >> actual deactivation of guest-mode).
> > 
> > Ugh, I bet this is due to KVM invoking irq_set_vcpu_affinity() with garbage when
> > AVIC is enabled, but KVM can't use a posted interrupt due to the how the IRQ is
> > configured.  I vaguely recall a bug report about uninitialized data in "pi" being
> > consumed, but I can't find it at the moment.
> > 
> > 	if (!get_pi_vcpu_info(kvm, e, &vcpu_info, &svm) && set &&
> > 		    kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(&svm->vcpu)) {
> > 
> > 		...
> > 
> > 	} else {
> > 			/* Use legacy mode in IRTE */
> > 			struct amd_iommu_pi_data pi;
> > 
> > 			/**
> > 			 * Here, pi is used to:
> > 			 * - Tell IOMMU to use legacy mode for this interrupt.
> > 			 * - Retrieve ga_tag of prior interrupt remapping data.
> > 			 */
> > 			pi.prev_ga_tag = 0;
> > 			pi.is_guest_mode = false;
> > 			ret = irq_set_vcpu_affinity(host_irq, &pi);
> > 	}
> > 
> > 
> 
> I recall one instance of the 'garbage pi data' issue but this was due to
> prev_ga_tag not being initialized (see commit f6426ab9c957).

Yep, that's the one I was trying to recall.

> As far as I understand, AMD implementation on irq_vcpu_set_affinity will
> write back to caller the following fields of pi:
> 
> - prev_ga_tag
> - ir_data
> - guest_mode (sometimes when it is unsupported or disabled by the host via cmdline)
> 
> On legacy interrupt remap path (no iommu avic) the IRQ update just uses irq data
> mostly. It's the avic path that uses more things (vcpu_data, ga_tag, base,
> ga_root_ptr, ga_vector), but all of which are initialized by KVM properly already.

Ya, on my Nth read through, I don't see any issues with KVM's behavior.  I was
thinking that KVM's "pi" could bleed into amd_iommu_deactivate_guest_mode(), but
I had just gotten turned around by the many "data" variables.  Bummer.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-28 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-16 20:02 [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/amd: Fix GAM IRTEs affinity and GALog restart Joao Martins
2023-03-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/amd: Don't block updates to GATag if guest mode is on Joao Martins
2023-03-16 21:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-16 21:25     ` Joao Martins
2023-03-24 14:31       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-28 10:42         ` Joao Martins
2023-03-28 15:20           ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-03-28  9:07   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-03-28 10:19     ` Joao Martins
2023-03-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/amd: Handle GALog overflows Joao Martins
2023-04-13 10:24   ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2023-04-13 10:30     ` Joao Martins
2023-04-13 10:41       ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2023-04-17  5:04   ` Vasant Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZCMF0ReWqG0Q7Zna@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox