From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 13:33:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCXyAcTd8NX4Lteq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZCXDAiUOnsL3fRBj@google.com>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, Mathias Krause wrote:
> > On 22.03.23 02:37, Mathias Krause wrote:
> > I'm leaning to make CR0.WP guest owned only iff we're running on bare
> > metal or the VMM is KVM to not play whack-a-mole for all the VMMs that
> > might have similar bugs. (Will try to test a few others here as well.)
> > However, that would prevent them from getting the performance gain, so
> > I'd rather have this fixed / worked around in KVM instead.
>
> Before we start putting bandaids on this, let's (a) confirm this appears to be
> an issue with ESXi and (b) pull in VMware folks to get their input.
>
> > Any ideas how to investigate this further?
>
> Does the host in question support UMIP?
>
> Can you capture a tracepoint log from L1 to verify that L1 KVM is _not_ injecting
> any kind of exception? E.g. to get the KVM kitchen sink:
>
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kvm/enable
>
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace > log
>
> Or if that's too noisy, a more targeted trace (exception injection + emulation)
> woud be:
>
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on
>
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kvm/kvm_emulate_insn/enable
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kvm/kvm_inj_exception/enable
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kvm/kvm_entry/enable
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kvm/kvm_exit/enable
Duh, this is likely a KVM bug. I expect the issue will go away if you revert
fb509f76acc8 ("KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit")
KVM doesn't consume CR0.WP for _its_ MMU, but it does consume CR0.WP for the
guest walker. By passing through CR0.WP, toggling only CR0.WP will not trap
(obviously) and thus won't run through kvm_post_set_cr0(), thus resulting in stle
information due to not invoking kvm_init_mmu().
I'm preetty sure I even called that we needed to refresh the permissions, but then
obviously forgot to actually make that happen.
I believe this will remedy the issue. If it does, I'll post a proper patch
(likely won't be until next week). Compile tested only.
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 8 +++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
index 89f532516a45..4a303aa735dd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool execonly,
bool kvm_can_do_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvm_handle_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 error_code,
u64 fault_address, char *insn, int insn_len);
+void kvm_mmu_refresh_passthrough_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu);
int kvm_mmu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_mmu_unload(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
@@ -184,8 +185,13 @@ static inline u8 permission_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
u64 implicit_access = access & PFERR_IMPLICIT_ACCESS;
bool not_smap = ((rflags & X86_EFLAGS_AC) | implicit_access) == X86_EFLAGS_AC;
int index = (pfec + (not_smap << PFERR_RSVD_BIT)) >> 1;
- bool fault = (mmu->permissions[index] >> pte_access) & 1;
u32 errcode = PFERR_PRESENT_MASK;
+ bool fault;
+
+ if (tdp_enabled)
+ kvm_mmu_refresh_passthrough_bits(vcpu, mmu);
+
+ fault = (mmu->permissions[index] >> pte_access) & 1;
WARN_ON(pfec & (PFERR_PK_MASK | PFERR_RSVD_MASK));
if (unlikely(mmu->pkru_mask)) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 4c874d4ec68f..2a63b5725f36 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5186,6 +5186,20 @@ static union kvm_cpu_role kvm_calc_cpu_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return role;
}
+void kvm_mmu_refresh_passthrough_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
+{
+ const bool cr0_wp = kvm_is_cr0_bit_set(vcpu, X86_CR0_WP);
+
+ BUILD_BUG_ON((KVM_MMU_CR0_ROLE_BITS & KVM_POSSIBLE_CR0_GUEST_BITS) != X86_CR0_WP);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON((KVM_MMU_CR4_ROLE_BITS & KVM_POSSIBLE_CR4_GUEST_BITS));
+
+ if (is_cr0_wp(mmu) == cr0_wp)
+ return;
+
+ mmu->cpu_role.base.cr0_wp = cr0_wp;
+ reset_guest_paging_metadata(vcpu, mmu);
+}
+
static inline int kvm_mmu_get_tdp_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
/* tdp_root_level is architecture forced level, use it if nonzero */
base-commit: 27d6845d258b67f4eb3debe062b7dacc67e0c393
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-22 1:37 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: MMU: performance tweaks for heavy CR0.WP users Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Avoid indirect call for get_cr3 Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: x86: Do not unload MMU roots when only toggling CR0.WP with TDP enabled Mathias Krause
2023-05-07 7:32 ` Robert Hoo
2023-05-08 9:30 ` Mathias Krause
2023-05-09 1:04 ` Robert Hoo
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: x86: Ignore CR0.WP toggles in non-paging mode Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: x86: Make use of kvm_read_cr*_bits() when testing bits Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix comment typo Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 1:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: VMX: Make CR0.WP a guest owned bit Mathias Krause
2023-03-27 8:33 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-03-27 8:37 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-27 13:48 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-03-30 8:45 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-30 17:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-30 20:15 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-30 20:30 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-30 20:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-30 20:33 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-03-30 20:55 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-31 14:18 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-22 7:41 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: MMU: performance tweaks for heavy CR0.WP users Mathias Krause
2023-03-23 22:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-25 11:39 ` Mathias Krause
2023-03-25 12:25 ` Greg KH
2023-04-06 2:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-06 13:22 ` Mathias Krause
2023-04-14 9:29 ` Mathias Krause
2023-04-14 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-04-14 20:09 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-04-14 20:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-02 17:38 ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-05-08 9:19 ` Mathias Krause
2023-05-08 15:57 ` Mathias Krause
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCXyAcTd8NX4Lteq@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minipli@grsecurity.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox