Kernel KVM virtualization development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.3, part #4
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 18:35:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEQo9+tuGhELAmU1@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1023162f05aac3b460effa4a7baa0760@kernel.org>

On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 10:05:38AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2023-04-22 00:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 4/19/23 17:54, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > > Hi Paolo,
> > > 
> > > Here is v2 of the last batch of fixes for 6.3 (for real this time!)
> > > 
> > > Details in the tag, but the noteworthy addition is Dan's fix for a
> > > rather obvious buffer overflow when writing to a firmware register.
> > 
> > At least going by the Fixes tag, I think this one should have been
> > Cc'd to stable as well.  Can you send it next week or would you like
> > someone else to handle the backport?

Thanks for spotting that, I had a mental note to do so, but my memory is
fleeting at best :)

> Indeed, that's missing. But yes, backports are definitely on
> the cards, and we'll make sure all stable versions get fixed
> as soon as the fix hits Linus' tree.

Between this last batch of fixes for 6.3 and the 6.4 pull we've accrued
quite a backlog of stable-worthy patches, many of them are likely to be
nontrivial backports.

I'll do the config_lock series, and I can pick up the firmware reg fix
if nobody else is handling that backport.

Are you going to take a stab at the vCPU flags fix?

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-22 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-19 15:54 [GIT PULL v2] KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.3, part #4 Oliver Upton
2023-04-21 23:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-04-21 23:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-04-22  9:05   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-04-22 18:35     ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2023-04-23  9:08       ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZEQo9+tuGhELAmU1@linux.dev \
    --to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox