From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86: Set KVM LASS based on hardware capability
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 15:28:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEeBMKcQxXHV2ggb@chao-email> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230420133724.11398-7-guang.zeng@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 09:37:24PM +0800, Zeng Guang wrote:
>Host kernel may clear LASS capability in boot_cpu_data.x86_capability
>besides explicitly using clearcpuid parameter. That will cause guest
>not being able to manage LASS independently. So set KVM LASS directly
>based on hardware capability to eliminate the dependency.
...
>+ /* Set LASS based on hardware capability */
>+ if (cpuid_count_eax(7, 1) & F(LASS))
>+ kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_LASS);
>+
What if LASS is cleared in boot_cpu_data because not all CPUs support LASS?
In arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c, identify_cpu() clears features which are
not supported by all CPUs:
/*
* On SMP, boot_cpu_data holds the common feature set between
* all CPUs; so make sure that we indicate which features are
* common between the CPUs. The first time this routine gets
* executed, c == &boot_cpu_data.
*/
if (c != &boot_cpu_data) {
/* AND the already accumulated flags with these */
for (i = 0; i < NCAPINTS; i++)
boot_cpu_data.x86_capability[i] &= c->x86_capability[i];
LA57 seems to have the same issue. We may need to add some checks for LA57
in KVM's cpu hotplug callback.
> kvm_cpu_cap_init_kvm_defined(CPUID_7_1_EDX,
> F(AVX_VNNI_INT8) | F(AVX_NE_CONVERT) | F(PREFETCHITI)
> );
>--
>2.27.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-25 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-20 13:37 [PATCH 0/6] LASS KVM virtualization support Zeng Guang
2023-04-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR4.LASS Zeng Guang
2023-04-24 6:45 ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-25 1:52 ` Zeng Guang
2023-04-24 7:32 ` Chao Gao
2023-04-25 2:35 ` Zeng Guang
2023-04-25 3:26 ` Chao Gao
2023-04-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: VMX: Add new ops in kvm_x86_ops for LASS violation check Zeng Guang
2023-04-24 7:43 ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-25 3:26 ` Zeng Guang
2023-04-26 1:46 ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-25 3:10 ` Chao Gao
2023-04-25 7:31 ` Zeng Guang
2023-04-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: Add emulator helper " Zeng Guang
2023-04-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86: LASS protection on KVM emulation when LASS enabled Zeng Guang
2023-04-25 2:52 ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-25 6:40 ` Zeng Guang
2023-04-26 1:31 ` Yuan Yao
2023-04-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: Advertise LASS CPUID to user space Zeng Guang
2023-04-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86: Set KVM LASS based on hardware capability Zeng Guang
2023-04-25 2:57 ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-25 6:47 ` Zeng Guang
2023-04-25 7:28 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2023-04-24 1:20 ` [PATCH 0/6] LASS KVM virtualization support Binbin Wu
2023-04-25 1:49 ` Zeng Guang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEeBMKcQxXHV2ggb@chao-email \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox