Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] iommufd: Pass parent hwpt and user_data to iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc()

[Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>]

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 09:06:20AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:

> > @@ -73,14 +77,22 @@ int iommufd_hw_pagetable_enforce_cc(struct
> > iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt)
> >   */
> >  struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *
> >  iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, struct
> > iommufd_ioas *ioas,
> > -                        struct iommufd_device *idev, bool
> > immediate_attach)
> > +                        struct iommufd_device *idev,
> > +                        struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *parent,
> > +                        union iommu_domain_user_data *user_data,
> > +                        bool immediate_attach)
> >  {
> >       const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev_iommu_ops(idev->dev);
> > +     struct iommu_domain *parent_domain = NULL;
> >       struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt;
> > +     bool type_unmanaged, type_nested;
> >       int rc;
> >
> >       lockdep_assert_held(&ioas->mutex);
> >
> > +     if ((user_data || parent) && !ops->domain_alloc_user)
> > +             return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> 
> Do we allow specifying parent w/o user_data?

I don't think so. Perhaps we should do a double check:

+	if (!!user_data ^ !!parent)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	if (user_data && !ops->domain_alloc_user)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);

> > @@ -99,6 +117,15 @@ iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc(struct iommufd_ctx
> > *ictx, struct iommufd_ioas *ioas,
> >               goto out_abort;
> >       }
> >
> > +     /* It must be either NESTED or UNMANAGED, depending on
> > parent_domain */
> > +       type_nested = hwpt->domain->type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED;
> > +       type_unmanaged = hwpt->domain->type ==
> > IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED;
> 
> no need of one-time used variables. Just put the conditions directly
> in WARN_ON.

It is to improve the readability. Otherwise, we'd have:

	if (WARN_ON((parent_domain &&
		     hwpt->domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED) ||
		    (!parent_domain &&
		     hwpt->domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)))

> > +       if (WARN_ON((parent_domain && !type_nested) ||
> > +                   (!parent_domain && !type_unmanaged))) {
> > +             rc = -EINVAL;
> > +             goto out_abort;
> > +     }
> > +
> 
> probably just WARN_ON_ONCE() to mark that driver has problem?

Yea. I think we could do that.

Thanks
Nic