public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] vfio: Allocate per device file structure Yi Liu
                   ` (24 more replies)
  0 siblings, 25 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

Existing VFIO provides group-centric user APIs for userspace. Userspace
opens the /dev/vfio/$group_id first before getting device fd and hence
getting access to device. This is not the desired model for iommufd. Per
the conclusion of community discussion[1], iommufd provides device-centric
kAPIs and requires its consumer (like VFIO) to be device-centric user
APIs. Such user APIs are used to associate device with iommufd and also
the I/O address spaces managed by the iommufd.

This series first introduces a per device file structure to be prepared
for further enhancement and refactors the kvm-vfio code to be prepared
for accepting device file from userspace. After this, adds a mechanism for
blocking device access before iommufd bind. Then refactors the vfio to be
able to handle cdev path (e.g. iommufd binding, no-iommufd, [de]attach ioas).
This refactor includes making the device_open exclusive between the group
and the cdev path, only allow single device open in cdev path; vfio-iommufd
code is also refactored to support cdev. e.g. split the vfio_iommufd_bind()
into two steps. Eventually, adds the cdev support for vfio device and the
new ioctls, then makes group infrastructure optional as it is not needed
when vfio device cdev is compiled.

This series is based on some preparation works done to vfio emulated devices[2]
and vfio pci hot reset enhancements[3].

This series is a prerequisite for iommu nesting for vfio device[4] [5].

The complete code can be found in below branch, simple tests done to the
legacy group path and the cdev path. Draft QEMU branch can be found at[6]
However, the noiommu mode test is only done with some hacks in kernel and
qemu to check if qemu can boot with noiommu devices.

https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/tree/vfio_device_cdev_v11
(config CONFIG_IOMMUFD=y CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV=y)

base-commit: b8b967d5ec691bddb883ab2abbfb8d632c97052e

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/BN9PR11MB5433B1E4AE5B0480369F97178C189@BN9PR11MB5433.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230327093351.44505-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/ - merged
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230513132136.15021-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20230511143844.22693-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20230511145110.27707-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/#t
[6] https://github.com/yiliu1765/qemu/tree/iommufd_rfcv4.mig.reset.v4_var3

Change log:

v11:
 - Add back the noiommu determination at vfio device registration patch and
   put it prior to compiling vfio_group code optionally as compiling vfio_group
   optionaly is the major reason for it.
 - Fix a typo related to SPAPR (Cédric Le Goater)
 - Add t-b from Shameerali Kolothum Thodi, tested on HiSilicon D06(ARM64) platform
   with a NIC pass-through

v10: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230426150321.454465-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
 - Drop patch 03 of v9 as vfio_file_is_group() is still needed by pci hot reset path
 - Drop 11 of v9 per the change of noiommu support
 - Move patch 18 of v9 to hot-reset series [3]
 - vfio_file_has_device_access() is dropped as no usage now (hot-reset does not accept
   device fd, hence no need for this helper)
 - Minor change to patch 02, mainly make it back to patch v2 of v6 which is before
   splitting hot-reset series
 - Minor change in 10 and 11 due to rebase
 - Functional changes in patch 19, 20 and 21 per the latest noiommu support
   policy. noiommu device can be bound to valid iommufd now, this is different
   from the prior policy in which noiommu device is not allowed to be bound to
   valid iommufd. So may pay more attention on the three patches, previous r-b
   and t-b are dropped for these three patches.

v9: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230401151833.124749-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
 - Use smp_load_acquire() in vfio_file_has_device_access() for df->access_granted (Alex)
 - Fix lock init in patch 16 of v8 (Jon Pan-Doh)
 - Split patch 20 of v8 (Alex)
 - Refine noiommu logic in BIND_IOMMUFD (Alex)
 - Remove dev_cookie in BIND_IOMMUFD ioctl (Alex, Jason)
 - Remove static_assert in ATTACH/DETACH ioctl handling (Alex)
 - Remove device->ops->bind_iommufd presence check in BIND_IOMMUFD/ATTACH/DETACH handling (Alex)
 - Remove VFIO dependecny for VFIO_CONTAINER as VFIO_GROUP should imply it (Alex)
 - Improve the documentation per suggestions from Alex on patch 24 of v8 (Alex)
 - Remove WARN_ON(df->group) in vfio_device_group_uses_container() of patch 11
 - Add r-b from Kevin to patch 18/19 of v8
 - Add r-b from Jason to patch 03/10/11 of v8
 - Add t-b from Yanting Jiang and Nicolin Chen

v8: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230327094047.47215-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
 - Add patch 18 to determine noiommu device at vfio_device registration (Jason)
 - Add patch 19 to name noiommu device with "noiommu-" prefix to be par with
   group path
 - Add r-b from Kevin
 - Add t-b from Terrence

v7: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230316125534.17216-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
 - Split the vfio-pci hot reset changes to be separate patch series (Jason, Kevin)
 - More polish on no-iommufd support (patch 11 - 13) in cdev path (Kevin)
 - iommufd_access_detach() in patch 16 is added by Nic for emulated devices (Kevin, Jason)

v6: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230308132903.465159-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/#t
 - Add r-b from Jason on patch 01 - 08 and 13 in v5
 - Based on the prerequisite mini-series which makes vfio emulated devices
   be prepared to cdev (Jason)
 - Add the approach to pass a set of device fds to do hot reset ownership
   check, while the zero-length array approach is also kept. (Jason, Kevin, Alex)
 - Drop patch 10 of v5, it is reworked by patch 13 and 17 in v6 (Jason)
 - Store vfio_group pointer in vfio_device_file to check if user is using
   legacy vfio container (Jason)
 - Drop the is_cdev_device flag (introduced in patch 14 of v5) as the group
   pointer stored in vfio_device_file can cover it.
 - Add iommu_group check in the cdev no-iommu path patch 24 (Kevin)
 - Add t-b from Terrence, Nicolin and Matthew (thanks for the help, some patches
   are new in this version, so I just added t-b to the patches that are also
   in v5 and no big change, for others would add in this version).

v5: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230227111135.61728-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
 - Add r-b from Kevin on patch 08, 13, 14, 15 and 17.
 - Rename patch 02 to limit the change for KVM facing kAPIs. The vfio pci
   hot reset path only accepts group file until patch 09. (Kevin)
 - Update comment around smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted) (Yan)
 - Adopt Jason's suggestion on the vfio pci hot reset path, passing zero-length
   fd array to indicate using bound iommufd_ctx as ownership check. (Jason, Kevin)
 - Direct read df->access_granted value in vfio_device_cdev_close() (Kevin, Yan, Jason)
 - Wrap the iommufd get/put into a helper to refine the error path of
   vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(). (Yan)

v4: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230221034812.138051-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
 - Add r-b from Kevin on patch 09/10
 - Add a line in devices/vfio.rst to emphasize user should add group/device to
   KVM prior to invoke open_device op which may be called in the VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD
   or VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD ioctl.
 - Modify VFIO_GROUP/VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV Kconfig dependency (Alex)
 - Select VFIO_GROUP for SPAPR (Jason)
 - Check device fully-opened in PCI hotreset path for device fd (Jason)
 - Set df->access_granted in the caller of vfio_device_open() since
   the caller may fail in other operations, but df->access_granted
   does not allow a true to false change. So it should be set only when
   the open path is really done successfully. (Yan, Kevin)
 - Fix missing iommufd_ctx_put() in the cdev path (Yan)
 - Fix an issue found in testing exclusion between group and cdev path.
   vfio_device_cdev_close() should check df->access_granted before heading
   to other operations.
 - Update vfio.rst for iommufd/cdev

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230213151348.56451-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
 - Add r-b from Kevin on patch 03, 06, 07, 08.
 - Refine the group and cdev path exclusion. Remove vfio_device:single_open;
   add vfio_group::cdev_device_open_cnt to achieve exlucsion between group
   path and cdev path (Kevin, Jason)
 - Fix a bug in the error handling path (Yan Zhao)
 - Address misc remarks from Kevin

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230206090532.95598-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
 - Add r-b from Kevin and Eric on patch 01 02 04.
 - "Split kvm/vfio: Provide struct kvm_device_ops::release() insted of ::destroy()"
   from this series and got applied. (Alex, Kevin, Jason, Mathhew)
 - Add kvm_ref_lock to protect vfio_device_file->kvm instead of reusing
   dev_set->lock as dead-lock is observed with vfio-ap which would try to
   acquire kvm_lock. This is opposite lock order with kvm_device_release()
   which holds kvm_lock first and then hold dev_set->lock. (Kevin)
 - Use a separate ioctl for detaching IOAS. (Alex)
 - Rename vfio_device_file::single_open to be is_cdev_device (Kevin, Alex)
 - Move the vfio device cdev code into device_cdev.c and add a VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV
   kconfig for it. (Kevin, Jason)

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230117134942.101112-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
 - Fix the circular refcount between kvm struct and device file reference. (JasonG)
 - Address comments from KevinT
 - Remained the ioctl for detach, needs to Alex's taste
   (https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/BN9PR11MB5276BE9F4B0613EE859317028CFF9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/)

rfc: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221219084718.9342-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/

Thanks,
	Yi Liu

Nicolin Chen (1):
  iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API

Yi Liu (22):
  vfio: Allocate per device file structure
  vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM
  vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI
  kvm/vfio: Rename kvm_vfio_group to prepare for accepting vfio device
    fd
  kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace
  vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close()
  vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened
  vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group
  vfio: Make vfio_device_open() single open for device cdev path
  vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind()
  vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps
  vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file
  vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices
  vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices
  vfio: Name noiommu vfio_device with "noiommu-" prefix
  vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in
    unregister
  vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device
  vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
  vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev()
  vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally
  docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description

 Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst             | 140 +++++++++-
 Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vfio.rst       |  47 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c              |   1 +
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/Kconfig                 |   4 +-
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c                |  76 +++++-
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h       |   2 +
 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c               |   1 +
 drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c             |   1 +
 drivers/vfio/Kconfig                          |  25 ++
 drivers/vfio/Makefile                         |   3 +-
 drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c                    | 258 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c             |   1 +
 drivers/vfio/group.c                          | 150 ++++++----
 drivers/vfio/iommufd.c                        | 125 ++++++---
 .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c    |   2 +
 drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c                  |   1 +
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                   |   1 +
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c              |  16 +-
 drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c             |   1 +
 drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c         |   1 +
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h                           | 238 ++++++++++++++--
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c                      | 225 +++++++++++++--
 include/linux/iommufd.h                       |   1 +
 include/linux/vfio.h                          |  45 ++-
 include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                      |  13 +-
 include/uapi/linux/vfio.h                     |  80 ++++++
 samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c                    |   1 +
 samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c                      |   1 +
 samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c                      |   1 +
 virt/kvm/vfio.c                               | 137 +++++-----
 30 files changed, 1365 insertions(+), 233 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c

-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 01/23] vfio: Allocate per device file structure
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM Yi Liu
                   ` (23 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This is preparation for adding vfio device cdev support. vfio device
cdev requires:
1) A per device file memory to store the kvm pointer set by KVM. It will
   be propagated to vfio_device:kvm after the device cdev file is bound
   to an iommufd.
2) A mechanism to block device access through device cdev fd before it
   is bound to an iommufd.

To address the above requirements, this adds a per device file structure
named vfio_device_file. For now, it's only a wrapper of struct vfio_device
pointer. Other fields will be added to this per file structure in future
commits.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/group.c     | 13 +++++++++++--
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h      |  6 ++++++
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index fc75c1000d74..fbba9fc15e57 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -218,19 +218,26 @@ void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device)
 
 static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
 {
+	struct vfio_device_file *df;
 	struct file *filep;
 	int ret;
 
+	df = vfio_allocate_device_file(device);
+	if (IS_ERR(df)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(df);
+		goto err_out;
+	}
+
 	ret = vfio_device_group_open(device);
 	if (ret)
-		goto err_out;
+		goto err_free;
 
 	/*
 	 * We can't use anon_inode_getfd() because we need to modify
 	 * the f_mode flags directly to allow more than just ioctls
 	 */
 	filep = anon_inode_getfile("[vfio-device]", &vfio_device_fops,
-				   device, O_RDWR);
+				   df, O_RDWR);
 	if (IS_ERR(filep)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(filep);
 		goto err_close_device;
@@ -254,6 +261,8 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
 
 err_close_device:
 	vfio_device_group_close(device);
+err_free:
+	kfree(df);
 err_out:
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 7b19c621e0e6..87d3dd6b9ef9 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -16,11 +16,17 @@ struct iommufd_ctx;
 struct iommu_group;
 struct vfio_container;
 
+struct vfio_device_file {
+	struct vfio_device *device;
+};
+
 void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
 bool vfio_device_try_get_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
 int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd);
 void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
 		       struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd);
+struct vfio_device_file *
+vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device);
 
 extern const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops;
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index ab4f3a794f78..39c1158ffef0 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -419,6 +419,20 @@ static bool vfio_assert_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
 	return !WARN_ON_ONCE(!READ_ONCE(device->open_count));
 }
 
+struct vfio_device_file *
+vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	struct vfio_device_file *df;
+
+	df = kzalloc(sizeof(*df), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+	if (!df)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	df->device = device;
+
+	return df;
+}
+
 static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
 				  struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
 {
@@ -532,12 +546,15 @@ static inline void vfio_device_pm_runtime_put(struct vfio_device *device)
  */
 static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
 {
-	struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
+	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 
 	vfio_device_group_close(device);
 
 	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
 
+	kfree(df);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1102,7 +1119,8 @@ static int vfio_ioctl_device_feature(struct vfio_device *device,
 static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
 				       unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 {
-	struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
+	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = vfio_device_pm_runtime_get(device);
@@ -1129,7 +1147,8 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
 static ssize_t vfio_device_fops_read(struct file *filep, char __user *buf,
 				     size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
 {
-	struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
+	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 
 	if (unlikely(!device->ops->read))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1141,7 +1160,8 @@ static ssize_t vfio_device_fops_write(struct file *filep,
 				      const char __user *buf,
 				      size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
 {
-	struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
+	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 
 	if (unlikely(!device->ops->write))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1151,7 +1171,8 @@ static ssize_t vfio_device_fops_write(struct file *filep,
 
 static int vfio_device_fops_mmap(struct file *filep, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
-	struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
+	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 
 	if (unlikely(!device->ops->mmap))
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 02/23] vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] vfio: Allocate per device file structure Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI Yi Liu
                   ` (22 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This prepares for making the below kAPIs to accept both group file
and device file instead of only vfio group file.

  bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file);
  void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm);

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/group.c     | 53 +++++++++++++---------------------------
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h      |  3 +++
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/vfio.h     |  1 +
 virt/kvm/vfio.c          | 10 ++++----
 5 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index fbba9fc15e57..b56e19d2a02d 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -754,6 +754,15 @@ bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device)
 	return device->group->container;
 }
 
+struct vfio_group *vfio_group_from_file(struct file *file)
+{
+	struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
+
+	if (file->f_op != &vfio_group_fops)
+		return NULL;
+	return group;
+}
+
 /**
  * vfio_file_iommu_group - Return the struct iommu_group for the vfio group file
  * @file: VFIO group file
@@ -764,13 +773,13 @@ bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device)
  */
 struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
 {
-	struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
+	struct vfio_group *group = vfio_group_from_file(file);
 	struct iommu_group *iommu_group = NULL;
 
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU))
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
+	if (!group)
 		return NULL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
@@ -784,33 +793,20 @@ struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_iommu_group);
 
 /**
- * vfio_file_is_group - True if the file is usable with VFIO aPIS
+ * vfio_file_is_group - True if the file is a vfio group file
  * @file: VFIO group file
  */
 bool vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file)
 {
-	return file->f_op == &vfio_group_fops;
+	return vfio_group_from_file(file);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_group);
 
-/**
- * vfio_file_enforced_coherent - True if the DMA associated with the VFIO file
- *        is always CPU cache coherent
- * @file: VFIO group file
- *
- * Enforced coherency means that the IOMMU ignores things like the PCIe no-snoop
- * bit in DMA transactions. A return of false indicates that the user has
- * rights to access additional instructions such as wbinvd on x86.
- */
-bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file)
+bool vfio_group_enforced_coherent(struct vfio_group *group)
 {
-	struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
 	struct vfio_device *device;
 	bool ret = true;
 
-	if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
-		return true;
-
 	/*
 	 * If the device does not have IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY then
 	 * any domain later attached to it will also not support it. If the cap
@@ -828,28 +824,13 @@ bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file)
 	mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
 	return ret;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_enforced_coherent);
 
-/**
- * vfio_file_set_kvm - Link a kvm with VFIO drivers
- * @file: VFIO group file
- * @kvm: KVM to link
- *
- * When a VFIO device is first opened the KVM will be available in
- * device->kvm if one was associated with the group.
- */
-void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
+void vfio_group_set_kvm(struct vfio_group *group, struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
-
-	if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
-		return;
-
 	spin_lock(&group->kvm_ref_lock);
 	group->kvm = kvm;
 	spin_unlock(&group->kvm_ref_lock);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_set_kvm);
 
 /**
  * vfio_file_has_dev - True if the VFIO file is a handle for device
@@ -860,9 +841,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_set_kvm);
  */
 bool vfio_file_has_dev(struct file *file, struct vfio_device *device)
 {
-	struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
+	struct vfio_group *group = vfio_group_from_file(file);
 
-	if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
+	if (!group)
 		return false;
 
 	return group == device->group;
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 87d3dd6b9ef9..b1e327a85a32 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device);
 int vfio_device_group_use_iommu(struct vfio_device *device);
 void vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(struct vfio_device *device);
 void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device);
+struct vfio_group *vfio_group_from_file(struct file *file);
+bool vfio_group_enforced_coherent(struct vfio_group *group);
+void vfio_group_set_kvm(struct vfio_group *group, struct kvm *kvm);
 bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device);
 int __init vfio_group_init(void);
 void vfio_group_cleanup(void);
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 39c1158ffef0..4665791aa2eb 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -1190,6 +1190,55 @@ const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops = {
 	.mmap		= vfio_device_fops_mmap,
 };
 
+/**
+ * vfio_file_is_valid - True if the file is valid vfio file
+ * @file: VFIO group file or VFIO device file
+ */
+bool vfio_file_is_valid(struct file *file)
+{
+	return vfio_group_from_file(file);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_valid);
+
+/**
+ * vfio_file_enforced_coherent - True if the DMA associated with the VFIO file
+ *        is always CPU cache coherent
+ * @file: VFIO group file or VFIO device file
+ *
+ * Enforced coherency means that the IOMMU ignores things like the PCIe no-snoop
+ * bit in DMA transactions. A return of false indicates that the user has
+ * rights to access additional instructions such as wbinvd on x86.
+ */
+bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file)
+{
+	struct vfio_group *group;
+
+	group = vfio_group_from_file(file);
+	if (group)
+		return vfio_group_enforced_coherent(group);
+
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_enforced_coherent);
+
+/**
+ * vfio_file_set_kvm - Link a kvm with VFIO drivers
+ * @file: VFIO group file or VFIO device file
+ * @kvm: KVM to link
+ *
+ * When a VFIO device is first opened the KVM will be available in
+ * device->kvm if one was associated with the file.
+ */
+void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	struct vfio_group *group;
+
+	group = vfio_group_from_file(file);
+	if (group)
+		vfio_group_set_kvm(group, kvm);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_set_kvm);
+
 /*
  * Sub-module support
  */
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index 4c17395ed4d2..431eb82e0595 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ int vfio_mig_get_next_state(struct vfio_device *device,
  */
 struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file);
 bool vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file);
+bool vfio_file_is_valid(struct file *file);
 bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file);
 void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm);
 bool vfio_file_has_dev(struct file *file, struct vfio_device *device);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/vfio.c b/virt/kvm/vfio.c
index 9584eb57e0ed..b33c7b8488b3 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/vfio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/vfio.c
@@ -64,18 +64,18 @@ static bool kvm_vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static bool kvm_vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file)
+static bool kvm_vfio_file_is_valid(struct file *file)
 {
 	bool (*fn)(struct file *file);
 	bool ret;
 
-	fn = symbol_get(vfio_file_is_group);
+	fn = symbol_get(vfio_file_is_valid);
 	if (!fn)
 		return false;
 
 	ret = fn(file);
 
-	symbol_put(vfio_file_is_group);
+	symbol_put(vfio_file_is_valid);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -154,8 +154,8 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_add(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
 	if (!filp)
 		return -EBADF;
 
-	/* Ensure the FD is a vfio group FD.*/
-	if (!kvm_vfio_file_is_group(filp)) {
+	/* Ensure the FD is a vfio FD. */
+	if (!kvm_vfio_file_is_valid(filp)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto err_fput;
 	}
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 03/23] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] vfio: Allocate per device file structure Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-22 19:42   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] kvm/vfio: Rename kvm_vfio_group to prepare for accepting vfio device fd Yi Liu
                   ` (21 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This makes the vfio file kAPIs to accept vfio device files, also a
preparation for vfio device cdev support.

For the kvm set with vfio device file, kvm pointer is stored in struct
vfio_device_file, and use kvm_ref_lock to protect kvm set and kvm
pointer usage within VFIO. This kvm pointer will be set to vfio_device
after device file is bound to iommufd in the cdev path.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h      |  2 ++
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index b1e327a85a32..69e1a0692b06 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ struct vfio_container;
 
 struct vfio_device_file {
 	struct vfio_device *device;
+	spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */
+	struct kvm *kvm;
 };
 
 void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 4665791aa2eb..8ef9210ad2aa 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -429,6 +429,7 @@ vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
 	df->device = device;
+	spin_lock_init(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
 
 	return df;
 }
@@ -1190,13 +1191,23 @@ const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops = {
 	.mmap		= vfio_device_fops_mmap,
 };
 
+static struct vfio_device *vfio_device_from_file(struct file *file)
+{
+	struct vfio_device_file *df = file->private_data;
+
+	if (file->f_op != &vfio_device_fops)
+		return NULL;
+	return df->device;
+}
+
 /**
  * vfio_file_is_valid - True if the file is valid vfio file
  * @file: VFIO group file or VFIO device file
  */
 bool vfio_file_is_valid(struct file *file)
 {
-	return vfio_group_from_file(file);
+	return vfio_group_from_file(file) ||
+	       vfio_device_from_file(file);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_valid);
 
@@ -1211,16 +1222,36 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_valid);
  */
 bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file)
 {
+	struct vfio_device *device;
 	struct vfio_group *group;
 
 	group = vfio_group_from_file(file);
 	if (group)
 		return vfio_group_enforced_coherent(group);
 
+	device = vfio_device_from_file(file);
+	if (device)
+		return device_iommu_capable(device->dev,
+					    IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY);
+
 	return true;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_enforced_coherent);
 
+static void vfio_device_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+	struct vfio_device_file *df = file->private_data;
+
+	/*
+	 * The kvm is first recorded in the vfio_device_file, and will
+	 * be propagated to vfio_device::kvm when the file is bound to
+	 * iommufd successfully in the vfio device cdev path.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
+	df->kvm = kvm;
+	spin_unlock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
+}
+
 /**
  * vfio_file_set_kvm - Link a kvm with VFIO drivers
  * @file: VFIO group file or VFIO device file
@@ -1236,6 +1267,9 @@ void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
 	group = vfio_group_from_file(file);
 	if (group)
 		vfio_group_set_kvm(group, kvm);
+
+	if (vfio_device_from_file(file))
+		vfio_device_file_set_kvm(file, kvm);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_set_kvm);
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 04/23] kvm/vfio: Rename kvm_vfio_group to prepare for accepting vfio device fd
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace Yi Liu
                   ` (20 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

Meanwhile, rename related helpers. No functional change is intended.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 virt/kvm/vfio.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/vfio.c b/virt/kvm/vfio.c
index b33c7b8488b3..8f7fa07e8170 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/vfio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/vfio.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 #include <asm/kvm_ppc.h>
 #endif
 
-struct kvm_vfio_group {
+struct kvm_vfio_file {
 	struct list_head node;
 	struct file *file;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct kvm_vfio_group {
 };
 
 struct kvm_vfio {
-	struct list_head group_list;
+	struct list_head file_list;
 	struct mutex lock;
 	bool noncoherent;
 };
@@ -98,34 +98,35 @@ static struct iommu_group *kvm_vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
 }
 
 static void kvm_spapr_tce_release_vfio_group(struct kvm *kvm,
-					     struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg)
+					     struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf)
 {
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvg->iommu_group))
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvf->iommu_group))
 		return;
 
-	kvm_spapr_tce_release_iommu_group(kvm, kvg->iommu_group);
-	iommu_group_put(kvg->iommu_group);
-	kvg->iommu_group = NULL;
+	kvm_spapr_tce_release_iommu_group(kvm, kvf->iommu_group);
+	iommu_group_put(kvf->iommu_group);
+	kvf->iommu_group = NULL;
 }
 #endif
 
 /*
- * Groups can use the same or different IOMMU domains.  If the same then
- * adding a new group may change the coherency of groups we've previously
- * been told about.  We don't want to care about any of that so we retest
- * each group and bail as soon as we find one that's noncoherent.  This
- * means we only ever [un]register_noncoherent_dma once for the whole device.
+ * Groups/devices can use the same or different IOMMU domains. If the same
+ * then adding a new group/device may change the coherency of groups/devices
+ * we've previously been told about. We don't want to care about any of
+ * that so we retest each group/device and bail as soon as we find one that's
+ * noncoherent.  This means we only ever [un]register_noncoherent_dma once
+ * for the whole device.
  */
 static void kvm_vfio_update_coherency(struct kvm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct kvm_vfio *kv = dev->private;
 	bool noncoherent = false;
-	struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg;
+	struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf;
 
 	mutex_lock(&kv->lock);
 
-	list_for_each_entry(kvg, &kv->group_list, node) {
-		if (!kvm_vfio_file_enforced_coherent(kvg->file)) {
+	list_for_each_entry(kvf, &kv->file_list, node) {
+		if (!kvm_vfio_file_enforced_coherent(kvf->file)) {
 			noncoherent = true;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -143,10 +144,10 @@ static void kvm_vfio_update_coherency(struct kvm_device *dev)
 	mutex_unlock(&kv->lock);
 }
 
-static int kvm_vfio_group_add(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
+static int kvm_vfio_file_add(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
 {
 	struct kvm_vfio *kv = dev->private;
-	struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg;
+	struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf;
 	struct file *filp;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -162,27 +163,27 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_add(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
 
 	mutex_lock(&kv->lock);
 
-	list_for_each_entry(kvg, &kv->group_list, node) {
-		if (kvg->file == filp) {
+	list_for_each_entry(kvf, &kv->file_list, node) {
+		if (kvf->file == filp) {
 			ret = -EEXIST;
 			goto err_unlock;
 		}
 	}
 
-	kvg = kzalloc(sizeof(*kvg), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
-	if (!kvg) {
+	kvf = kzalloc(sizeof(*kvf), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+	if (!kvf) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto err_unlock;
 	}
 
-	kvg->file = filp;
-	list_add_tail(&kvg->node, &kv->group_list);
+	kvf->file = filp;
+	list_add_tail(&kvf->node, &kv->file_list);
 
 	kvm_arch_start_assignment(dev->kvm);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&kv->lock);
 
-	kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvg->file, dev->kvm);
+	kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvf->file, dev->kvm);
 	kvm_vfio_update_coherency(dev);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -193,10 +194,10 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_add(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int kvm_vfio_group_del(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
+static int kvm_vfio_file_del(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
 {
 	struct kvm_vfio *kv = dev->private;
-	struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg;
+	struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf;
 	struct fd f;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -208,18 +209,18 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_del(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
 
 	mutex_lock(&kv->lock);
 
-	list_for_each_entry(kvg, &kv->group_list, node) {
-		if (kvg->file != f.file)
+	list_for_each_entry(kvf, &kv->file_list, node) {
+		if (kvf->file != f.file)
 			continue;
 
-		list_del(&kvg->node);
+		list_del(&kvf->node);
 		kvm_arch_end_assignment(dev->kvm);
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
-		kvm_spapr_tce_release_vfio_group(dev->kvm, kvg);
+		kvm_spapr_tce_release_vfio_group(dev->kvm, kvf);
 #endif
-		kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvg->file, NULL);
-		fput(kvg->file);
-		kfree(kvg);
+		kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvf->file, NULL);
+		fput(kvf->file);
+		kfree(kvf);
 		ret = 0;
 		break;
 	}
@@ -234,12 +235,12 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_del(struct kvm_device *dev, unsigned int fd)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
-static int kvm_vfio_group_set_spapr_tce(struct kvm_device *dev,
-					void __user *arg)
+static int kvm_vfio_file_set_spapr_tce(struct kvm_device *dev,
+				       void __user *arg)
 {
 	struct kvm_vfio_spapr_tce param;
 	struct kvm_vfio *kv = dev->private;
-	struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg;
+	struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf;
 	struct fd f;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -254,20 +255,20 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_set_spapr_tce(struct kvm_device *dev,
 
 	mutex_lock(&kv->lock);
 
-	list_for_each_entry(kvg, &kv->group_list, node) {
-		if (kvg->file != f.file)
+	list_for_each_entry(kvf, &kv->file_list, node) {
+		if (kvf->file != f.file)
 			continue;
 
-		if (!kvg->iommu_group) {
-			kvg->iommu_group = kvm_vfio_file_iommu_group(kvg->file);
-			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvg->iommu_group)) {
+		if (!kvf->iommu_group) {
+			kvf->iommu_group = kvm_vfio_file_iommu_group(kvf->file);
+			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvf->iommu_group)) {
 				ret = -EIO;
 				goto err_fdput;
 			}
 		}
 
 		ret = kvm_spapr_tce_attach_iommu_group(dev->kvm, param.tablefd,
-						       kvg->iommu_group);
+						       kvf->iommu_group);
 		break;
 	}
 
@@ -278,8 +279,8 @@ static int kvm_vfio_group_set_spapr_tce(struct kvm_device *dev,
 }
 #endif
 
-static int kvm_vfio_set_group(struct kvm_device *dev, long attr,
-			      void __user *arg)
+static int kvm_vfio_set_file(struct kvm_device *dev, long attr,
+			     void __user *arg)
 {
 	int32_t __user *argp = arg;
 	int32_t fd;
@@ -288,16 +289,16 @@ static int kvm_vfio_set_group(struct kvm_device *dev, long attr,
 	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD:
 		if (get_user(fd, argp))
 			return -EFAULT;
-		return kvm_vfio_group_add(dev, fd);
+		return kvm_vfio_file_add(dev, fd);
 
 	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL:
 		if (get_user(fd, argp))
 			return -EFAULT;
-		return kvm_vfio_group_del(dev, fd);
+		return kvm_vfio_file_del(dev, fd);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
 	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_SET_SPAPR_TCE:
-		return kvm_vfio_group_set_spapr_tce(dev, arg);
+		return kvm_vfio_file_set_spapr_tce(dev, arg);
 #endif
 	}
 
@@ -309,8 +310,8 @@ static int kvm_vfio_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
 {
 	switch (attr->group) {
 	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP:
-		return kvm_vfio_set_group(dev, attr->attr,
-					  u64_to_user_ptr(attr->addr));
+		return kvm_vfio_set_file(dev, attr->attr,
+					 u64_to_user_ptr(attr->addr));
 	}
 
 	return -ENXIO;
@@ -339,16 +340,16 @@ static int kvm_vfio_has_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
 static void kvm_vfio_release(struct kvm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct kvm_vfio *kv = dev->private;
-	struct kvm_vfio_group *kvg, *tmp;
+	struct kvm_vfio_file *kvf, *tmp;
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(kvg, tmp, &kv->group_list, node) {
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(kvf, tmp, &kv->file_list, node) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
-		kvm_spapr_tce_release_vfio_group(dev->kvm, kvg);
+		kvm_spapr_tce_release_vfio_group(dev->kvm, kvf);
 #endif
-		kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvg->file, NULL);
-		fput(kvg->file);
-		list_del(&kvg->node);
-		kfree(kvg);
+		kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm(kvf->file, NULL);
+		fput(kvf->file);
+		list_del(&kvf->node);
+		kfree(kvf);
 		kvm_arch_end_assignment(dev->kvm);
 	}
 
@@ -382,7 +383,7 @@ static int kvm_vfio_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
 	if (!kv)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kv->group_list);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kv->file_list);
 	mutex_init(&kv->lock);
 
 	dev->private = kv;
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 05/23] kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] kvm/vfio: Rename kvm_vfio_group to prepare for accepting vfio device fd Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close() Yi Liu
                   ` (19 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This defines KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE* and make alias with KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP*.
Old userspace uses KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP* works as well.

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vfio.rst | 47 ++++++++++++++++---------
 include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                | 13 +++++--
 virt/kvm/vfio.c                         | 12 +++----
 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vfio.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vfio.rst
index 08b544212638..c549143bb891 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vfio.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vfio.rst
@@ -9,22 +9,34 @@ Device types supported:
   - KVM_DEV_TYPE_VFIO
 
 Only one VFIO instance may be created per VM.  The created device
-tracks VFIO groups in use by the VM and features of those groups
-important to the correctness and acceleration of the VM.  As groups
-are enabled and disabled for use by the VM, KVM should be updated
-about their presence.  When registered with KVM, a reference to the
-VFIO-group is held by KVM.
+tracks VFIO files (group or device) in use by the VM and features
+of those groups/devices important to the correctness and acceleration
+of the VM.  As groups/devices are enabled and disabled for use by the
+VM, KVM should be updated about their presence.  When registered with
+KVM, a reference to the VFIO file is held by KVM.
 
 Groups:
-  KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP
-
-KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP attributes:
-  KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD: Add a VFIO group to VFIO-KVM device tracking
-	kvm_device_attr.addr points to an int32_t file descriptor
-	for the VFIO group.
-  KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL: Remove a VFIO group from VFIO-KVM device tracking
-	kvm_device_attr.addr points to an int32_t file descriptor
-	for the VFIO group.
+  KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE
+	alias: KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP
+
+KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE attributes:
+  KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_ADD: Add a VFIO file (group/device) to VFIO-KVM device
+	tracking
+
+	kvm_device_attr.addr points to an int32_t file descriptor for the
+	VFIO file.
+
+  KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_DEL: Remove a VFIO file (group/device) from VFIO-KVM
+	device tracking
+
+	kvm_device_attr.addr points to an int32_t file descriptor for the
+	VFIO file.
+
+KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP (legacy kvm device group restricted to the handling of VFIO group fd):
+  KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD: same as KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_ADD for group fd only
+
+  KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL: same as KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_DEL for group fd only
+
   KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_SET_SPAPR_TCE: attaches a guest visible TCE table
 	allocated by sPAPR KVM.
 	kvm_device_attr.addr points to a struct::
@@ -40,7 +52,10 @@ KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP attributes:
 	- @tablefd is a file descriptor for a TCE table allocated via
 	  KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE.
 
-The GROUP_ADD operation above should be invoked prior to accessing the
+The FILE/GROUP_ADD operation above should be invoked prior to accessing the
 device file descriptor via VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD in order to support
 drivers which require a kvm pointer to be set in their .open_device()
-callback.
+callback.  It is the same for device file descriptor via character device
+open which gets device access via VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD.  For such file
+descriptors, FILE_ADD should be invoked before VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
+to support the drivers mentioned in prior sentence as well.
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 737318b1c1d9..0423af6161e1 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -1416,9 +1416,16 @@ struct kvm_device_attr {
 	__u64	addr;		/* userspace address of attr data */
 };
 
-#define  KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP			1
-#define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD			1
-#define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL			2
+#define  KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE			1
+
+#define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_ADD			1
+#define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_DEL			2
+
+/* KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP aliases are for compile time uapi compatibility */
+#define  KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP	KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE
+
+#define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD	KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_ADD
+#define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL	KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_DEL
 #define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_SET_SPAPR_TCE		3
 
 enum kvm_device_type {
diff --git a/virt/kvm/vfio.c b/virt/kvm/vfio.c
index 8f7fa07e8170..07cb5f44b2a2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/vfio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/vfio.c
@@ -286,12 +286,12 @@ static int kvm_vfio_set_file(struct kvm_device *dev, long attr,
 	int32_t fd;
 
 	switch (attr) {
-	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD:
+	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_ADD:
 		if (get_user(fd, argp))
 			return -EFAULT;
 		return kvm_vfio_file_add(dev, fd);
 
-	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL:
+	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_DEL:
 		if (get_user(fd, argp))
 			return -EFAULT;
 		return kvm_vfio_file_del(dev, fd);
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static int kvm_vfio_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
 			     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
 {
 	switch (attr->group) {
-	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP:
+	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE:
 		return kvm_vfio_set_file(dev, attr->attr,
 					 u64_to_user_ptr(attr->addr));
 	}
@@ -321,10 +321,10 @@ static int kvm_vfio_has_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
 			     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
 {
 	switch (attr->group) {
-	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP:
+	case KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE:
 		switch (attr->attr) {
-		case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD:
-		case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL:
+		case KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_ADD:
+		case KVM_DEV_VFIO_FILE_DEL:
 #ifdef CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
 		case KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_SET_SPAPR_TCE:
 #endif
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 06/23] vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close()
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened Yi Liu
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This avoids passing too much parameters in multiple functions.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/group.c     | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h      |  8 ++++----
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index b56e19d2a02d..2829dd4ba2c0 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -169,8 +169,9 @@ static void vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device)
 	spin_unlock(&device->group->kvm_ref_lock);
 }
 
-static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
+static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 {
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 	int ret;
 
 	mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
@@ -190,7 +191,11 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
 	if (device->open_count == 0)
 		vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(device);
 
-	ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd);
+	df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd;
+
+	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
+	if (ret)
+		df->iommufd = NULL;
 
 	if (device->open_count == 0)
 		vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
@@ -202,12 +207,15 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device)
+void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 {
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
+
 	mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
 	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
 
-	vfio_device_close(device, device->group->iommufd);
+	vfio_device_close(df);
+	df->iommufd = NULL;
 
 	if (device->open_count == 0)
 		vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
@@ -228,7 +236,7 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
 		goto err_out;
 	}
 
-	ret = vfio_device_group_open(device);
+	ret = vfio_device_group_open(df);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_free;
 
@@ -260,7 +268,7 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
 	return filep;
 
 err_close_device:
-	vfio_device_group_close(device);
+	vfio_device_group_close(df);
 err_free:
 	kfree(df);
 err_out:
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 69e1a0692b06..7ced404526d9 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ struct vfio_device_file {
 	struct vfio_device *device;
 	spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */
 	struct kvm *kvm;
+	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd; /* protected by struct vfio_device_set::lock */
 };
 
 void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
 bool vfio_device_try_get_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
-int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd);
-void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
-		       struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd);
+int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device_file *df);
+void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
 struct vfio_device_file *
 vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device);
 
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ void vfio_device_group_register(struct vfio_device *device);
 void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device);
 int vfio_device_group_use_iommu(struct vfio_device *device);
 void vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(struct vfio_device *device);
-void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device);
+void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
 struct vfio_group *vfio_group_from_file(struct file *file);
 bool vfio_group_enforced_coherent(struct vfio_group *group);
 void vfio_group_set_kvm(struct vfio_group *group, struct kvm *kvm);
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 8ef9210ad2aa..ae0739d17154 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -434,9 +434,10 @@ vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device)
 	return df;
 }
 
-static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
-				  struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
+static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 {
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
+	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd = df->iommufd;
 	int ret;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
@@ -468,9 +469,11 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
-				   struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
+static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 {
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
+	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd = df->iommufd;
+
 	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
 
 	if (device->ops->close_device)
@@ -482,15 +485,16 @@ static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
 	module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
 }
 
-int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
+int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 {
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
 
 	device->open_count++;
 	if (device->open_count == 1) {
-		ret = vfio_device_first_open(device, iommufd);
+		ret = vfio_device_first_open(df);
 		if (ret)
 			device->open_count--;
 	}
@@ -498,14 +502,15 @@ int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
-		       struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
+void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 {
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
+
 	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
 
 	vfio_assert_device_open(device);
 	if (device->open_count == 1)
-		vfio_device_last_close(device, iommufd);
+		vfio_device_last_close(df);
 	device->open_count--;
 }
 
@@ -550,7 +555,7 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
 	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
 	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 
-	vfio_device_group_close(device);
+	vfio_device_group_close(df);
 
 	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 07/23] vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close() Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group Yi Liu
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

Allow the vfio_device file to be in a state where the device FD is
opened but the device cannot be used by userspace (i.e. its .open_device()
hasn't been called). This inbetween state is not used when the device
FD is spawned from the group FD, however when we create the device FD
directly by opening a cdev it will be opened in the blocked state.

The reason for the inbetween state is that userspace only gets a FD but
doesn't gain access permission until binding the FD to an iommufd. So in
the blocked state, only the bind operation is allowed. Completing bind
will allow user to further access the device.

This is implemented by adding a flag in struct vfio_device_file to mark
the blocked state and using a simple smp_load_acquire() to obtain the
flag value and serialize all the device setup with the thread accessing
this device.

Following this lockless scheme, it can safely handle the device FD
unbound->bound but it cannot handle bound->unbound. To allow this we'd
need to add a lock on all the vfio ioctls which seems costly. So once
device FD is bound, it remains bound until the FD is closed.

Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/group.c     | 11 ++++++++++-
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h      |  1 +
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index 2829dd4ba2c0..4ed8c2a9145a 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -194,9 +194,18 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 	df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd;
 
 	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
 		df->iommufd = NULL;
+		goto out_put_kvm;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Paired with smp_load_acquire() in vfio_device_fops::ioctl/
+	 * read/write/mmap and vfio_file_has_device_access()
+	 */
+	smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true);
 
+out_put_kvm:
 	if (device->open_count == 0)
 		vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 7ced404526d9..e60c409868f8 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct vfio_container;
 
 struct vfio_device_file {
 	struct vfio_device *device;
+	bool access_granted;
 	spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */
 	struct kvm *kvm;
 	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd; /* protected by struct vfio_device_set::lock */
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index ae0739d17154..224425cb7259 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -1129,6 +1129,10 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
 	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 	int ret;
 
+	/* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_device_open() */
+	if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	ret = vfio_device_pm_runtime_get(device);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -1156,6 +1160,10 @@ static ssize_t vfio_device_fops_read(struct file *filep, char __user *buf,
 	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
 	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 
+	/* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_device_open() */
+	if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (unlikely(!device->ops->read))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -1169,6 +1177,10 @@ static ssize_t vfio_device_fops_write(struct file *filep,
 	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
 	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 
+	/* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_device_open() */
+	if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (unlikely(!device->ops->write))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -1180,6 +1192,10 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_mmap(struct file *filep, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
 	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 
+	/* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_device_open() */
+	if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (unlikely(!device->ops->mmap))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 08/23] vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] vfio: Make vfio_device_open() single open for device cdev path Yi Liu
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

for counting the devices that are opened via the cdev path. This count
is increased and decreased by the cdev path. The group path checks it
to achieve exclusion with the cdev path. With this, only one path (group
path or cdev path) will claim DMA ownership. This avoids scenarios in
which devices within the same group may be opened via different paths.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/group.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h  |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index 4ed8c2a9145a..fd4ddafb6152 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -383,6 +383,33 @@ static long vfio_group_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
 	}
 }
 
+int vfio_device_block_group(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+	if (group->opened_file) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
+	group->cdev_device_open_cnt++;
+
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+void vfio_device_unblock_group(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
+
+	mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+	group->cdev_device_open_cnt--;
+	mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+}
+
 static int vfio_group_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
 {
 	struct vfio_group *group =
@@ -405,6 +432,11 @@ static int vfio_group_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	if (group->cdev_device_open_cnt) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Do we need multiple instances of the group open?  Seems not.
 	 */
@@ -479,6 +511,7 @@ static void vfio_group_release(struct device *dev)
 	mutex_destroy(&group->device_lock);
 	mutex_destroy(&group->group_lock);
 	WARN_ON(group->iommu_group);
+	WARN_ON(group->cdev_device_open_cnt);
 	ida_free(&vfio.group_ida, MINOR(group->dev.devt));
 	kfree(group);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index e60c409868f8..3c82d1cc4520 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -83,8 +83,11 @@ struct vfio_group {
 	struct blocking_notifier_head	notifier;
 	struct iommufd_ctx		*iommufd;
 	spinlock_t			kvm_ref_lock;
+	unsigned int			cdev_device_open_cnt;
 };
 
+int vfio_device_block_group(struct vfio_device *device);
+void vfio_device_unblock_group(struct vfio_device *device);
 int vfio_device_set_group(struct vfio_device *device,
 			  enum vfio_group_type type);
 void vfio_device_remove_group(struct vfio_device *device);
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 09/23] vfio: Make vfio_device_open() single open for device cdev path
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind() Yi Liu
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

VFIO group has historically allowed multi-open of the device FD. This
was made secure because the "open" was executed via an ioctl to the
group FD which is itself only single open.

However, no known use of multiple device FDs today. It is kind of a
strange thing to do because new device FDs can naturally be created
via dup().

When we implement the new device uAPI (only used in cdev path) there is
no natural way to allow the device itself from being multi-opened in a
secure manner. Without the group FD we cannot prove the security context
of the opener.

Thus, when moving to the new uAPI we block the ability of opening
a device multiple times. Given old group path still allows it we store
a vfio_group pointer in struct vfio_device_file to differentiate.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/group.c     | 2 ++
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h      | 2 ++
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index fd4ddafb6152..a17584e8be15 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
 		goto err_out;
 	}
 
+	df->group = device->group;
+
 	ret = vfio_device_group_open(df);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_free;
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 3c82d1cc4520..785afc40ece8 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ struct vfio_container;
 
 struct vfio_device_file {
 	struct vfio_device *device;
+	struct vfio_group *group;
+
 	bool access_granted;
 	spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */
 	struct kvm *kvm;
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 224425cb7259..513f9516aed2 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -492,6 +492,13 @@ int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
 
+	/*
+	 * Only the group path allows the device to be opened multiple
+	 * times.  The device cdev path doesn't have a secure way for it.
+	 */
+	if (device->open_count != 0 && !df->group)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	device->open_count++;
 	if (device->open_count == 1) {
 		ret = vfio_device_first_open(df);
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 10/23] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind()
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] vfio: Make vfio_device_open() single open for device cdev path Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-22 20:24   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps Yi Liu
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

into vfio_device_group_open(). This is more consistent with what will
be done in vfio device cdev path.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/group.c   |  6 ++++++
 drivers/vfio/iommufd.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h    |  9 +++++++++
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index a17584e8be15..cfd0b9254bbc 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -192,6 +192,12 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 		vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(device);
 
 	df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd;
+	if (df->iommufd && vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && device->open_count == 0) {
+		ret = vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(device,
+							df->iommufd);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_put_kvm;
+	}
 
 	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
 	if (ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
index a18e920be164..7a654a1437f0 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
@@ -46,6 +46,24 @@ static void vfio_iommufd_noiommu_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 	}
 }
 
+int vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
+				      struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
+{
+	u32 ioas_id;
+
+	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	/*
+	 * Require no compat ioas to be assigned to proceed.  The basic
+	 * statement is that the user cannot have done something that
+	 * implies they expected translation to exist
+	 */
+	if (!iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id))
+		return -EPERM;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
 {
 	u32 ioas_id;
@@ -54,20 +72,8 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
 
-	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev)) {
-		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
-			return -EPERM;
-
-		/*
-		 * Require no compat ioas to be assigned to proceed. The basic
-		 * statement is that the user cannot have done something that
-		 * implies they expected translation to exist
-		 */
-		if (!iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id))
-			return -EPERM;
-
+	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
 		return vfio_iommufd_noiommu_bind(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
-	}
 
 	ret = vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
 	if (ret)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 785afc40ece8..8884b557fb26 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -234,9 +234,18 @@ static inline void vfio_container_cleanup(void)
 #endif
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD)
+int vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
+				      struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
 int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
 void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device *device);
 #else
+static inline int
+vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
+				  struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
+{
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
 static inline int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *device,
 				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
 {
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 11/23] vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind() Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file Yi Liu
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

to align with the coming vfio device cdev support.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/group.c   | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 drivers/vfio/iommufd.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h    |  9 +++++++++
 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index cfd0b9254bbc..7aacbd9d08c9 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -200,9 +200,14 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 	}
 
 	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
-	if (ret) {
-		df->iommufd = NULL;
+	if (ret)
 		goto out_put_kvm;
+
+	if (df->iommufd && device->open_count == 1) {
+		ret = vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(device,
+						      df->iommufd);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_close_device;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -211,12 +216,17 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 	 */
 	smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true);
 
+	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
+	return 0;
+
+out_close_device:
+	vfio_device_close(df);
 out_put_kvm:
+	df->iommufd = NULL;
 	if (device->open_count == 0)
 		vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
-
 	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
-
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
 	return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
index 7a654a1437f0..acc683a3620b 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
@@ -66,36 +66,35 @@ int vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
 
 int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
 {
-	u32 ioas_id;
 	u32 device_id;
-	int ret;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
 
 	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
 		return vfio_iommufd_noiommu_bind(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
 
-	ret = vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	/* The legacy path has no way to return the device id */
+	return vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
+}
+
+int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev,
+				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
+{
+	u32 ioas_id;
+	int ret;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
+
+	/* compat noiommu does not need to do ioas attach */
+	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
+		return 0;
 
 	ret = iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id);
 	if (ret)
-		goto err_unbind;
-	ret = vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, &ioas_id);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err_unbind;
-
-	/*
-	 * The legacy path has no way to return the device id or the selected
-	 * pt_id
-	 */
-	return 0;
+		return ret;
 
-err_unbind:
-	if (vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd)
-		vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
-	return ret;
+	/* The legacy path has no way to return the selected pt_id */
+	return vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, &ioas_id);
 }
 
 void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 8884b557fb26..c7431ca19d9e 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ int vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
 				      struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
 int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
 void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device *device);
+int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
+				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
 #else
 static inline int
 vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
@@ -255,6 +257,13 @@ static inline int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *device,
 static inline void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device *device)
 {
 }
+
+static inline int
+vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
+				struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
+{
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
 #endif
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_VIRQFD)
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 12/23] vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices Yi Liu
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

.bind_iommufd() will generate an ID to represent this bond, which is
needed by userspace for further usage. Store devid in vfio_device_file
to avoid passing the pointer in multiple places.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/iommufd.c   | 14 ++++++++------
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h      | 10 +++++-----
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c |  6 +++---
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
index acc683a3620b..07b58c4625b5 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
@@ -64,17 +64,17 @@ int vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
+int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 {
-	u32 device_id;
+	struct vfio_device *vdev = df->device;
+	struct iommufd_ctx *ictx = df->iommufd;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
 
 	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
-		return vfio_iommufd_noiommu_bind(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
+		return vfio_iommufd_noiommu_bind(vdev, ictx, &df->devid);
 
-	/* The legacy path has no way to return the device id */
-	return vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
+	return vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &df->devid);
 }
 
 int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev,
@@ -97,8 +97,10 @@ int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev,
 	return vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, &ioas_id);
 }
 
-void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev)
+void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 {
+	struct vfio_device *vdev = df->device;
+
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
 
 	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev)) {
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index c7431ca19d9e..429166fe0e33 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct vfio_device_file {
 	spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */
 	struct kvm *kvm;
 	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd; /* protected by struct vfio_device_set::lock */
+	u32 devid; /* only valid when iommufd is valid */
 };
 
 void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
@@ -236,8 +237,8 @@ static inline void vfio_container_cleanup(void)
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD)
 int vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
 				      struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
-int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
-void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device *device);
+int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
+void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
 int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
 				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
 #else
@@ -248,13 +249,12 @@ vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 }
 
-static inline int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *device,
-				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
+static inline int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *fd)
 {
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 }
 
-static inline void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device *device)
+static inline void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 {
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 513f9516aed2..39d552e5160b 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	if (iommufd)
-		ret = vfio_iommufd_bind(device, iommufd);
+		ret = vfio_iommufd_bind(df);
 	else
 		ret = vfio_device_group_use_iommu(device);
 	if (ret)
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 
 err_unuse_iommu:
 	if (iommufd)
-		vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
+		vfio_iommufd_unbind(df);
 	else
 		vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(device);
 err_module_put:
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 	if (device->ops->close_device)
 		device->ops->close_device(device);
 	if (iommufd)
-		vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
+		vfio_iommufd_unbind(df);
 	else
 		vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(device);
 	module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 13/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-22 20:46   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API Yi Liu
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

this prepares for adding DETACH ioctl for physical VFIO devices.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst             |  8 +++++---
 drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c             |  1 +
 drivers/vfio/iommufd.c                        | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c    |  2 ++
 drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c                  |  1 +
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                   |  1 +
 drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c             |  1 +
 drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c         |  1 +
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c                      |  3 ++-
 include/linux/vfio.h                          |  8 +++++++-
 10 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
index 68abc089d6dd..363e12c90b87 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ similar to a file operations structure::
 					struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
 		void	(*unbind_iommufd)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 		int	(*attach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
+		void	(*detach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 		int	(*open_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 		void	(*close_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 		ssize_t	(*read)(struct vfio_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
@@ -315,9 +316,10 @@ container_of().
 	- The [un]bind_iommufd callbacks are issued when the device is bound to
 	  and unbound from iommufd.
 
-	- The attach_ioas callback is issued when the device is attached to an
-	  IOAS managed by the bound iommufd. The attached IOAS is automatically
-	  detached when the device is unbound from iommufd.
+	- The [de]attach_ioas callback is issued when the device is attached to
+	  and detached from an IOAS managed by the bound iommufd. However, the
+	  attached IOAS can also be automatically detached when the device is
+	  unbound from iommufd.
 
 	- The read/write/mmap callbacks implement the device region access defined
 	  by the device's own VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO ioctl.
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
index c89a047a4cd8..d540cf683d93 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
@@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_fsl_mc_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static struct fsl_mc_driver vfio_fsl_mc_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
index 07b58c4625b5..e3953e1617a5 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
@@ -167,6 +167,14 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
 {
 	int rc;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!vdev->iommufd_device))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (vdev->iommufd_attached)
+		return -EBUSY;
+
 	rc = iommufd_device_attach(vdev->iommufd_device, pt_id);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
@@ -175,6 +183,18 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas);
 
+void vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!vdev->iommufd_device) || !vdev->iommufd_attached)
+		return;
+
+	iommufd_device_detach(vdev->iommufd_device);
+	vdev->iommufd_attached = false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas);
+
 /*
  * The emulated standard ops mean that vfio_device is going to use the
  * "mdev path" and will call vfio_pin_pages()/vfio_dma_rw(). Drivers using this
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
index a117eaf21c14..b2f9778c8366 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
@@ -1373,6 +1373,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_migrn_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_ops = {
@@ -1391,6 +1392,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static int hisi_acc_vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
index d95fd382814c..42ec574a8622 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
@@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops mlx5vf_pci_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static int mlx5vf_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
index 29091ee2e984..cb5b7f865d58 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_pci_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
index 83fe54015595..6464b3939ebc 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_amba_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static const struct amba_id pl330_ids[] = {
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
index 22a1efca32a8..8cf22fa65baa 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_platform_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static struct platform_driver vfio_platform_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 39d552e5160b..599d551fc4b5 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -273,7 +273,8 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
 	if (WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD) &&
 		    (!device->ops->bind_iommufd ||
 		     !device->ops->unbind_iommufd ||
-		     !device->ops->attach_ioas)))
+		     !device->ops->attach_ioas ||
+		     !device->ops->detach_ioas)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index 431eb82e0595..f446f5901e46 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -74,7 +74,9 @@ struct vfio_device {
  * @bind_iommufd: Called when binding the device to an iommufd
  * @unbind_iommufd: Opposite of bind_iommufd
  * @attach_ioas: Called when attaching device to an IOAS/HWPT managed by the
- *		 bound iommufd. Undo in unbind_iommufd.
+ *		 bound iommufd. Undo in unbind_iommufd if @detach_ioas is not
+ *		 called.
+ * @detach_ioas: Opposite of attach_ioas
  * @open_device: Called when the first file descriptor is opened for this device
  * @close_device: Opposite of open_device
  * @read: Perform read(2) on device file descriptor
@@ -98,6 +100,7 @@ struct vfio_device_ops {
 				struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
 	void	(*unbind_iommufd)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 	int	(*attach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
+	void	(*detach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 	int	(*open_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 	void	(*close_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 	ssize_t	(*read)(struct vfio_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
@@ -121,6 +124,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev,
 			       struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
 void vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
+void vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 int vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev,
 			       struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
 void vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev);
@@ -145,6 +149,8 @@ vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 	((void (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev)) NULL)
 #define vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas \
 	((int (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)) NULL)
+#define vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas \
+	((void (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev)) NULL)
 #define vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind                                      \
 	((int (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,   \
 		  u32 *out_device_id)) NULL)
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 14/23] iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices Yi Liu
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>

Previously, the detach routine is only done by the destroy(). And it was
called by vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind() when the device runs close(), so
all the mappings in iopt were cleaned in that setup, when the call trace
reaches this detach() routine.

Now, there's a need of a detach uAPI, meaning that it does not only need
a new iommufd_access_detach() API, but also requires access->ops->unmap()
call as a cleanup. So add one.

However, leaving that unprotected can introduce some potential of a race
condition during the pin_/unpin_pages() call, where access->ioas->iopt is
getting referenced. So, add an ioas_lock to protect the context of iopt
referencings.

Also, to allow the iommufd_access_unpin_pages() callback to happen via
this unmap() call, add an ioas_unpin pointer, so the unpin routine won't
be affected by the "access->ioas = NULL" trick.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c          | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h |  2 +
 include/linux/iommufd.h                 |  1 +
 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
index 5e5f7912807b..a4e0f3d2ac37 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
@@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ iommufd_access_create(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
 	iommufd_ctx_get(ictx);
 	iommufd_object_finalize(ictx, &access->obj);
 	*id = access->obj.id;
+	mutex_init(&access->ioas_lock);
 	return access;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_create, IOMMUFD);
@@ -516,26 +517,66 @@ u32 iommufd_access_to_id(struct iommufd_access *access)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_to_id, IOMMUFD);
 
+static void __iommufd_access_detach(struct iommufd_access *access)
+{
+	struct iommufd_ioas *cur_ioas = access->ioas;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&access->ioas_lock);
+	/*
+	 * Set ioas to NULL to block any further iommufd_access_pin_pages().
+	 * iommufd_access_unpin_pages() can continue using access->ioas_unpin.
+	 */
+	access->ioas = NULL;
+
+	if (access->ops->unmap) {
+		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
+		access->ops->unmap(access->data, 0, ULONG_MAX);
+		mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+	}
+	iopt_remove_access(&cur_ioas->iopt, access);
+	refcount_dec(&cur_ioas->obj.users);
+}
+
+void iommufd_access_detach(struct iommufd_access *access)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+	if (WARN_ON(!access->ioas))
+		goto out;
+	__iommufd_access_detach(access);
+out:
+	access->ioas_unpin = NULL;
+	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_detach, IOMMUFD);
+
 int iommufd_access_attach(struct iommufd_access *access, u32 ioas_id)
 {
 	struct iommufd_ioas *new_ioas;
 	int rc = 0;
 
-	if (access->ioas)
+	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+	if (access->ioas) {
+		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	new_ioas = iommufd_get_ioas(access->ictx, ioas_id);
-	if (IS_ERR(new_ioas))
+	if (IS_ERR(new_ioas)) {
+		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 		return PTR_ERR(new_ioas);
+	}
 
 	rc = iopt_add_access(&new_ioas->iopt, access);
 	if (rc) {
+		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 		iommufd_put_object(&new_ioas->obj);
 		return rc;
 	}
 	iommufd_ref_to_users(&new_ioas->obj);
 
 	access->ioas = new_ioas;
+	access->ioas_unpin = new_ioas;
+	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_attach, IOMMUFD);
@@ -590,8 +631,8 @@ void iommufd_access_notify_unmap(struct io_pagetable *iopt, unsigned long iova,
 void iommufd_access_unpin_pages(struct iommufd_access *access,
 				unsigned long iova, unsigned long length)
 {
-	struct io_pagetable *iopt = &access->ioas->iopt;
 	struct iopt_area_contig_iter iter;
+	struct io_pagetable *iopt;
 	unsigned long last_iova;
 	struct iopt_area *area;
 
@@ -599,6 +640,13 @@ void iommufd_access_unpin_pages(struct iommufd_access *access,
 	    WARN_ON(check_add_overflow(iova, length - 1, &last_iova)))
 		return;
 
+	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+	if (!access->ioas_unpin) {
+		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
+		return;
+	}
+	iopt = &access->ioas_unpin->iopt;
+
 	down_read(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
 	iopt_for_each_contig_area(&iter, area, iopt, iova, last_iova)
 		iopt_area_remove_access(
@@ -608,6 +656,7 @@ void iommufd_access_unpin_pages(struct iommufd_access *access,
 				min(last_iova, iopt_area_last_iova(area))));
 	up_read(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
 	WARN_ON(!iopt_area_contig_done(&iter));
+	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_unpin_pages, IOMMUFD);
 
@@ -653,8 +702,8 @@ int iommufd_access_pin_pages(struct iommufd_access *access, unsigned long iova,
 			     unsigned long length, struct page **out_pages,
 			     unsigned int flags)
 {
-	struct io_pagetable *iopt = &access->ioas->iopt;
 	struct iopt_area_contig_iter iter;
+	struct io_pagetable *iopt;
 	unsigned long last_iova;
 	struct iopt_area *area;
 	int rc;
@@ -669,6 +718,13 @@ int iommufd_access_pin_pages(struct iommufd_access *access, unsigned long iova,
 	if (check_add_overflow(iova, length - 1, &last_iova))
 		return -EOVERFLOW;
 
+	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+	if (!access->ioas) {
+		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+	iopt = &access->ioas->iopt;
+
 	down_read(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
 	iopt_for_each_contig_area(&iter, area, iopt, iova, last_iova) {
 		unsigned long last = min(last_iova, iopt_area_last_iova(area));
@@ -699,6 +755,7 @@ int iommufd_access_pin_pages(struct iommufd_access *access, unsigned long iova,
 	}
 
 	up_read(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
+	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 	return 0;
 
 err_remove:
@@ -713,6 +770,7 @@ int iommufd_access_pin_pages(struct iommufd_access *access, unsigned long iova,
 						  iopt_area_last_iova(area))));
 	}
 	up_read(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
+	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 	return rc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_pin_pages, IOMMUFD);
@@ -732,8 +790,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_pin_pages, IOMMUFD);
 int iommufd_access_rw(struct iommufd_access *access, unsigned long iova,
 		      void *data, size_t length, unsigned int flags)
 {
-	struct io_pagetable *iopt = &access->ioas->iopt;
 	struct iopt_area_contig_iter iter;
+	struct io_pagetable *iopt;
 	struct iopt_area *area;
 	unsigned long last_iova;
 	int rc;
@@ -743,6 +801,13 @@ int iommufd_access_rw(struct iommufd_access *access, unsigned long iova,
 	if (check_add_overflow(iova, length - 1, &last_iova))
 		return -EOVERFLOW;
 
+	mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
+	if (!access->ioas) {
+		mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+	iopt = &access->ioas->iopt;
+
 	down_read(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
 	iopt_for_each_contig_area(&iter, area, iopt, iova, last_iova) {
 		unsigned long last = min(last_iova, iopt_area_last_iova(area));
@@ -769,6 +834,7 @@ int iommufd_access_rw(struct iommufd_access *access, unsigned long iova,
 		rc = -ENOENT;
 err_out:
 	up_read(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
+	mutex_unlock(&access->ioas_lock);
 	return rc;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommufd_access_rw, IOMMUFD);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
index b38e67d1988b..3dcaf86aab97 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h
@@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ struct iommufd_access {
 	struct iommufd_object obj;
 	struct iommufd_ctx *ictx;
 	struct iommufd_ioas *ioas;
+	struct iommufd_ioas *ioas_unpin;
+	struct mutex ioas_lock;
 	const struct iommufd_access_ops *ops;
 	void *data;
 	unsigned long iova_alignment;
diff --git a/include/linux/iommufd.h b/include/linux/iommufd.h
index e49c16cd6831..d953d3305d62 100644
--- a/include/linux/iommufd.h
+++ b/include/linux/iommufd.h
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ iommufd_access_create(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
 		      const struct iommufd_access_ops *ops, void *data, u32 *id);
 void iommufd_access_destroy(struct iommufd_access *access);
 int iommufd_access_attach(struct iommufd_access *access, u32 ioas_id);
+void iommufd_access_detach(struct iommufd_access *access);
 
 struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd_access_to_ictx(struct iommufd_access *access);
 u32 iommufd_access_to_id(struct iommufd_access *access);
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 15/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] vfio: Name noiommu vfio_device with "noiommu-" prefix Yi Liu
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

this prepares for adding DETACH ioctl for emulated VFIO devices.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c  |  1 +
 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c   |  1 +
 drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c |  1 +
 drivers/vfio/iommufd.c            | 12 ++++++++++++
 include/linux/vfio.h              |  3 +++
 samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c        |  1 +
 samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c          |  1 +
 samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c          |  1 +
 8 files changed, 21 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index de675d799c7d..9cd9e9da60dd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -1474,6 +1474,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops intel_vgpu_dev_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static int intel_vgpu_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index 5b53b94f13c7..cba4971618ff 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -632,6 +632,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_ccw_dev_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_emulated_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 struct mdev_driver vfio_ccw_mdev_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index cfbcb864ab63..50d0293eeef3 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -1844,6 +1844,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_ap_matrix_dev_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_emulated_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static struct mdev_driver vfio_ap_matrix_driver = {
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
index e3953e1617a5..83575b65ea01 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
@@ -258,3 +258,15 @@ int vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas);
+
+void vfio_iommufd_emulated_detach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!vdev->iommufd_access) || !vdev->iommufd_attached)
+		return;
+
+	iommufd_access_detach(vdev->iommufd_access);
+	vdev->iommufd_attached = false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_emulated_detach_ioas);
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index f446f5901e46..26e4a73101eb 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev,
 			       struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
 void vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 int vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
+void vfio_iommufd_emulated_detach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 #else
 static inline struct iommufd_ctx *
 vfio_iommufd_physical_ictx(struct vfio_device *vdev)
@@ -158,6 +159,8 @@ vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 	((void (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev)) NULL)
 #define vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas \
 	((int (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)) NULL)
+#define vfio_iommufd_emulated_detach_ioas \
+	((void (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev)) NULL)
 #endif
 
 static inline bool vfio_device_cdev_opened(struct vfio_device *device)
diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
index c6c6b5d26670..3764d1911b51 100644
--- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
+++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
@@ -1377,6 +1377,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops mbochs_dev_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static struct mdev_driver mbochs_driver = {
diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c
index a62ea11e20ec..064e1c0a7aa8 100644
--- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c
+++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c
@@ -666,6 +666,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops mdpy_dev_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static struct mdev_driver mdpy_driver = {
diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
index a60801fb8660..5af00387c519 100644
--- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
+++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
@@ -1272,6 +1272,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops mtty_dev_ops = {
 	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind,
 	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind,
 	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_attach_ioas,
+	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_emulated_detach_ioas,
 };
 
 static struct mdev_driver mtty_driver = {
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 16/23] vfio: Name noiommu vfio_device with "noiommu-" prefix
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in unregister Yi Liu
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

For noiommu device, vfio core names the cdev node with prefix "noiommu-".

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 599d551fc4b5..89720b73fa30 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -284,13 +284,14 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
 	if (!device->dev_set)
 		vfio_assign_device_set(device, device);
 
-	ret = dev_set_name(&device->device, "vfio%d", device->index);
+	ret = vfio_device_set_group(device, type);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = vfio_device_set_group(device, type);
+	ret = dev_set_name(&device->device, "%svfio%d",
+			   vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) ? "noiommu-" : "", device->index);
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		goto err_out;
 
 	ret = device_add(&device->device);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 17/23] vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in unregister
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] vfio: Name noiommu vfio_device with "noiommu-" prefix Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device Yi Liu
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This can avoid endless vfio_device refcount increasement by userspace,
which would keep blocking the vfio_unregister_group_dev().

Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 89720b73fa30..541bfd9ce004 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -333,6 +333,12 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 	bool interrupted = false;
 	long rc;
 
+	/*
+	 * Prevent new device opened by userspace via the
+	 * VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD in the group path.
+	 */
+	vfio_device_group_unregister(device);
+
 	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
 	rc = try_wait_for_completion(&device->comp);
 	while (rc <= 0) {
@@ -356,8 +362,6 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 		}
 	}
 
-	vfio_device_group_unregister(device);
-
 	/* Balances device_add in register path */
 	device_del(&device->device);
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 18/23] vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in unregister Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD Yi Liu
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This allows user to directly open a vfio device w/o using the legacy
container/group interface, as a prerequisite for supporting new iommu
features like nested translation.

The device fd opened in this manner doesn't have the capability to access
the device as the fops open() doesn't open the device until the successful
BIND_IOMMUFD which be added in next patch.

With this patch, devices registered to vfio core have both group and device
interface created.

- group interface : /dev/vfio/$groupID
- device interface: /dev/vfio/devices/vfioX - normal device
		    /dev/vfio/devices/noiommu-vfioX - noiommu device
		    ("X" is the minor number and is unique across devices)

Given a vfio device the user can identify the matching vfioX by checking
the sysfs path of the device. Take PCI device (0000:6a:01.0) for example,
/sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:6a\:01.0/vfio-dev/vfio0/dev contains the
major:minor of the matching vfioX.

Userspace then opens the /dev/vfio/devices/vfioX and checks with fstat
that the major:minor matches.

The vfio_device cdev logic in this patch:
*) __vfio_register_dev() path ends up doing cdev_device_add() for each
   vfio_device if VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV configured.
*) vfio_unregister_group_dev() path does cdev_device_del();

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/Kconfig       | 11 +++++++
 drivers/vfio/Makefile      |  1 +
 drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h        | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   | 24 ++++++++++++---
 include/linux/vfio.h       |  4 +++
 6 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
index 89e06c981e43..e2105b4dac2d 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
@@ -12,6 +12,17 @@ menuconfig VFIO
 	  If you don't know what to do here, say N.
 
 if VFIO
+config VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV
+	bool "Support for the VFIO cdev /dev/vfio/devices/vfioX"
+	depends on IOMMUFD
+	help
+	  The VFIO device cdev is another way for userspace to get device
+	  access. Userspace gets device fd by opening device cdev under
+	  /dev/vfio/devices/vfioX, and then bind the device fd with an iommufd
+	  to set up secure DMA context for device access.
+
+	  If you don't know what to do here, say N.
+
 config VFIO_CONTAINER
 	bool "Support for the VFIO container /dev/vfio/vfio"
 	select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if MMU && (X86 || S390 || ARM || ARM64)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
index 70e7dcb302ef..245394aeb94b 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO) += vfio.o
 vfio-y += vfio_main.o \
 	  group.o \
 	  iova_bitmap.o
+vfio-$(CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV) += device_cdev.o
 vfio-$(CONFIG_IOMMUFD) += iommufd.o
 vfio-$(CONFIG_VFIO_CONTAINER) += container.o
 vfio-$(CONFIG_VFIO_VIRQFD) += virqfd.o
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1c640016a824
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Intel Corporation.
+ */
+#include <linux/vfio.h>
+
+#include "vfio.h"
+
+static dev_t device_devt;
+
+void vfio_init_device_cdev(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	device->device.devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(device_devt), device->index);
+	cdev_init(&device->cdev, &vfio_device_fops);
+	device->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+}
+
+/*
+ * device access via the fd opened by this function is blocked until
+ * .open_device() is called successfully during BIND_IOMMUFD.
+ */
+int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
+{
+	struct vfio_device *device = container_of(inode->i_cdev,
+						  struct vfio_device, cdev);
+	struct vfio_device_file *df;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!vfio_device_try_get_registration(device))
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	df = vfio_allocate_device_file(device);
+	if (IS_ERR(df)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(df);
+		goto err_put_registration;
+	}
+
+	filep->private_data = df;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_put_registration:
+	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
+{
+	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
+}
+
+int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
+{
+	device_class->devnode = vfio_device_devnode;
+	return alloc_chrdev_region(&device_devt, 0,
+				   MINORMASK + 1, "vfio-dev");
+}
+
+void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void)
+{
+	unregister_chrdev_region(device_devt, MINORMASK + 1);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 429166fe0e33..6861f8ebb64d 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -266,6 +266,52 @@ vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
 }
 #endif
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV)
+static inline int vfio_device_add(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	return cdev_device_add(&device->cdev, &device->device);
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_device_del(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	cdev_device_del(&device->cdev, &device->device);
+}
+
+void vfio_init_device_cdev(struct vfio_device *device);
+int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep);
+int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
+void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
+#else
+static inline int vfio_device_add(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	return device_add(&device->device);
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_device_del(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	device_del(&device->device);
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_init_device_cdev(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+}
+
+static inline int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode,
+					     struct file *filep)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void)
+{
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV */
+
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_VIRQFD)
 int __init vfio_virqfd_init(void);
 void vfio_virqfd_exit(void);
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 541bfd9ce004..c87cc7afe92c 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
 	device->device.release = vfio_device_release;
 	device->device.class = vfio.device_class;
 	device->device.parent = device->dev;
+	vfio_init_device_cdev(device);
 	return 0;
 
 out_uninit:
@@ -293,7 +294,7 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_out;
 
-	ret = device_add(&device->device);
+	ret = vfio_device_add(device);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_out;
 
@@ -339,6 +340,12 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 	 */
 	vfio_device_group_unregister(device);
 
+	/*
+	 * Balances vfio_device_add() in register path, also prevents
+	 * new device opened by userspace in the cdev path.
+	 */
+	vfio_device_del(device);
+
 	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
 	rc = try_wait_for_completion(&device->comp);
 	while (rc <= 0) {
@@ -362,9 +369,6 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Balances device_add in register path */
-	device_del(&device->device);
-
 	/* Balances vfio_device_set_group in register path */
 	vfio_device_remove_group(device);
 }
@@ -568,7 +572,8 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
 	struct vfio_device_file *df = filep->private_data;
 	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 
-	vfio_device_group_close(df);
+	if (df->group)
+		vfio_device_group_close(df);
 
 	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
 
@@ -1217,6 +1222,7 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_mmap(struct file *filep, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 
 const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops = {
 	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.open		= vfio_device_fops_cdev_open,
 	.release	= vfio_device_fops_release,
 	.read		= vfio_device_fops_read,
 	.write		= vfio_device_fops_write,
@@ -1568,9 +1574,16 @@ static int __init vfio_init(void)
 		goto err_dev_class;
 	}
 
+	ret = vfio_cdev_init(vfio.device_class);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_alloc_dev_chrdev;
+
 	pr_info(DRIVER_DESC " version: " DRIVER_VERSION "\n");
 	return 0;
 
+err_alloc_dev_chrdev:
+	class_destroy(vfio.device_class);
+	vfio.device_class = NULL;
 err_dev_class:
 	vfio_virqfd_exit();
 err_virqfd:
@@ -1581,6 +1594,7 @@ static int __init vfio_init(void)
 static void __exit vfio_cleanup(void)
 {
 	ida_destroy(&vfio.device_ida);
+	vfio_cdev_cleanup();
 	class_destroy(vfio.device_class);
 	vfio.device_class = NULL;
 	vfio_virqfd_exit();
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index 26e4a73101eb..873275419f13 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/poll.h>
+#include <linux/cdev.h>
 #include <uapi/linux/vfio.h>
 #include <linux/iova_bitmap.h>
 
@@ -51,6 +52,9 @@ struct vfio_device {
 	/* Members below here are private, not for driver use */
 	unsigned int index;
 	struct device device;	/* device.kref covers object life circle */
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV)
+	struct cdev cdev;
+#endif
 	refcount_t refcount;	/* user count on registered device*/
 	unsigned int open_count;
 	struct completion comp;
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-22 22:01   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT Yi Liu
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This adds ioctl for userspace to bind device cdev fd to iommufd.

    VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD: bind device to an iommufd, hence gain DMA
			      control provided by the iommufd. open_device
			      op is called after bind_iommufd op.

Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h        |  13 ++++
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |   5 ++
 include/linux/vfio.h       |   3 +-
 include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  |  28 ++++++++
 5 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
index 1c640016a824..291cc678a18b 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
  * Copyright (c) 2023 Intel Corporation.
  */
 #include <linux/vfio.h>
+#include <linux/iommufd.h>
 
 #include "vfio.h"
 
@@ -44,6 +45,135 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device_file *df)
+{
+	spin_lock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
+	if (df->kvm)
+		_vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df->device, df->kvm);
+	spin_unlock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
+}
+
+void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
+{
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
+
+	/*
+	 * In the time of close, there is no contention with another one
+	 * changing this flag.  So read df->access_granted without lock
+	 * and no smp_load_acquire() is ok.
+	 */
+	if (!df->access_granted)
+		return;
+
+	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+	vfio_device_close(df);
+	vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
+	iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
+	device->cdev_opened = false;
+	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+	vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
+}
+
+static struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(int fd)
+{
+	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd;
+	struct fd f;
+
+	f = fdget(fd);
+	if (!f.file)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
+
+	iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
+
+	fdput(f);
+	return iommufd;
+}
+
+long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
+				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg)
+{
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
+	struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind;
+	unsigned long minsz;
+	int ret;
+
+	static_assert(__same_type(arg->out_devid, df->devid));
+
+	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd, out_devid);
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&bind, arg, minsz))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (bind.argsz < minsz || bind.flags || bind.iommufd < 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* BIND_IOMMUFD only allowed for cdev fds */
+	if (df->group)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
+		return -EPERM;
+
+	ret = vfio_device_block_group(device);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+	/* one device cannot be bound twice */
+	if (df->access_granted) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
+	df->iommufd = vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(bind.iommufd);
+	if (IS_ERR(df->iommufd)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(df->iommufd);
+		df->iommufd = NULL;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Before the device open, get the KVM pointer currently
+	 * associated with the device file (if there is) and obtain
+	 * a reference.  This reference is held until device closed.
+	 * Save the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
+	 */
+	vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df);
+
+	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_put_kvm;
+
+	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->out_devid, &df->devid,
+			   sizeof(df->devid)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_close_device;
+
+	/*
+	 * Paired with smp_load_acquire() in vfio_device_fops::ioctl/
+	 * read/write/mmap
+	 */
+	smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true);
+	device->cdev_opened = true;
+	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
+	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
+		dev_warn(device->dev, "noiommu device is bound to iommufd by user "
+			 "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
+	return 0;
+
+out_close_device:
+	vfio_device_close(df);
+out_put_kvm:
+	vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
+	iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
+	df->iommufd = NULL;
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+	vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
 {
 	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 6861f8ebb64d..8b359a7794be 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ static inline void vfio_device_del(struct vfio_device *device)
 
 void vfio_init_device_cdev(struct vfio_device *device);
 int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep);
+void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
+long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
+				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg);
 int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
 void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
 #else
@@ -302,6 +305,16 @@ static inline int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
+{
+}
+
+static inline long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
+						  struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg)
+{
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
 static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index c87cc7afe92c..c9fa39ac4b02 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -574,6 +574,8 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
 
 	if (df->group)
 		vfio_device_group_close(df);
+	else
+		vfio_device_cdev_close(df);
 
 	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
 
@@ -1147,6 +1149,9 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
 	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (cmd == VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD)
+		return vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(df, (void __user *)arg);
+
 	/* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_device_open() */
 	if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted))
 		return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index 873275419f13..cf9d082a623c 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
 	struct iommufd_device *iommufd_device;
 	bool iommufd_attached;
 #endif
+	bool cdev_opened:1;
 };
 
 /**
@@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 
 static inline bool vfio_device_cdev_opened(struct vfio_device *device)
 {
-	return false;
+	return device->cdev_opened;
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
index 24858b650562..07c917de31e9 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
@@ -194,6 +194,34 @@ struct vfio_group_status {
 
 /* --------------- IOCTLs for DEVICE file descriptors --------------- */
 
+/*
+ * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19,
+ *				   struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd)
+ *
+ * Bind a vfio_device to the specified iommufd.
+ *
+ * User is restricted from accessing the device before the binding operation
+ * is completed.
+ *
+ * Unbind is automatically conducted when device fd is closed.
+ *
+ * @argsz:	 User filled size of this data.
+ * @flags:	 Must be 0.
+ * @iommufd:	 iommufd to bind.
+ * @out_devid:	 The device id generated by this bind. devid is a handle for
+ *		 this device/iommufd bond and can be used in IOMMUFD commands.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
+ */
+struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd {
+	__u32		argsz;
+	__u32		flags;
+	__s32		iommufd;
+	__u32		out_devid;
+};
+
+#define VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD	_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
+
 /**
  * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 7,
  *						struct vfio_device_info)
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-22 22:15   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev() Yi Liu
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This adds ioctl for userspace to attach device cdev fd to and detach
from IOAS/hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.

    VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT: attach vfio device to IOAS, hw_pagetable
				   managed by iommufd. Attach can be
				   undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT
				   or device fd close.
    VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT: detach vfio device from the current attached
				   IOAS or hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.

Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/vfio/iommufd.c     | 18 +++++++++++
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h        | 18 +++++++++++
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |  8 +++++
 include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 162 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
index 291cc678a18b..3f14edb80a93 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
@@ -174,6 +174,72 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
+			     struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
+{
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
+	struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt attach;
+	unsigned long minsz;
+	int ret;
+
+	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt, pt_id);
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&attach, arg, minsz))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (attach.argsz < minsz || attach.flags)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* ATTACH only allowed for cdev fds */
+	if (df->group)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+	ret = vfio_iommufd_attach(device, &attach.pt_id);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_unlock;
+
+	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->pt_id, &attach.pt_id,
+			   sizeof(attach.pt_id)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_detach;
+	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
+	return 0;
+
+out_detach:
+	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
+			     struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
+{
+	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
+	struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt detach;
+	unsigned long minsz;
+
+	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt, flags);
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&detach, arg, minsz))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (detach.argsz < minsz || detach.flags)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* DETACH only allowed for cdev fds */
+	if (df->group)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
+	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
 {
 	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
index 83575b65ea01..799ea322a7d4 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
@@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 		vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
 }
 
+int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
+
+	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
+		return 0;
+
+	return vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, pt_id);
+}
+
+void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
+
+	if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
+		vdev->ops->detach_ioas(vdev);
+}
+
 struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_iommufd_physical_ictx(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 {
 	if (vdev->iommufd_device)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 8b359a7794be..50553f67600f 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
 void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
 int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
 				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
+int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
+void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev);
 #else
 static inline int
 vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
@@ -282,6 +284,10 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep);
 void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
 long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
 				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg);
+int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
+			     struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg);
+int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
+			     struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg);
 int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
 void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
 #else
@@ -315,6 +321,18 @@ static inline long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 }
 
+static inline int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
+					   struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
+{
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static inline int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
+					   struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
+{
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
 static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
 {
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index c9fa39ac4b02..8c3f26b4929b 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -1165,6 +1165,14 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
 		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_feature(device, (void __user *)arg);
 		break;
 
+	case VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT:
+		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_attach(df, (void __user *)arg);
+		break;
+
+	case VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT:
+		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_detach(df, (void __user *)arg);
+		break;
+
 	default:
 		if (unlikely(!device->ops->ioctl))
 			ret = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
index 07c917de31e9..770f5f949929 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
@@ -222,6 +222,58 @@ struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd {
 
 #define VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD	_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
 
+/*
+ * VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 20,
+ *					struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt)
+ *
+ * Attach a vfio device to an iommufd address space specified by IOAS
+ * id or hw_pagetable (hwpt) id.
+ *
+ * Available only after a device has been bound to iommufd via
+ * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
+ *
+ * Undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT or device fd close.
+ *
+ * @argsz:	User filled size of this data.
+ * @flags:	Must be 0.
+ * @pt_id:	Input the target id which can represent an ioas or a hwpt
+ *		allocated via iommufd subsystem.
+ *		Output the input ioas id or the attached hwpt id which could
+ *		be the specified hwpt itself or a hwpt automatically created
+ *		for the specified ioas by kernel during the attachment.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
+ */
+struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt {
+	__u32	argsz;
+	__u32	flags;
+	__u32	pt_id;
+};
+
+#define VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT		_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 20)
+
+/*
+ * VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 21,
+ *					struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt)
+ *
+ * Detach a vfio device from the iommufd address space it has been
+ * attached to. After it, device should be in a blocking DMA state.
+ *
+ * Available only after a device has been bound to iommufd via
+ * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD.
+ *
+ * @argsz:	User filled size of this data.
+ * @flags:	Must be 0.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
+ */
+struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt {
+	__u32	argsz;
+	__u32	flags;
+};
+
+#define VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT		_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 21)
+
 /**
  * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 7,
  *						struct vfio_device_info)
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 21/23] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev()
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (19 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-22 23:04   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally Yi Liu
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This is to make the cdev path and group path consistent for the noiommu
devices registration. If vfio_noiommu is disabled, such registration
should fail. However, this check is vfio_device_set_group() which is part
of the vfio_group code. If the vfio_group code is compiled out, noiommu
devices would be registered even vfio_noiommu is disabled.

This adds vfio_device_set_noiommu() which can fail and calls it in the
device registration. For now, it never fails as long as
vfio_device_set_group() is successful. But when the vfio_group code is
compiled out, vfio_device_set_noiommu() would fail the noiommu devices
when vfio_noiommu is disabled.

As noiommu devices is checked and there are multiple places which needs
to test noiommu devices, this also adds a flag to mark noiommu devices.
Hence the callers of vfio_device_is_noiommu() can be converted to test
vfio_device->noiommu.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c |  4 ++--
 drivers/vfio/group.c       |  2 +-
 drivers/vfio/iommufd.c     | 10 +++++-----
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h        |  7 ++++---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |  6 +++++-
 include/linux/vfio.h       |  1 +
 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
index 3f14edb80a93..6d7f50ee535d 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
 	if (df->group)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
+	if (device->noiommu && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	ret = vfio_device_block_group(device);
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
 	device->cdev_opened = true;
 	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
 
-	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
+	if (device->noiommu)
 		dev_warn(device->dev, "noiommu device is bound to iommufd by user "
 			 "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index 7aacbd9d08c9..bf4335bce892 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 		vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(device);
 
 	df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd;
-	if (df->iommufd && vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && device->open_count == 0) {
+	if (df->iommufd && device->noiommu && device->open_count == 0) {
 		ret = vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(device,
 							df->iommufd);
 		if (ret)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
index 799ea322a7d4..dfe706f1e952 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
 
-	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
+	if (vdev->noiommu)
 		return vfio_iommufd_noiommu_bind(vdev, ictx, &df->devid);
 
 	return vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &df->devid);
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev,
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
 
 	/* compat noiommu does not need to do ioas attach */
-	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
+	if (vdev->noiommu)
 		return 0;
 
 	ret = iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id);
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
 
-	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev)) {
+	if (vdev->noiommu) {
 		vfio_iommufd_noiommu_unbind(vdev);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
 
-	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
+	if (vdev->noiommu)
 		return 0;
 
 	return vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, pt_id);
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
 
-	if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
+	if (!vdev->noiommu)
 		vdev->ops->detach_ioas(vdev);
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 50553f67600f..c8579d63b2b9 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -106,10 +106,11 @@ bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device);
 int __init vfio_group_init(void);
 void vfio_group_cleanup(void);
 
-static inline bool vfio_device_is_noiommu(struct vfio_device *vdev)
+static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
 {
-	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
-	       vdev->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
+	device->noiommu = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
+			  device->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_CONTAINER)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 8c3f26b4929b..8979f320d620 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -289,8 +289,12 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = vfio_device_set_noiommu(device);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_out;
+
 	ret = dev_set_name(&device->device, "%svfio%d",
-			   vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) ? "noiommu-" : "", device->index);
+			   device->noiommu ? "noiommu-" : "", device->index);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_out;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index cf9d082a623c..fa13889e763f 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
 	bool iommufd_attached;
 #endif
 	bool cdev_opened:1;
+	bool noiommu:1;
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 22/23] vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (20 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev() Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description Yi Liu
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

vfio_group is not needed for vfio device cdev, so with vfio device cdev
introduced, the vfio_group infrastructures can be compiled out if only
cdev is needed.

Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/Kconfig    |   4 +-
 drivers/vfio/Kconfig             |  14 +++++
 drivers/vfio/Makefile            |   2 +-
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c |  16 +++--
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h              | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/vfio.h             |  25 +++++++-
 6 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/Kconfig
index ada693ea51a7..99d4b075df49 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/Kconfig
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ config IOMMUFD
 if IOMMUFD
 config IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER
 	bool "IOMMUFD provides the VFIO container /dev/vfio/vfio"
-	depends on VFIO && !VFIO_CONTAINER
-	default VFIO && !VFIO_CONTAINER
+	depends on VFIO_GROUP && !VFIO_CONTAINER
+	default VFIO_GROUP && !VFIO_CONTAINER
 	help
 	  IOMMUFD will provide /dev/vfio/vfio instead of VFIO. This relies on
 	  IOMMUFD providing compatibility emulation to give the same ioctls.
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
index e2105b4dac2d..62c58830a8d5 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ menuconfig VFIO
 	select IOMMU_API
 	depends on IOMMUFD || !IOMMUFD
 	select INTERVAL_TREE
+	select VFIO_GROUP if SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU || IOMMUFD=n
+	select VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV if !VFIO_GROUP
 	select VFIO_CONTAINER if IOMMUFD=n
 	help
 	  VFIO provides a framework for secure userspace device drivers.
@@ -15,6 +17,7 @@ if VFIO
 config VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV
 	bool "Support for the VFIO cdev /dev/vfio/devices/vfioX"
 	depends on IOMMUFD
+	default !VFIO_GROUP
 	help
 	  The VFIO device cdev is another way for userspace to get device
 	  access. Userspace gets device fd by opening device cdev under
@@ -23,9 +26,20 @@ config VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV
 
 	  If you don't know what to do here, say N.
 
+config VFIO_GROUP
+	bool "Support for the VFIO group /dev/vfio/$group_id"
+	default y
+	help
+	   VFIO group support provides the traditional model for accessing
+	   devices through VFIO and is used by the majority of userspace
+	   applications and drivers making use of VFIO.
+
+	   If you don't know what to do here, say Y.
+
 config VFIO_CONTAINER
 	bool "Support for the VFIO container /dev/vfio/vfio"
 	select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if MMU && (X86 || S390 || ARM || ARM64)
+	depends on VFIO_GROUP
 	default y
 	help
 	  The VFIO container is the classic interface to VFIO for establishing
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
index 245394aeb94b..57c3515af606 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO) += vfio.o
 
 vfio-y += vfio_main.o \
-	  group.o \
 	  iova_bitmap.o
 vfio-$(CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV) += device_cdev.o
+vfio-$(CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP) += group.o
 vfio-$(CONFIG_IOMMUFD) += iommufd.o
 vfio-$(CONFIG_VFIO_CONTAINER) += container.o
 vfio-$(CONFIG_VFIO_VIRQFD) += virqfd.o
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
index 7fa3f54eb855..94d1f690d721 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
@@ -796,8 +796,12 @@ static int vfio_pci_fill_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
 		return -EAGAIN; /* Something changed, try again */
 
 	iommu_group = iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
-	if (!iommu_group)
-		return -EPERM; /* Cannot reset non-isolated devices */
+	/*
+	 * With CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP enabled, device should always have
+	 * iommu_group.
+	 */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP) && !iommu_group)
+		return -EPERM;
 
 	if (fill->devid) {
 		struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_ictx(fill->vdev);
@@ -821,20 +825,24 @@ static int vfio_pci_fill_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
 			if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
 				return ret;
 			fill->devices[fill->cur].devid = ret;
-		} else if (vdev && iommufd_ctx_has_group(iommufd, iommu_group)) {
+		} else if (vdev && iommu_group &&
+			   iommufd_ctx_has_group(iommufd, iommu_group)) {
 			fill->devices[fill->cur].devid = VFIO_PCI_DEVID_OWNED;
 		} else {
 			fill->devices[fill->cur].devid = VFIO_PCI_DEVID_NOT_OWNED;
 			fill->dev_owned = false;
 		}
 	} else {
+		if (WARN_ON(!iommu_group))
+			return -EINVAL;
 		fill->devices[fill->cur].group_id = iommu_group_id(iommu_group);
 	}
 	fill->devices[fill->cur].segment = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
 	fill->devices[fill->cur].bus = pdev->bus->number;
 	fill->devices[fill->cur].devfn = pdev->devfn;
 	fill->cur++;
-	iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
+	if (iommu_group)
+		iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index c8579d63b2b9..cbc65bfdd13f 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device);
 
 extern const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
+extern bool vfio_noiommu __read_mostly;
+#else
+enum { vfio_noiommu = false };
+#endif
+
 enum vfio_group_type {
 	/*
 	 * Physical device with IOMMU backing.
@@ -60,6 +66,7 @@ enum vfio_group_type {
 	VFIO_NO_IOMMU,
 };
 
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP)
 struct vfio_group {
 	struct device 			dev;
 	struct cdev			cdev;
@@ -112,6 +119,94 @@ static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
 			  device->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
 	return 0;
 }
+#else
+struct vfio_group;
+
+static inline int vfio_device_block_group(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_device_unblock_group(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+}
+
+static inline int vfio_device_set_group(struct vfio_device *device,
+					enum vfio_group_type type)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_device_remove_group(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_device_group_register(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+}
+
+static inline int vfio_device_group_use_iommu(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
+{
+}
+
+static inline struct vfio_group *vfio_group_from_file(struct file *file)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline bool vfio_group_enforced_coherent(struct vfio_group *group)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_group_set_kvm(struct vfio_group *group, struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+}
+
+static inline bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
+static inline int __init vfio_group_init(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void vfio_group_cleanup(void)
+{
+}
+
+static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
+
+	iommu_group = iommu_group_get(device->dev);
+	if (!iommu_group) {
+		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) || !vfio_noiommu)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		device->noiommu = true;
+	} else {
+		iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
+		device->noiommu = false;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP */
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_CONTAINER)
 /**
@@ -357,12 +452,6 @@ static inline void vfio_virqfd_exit(void)
 }
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
-extern bool vfio_noiommu __read_mostly;
-#else
-enum { vfio_noiommu = false };
-#endif
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
 void _vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device, struct kvm *kvm);
 void vfio_device_put_kvm(struct vfio_device *device);
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index fa13889e763f..c9e05acc20d2 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -43,7 +43,11 @@ struct vfio_device {
 	 */
 	const struct vfio_migration_ops *mig_ops;
 	const struct vfio_log_ops *log_ops;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP)
 	struct vfio_group *group;
+	struct list_head group_next;
+	struct list_head iommu_entry;
+#endif
 	struct vfio_device_set *dev_set;
 	struct list_head dev_set_list;
 	unsigned int migration_flags;
@@ -58,8 +62,6 @@ struct vfio_device {
 	refcount_t refcount;	/* user count on registered device*/
 	unsigned int open_count;
 	struct completion comp;
-	struct list_head group_next;
-	struct list_head iommu_entry;
 	struct iommufd_access *iommufd_access;
 	struct iommufd_access *noiommu_access;
 	void (*put_kvm)(struct kvm *kvm);
@@ -286,12 +288,29 @@ int vfio_mig_get_next_state(struct vfio_device *device,
 /*
  * External user API
  */
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP)
 struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file);
 bool vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file);
+bool vfio_file_has_dev(struct file *file, struct vfio_device *device);
+#else
+static inline struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline bool vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
+static inline bool vfio_file_has_dev(struct file *file, struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+#endif
 bool vfio_file_is_valid(struct file *file);
 bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file);
 void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm);
-bool vfio_file_has_dev(struct file *file, struct vfio_device *device);
 
 #define VFIO_PIN_PAGES_MAX_ENTRIES	(PAGE_SIZE/sizeof(unsigned long))
 
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v11 23/23] docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (21 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-13 13:28 ` Yi Liu
  2023-05-18  5:39 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Xu, Terrence
  2023-05-23  7:42 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2023-05-13 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alex.williamson, jgg, kevin.tian
  Cc: joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
	chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

This gives notes for userspace applications on device cdev usage.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
index 363e12c90b87..4f21be7bda8a 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
@@ -239,6 +239,130 @@ group and can access them as follows::
 	/* Gratuitous device reset and go... */
 	ioctl(device, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET);
 
+IOMMUFD and vfio_iommu_type1
+----------------------------
+
+IOMMUFD is the new user API to manage I/O page tables from userspace.
+It intends to be the portal of delivering advanced userspace DMA
+features (nested translation [5], PASID [6], etc.) while also providing
+a backwards compatibility interface for existing VFIO_TYPE1v2_IOMMU use
+cases.  Eventually the vfio_iommu_type1 driver, as well as the legacy
+vfio container and group model is intended to be deprecated.
+
+The IOMMUFD backwards compatibility interface can be enabled two ways.
+In the first method, the kernel can be configured with
+CONFIG_IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER, in which case the IOMMUFD subsystem
+transparently provides the entire infrastructure for the VFIO
+container and IOMMU backend interfaces.  The compatibility mode can
+also be accessed if the VFIO container interface, ie. /dev/vfio/vfio is
+simply symlink'd to /dev/iommu.  Note that at the time of writing, the
+compatibility mode is not entirely feature complete relative to
+VFIO_TYPE1v2_IOMMU (ex. DMA mapping MMIO) and does not attempt to
+provide compatibility to the VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU interface.  Therefore
+it is not generally advisable at this time to switch from native VFIO
+implementations to the IOMMUFD compatibility interfaces.
+
+Long term, VFIO users should migrate to device access through the cdev
+interface described below, and native access through the IOMMUFD
+provided interfaces.
+
+VFIO Device cdev
+----------------
+
+Traditionally user acquires a device fd via VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD
+in a VFIO group.
+
+With CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV=y the user can now acquire a device fd
+by directly opening a character device /dev/vfio/devices/vfioX where
+"X" is the number allocated uniquely by VFIO for registered devices.
+For noiommu devices, the character device would be named with "noiommu-"
+prefix. e.g. /dev/vfio/devices/noiommu-vfioX.
+
+The cdev only works with IOMMUFD.  Both VFIO drivers and applications
+must adapt to the new cdev security model which requires using
+VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD to claim DMA ownership before starting to
+actually use the device.  Once BIND succeeds then a VFIO device can
+be fully accessed by the user.
+
+VFIO device cdev doesn't rely on VFIO group/container/iommu drivers.
+Hence those modules can be fully compiled out in an environment
+where no legacy VFIO application exists.
+
+So far SPAPR does not support IOMMUFD yet.  So it cannot support device
+cdev neither.
+
+Device cdev Example
+-------------------
+
+Assume user wants to access PCI device 0000:6a:01.0::
+
+	$ ls /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:6a:01.0/vfio-dev/
+	vfio0
+
+This device is therefore represented as vfio0.  The user can verify
+its existence::
+
+	$ ls -l /dev/vfio/devices/vfio0
+	crw------- 1 root root 511, 0 Feb 16 01:22 /dev/vfio/devices/vfio0
+	$ cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:6a:01.0/vfio-dev/vfio0/dev
+	511:0
+	$ ls -l /dev/char/511\:0
+	lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Feb 16 01:22 /dev/char/511:0 -> ../vfio/devices/vfio0
+
+Then provide the user with access to the device if unprivileged
+operation is desired::
+
+	$ chown user:user /dev/vfio/devices/vfio0
+
+Finally the user could get cdev fd by::
+
+	cdev_fd = open("/dev/vfio/devices/vfio0", O_RDWR);
+
+An opened cdev_fd doesn't give the user any permission of accessing
+the device except binding the cdev_fd to an iommufd.  After that point
+then the device is fully accessible including attaching it to an
+IOMMUFD IOAS/HWPT to enable userspace DMA::
+
+	struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind = {
+		.argsz = sizeof(bind),
+		.flags = 0,
+	};
+	struct iommu_ioas_alloc alloc_data  = {
+		.size = sizeof(alloc_data),
+		.flags = 0,
+	};
+	struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt attach_data = {
+		.argsz = sizeof(attach_data),
+		.flags = 0,
+	};
+	struct iommu_ioas_map map = {
+		.size = sizeof(map),
+		.flags = IOMMU_IOAS_MAP_READABLE |
+			 IOMMU_IOAS_MAP_WRITEABLE |
+			 IOMMU_IOAS_MAP_FIXED_IOVA,
+		.__reserved = 0,
+	};
+
+	iommufd = open("/dev/iommu", O_RDWR);
+
+	bind.iommufd = iommufd; // negative value means vfio-noiommu mode
+	ioctl(cdev_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD, &bind);
+
+	ioctl(iommufd, IOMMU_IOAS_ALLOC, &alloc_data);
+	attach_data.pt_id = alloc_data.out_ioas_id;
+	ioctl(cdev_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT, &attach_data);
+
+	/* Allocate some space and setup a DMA mapping */
+	map.user_va = (int64_t)mmap(0, 1024 * 1024, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
+				    MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, 0, 0);
+	map.iova = 0; /* 1MB starting at 0x0 from device view */
+	map.length = 1024 * 1024;
+	map.ioas_id = alloc_data.out_ioas_id;;
+
+	ioctl(iommufd, IOMMU_IOAS_MAP, &map);
+
+	/* Other device operations as stated in "VFIO Usage Example" */
+
 VFIO User API
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
@@ -566,3 +690,11 @@ This implementation has some specifics:
 				\-0d.1
 
 	00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev 90)
+
+.. [5] Nested translation is an IOMMU feature which supports two stage
+   address translations.  This improves the address translation efficiency
+   in IOMMU virtualization.
+
+.. [6] PASID stands for Process Address Space ID, introduced by PCI
+   Express.  It is a prerequisite for Shared Virtual Addressing (SVA)
+   and Scalable I/O Virtualization (Scalable IOV).
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (22 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-18  5:39 ` Xu, Terrence
  2023-05-23  7:42 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Xu, Terrence @ 2023-05-18  5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Yi L, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
	Tian, Kevin
  Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
	yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com, peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Jiang, Yanting, Duan, Zhenzhong,
	clegoate@redhat.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support
> 
> Existing VFIO provides group-centric user APIs for userspace. Userspace
> opens the /dev/vfio/$group_id first before getting device fd and hence
> getting access to device. This is not the desired model for iommufd. Per the
> conclusion of community discussion[1], iommufd provides device-centric
> kAPIs and requires its consumer (like VFIO) to be device-centric user APIs.
> Such user APIs are used to associate device with iommufd and also the I/O
> address spaces managed by the iommufd.
> 
> This series first introduces a per device file structure to be prepared for
> further enhancement and refactors the kvm-vfio code to be prepared for
> accepting device file from userspace. After this, adds a mechanism for
> blocking device access before iommufd bind. Then refactors the vfio to be
> able to handle cdev path (e.g. iommufd binding, no-iommufd, [de]attach
> ioas).
> This refactor includes making the device_open exclusive between the group
> and the cdev path, only allow single device open in cdev path; vfio-iommufd
> code is also refactored to support cdev. e.g. split the vfio_iommufd_bind()
> into two steps. Eventually, adds the cdev support for vfio device and the new
> ioctls, then makes group infrastructure optional as it is not needed when vfio
> device cdev is compiled.
> 
> This series is based on some preparation works done to vfio emulated
> devices[2] and vfio pci hot reset enhancements[3].
> 
> This series is a prerequisite for iommu nesting for vfio device[4] [5].
> 
> The complete code can be found in below branch, simple tests done to the
> legacy group path and the cdev path. Draft QEMU branch can be found at[6]
> However, the noiommu mode test is only done with some hacks in kernel
> and qemu to check if qemu can boot with noiommu devices.
> 
> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/tree/vfio_device_cdev_v11
> (config CONFIG_IOMMUFD=y CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV=y)
> 
> base-commit: b8b967d5ec691bddb883ab2abbfb8d632c97052e
> 
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/BN9PR11MB5433B1E4AE5B0480369F97178C189
> @BN9PR11MB5433.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230327093351.44505-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/ -
> merged [3] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230513132136.15021-1-
> yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20230511143844.22693-1-
> yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20230511145110.27707-1-
> yi.l.liu@intel.com/#t
> [6]
> https://github.com/yiliu1765/qemu/tree/iommufd_rfcv4.mig.reset.v4_var3
> 
> Change log:
> 
> v11:
>  - Add back the noiommu determination at vfio device registration patch and
>    put it prior to compiling vfio_group code optionally as compiling vfio_group
>    optionaly is the major reason for it.
>  - Fix a typo related to SPAPR (Cédric Le Goater)
>  - Add t-b from Shameerali Kolothum Thodi, tested on HiSilicon D06(ARM64)
> platform
>    with a NIC pass-through
> 
> v10: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230426150321.454465-1-
> yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>  - Drop patch 03 of v9 as vfio_file_is_group() is still needed by pci hot reset
> path
>  - Drop 11 of v9 per the change of noiommu support
>  - Move patch 18 of v9 to hot-reset series [3]
>  - vfio_file_has_device_access() is dropped as no usage now (hot-reset does
> not accept
>    device fd, hence no need for this helper)
>  - Minor change to patch 02, mainly make it back to patch v2 of v6 which is
> before
>    splitting hot-reset series
>  - Minor change in 10 and 11 due to rebase
>  - Functional changes in patch 19, 20 and 21 per the latest noiommu support
>    policy. noiommu device can be bound to valid iommufd now, this is
> different
>    from the prior policy in which noiommu device is not allowed to be bound
> to
>    valid iommufd. So may pay more attention on the three patches, previous
> r-b
>    and t-b are dropped for these three patches.
> 
> v9: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230401151833.124749-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>  - Use smp_load_acquire() in vfio_file_has_device_access() for df-
> >access_granted (Alex)
>  - Fix lock init in patch 16 of v8 (Jon Pan-Doh)
>  - Split patch 20 of v8 (Alex)
>  - Refine noiommu logic in BIND_IOMMUFD (Alex)
>  - Remove dev_cookie in BIND_IOMMUFD ioctl (Alex, Jason)
>  - Remove static_assert in ATTACH/DETACH ioctl handling (Alex)
>  - Remove device->ops->bind_iommufd presence check in
> BIND_IOMMUFD/ATTACH/DETACH handling (Alex)
>  - Remove VFIO dependecny for VFIO_CONTAINER as VFIO_GROUP should
> imply it (Alex)
>  - Improve the documentation per suggestions from Alex on patch 24 of v8
> (Alex)
>  - Remove WARN_ON(df->group) in vfio_device_group_uses_container() of
> patch 11
>  - Add r-b from Kevin to patch 18/19 of v8
>  - Add r-b from Jason to patch 03/10/11 of v8
>  - Add t-b from Yanting Jiang and Nicolin Chen
> 
> v8: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230327094047.47215-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>  - Add patch 18 to determine noiommu device at vfio_device registration
> (Jason)
>  - Add patch 19 to name noiommu device with "noiommu-" prefix to be par
> with
>    group path
>  - Add r-b from Kevin
>  - Add t-b from Terrence
> 
> v7: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230316125534.17216-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>  - Split the vfio-pci hot reset changes to be separate patch series (Jason,
> Kevin)
>  - More polish on no-iommufd support (patch 11 - 13) in cdev path (Kevin)
>  - iommufd_access_detach() in patch 16 is added by Nic for emulated devices
> (Kevin, Jason)
> 
> v6: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230308132903.465159-1-
> yi.l.liu@intel.com/#t
>  - Add r-b from Jason on patch 01 - 08 and 13 in v5
>  - Based on the prerequisite mini-series which makes vfio emulated devices
>    be prepared to cdev (Jason)
>  - Add the approach to pass a set of device fds to do hot reset ownership
>    check, while the zero-length array approach is also kept. (Jason, Kevin, Alex)
>  - Drop patch 10 of v5, it is reworked by patch 13 and 17 in v6 (Jason)
>  - Store vfio_group pointer in vfio_device_file to check if user is using
>    legacy vfio container (Jason)
>  - Drop the is_cdev_device flag (introduced in patch 14 of v5) as the group
>    pointer stored in vfio_device_file can cover it.
>  - Add iommu_group check in the cdev no-iommu path patch 24 (Kevin)
>  - Add t-b from Terrence, Nicolin and Matthew (thanks for the help, some
> patches
>    are new in this version, so I just added t-b to the patches that are also
>    in v5 and no big change, for others would add in this version).
> 
> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230227111135.61728-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>  - Add r-b from Kevin on patch 08, 13, 14, 15 and 17.
>  - Rename patch 02 to limit the change for KVM facing kAPIs. The vfio pci
>    hot reset path only accepts group file until patch 09. (Kevin)
>  - Update comment around smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted) (Yan)
>  - Adopt Jason's suggestion on the vfio pci hot reset path, passing zero-length
>    fd array to indicate using bound iommufd_ctx as ownership check. (Jason,
> Kevin)
>  - Direct read df->access_granted value in vfio_device_cdev_close() (Kevin,
> Yan, Jason)
>  - Wrap the iommufd get/put into a helper to refine the error path of
>    vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(). (Yan)
> 
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230221034812.138051-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>  - Add r-b from Kevin on patch 09/10
>  - Add a line in devices/vfio.rst to emphasize user should add group/device to
>    KVM prior to invoke open_device op which may be called in the
> VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD
>    or VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD ioctl.
>  - Modify VFIO_GROUP/VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV Kconfig dependency (Alex)
>  - Select VFIO_GROUP for SPAPR (Jason)
>  - Check device fully-opened in PCI hotreset path for device fd (Jason)
>  - Set df->access_granted in the caller of vfio_device_open() since
>    the caller may fail in other operations, but df->access_granted
>    does not allow a true to false change. So it should be set only when
>    the open path is really done successfully. (Yan, Kevin)
>  - Fix missing iommufd_ctx_put() in the cdev path (Yan)
>  - Fix an issue found in testing exclusion between group and cdev path.
>    vfio_device_cdev_close() should check df->access_granted before heading
>    to other operations.
>  - Update vfio.rst for iommufd/cdev
> 
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230213151348.56451-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>  - Add r-b from Kevin on patch 03, 06, 07, 08.
>  - Refine the group and cdev path exclusion. Remove
> vfio_device:single_open;
>    add vfio_group::cdev_device_open_cnt to achieve exlucsion between
> group
>    path and cdev path (Kevin, Jason)
>  - Fix a bug in the error handling path (Yan Zhao)
>  - Address misc remarks from Kevin
> 
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230206090532.95598-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>  - Add r-b from Kevin and Eric on patch 01 02 04.
>  - "Split kvm/vfio: Provide struct kvm_device_ops::release() insted
> of ::destroy()"
>    from this series and got applied. (Alex, Kevin, Jason, Mathhew)
>  - Add kvm_ref_lock to protect vfio_device_file->kvm instead of reusing
>    dev_set->lock as dead-lock is observed with vfio-ap which would try to
>    acquire kvm_lock. This is opposite lock order with kvm_device_release()
>    which holds kvm_lock first and then hold dev_set->lock. (Kevin)
>  - Use a separate ioctl for detaching IOAS. (Alex)
>  - Rename vfio_device_file::single_open to be is_cdev_device (Kevin, Alex)
>  - Move the vfio device cdev code into device_cdev.c and add a
> VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV
>    kconfig for it. (Kevin, Jason)
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230117134942.101112-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>  - Fix the circular refcount between kvm struct and device file reference.
> (JasonG)
>  - Address comments from KevinT
>  - Remained the ioctl for detach, needs to Alex's taste
> 
> (https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/BN9PR11MB5276BE9F4B0613EE859317028CFF9
> @BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/)
> 
> rfc: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221219084718.9342-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> 
> Thanks,
> 	Yi Liu
> 
> Nicolin Chen (1):
>   iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API
> 
> Yi Liu (22):
>   vfio: Allocate per device file structure
>   vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM
>   vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI
>   kvm/vfio: Rename kvm_vfio_group to prepare for accepting vfio device
>     fd
>   kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace
>   vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close()
>   vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened
>   vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group
>   vfio: Make vfio_device_open() single open for device cdev path
>   vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind()
>   vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps
>   vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file
>   vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices
>   vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices
>   vfio: Name noiommu vfio_device with "noiommu-" prefix
>   vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in
>     unregister
>   vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device
>   vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
>   vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
>   vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev()
>   vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally
>   docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description
> 
>  Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst             | 140 +++++++++-
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vfio.rst       |  47 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c              |   1 +
>  drivers/iommu/iommufd/Kconfig                 |   4 +-
>  drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c                |  76 +++++-
>  drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h       |   2 +
>  drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c               |   1 +
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c             |   1 +
>  drivers/vfio/Kconfig                          |  25 ++
>  drivers/vfio/Makefile                         |   3 +-
>  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c                    | 258 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c             |   1 +
>  drivers/vfio/group.c                          | 150 ++++++----
>  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c                        | 125 ++++++---
>  .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c    |   2 +
>  drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c                  |   1 +
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                   |   1 +
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c              |  16 +-
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c             |   1 +
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c         |   1 +
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h                           | 238 ++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c                      | 225 +++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/iommufd.h                       |   1 +
>  include/linux/vfio.h                          |  45 ++-
>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                      |  13 +-
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h                     |  80 ++++++
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c                    |   1 +
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c                      |   1 +
>  samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c                      |   1 +
>  virt/kvm/vfio.c                               | 137 +++++-----
>  30 files changed, 1365 insertions(+), 233 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
> drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> 
> --
> 2.34.1

Tested GVT-g / GVT-d VFIO legacy mode / compat mode / cdev mode, including negative tests. No regression be introduced.  

Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 03/23] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-22 19:42   ` Alex Williamson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-22 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yi Liu
  Cc: jgg, kevin.tian, joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc,
	kvm, mjrosato, chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:07 -0700
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> This makes the vfio file kAPIs to accept vfio device files, also a
> preparation for vfio device cdev support.
> 
> For the kvm set with vfio device file, kvm pointer is stored in struct
> vfio_device_file, and use kvm_ref_lock to protect kvm set and kvm
> pointer usage within VFIO. This kvm pointer will be set to vfio_device
> after device file is bound to iommufd in the cdev path.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h      |  2 ++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> index b1e327a85a32..69e1a0692b06 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ struct vfio_container;
>  
>  struct vfio_device_file {
>  	struct vfio_device *device;
> +	spinlock_t kvm_ref_lock; /* protect kvm field */
> +	struct kvm *kvm;
>  };
>  
>  void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 4665791aa2eb..8ef9210ad2aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -429,6 +429,7 @@ vfio_allocate_device_file(struct vfio_device *device)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	df->device = device;
> +	spin_lock_init(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
>  
>  	return df;
>  }
> @@ -1190,13 +1191,23 @@ const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops = {
>  	.mmap		= vfio_device_fops_mmap,
>  };
>  
> +static struct vfio_device *vfio_device_from_file(struct file *file)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_device_file *df = file->private_data;
> +
> +	if (file->f_op != &vfio_device_fops)
> +		return NULL;
> +	return df->device;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * vfio_file_is_valid - True if the file is valid vfio file
>   * @file: VFIO group file or VFIO device file
>   */
>  bool vfio_file_is_valid(struct file *file)
>  {
> -	return vfio_group_from_file(file);
> +	return vfio_group_from_file(file) ||
> +	       vfio_device_from_file(file);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_valid);
>  
> @@ -1211,16 +1222,36 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_valid);
>   */
>  bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_device *device;
>  	struct vfio_group *group;
>  
>  	group = vfio_group_from_file(file);
>  	if (group)
>  		return vfio_group_enforced_coherent(group);
>  
> +	device = vfio_device_from_file(file);
> +	if (device)
> +		return device_iommu_capable(device->dev,
> +					    IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY);
> +
>  	return true;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_enforced_coherent);
>  
> +static void vfio_device_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)

A general nit, we've been trying to maintain function naming based on
the object it operates on in vfio, for example vfio_group_set_kvm()
clearly operates on the struct vfio_group object.  Here we have
vfio_device_file_set_kvm(), which would suggest it works on a
struct vfio_device_file, but we're passing a struct file.
vfio_file_set_kvm() is already taken below, so should this be:

static void vfio_df_set_kvm(struct vfio_device_file *df,
			    struct kvm *kvm)

After this series We end up with a number of functions where the object
doesn't really match, ex:

	vfio_device_open -> vfio_df_open
	vfio_device_close -> vfio_df_close
	vfio_device_group_close -> vfio_df_group_close
	vfio_iommufd_bind -> vfio_df_iommufd_bind
	vfio_iommufd_unbind -> vfio_df_iommufd_unbind
	vfio_device_cdev_close -> vfio_df_cdev_close
	vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd -> vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd
	vfio_ioctl_device_attach -> vfio_df_ioctl_attach_pt
	vfio_ioctl_device_detach -> vfio_df_ioctl_detach_pt

"df" is just a suggestion, maybe someone has a better one.  Thanks,

Alex

> +{
> +	struct vfio_device_file *df = file->private_data;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The kvm is first recorded in the vfio_device_file, and will
> +	 * be propagated to vfio_device::kvm when the file is bound to
> +	 * iommufd successfully in the vfio device cdev path.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> +	df->kvm = kvm;
> +	spin_unlock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * vfio_file_set_kvm - Link a kvm with VFIO drivers
>   * @file: VFIO group file or VFIO device file
> @@ -1236,6 +1267,9 @@ void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
>  	group = vfio_group_from_file(file);
>  	if (group)
>  		vfio_group_set_kvm(group, kvm);
> +
> +	if (vfio_device_from_file(file))
> +		vfio_device_file_set_kvm(file, kvm);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_set_kvm);
>  


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 10/23] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind()
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind() Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-22 20:24   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-23  0:45     ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-22 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yi Liu
  Cc: jgg, kevin.tian, joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc,
	kvm, mjrosato, chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:14 -0700
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> into vfio_device_group_open(). This is more consistent with what will
> be done in vfio device cdev path.

Same comment regarding flowing commit subject into body on this series.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/group.c   |  6 ++++++
>  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h    |  9 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> index a17584e8be15..cfd0b9254bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,12 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  		vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(device);
>  
>  	df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd;
> +	if (df->iommufd && vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && device->open_count == 0) {
> +		ret = vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(device,
> +							df->iommufd);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out_put_kvm;
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
>  	if (ret) {
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> index a18e920be164..7a654a1437f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,24 @@ static void vfio_iommufd_noiommu_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +int vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
> +				      struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
> +{
> +	u32 ioas_id;
> +
> +	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Require no compat ioas to be assigned to proceed.  The basic
> +	 * statement is that the user cannot have done something that
> +	 * implies they expected translation to exist
> +	 */
> +	if (!iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id))
> +		return -EPERM;
> +	return 0;
> +}

I think the purpose of this function is to keep the iommufd namespace
out of the group, but we're muddying it as a general grab bag of
noiommu validation.  What if the caller retained the RAWIO test and
comment, and this function simply became a wrapper around the iommufd
function, ex:

bool vfio_iommufd_device_has_compat_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
					 struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
{
	u32 ioas_id;

	return !iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id));
}

Thanks,
Alex

> +
>  int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
>  {
>  	u32 ioas_id;
> @@ -54,20 +72,8 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
>  
> -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev)) {
> -		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> -			return -EPERM;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Require no compat ioas to be assigned to proceed. The basic
> -		 * statement is that the user cannot have done something that
> -		 * implies they expected translation to exist
> -		 */
> -		if (!iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id))
> -			return -EPERM;
> -
> +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
>  		return vfio_iommufd_noiommu_bind(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
> -	}
>  
>  	ret = vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
>  	if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> index 785afc40ece8..8884b557fb26 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> @@ -234,9 +234,18 @@ static inline void vfio_container_cleanup(void)
>  #endif
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD)
> +int vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
> +				      struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
>  int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
>  void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device *device);
>  #else
> +static inline int
> +vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
> +				  struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *device,
>  				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
>  {


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 13/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-22 20:46   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-22 20:59     ` Alex Williamson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-22 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yi Liu
  Cc: jgg, kevin.tian, joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc,
	kvm, mjrosato, chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:17 -0700
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> this prepares for adding DETACH ioctl for physical VFIO devices.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst             |  8 +++++---
>  drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c             |  1 +
>  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c                        | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c    |  2 ++
>  drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c                  |  1 +
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                   |  1 +
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c             |  1 +
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c         |  1 +
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c                      |  3 ++-
>  include/linux/vfio.h                          |  8 +++++++-
>  10 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> index 68abc089d6dd..363e12c90b87 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ similar to a file operations structure::
>  					struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
>  		void	(*unbind_iommufd)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  		int	(*attach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> +		void	(*detach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  		int	(*open_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  		void	(*close_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  		ssize_t	(*read)(struct vfio_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> @@ -315,9 +316,10 @@ container_of().
>  	- The [un]bind_iommufd callbacks are issued when the device is bound to
>  	  and unbound from iommufd.
>  
> -	- The attach_ioas callback is issued when the device is attached to an
> -	  IOAS managed by the bound iommufd. The attached IOAS is automatically
> -	  detached when the device is unbound from iommufd.
> +	- The [de]attach_ioas callback is issued when the device is attached to
> +	  and detached from an IOAS managed by the bound iommufd. However, the
> +	  attached IOAS can also be automatically detached when the device is
> +	  unbound from iommufd.
>  
>  	- The read/write/mmap callbacks implement the device region access defined
>  	  by the device's own VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO ioctl.
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> index c89a047a4cd8..d540cf683d93 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_fsl_mc_ops = {
>  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
>  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
>  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
>  };
>  
>  static struct fsl_mc_driver vfio_fsl_mc_driver = {
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> index 07b58c4625b5..e3953e1617a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> @@ -167,6 +167,14 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
>  {
>  	int rc;
>  
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!vdev->iommufd_device))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (vdev->iommufd_attached)
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
>  	rc = iommufd_device_attach(vdev->iommufd_device, pt_id);
>  	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
> @@ -175,6 +183,18 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas);
>  
> +void vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!vdev->iommufd_device) || !vdev->iommufd_attached)
> +		return;
> +
> +	iommufd_device_detach(vdev->iommufd_device);
> +	vdev->iommufd_attached = false;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas);

Can't a user trigger this WARN_ON by simply repeatedly calling the
to-be-added detach ioctl?  Thanks,

Alex

> +
>  /*
>   * The emulated standard ops mean that vfio_device is going to use the
>   * "mdev path" and will call vfio_pin_pages()/vfio_dma_rw(). Drivers using this
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> index a117eaf21c14..b2f9778c8366 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> @@ -1373,6 +1373,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_migrn_ops = {
>  	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
>  	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
>  	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> +	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_ops = {
> @@ -1391,6 +1392,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_ops = {
>  	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
>  	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
>  	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> +	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
>  };
>  
>  static int hisi_acc_vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> index d95fd382814c..42ec574a8622 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops mlx5vf_pci_ops = {
>  	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
>  	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
>  	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> +	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
>  };
>  
>  static int mlx5vf_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> index 29091ee2e984..cb5b7f865d58 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_pci_ops = {
>  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
>  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
>  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
>  };
>  
>  static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
> index 83fe54015595..6464b3939ebc 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_amba_ops = {
>  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
>  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
>  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct amba_id pl330_ids[] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
> index 22a1efca32a8..8cf22fa65baa 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_platform_ops = {
>  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
>  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
>  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
>  };
>  
>  static struct platform_driver vfio_platform_driver = {
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 39d552e5160b..599d551fc4b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -273,7 +273,8 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
>  	if (WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD) &&
>  		    (!device->ops->bind_iommufd ||
>  		     !device->ops->unbind_iommufd ||
> -		     !device->ops->attach_ioas)))
> +		     !device->ops->attach_ioas ||
> +		     !device->ops->detach_ioas)))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index 431eb82e0595..f446f5901e46 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -74,7 +74,9 @@ struct vfio_device {
>   * @bind_iommufd: Called when binding the device to an iommufd
>   * @unbind_iommufd: Opposite of bind_iommufd
>   * @attach_ioas: Called when attaching device to an IOAS/HWPT managed by the
> - *		 bound iommufd. Undo in unbind_iommufd.
> + *		 bound iommufd. Undo in unbind_iommufd if @detach_ioas is not
> + *		 called.
> + * @detach_ioas: Opposite of attach_ioas
>   * @open_device: Called when the first file descriptor is opened for this device
>   * @close_device: Opposite of open_device
>   * @read: Perform read(2) on device file descriptor
> @@ -98,6 +100,7 @@ struct vfio_device_ops {
>  				struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
>  	void	(*unbind_iommufd)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  	int	(*attach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> +	void	(*detach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  	int	(*open_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  	void	(*close_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  	ssize_t	(*read)(struct vfio_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> @@ -121,6 +124,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev,
>  			       struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
>  void vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> +void vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  int vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev,
>  			       struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
>  void vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> @@ -145,6 +149,8 @@ vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
>  	((void (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev)) NULL)
>  #define vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas \
>  	((int (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)) NULL)
> +#define vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas \
> +	((void (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev)) NULL)
>  #define vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind                                      \
>  	((int (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,   \
>  		  u32 *out_device_id)) NULL)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 13/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices
  2023-05-22 20:46   ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-05-22 20:59     ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-23  1:34       ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-22 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yi Liu
  Cc: jgg, kevin.tian, joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc,
	kvm, mjrosato, chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

On Mon, 22 May 2023 14:46:17 -0600
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:17 -0700
> Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > this prepares for adding DETACH ioctl for physical VFIO devices.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst             |  8 +++++---
> >  drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c             |  1 +
> >  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c                        | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c    |  2 ++
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c                  |  1 +
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                   |  1 +
> >  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c             |  1 +
> >  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c         |  1 +
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c                      |  3 ++-
> >  include/linux/vfio.h                          |  8 +++++++-
> >  10 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> > index 68abc089d6dd..363e12c90b87 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> > @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ similar to a file operations structure::
> >  					struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
> >  		void	(*unbind_iommufd)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  		int	(*attach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> > +		void	(*detach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  		int	(*open_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  		void	(*close_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  		ssize_t	(*read)(struct vfio_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> > @@ -315,9 +316,10 @@ container_of().
> >  	- The [un]bind_iommufd callbacks are issued when the device is bound to
> >  	  and unbound from iommufd.
> >  
> > -	- The attach_ioas callback is issued when the device is attached to an
> > -	  IOAS managed by the bound iommufd. The attached IOAS is automatically
> > -	  detached when the device is unbound from iommufd.
> > +	- The [de]attach_ioas callback is issued when the device is attached to
> > +	  and detached from an IOAS managed by the bound iommufd. However, the
> > +	  attached IOAS can also be automatically detached when the device is
> > +	  unbound from iommufd.
> >  
> >  	- The read/write/mmap callbacks implement the device region access defined
> >  	  by the device's own VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO ioctl.
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> > index c89a047a4cd8..d540cf683d93 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> > @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_fsl_mc_ops = {
> >  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> >  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> >  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static struct fsl_mc_driver vfio_fsl_mc_driver = {
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > index 07b58c4625b5..e3953e1617a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > @@ -167,6 +167,14 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> >  {
> >  	int rc;
> >  
> > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > +
> > +	if (WARN_ON(!vdev->iommufd_device))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (vdev->iommufd_attached)
> > +		return -EBUSY;
> > +
> >  	rc = iommufd_device_attach(vdev->iommufd_device, pt_id);
> >  	if (rc)
> >  		return rc;
> > @@ -175,6 +183,18 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas);
> >  
> > +void vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > +
> > +	if (WARN_ON(!vdev->iommufd_device) || !vdev->iommufd_attached)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	iommufd_device_detach(vdev->iommufd_device);
> > +	vdev->iommufd_attached = false;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas);  
> 
> Can't a user trigger this WARN_ON by simply repeatedly calling the
> to-be-added detach ioctl?  Thanks,

Oops, didn't track the close paren correctly, disregard.  Thanks,

Alex

> > +
> >  /*
> >   * The emulated standard ops mean that vfio_device is going to use the
> >   * "mdev path" and will call vfio_pin_pages()/vfio_dma_rw(). Drivers using this
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> > index a117eaf21c14..b2f9778c8366 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> > @@ -1373,6 +1373,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_migrn_ops = {
> >  	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> >  	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> >  	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > +	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_ops = {
> > @@ -1391,6 +1392,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_ops = {
> >  	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> >  	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> >  	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > +	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static int hisi_acc_vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> > index d95fd382814c..42ec574a8622 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> > @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops mlx5vf_pci_ops = {
> >  	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> >  	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> >  	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > +	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static int mlx5vf_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > index 29091ee2e984..cb5b7f865d58 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_pci_ops = {
> >  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> >  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> >  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
> > index 83fe54015595..6464b3939ebc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
> > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_amba_ops = {
> >  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> >  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> >  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const struct amba_id pl330_ids[] = {
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
> > index 22a1efca32a8..8cf22fa65baa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
> > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_platform_ops = {
> >  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> >  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> >  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> >  };
> >  
> >  static struct platform_driver vfio_platform_driver = {
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > index 39d552e5160b..599d551fc4b5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > @@ -273,7 +273,8 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
> >  	if (WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD) &&
> >  		    (!device->ops->bind_iommufd ||
> >  		     !device->ops->unbind_iommufd ||
> > -		     !device->ops->attach_ioas)))
> > +		     !device->ops->attach_ioas ||
> > +		     !device->ops->detach_ioas)))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> >  	/*
> > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > index 431eb82e0595..f446f5901e46 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -74,7 +74,9 @@ struct vfio_device {
> >   * @bind_iommufd: Called when binding the device to an iommufd
> >   * @unbind_iommufd: Opposite of bind_iommufd
> >   * @attach_ioas: Called when attaching device to an IOAS/HWPT managed by the
> > - *		 bound iommufd. Undo in unbind_iommufd.
> > + *		 bound iommufd. Undo in unbind_iommufd if @detach_ioas is not
> > + *		 called.
> > + * @detach_ioas: Opposite of attach_ioas
> >   * @open_device: Called when the first file descriptor is opened for this device
> >   * @close_device: Opposite of open_device
> >   * @read: Perform read(2) on device file descriptor
> > @@ -98,6 +100,7 @@ struct vfio_device_ops {
> >  				struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
> >  	void	(*unbind_iommufd)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  	int	(*attach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> > +	void	(*detach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  	int	(*open_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  	void	(*close_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  	ssize_t	(*read)(struct vfio_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> > @@ -121,6 +124,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev,
> >  			       struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
> >  void vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> > +void vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  int vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev,
> >  			       struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
> >  void vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > @@ -145,6 +149,8 @@ vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> >  	((void (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev)) NULL)
> >  #define vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas \
> >  	((int (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)) NULL)
> > +#define vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas \
> > +	((void (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev)) NULL)
> >  #define vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind                                      \
> >  	((int (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,   \
> >  		  u32 *out_device_id)) NULL)  
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-22 22:01   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-23  1:41     ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-22 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yi Liu
  Cc: jgg, kevin.tian, joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc,
	kvm, mjrosato, chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:23 -0700
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> This adds ioctl for userspace to bind device cdev fd to iommufd.
> 
>     VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD: bind device to an iommufd, hence gain DMA
> 			      control provided by the iommufd. open_device
> 			      op is called after bind_iommufd op.
> 
> Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        |  13 ++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |   5 ++
>  include/linux/vfio.h       |   3 +-
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  |  28 ++++++++
>  5 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> index 1c640016a824..291cc678a18b 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>   * Copyright (c) 2023 Intel Corporation.
>   */
>  #include <linux/vfio.h>
> +#include <linux/iommufd.h>
>  
>  #include "vfio.h"
>  
> @@ -44,6 +45,135 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> +	if (df->kvm)
> +		_vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df->device, df->kvm);
> +	spin_unlock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> +}
> +
> +void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * In the time of close, there is no contention with another one
> +	 * changing this flag.  So read df->access_granted without lock
> +	 * and no smp_load_acquire() is ok.
> +	 */
> +	if (!df->access_granted)
> +		return;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +	vfio_device_close(df);
> +	vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> +	iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
> +	device->cdev_opened = false;
> +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +	vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
> +}
> +
> +static struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(int fd)
> +{
> +	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd;
> +	struct fd f;
> +
> +	f = fdget(fd);
> +	if (!f.file)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
> +
> +	iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
> +
> +	fdput(f);
> +	return iommufd;
> +}
> +
> +long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> +				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +	struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind;
> +	unsigned long minsz;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	static_assert(__same_type(arg->out_devid, df->devid));
> +
> +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd, out_devid);
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&bind, arg, minsz))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (bind.argsz < minsz || bind.flags || bind.iommufd < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* BIND_IOMMUFD only allowed for cdev fds */
> +	if (df->group)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
> +	ret = vfio_device_block_group(device);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +	/* one device cannot be bound twice */
> +	if (df->access_granted) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	df->iommufd = vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(bind.iommufd);
> +	if (IS_ERR(df->iommufd)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(df->iommufd);
> +		df->iommufd = NULL;
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Before the device open, get the KVM pointer currently
> +	 * associated with the device file (if there is) and obtain
> +	 * a reference.  This reference is held until device closed.
> +	 * Save the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
> +	 */
> +	vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df);
> +
> +	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_put_kvm;
> +
> +	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->out_devid, &df->devid,
> +			   sizeof(df->devid)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_close_device;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Paired with smp_load_acquire() in vfio_device_fops::ioctl/
> +	 * read/write/mmap
> +	 */
> +	smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true);
> +	device->cdev_opened = true;
> +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +
> +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
> +		dev_warn(device->dev, "noiommu device is bound to iommufd by user "
> +			 "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));

The noiommu kernel taint only happens in vfio_group_find_or_alloc(), so
how does noiommu taint the kernel when !CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP?


> +	return 0;
> +
> +out_close_device:
> +	vfio_device_close(df);
> +out_put_kvm:
> +	vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> +	iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
> +	df->iommufd = NULL;
> +out_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +	vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
>  {
>  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> index 6861f8ebb64d..8b359a7794be 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> @@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ static inline void vfio_device_del(struct vfio_device *device)
>  
>  void vfio_init_device_cdev(struct vfio_device *device);
>  int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep);
> +void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> +long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> +				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg);
>  int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
>  void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
>  #else
> @@ -302,6 +305,16 @@ static inline int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static inline long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> +						  struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index c87cc7afe92c..c9fa39ac4b02 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -574,6 +574,8 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>  
>  	if (df->group)
>  		vfio_device_group_close(df);
> +	else
> +		vfio_device_cdev_close(df);
>  
>  	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
>  
> @@ -1147,6 +1149,9 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
>  	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (cmd == VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD)
> +		return vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(df, (void __user *)arg);
> +
>  	/* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_device_open() */
>  	if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index 873275419f13..cf9d082a623c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
>  	struct iommufd_device *iommufd_device;
>  	bool iommufd_attached;
>  #endif
> +	bool cdev_opened:1;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> @@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
>  
>  static inline bool vfio_device_cdev_opened(struct vfio_device *device)
>  {
> -	return false;
> +	return device->cdev_opened;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 24858b650562..07c917de31e9 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -194,6 +194,34 @@ struct vfio_group_status {
>  
>  /* --------------- IOCTLs for DEVICE file descriptors --------------- */
>  
> +/*
> + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19,
> + *				   struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd)
> + *
> + * Bind a vfio_device to the specified iommufd.
> + *
> + * User is restricted from accessing the device before the binding operation
> + * is completed.
> + *
> + * Unbind is automatically conducted when device fd is closed.
> + *
> + * @argsz:	 User filled size of this data.
> + * @flags:	 Must be 0.
> + * @iommufd:	 iommufd to bind.
> + * @out_devid:	 The device id generated by this bind. devid is a handle for
> + *		 this device/iommufd bond and can be used in IOMMUFD commands.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> + */
> +struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd {
> +	__u32		argsz;
> +	__u32		flags;
> +	__s32		iommufd;
> +	__u32		out_devid;
> +};
> +
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD	_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
> +

Why is this preempting the first device ioctl below rather than being
added in sequential order?  I'm also not sure what's at device ioctl 18
that we started at 19.  VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE is at 17.  Yes, they're
hard to keep track of.  Thanks,

Alex

>  /**
>   * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 7,
>   *						struct vfio_device_info)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-22 22:15   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-23  1:20     ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-22 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yi Liu
  Cc: jgg, kevin.tian, joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc,
	kvm, mjrosato, chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:24 -0700
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> This adds ioctl for userspace to attach device cdev fd to and detach
> from IOAS/hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> 
>     VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT: attach vfio device to IOAS, hw_pagetable
> 				   managed by iommufd. Attach can be
> 				   undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT
> 				   or device fd close.
>     VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT: detach vfio device from the current attached
> 				   IOAS or hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> 
> Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c     | 18 +++++++++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        | 18 +++++++++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |  8 +++++
>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 162 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> index 291cc678a18b..3f14edb80a93 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,72 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> +			     struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +	struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt attach;
> +	unsigned long minsz;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt, pt_id);
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&attach, arg, minsz))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (attach.argsz < minsz || attach.flags)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* ATTACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> +	if (df->group)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +	ret = vfio_iommufd_attach(device, &attach.pt_id);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +
> +	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->pt_id, &attach.pt_id,
> +			   sizeof(attach.pt_id)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_detach;
> +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +out_detach:
> +	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> +out_unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> +			     struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> +	struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt detach;
> +	unsigned long minsz;
> +
> +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt, flags);
> +
> +	if (copy_from_user(&detach, arg, minsz))
> +		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (detach.argsz < minsz || detach.flags)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* DETACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> +	if (df->group)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
>  {
>  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> index 83575b65ea01..799ea322a7d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  		vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
>  }
>  
> +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> +
> +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> +		return 0;

Isn't this an invalid operation for a noiommu cdev, ie. -EINVAL?  We
return success and copy back the provided pt_id, why would a user not
consider it a bug that they can't use whatever value was there with
iommufd?

> +
> +	return vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, pt_id);
> +}
> +
> +void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> +
> +	if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> +		vdev->ops->detach_ioas(vdev);
> +}
> +
>  struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_iommufd_physical_ictx(struct vfio_device *vdev)
>  {
>  	if (vdev->iommufd_device)
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> index 8b359a7794be..50553f67600f 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
>  void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
>  int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
>  				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
> +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> +void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev);
>  #else
>  static inline int
>  vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
> @@ -282,6 +284,10 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep);
>  void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
>  long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
>  				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg);
> +int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> +			     struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg);
> +int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> +			     struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg);
>  int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
>  void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
>  #else
> @@ -315,6 +321,18 @@ static inline long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
>  	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> +					   struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> +					   struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> +{
> +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index c9fa39ac4b02..8c3f26b4929b 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -1165,6 +1165,14 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
>  		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_feature(device, (void __user *)arg);
>  		break;
>  
> +	case VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT:
> +		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_attach(df, (void __user *)arg);
> +		break;
> +
> +	case VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT:
> +		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_detach(df, (void __user *)arg);
> +		break;
> +
>  	default:
>  		if (unlikely(!device->ops->ioctl))
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 07c917de31e9..770f5f949929 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -222,6 +222,58 @@ struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd {
>  
>  #define VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD	_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
>  
> +/*
> + * VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 20,
> + *					struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt)
> + *
> + * Attach a vfio device to an iommufd address space specified by IOAS
> + * id or hw_pagetable (hwpt) id.
> + *
> + * Available only after a device has been bound to iommufd via
> + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
> + *
> + * Undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT or device fd close.
> + *
> + * @argsz:	User filled size of this data.
> + * @flags:	Must be 0.
> + * @pt_id:	Input the target id which can represent an ioas or a hwpt
> + *		allocated via iommufd subsystem.
> + *		Output the input ioas id or the attached hwpt id which could
> + *		be the specified hwpt itself or a hwpt automatically created
> + *		for the specified ioas by kernel during the attachment.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> + */
> +struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt {
> +	__u32	argsz;
> +	__u32	flags;
> +	__u32	pt_id;
> +};
> +
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT		_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 20)
> +
> +/*
> + * VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 21,
> + *					struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt)
> + *
> + * Detach a vfio device from the iommufd address space it has been
> + * attached to. After it, device should be in a blocking DMA state.
> + *
> + * Available only after a device has been bound to iommufd via
> + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD.

These "[a]vailable only after" comments are meaningless, if the user
has the file descriptor the ioctl is available.  We can say that ATTACH
should be used after BIND to associate the device with an address space
within the bound iommufd and DETACH removes that association, but the
user is welcome to call everything in the wrong order and we need to be
prepared for that anyway.  Thanks,

Alex

> + *
> + * @argsz:	User filled size of this data.
> + * @flags:	Must be 0.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> + */
> +struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt {
> +	__u32	argsz;
> +	__u32	flags;
> +};
> +
> +#define VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT		_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 21)
> +
>  /**
>   * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 7,
>   *						struct vfio_device_info)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 21/23] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev()
  2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev() Yi Liu
@ 2023-05-22 23:04   ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-23  2:13     ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-22 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yi Liu
  Cc: jgg, kevin.tian, joro, robin.murphy, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc,
	kvm, mjrosato, chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun, peterx, jasowang,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi, lulu, suravee.suthikulpanit,
	intel-gvt-dev, intel-gfx, linux-s390, xudong.hao, yan.y.zhao,
	terrence.xu, yanting.jiang, zhenzhong.duan, clegoate

On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:25 -0700
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> This is to make the cdev path and group path consistent for the noiommu
> devices registration. If vfio_noiommu is disabled, such registration
> should fail. However, this check is vfio_device_set_group() which is part
> of the vfio_group code. If the vfio_group code is compiled out, noiommu
> devices would be registered even vfio_noiommu is disabled.
> 
> This adds vfio_device_set_noiommu() which can fail and calls it in the
> device registration. For now, it never fails as long as
> vfio_device_set_group() is successful. But when the vfio_group code is
> compiled out, vfio_device_set_noiommu() would fail the noiommu devices
> when vfio_noiommu is disabled.

I'm lost.  After the next patch we end up with the following when
CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP is set:

static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
{
        device->noiommu = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
                          device->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
        return 0;
}

I think this is relying on the fact that vfio_device_set_group() which
is called immediately prior to this function would have performed the
testing for noiommu and failed prior to this function being called and
therefore there is no error return here.

Note also here that I think CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU was only being tested
here previously so that a smart enough compiler would optimize out the
entire function, we can never set a VFIO_NO_IOMMU type when
!CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU.  That's no longer the case if the function is
refactored like this.

When !CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP:

static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
{
        struct iommu_group *iommu_group;

        iommu_group = iommu_group_get(device->dev);
        if (!iommu_group) {
                if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) || !vfio_noiommu)
                        return -EINVAL;
                device->noiommu = true;
        } else {
                iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
                device->noiommu = false;
        }

        return 0;
}

Here again, the NOIOMMU config option is irrelevant, vfio_noiommu can
only be true if the config option is enabled.  Therefore if there's no
IOMMU group and the module option to enable noiommu is not set, return
an error.

It's really quite ugly that in one mode we rely on this function to
generate the error and in the other mode it happens prior to getting
here.

The above could be simplified to something like:

	iommu_group = iommu_group_get(device->dev);
	if (!iommu_group && !vfio_iommu)
		return -EINVAL;

	device->noiommu = !iommu_group;
	iommu_group_put(iommu_group); /* Accepts NULL */
	return 0;

Which would actually work regardless of CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP, where maybe
this could then be moved before vfio_device_set_group() and become the
de facto exit point for invalid noiommu configurations and maybe we
could remove the test from the group code (with a comment to note that
it's been tested prior)?  Thanks,

Alex

> As noiommu devices is checked and there are multiple places which needs
> to test noiommu devices, this also adds a flag to mark noiommu devices.
> Hence the callers of vfio_device_is_noiommu() can be converted to test
> vfio_device->noiommu.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c |  4 ++--
>  drivers/vfio/group.c       |  2 +-
>  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c     | 10 +++++-----
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        |  7 ++++---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |  6 +++++-
>  include/linux/vfio.h       |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> index 3f14edb80a93..6d7f50ee535d 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
>  	if (df->group)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> +	if (device->noiommu && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
>  		return -EPERM;
>  
>  	ret = vfio_device_block_group(device);
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
>  	device->cdev_opened = true;
>  	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
>  
> -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
> +	if (device->noiommu)
>  		dev_warn(device->dev, "noiommu device is bound to iommufd by user "
>  			 "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
>  	return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> index 7aacbd9d08c9..bf4335bce892 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  		vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(device);
>  
>  	df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd;
> -	if (df->iommufd && vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && device->open_count == 0) {
> +	if (df->iommufd && device->noiommu && device->open_count == 0) {
>  		ret = vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(device,
>  							df->iommufd);
>  		if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> index 799ea322a7d4..dfe706f1e952 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
>  
> -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> +	if (vdev->noiommu)
>  		return vfio_iommufd_noiommu_bind(vdev, ictx, &df->devid);
>  
>  	return vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &df->devid);
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev,
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
>  
>  	/* compat noiommu does not need to do ioas attach */
> -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> +	if (vdev->noiommu)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	ret = iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id);
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
>  
> -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev)) {
> +	if (vdev->noiommu) {
>  		vfio_iommufd_noiommu_unbind(vdev);
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
>  {
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
>  
> -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> +	if (vdev->noiommu)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	return vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, pt_id);
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev)
>  {
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
>  
> -	if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> +	if (!vdev->noiommu)
>  		vdev->ops->detach_ioas(vdev);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> index 50553f67600f..c8579d63b2b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> @@ -106,10 +106,11 @@ bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device);
>  int __init vfio_group_init(void);
>  void vfio_group_cleanup(void);
>  
> -static inline bool vfio_device_is_noiommu(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> +static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
>  {
> -	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
> -	       vdev->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
> +	device->noiommu = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
> +			  device->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_CONTAINER)
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 8c3f26b4929b..8979f320d620 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -289,8 +289,12 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	ret = vfio_device_set_noiommu(device);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_out;
> +
>  	ret = dev_set_name(&device->device, "%svfio%d",
> -			   vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) ? "noiommu-" : "", device->index);
> +			   device->noiommu ? "noiommu-" : "", device->index);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_out;
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index cf9d082a623c..fa13889e763f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
>  	bool iommufd_attached;
>  #endif
>  	bool cdev_opened:1;
> +	bool noiommu:1;
>  };
>  
>  /**


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 10/23] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind()
  2023-05-22 20:24   ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-05-23  0:45     ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-23  0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 4:25 AM
> 
> On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:14 -0700
> Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > into vfio_device_group_open(). This is more consistent with what will
> > be done in vfio device cdev path.
> 
> Same comment regarding flowing commit subject into body on this series.

Yes, I've modified the commit message in my local branch.:-)

> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/group.c   |  6 ++++++
> >  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h    |  9 +++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > index a17584e8be15..cfd0b9254bbc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > @@ -192,6 +192,12 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> >  		vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(device);
> >
> >  	df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd;
> > +	if (df->iommufd && vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && device->open_count
> == 0) {
> > +		ret = vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(device,
> > +							df->iommufd);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			goto out_put_kvm;
> > +	}
> >
> >  	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
> >  	if (ret) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > index a18e920be164..7a654a1437f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > @@ -46,6 +46,24 @@ static void vfio_iommufd_noiommu_unbind(struct vfio_device
> *vdev)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >
> > +int vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
> > +				      struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
> > +{
> > +	u32 ioas_id;
> > +
> > +	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> > +		return -EPERM;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Require no compat ioas to be assigned to proceed.  The basic
> > +	 * statement is that the user cannot have done something that
> > +	 * implies they expected translation to exist
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id))
> > +		return -EPERM;
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> I think the purpose of this function is to keep the iommufd namespace
> out of the group,

Yes.

> but we're muddying it as a general grab bag of
> noiommu validation.  What if the caller retained the RAWIO test and
> comment, and this function simply became a wrapper around the iommufd
> function, ex:
> 
> bool vfio_iommufd_device_has_compat_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
> 					 struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
> {
> 	u32 ioas_id;
> 
> 	return !iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id));
> }

Sure. This looks better.

Regards,
Yi Liu
 
> Thanks,
> Alex
> 
> > +
> >  int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
> >  {
> >  	u32 ioas_id;
> > @@ -54,20 +72,8 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct
> iommufd_ctx *ictx)
> >
> >  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> >
> > -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev)) {
> > -		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> > -			return -EPERM;
> > -
> > -		/*
> > -		 * Require no compat ioas to be assigned to proceed. The basic
> > -		 * statement is that the user cannot have done something that
> > -		 * implies they expected translation to exist
> > -		 */
> > -		if (!iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id))
> > -			return -EPERM;
> > -
> > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> >  		return vfio_iommufd_noiommu_bind(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
> > -	}
> >
> >  	ret = vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &device_id);
> >  	if (ret)
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > index 785afc40ece8..8884b557fb26 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > @@ -234,9 +234,18 @@ static inline void vfio_container_cleanup(void)
> >  #endif
> >
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD)
> > +int vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
> > +				      struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
> >  int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *device, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
> >  void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device *device);
> >  #else
> > +static inline int
> > +vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
> > +				  struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
> > +{
> > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device *device,
> >  				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx)
> >  {


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-22 22:15   ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-05-23  1:20     ` Liu, Yi L
  2023-05-23 15:50       ` Alex Williamson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-23  1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:16 AM
> 
> On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:24 -0700
> Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > This adds ioctl for userspace to attach device cdev fd to and detach
> > from IOAS/hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> >
> >     VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT: attach vfio device to IOAS, hw_pagetable
> > 				   managed by iommufd. Attach can be
> > 				   undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT
> > 				   or device fd close.
> >     VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT: detach vfio device from the current attached
> > 				   IOAS or hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> >
> > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c     | 18 +++++++++++
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        | 18 +++++++++++
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |  8 +++++
> >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 162 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > index 291cc678a18b..3f14edb80a93 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > @@ -174,6 +174,72 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file
> *df,
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > +			     struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > +	struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt attach;
> > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt, pt_id);
> > +
> > +	if (copy_from_user(&attach, arg, minsz))
> > +		return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +	if (attach.argsz < minsz || attach.flags)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	/* ATTACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> > +	if (df->group)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > +	ret = vfio_iommufd_attach(device, &attach.pt_id);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto out_unlock;
> > +
> > +	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->pt_id, &attach.pt_id,
> > +			   sizeof(attach.pt_id)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto out_detach;
> > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +out_detach:
> > +	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> > +out_unlock:
> > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > +			     struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > +	struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt detach;
> > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > +
> > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt, flags);
> > +
> > +	if (copy_from_user(&detach, arg, minsz))
> > +		return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +	if (detach.argsz < minsz || detach.flags)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	/* DETACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> > +	if (df->group)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > +	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
> >  {
> >  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > index 83575b65ea01..799ea322a7d4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > @@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> >  		vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
> >  }
> >
> > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> > +{
> > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > +
> > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > +		return 0;
> 
> Isn't this an invalid operation for a noiommu cdev, ie. -EINVAL?  We
> return success and copy back the provided pt_id, why would a user not
> consider it a bug that they can't use whatever value was there with
> iommufd?

Yes, this is the question I asked in [1]. At that time, it appears to me
that better to allow it [2]. Maybe it's more suitable to ask it here.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/c203f11f-4d9f-cf43-03ab-e41a858bdd92@intel.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/ZFFUyhqID+LtUB%2FD@nvidia.com/

> > +
> > +	return vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, pt_id);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > +{
> > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > +
> > +	if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > +		vdev->ops->detach_ioas(vdev);
> > +}
> > +
> >  struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_iommufd_physical_ictx(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> >  {
> >  	if (vdev->iommufd_device)
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > index 8b359a7794be..50553f67600f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> >  void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> >  int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
> >  				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
> > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> > +void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> >  #else
> >  static inline int
> >  vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
> > @@ -282,6 +284,10 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> file *filep);
> >  void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> >  long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> >  				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg);
> > +int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > +			     struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg);
> > +int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > +			     struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg);
> >  int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
> >  void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
> >  #else
> > @@ -315,6 +321,18 @@ static inline long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct
> vfio_device_file *df,
> >  	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > +					   struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user
> *arg)
> > +{
> > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > +					   struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt
> __user *arg)
> > +{
> > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
> >  {
> >  	return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > index c9fa39ac4b02..8c3f26b4929b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > @@ -1165,6 +1165,14 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> >  		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_feature(device, (void __user *)arg);
> >  		break;
> >
> > +	case VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT:
> > +		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_attach(df, (void __user *)arg);
> > +		break;
> > +
> > +	case VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT:
> > +		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_detach(df, (void __user *)arg);
> > +		break;
> > +
> >  	default:
> >  		if (unlikely(!device->ops->ioctl))
> >  			ret = -EINVAL;
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > index 07c917de31e9..770f5f949929 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -222,6 +222,58 @@ struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd {
> >
> >  #define VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD	_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
> >
> > +/*
> > + * VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 20,
> > + *					struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt)
> > + *
> > + * Attach a vfio device to an iommufd address space specified by IOAS
> > + * id or hw_pagetable (hwpt) id.
> > + *
> > + * Available only after a device has been bound to iommufd via
> > + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
> > + *
> > + * Undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT or device fd close.
> > + *
> > + * @argsz:	User filled size of this data.
> > + * @flags:	Must be 0.
> > + * @pt_id:	Input the target id which can represent an ioas or a hwpt
> > + *		allocated via iommufd subsystem.
> > + *		Output the input ioas id or the attached hwpt id which could
> > + *		be the specified hwpt itself or a hwpt automatically created
> > + *		for the specified ioas by kernel during the attachment.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > + */
> > +struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt {
> > +	__u32	argsz;
> > +	__u32	flags;
> > +	__u32	pt_id;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT		_IO(VFIO_TYPE,
> VFIO_BASE + 20)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 21,
> > + *					struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt)
> > + *
> > + * Detach a vfio device from the iommufd address space it has been
> > + * attached to. After it, device should be in a blocking DMA state.
> > + *
> > + * Available only after a device has been bound to iommufd via
> > + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD.
> 
> These "[a]vailable only after" comments are meaningless, if the user
> has the file descriptor the ioctl is available.  We can say that ATTACH
> should be used after BIND to associate the device with an address space
> within the bound iommufd and DETACH removes that association, but the
> user is welcome to call everything in the wrong order and we need to be
> prepared for that anyway.  Thanks,

Oh, yes. it's available as long as FD is got. But it is expected to fail if
the order is not met. This should be what the comment really wants
to deliver. Will have a look at other ioctls as well.

Regards,
Yi Liu

> 
> Alex
> 
> > + *
> > + * @argsz:	User filled size of this data.
> > + * @flags:	Must be 0.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > + */
> > +struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt {
> > +	__u32	argsz;
> > +	__u32	flags;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT		_IO(VFIO_TYPE,
> VFIO_BASE + 21)
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 7,
> >   *						struct vfio_device_info)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 13/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices
  2023-05-22 20:59     ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-05-23  1:34       ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-23  1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 4:59 AM
> 
> On Mon, 22 May 2023 14:46:17 -0600
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:17 -0700
> > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > this prepares for adding DETACH ioctl for physical VFIO devices.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Terrence Xu <terrence.xu@intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > > Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> > > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst             |  8 +++++---
> > >  drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c             |  1 +
> > >  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c                        | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c    |  2 ++
> > >  drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c                  |  1 +
> > >  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                   |  1 +
> > >  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c             |  1 +
> > >  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c         |  1 +
> > >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c                      |  3 ++-
> > >  include/linux/vfio.h                          |  8 +++++++-
> > >  10 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> > > index 68abc089d6dd..363e12c90b87 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> > > @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ similar to a file operations structure::
> > >  					struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
> > >  		void	(*unbind_iommufd)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  		int	(*attach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> > > +		void	(*detach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  		int	(*open_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  		void	(*close_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  		ssize_t	(*read)(struct vfio_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> > > @@ -315,9 +316,10 @@ container_of().
> > >  	- The [un]bind_iommufd callbacks are issued when the device is bound to
> > >  	  and unbound from iommufd.
> > >
> > > -	- The attach_ioas callback is issued when the device is attached to an
> > > -	  IOAS managed by the bound iommufd. The attached IOAS is automatically
> > > -	  detached when the device is unbound from iommufd.
> > > +	- The [de]attach_ioas callback is issued when the device is attached to
> > > +	  and detached from an IOAS managed by the bound iommufd. However, the
> > > +	  attached IOAS can also be automatically detached when the device is
> > > +	  unbound from iommufd.
> > >
> > >  	- The read/write/mmap callbacks implement the device region access defined
> > >  	  by the device's own VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO ioctl.
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> > > index c89a047a4cd8..d540cf683d93 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
> > > @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_fsl_mc_ops = {
> > >  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> > >  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> > >  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > > +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static struct fsl_mc_driver vfio_fsl_mc_driver = {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > index 07b58c4625b5..e3953e1617a5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > @@ -167,6 +167,14 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device
> *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> > >  {
> > >  	int rc;
> > >
> > > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > +	if (WARN_ON(!vdev->iommufd_device))
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	if (vdev->iommufd_attached)
> > > +		return -EBUSY;
> > > +
> > >  	rc = iommufd_device_attach(vdev->iommufd_device, pt_id);
> > >  	if (rc)
> > >  		return rc;
> > > @@ -175,6 +183,18 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device
> *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas);
> > >
> > > +void vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > +	if (WARN_ON(!vdev->iommufd_device) || !vdev->iommufd_attached)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	iommufd_device_detach(vdev->iommufd_device);
> > > +	vdev->iommufd_attached = false;
> > > +}
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas);
> >
> > Can't a user trigger this WARN_ON by simply repeatedly calling the
> > to-be-added detach ioctl?  Thanks,
> 
> Oops, didn't track the close paren correctly, disregard.  Thanks,

Not sure ill it be clearer to have !vdev->iommufd_attached in the next
line? 😊

Regards,
Yi Liu

> Alex
> 
> > > +
> > >  /*
> > >   * The emulated standard ops mean that vfio_device is going to use the
> > >   * "mdev path" and will call vfio_pin_pages()/vfio_dma_rw(). Drivers using this
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> > > index a117eaf21c14..b2f9778c8366 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
> > > @@ -1373,6 +1373,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops
> hisi_acc_vfio_pci_migrn_ops = {
> > >  	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> > >  	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> > >  	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > > +	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_ops = {
> > > @@ -1391,6 +1392,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops hisi_acc_vfio_pci_ops =
> {
> > >  	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> > >  	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> > >  	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > > +	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static int hisi_acc_vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id
> *id)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> > > index d95fd382814c..42ec574a8622 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c
> > > @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops mlx5vf_pci_ops = {
> > >  	.bind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> > >  	.unbind_iommufd = vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> > >  	.attach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > > +	.detach_ioas = vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static int mlx5vf_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > > index 29091ee2e984..cb5b7f865d58 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > > @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_pci_ops = {
> > >  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> > >  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> > >  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > > +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
> > > index 83fe54015595..6464b3939ebc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c
> > > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_amba_ops = {
> > >  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> > >  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> > >  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > > +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static const struct amba_id pl330_ids[] = {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
> b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
> > > index 22a1efca32a8..8cf22fa65baa 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c
> > > @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_platform_ops = {
> > >  	.bind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_bind,
> > >  	.unbind_iommufd	= vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind,
> > >  	.attach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas,
> > > +	.detach_ioas	= vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas,
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static struct platform_driver vfio_platform_driver = {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > index 39d552e5160b..599d551fc4b5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > @@ -273,7 +273,8 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
> > >  	if (WARN_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IOMMUFD) &&
> > >  		    (!device->ops->bind_iommufd ||
> > >  		     !device->ops->unbind_iommufd ||
> > > -		     !device->ops->attach_ioas)))
> > > +		     !device->ops->attach_ioas ||
> > > +		     !device->ops->detach_ioas)))
> > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > >  	/*
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > index 431eb82e0595..f446f5901e46 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > @@ -74,7 +74,9 @@ struct vfio_device {
> > >   * @bind_iommufd: Called when binding the device to an iommufd
> > >   * @unbind_iommufd: Opposite of bind_iommufd
> > >   * @attach_ioas: Called when attaching device to an IOAS/HWPT managed by the
> > > - *		 bound iommufd. Undo in unbind_iommufd.
> > > + *		 bound iommufd. Undo in unbind_iommufd if @detach_ioas is not
> > > + *		 called.
> > > + * @detach_ioas: Opposite of attach_ioas
> > >   * @open_device: Called when the first file descriptor is opened for this device
> > >   * @close_device: Opposite of open_device
> > >   * @read: Perform read(2) on device file descriptor
> > > @@ -98,6 +100,7 @@ struct vfio_device_ops {
> > >  				struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
> > >  	void	(*unbind_iommufd)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  	int	(*attach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> > > +	void	(*detach_ioas)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  	int	(*open_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  	void	(*close_device)(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  	ssize_t	(*read)(struct vfio_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> > > @@ -121,6 +124,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_physical_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev,
> > >  			       struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
> > >  void vfio_iommufd_physical_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  int vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> > > +void vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  int vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind(struct vfio_device *vdev,
> > >  			       struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, u32 *out_device_id);
> > >  void vfio_iommufd_emulated_unbind(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > > @@ -145,6 +149,8 @@ vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > >  	((void (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev)) NULL)
> > >  #define vfio_iommufd_physical_attach_ioas \
> > >  	((int (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)) NULL)
> > > +#define vfio_iommufd_physical_detach_ioas \
> > > +	((void (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev)) NULL)
> > >  #define vfio_iommufd_emulated_bind                                      \
> > >  	((int (*)(struct vfio_device *vdev, struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,   \
> > >  		  u32 *out_device_id)) NULL)
> >


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
  2023-05-22 22:01   ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-05-23  1:41     ` Liu, Yi L
  2023-05-23 15:51       ` Alex Williamson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-23  1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:01 AM
> 
> On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:23 -0700
> Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > This adds ioctl for userspace to bind device cdev fd to iommufd.
> >
> >     VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD: bind device to an iommufd, hence gain DMA
> > 			      control provided by the iommufd. open_device
> > 			      op is called after bind_iommufd op.
> >
> > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        |  13 ++++
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |   5 ++
> >  include/linux/vfio.h       |   3 +-
> >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  |  28 ++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > index 1c640016a824..291cc678a18b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >   * Copyright (c) 2023 Intel Corporation.
> >   */
> >  #include <linux/vfio.h>
> > +#include <linux/iommufd.h>
> >
> >  #include "vfio.h"
> >
> > @@ -44,6 +45,135 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> file *filep)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > +{
> > +	spin_lock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> > +	if (df->kvm)
> > +		_vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df->device, df->kvm);
> > +	spin_unlock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * In the time of close, there is no contention with another one
> > +	 * changing this flag.  So read df->access_granted without lock
> > +	 * and no smp_load_acquire() is ok.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!df->access_granted)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > +	vfio_device_close(df);
> > +	vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> > +	iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
> > +	device->cdev_opened = false;
> > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > +	vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(int fd)
> > +{
> > +	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd;
> > +	struct fd f;
> > +
> > +	f = fdget(fd);
> > +	if (!f.file)
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
> > +
> > +	iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
> > +
> > +	fdput(f);
> > +	return iommufd;
> > +}
> > +
> > +long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > +				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg)
> > +{
> > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > +	struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind;
> > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	static_assert(__same_type(arg->out_devid, df->devid));
> > +
> > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd, out_devid);
> > +
> > +	if (copy_from_user(&bind, arg, minsz))
> > +		return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > +	if (bind.argsz < minsz || bind.flags || bind.iommufd < 0)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	/* BIND_IOMMUFD only allowed for cdev fds */
> > +	if (df->group)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> > +		return -EPERM;
> > +
> > +	ret = vfio_device_block_group(device);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > +	/* one device cannot be bound twice */
> > +	if (df->access_granted) {
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		goto out_unlock;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	df->iommufd = vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(bind.iommufd);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(df->iommufd)) {
> > +		ret = PTR_ERR(df->iommufd);
> > +		df->iommufd = NULL;
> > +		goto out_unlock;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Before the device open, get the KVM pointer currently
> > +	 * associated with the device file (if there is) and obtain
> > +	 * a reference.  This reference is held until device closed.
> > +	 * Save the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
> > +	 */
> > +	vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df);
> > +
> > +	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto out_put_kvm;
> > +
> > +	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->out_devid, &df->devid,
> > +			   sizeof(df->devid)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto out_close_device;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Paired with smp_load_acquire() in vfio_device_fops::ioctl/
> > +	 * read/write/mmap
> > +	 */
> > +	smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true);
> > +	device->cdev_opened = true;
> > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > +
> > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
> > +		dev_warn(device->dev, "noiommu device is bound to iommufd by user
> "
> > +			 "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> 
> The noiommu kernel taint only happens in vfio_group_find_or_alloc(), so
> how does noiommu taint the kernel when !CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP?

Yeah, in the cdev path, no taint. I add this just in order to par with the below
message in the group path.

vfio_device_open_file()
{
	dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device opened by user "
		   "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
}

> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +out_close_device:
> > +	vfio_device_close(df);
> > +out_put_kvm:
> > +	vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> > +	iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
> > +	df->iommufd = NULL;
> > +out_unlock:
> > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > +	vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
> >  {
> >  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > index 6861f8ebb64d..8b359a7794be 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > @@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ static inline void vfio_device_del(struct vfio_device *device)
> >
> >  void vfio_init_device_cdev(struct vfio_device *device);
> >  int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep);
> > +void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> > +long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > +				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg);
> >  int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
> >  void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
> >  #else
> > @@ -302,6 +305,16 @@ static inline int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode
> *inode,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > +						  struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd
> __user *arg)
> > +{
> > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
> >  {
> >  	return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > index c87cc7afe92c..c9fa39ac4b02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > @@ -574,6 +574,8 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct
> file *filep)
> >
> >  	if (df->group)
> >  		vfio_device_group_close(df);
> > +	else
> > +		vfio_device_cdev_close(df);
> >
> >  	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
> >
> > @@ -1147,6 +1149,9 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> >  	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> >  	int ret;
> >
> > +	if (cmd == VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD)
> > +		return vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(df, (void __user *)arg);
> > +
> >  	/* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_device_open() */
> >  	if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > index 873275419f13..cf9d082a623c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
> >  	struct iommufd_device *iommufd_device;
> >  	bool iommufd_attached;
> >  #endif
> > +	bool cdev_opened:1;
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> >
> >  static inline bool vfio_device_cdev_opened(struct vfio_device *device)
> >  {
> > -	return false;
> > +	return device->cdev_opened;
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > index 24858b650562..07c917de31e9 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -194,6 +194,34 @@ struct vfio_group_status {
> >
> >  /* --------------- IOCTLs for DEVICE file descriptors --------------- */
> >
> > +/*
> > + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19,
> > + *				   struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd)
> > + *
> > + * Bind a vfio_device to the specified iommufd.
> > + *
> > + * User is restricted from accessing the device before the binding operation
> > + * is completed.
> > + *
> > + * Unbind is automatically conducted when device fd is closed.
> > + *
> > + * @argsz:	 User filled size of this data.
> > + * @flags:	 Must be 0.
> > + * @iommufd:	 iommufd to bind.
> > + * @out_devid:	 The device id generated by this bind. devid is a handle for
> > + *		 this device/iommufd bond and can be used in IOMMUFD commands.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > + */
> > +struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd {
> > +	__u32		argsz;
> > +	__u32		flags;
> > +	__s32		iommufd;
> > +	__u32		out_devid;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD	_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
> > +
> 
> Why is this preempting the first device ioctl below rather than being
> added in sequential order?  I'm also not sure what's at device ioctl 18
> that we started at 19.  VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE is at 17.  Yes, they're
> hard to keep track of.  Thanks,

yes, 17 is the last occupied ioctl offset on device fd. Will correct
it.

Regards,
Yi Liu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 21/23] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev()
  2023-05-22 23:04   ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-05-23  2:13     ` Liu, Yi L
  2023-05-24  8:14       ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-23  2:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 7:04 AM
> 
> On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:25 -0700
> Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > This is to make the cdev path and group path consistent for the noiommu
> > devices registration. If vfio_noiommu is disabled, such registration
> > should fail. However, this check is vfio_device_set_group() which is part
> > of the vfio_group code. If the vfio_group code is compiled out, noiommu
> > devices would be registered even vfio_noiommu is disabled.
> >
> > This adds vfio_device_set_noiommu() which can fail and calls it in the
> > device registration. For now, it never fails as long as
> > vfio_device_set_group() is successful. But when the vfio_group code is
> > compiled out, vfio_device_set_noiommu() would fail the noiommu devices
> > when vfio_noiommu is disabled.
> 
> I'm lost.  After the next patch we end up with the following when
> CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP is set:
> 
> static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
> {
>         device->noiommu = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
>                           device->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
>         return 0;
> }
> 
> I think this is relying on the fact that vfio_device_set_group() which
> is called immediately prior to this function would have performed the
> testing for noiommu and failed prior to this function being called and
> therefore there is no error return here.

Yes.

> 
> Note also here that I think CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU was only being tested
> here previously so that a smart enough compiler would optimize out the
> entire function, we can never set a VFIO_NO_IOMMU type when
> !CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU.

You are right. VFIO_NO_IOMMU type is only set when vfio_noiommu==true.

> That's no longer the case if the function is
> refactored like this.
> 
> When !CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP:
> 
> static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
> {
>         struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
> 
>         iommu_group = iommu_group_get(device->dev);
>         if (!iommu_group) {
>                 if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) || !vfio_noiommu)
>                         return -EINVAL;
>                 device->noiommu = true;
>         } else {
>                 iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
>                 device->noiommu = false;
>         }
> 
>         return 0;
> }
> 
> Here again, the NOIOMMU config option is irrelevant, vfio_noiommu can
> only be true if the config option is enabled.  Therefore if there's no
> IOMMU group and the module option to enable noiommu is not set, return
> an error.

Yes. I think I missed the part that the vfio_noiommu option can only be
true when CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU is enabled. That's why the check
is "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) && device->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;".
This appears that the two conditions are orthogonal.

> 
> It's really quite ugly that in one mode we rely on this function to
> generate the error and in the other mode it happens prior to getting
> here.
> 
> The above could be simplified to something like:
> 
> 	iommu_group = iommu_group_get(device->dev);
> 	if (!iommu_group && !vfio_iommu)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> 	device->noiommu = !iommu_group;
> 	iommu_group_put(iommu_group); /* Accepts NULL */
> 	return 0;
> 
> Which would actually work regardless of CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP, where maybe
> this could then be moved before vfio_device_set_group() and become the
> de facto exit point for invalid noiommu configurations and maybe we
> could remove the test from the group code (with a comment to note that
> it's been tested prior)?  Thanks,

Yes, this looks much clearer. I think this new logic must be called before
vfio_device_set_group(). Otherwise,  iommu_group_get () may return
the faked groups. Then it would need to work differently per CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP
configuration.

Regards,
Yi Liu
> 
> > As noiommu devices is checked and there are multiple places which needs
> > to test noiommu devices, this also adds a flag to mark noiommu devices.
> > Hence the callers of vfio_device_is_noiommu() can be converted to test
> > vfio_device->noiommu.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c |  4 ++--
> >  drivers/vfio/group.c       |  2 +-
> >  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c     | 10 +++++-----
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        |  7 ++++---
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |  6 +++++-
> >  include/linux/vfio.h       |  1 +
> >  6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > index 3f14edb80a93..6d7f50ee535d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file
> *df,
> >  	if (df->group)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >
> > -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> > +	if (device->noiommu && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> >  		return -EPERM;
> >
> >  	ret = vfio_device_block_group(device);
> > @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file
> *df,
> >  	device->cdev_opened = true;
> >  	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> >
> > -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
> > +	if (device->noiommu)
> >  		dev_warn(device->dev, "noiommu device is bound to iommufd by user
> "
> >  			 "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> >  	return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > index 7aacbd9d08c9..bf4335bce892 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> >  		vfio_device_group_get_kvm_safe(device);
> >
> >  	df->iommufd = device->group->iommufd;
> > -	if (df->iommufd && vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && device->open_count
> == 0) {
> > +	if (df->iommufd && device->noiommu && device->open_count == 0) {
> >  		ret = vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(device,
> >  							df->iommufd);
> >  		if (ret)
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > index 799ea322a7d4..dfe706f1e952 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> >
> >  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> >
> > -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > +	if (vdev->noiommu)
> >  		return vfio_iommufd_noiommu_bind(vdev, ictx, &df->devid);
> >
> >  	return vdev->ops->bind_iommufd(vdev, ictx, &df->devid);
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *vdev,
> >  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> >
> >  	/* compat noiommu does not need to do ioas attach */
> > -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > +	if (vdev->noiommu)
> >  		return 0;
> >
> >  	ret = iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_get_id(ictx, &ioas_id);
> > @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> >
> >  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> >
> > -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev)) {
> > +	if (vdev->noiommu) {
> >  		vfio_iommufd_noiommu_unbind(vdev);
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> >  {
> >  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> >
> > -	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > +	if (vdev->noiommu)
> >  		return 0;
> >
> >  	return vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, pt_id);
> > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> >  {
> >  	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> >
> > -	if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > +	if (!vdev->noiommu)
> >  		vdev->ops->detach_ioas(vdev);
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > index 50553f67600f..c8579d63b2b9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > @@ -106,10 +106,11 @@ bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device);
> >  int __init vfio_group_init(void);
> >  void vfio_group_cleanup(void);
> >
> > -static inline bool vfio_device_is_noiommu(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > +static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
> >  {
> > -	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
> > -	       vdev->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
> > +	device->noiommu = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
> > +			  device->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_CONTAINER)
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > index 8c3f26b4929b..8979f320d620 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > @@ -289,8 +289,12 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> > +	ret = vfio_device_set_noiommu(device);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto err_out;
> > +
> >  	ret = dev_set_name(&device->device, "%svfio%d",
> > -			   vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) ? "noiommu-" : "", device-
> >index);
> > +			   device->noiommu ? "noiommu-" : "", device->index);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		goto err_out;
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > index cf9d082a623c..fa13889e763f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
> >  	bool iommufd_attached;
> >  #endif
> >  	bool cdev_opened:1;
> > +	bool noiommu:1;
> >  };
> >
> >  /**


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support
  2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
                   ` (23 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-05-18  5:39 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Xu, Terrence
@ 2023-05-23  7:42 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Duan, Zhenzhong @ 2023-05-23  7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Yi L, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
	Tian, Kevin
  Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
	yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com, peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	clegoate@redhat.com



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2023 9:28 PM
>To: alex.williamson@redhat.com; jgg@nvidia.com; Tian, Kevin
><kevin.tian@intel.com>
>Cc: joro@8bytes.org; robin.murphy@arm.com; cohuck@redhat.com;
>eric.auger@redhat.com; nicolinc@nvidia.com; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
>mjrosato@linux.ibm.com; chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com; Liu, Yi L
><yi.l.liu@intel.com>; yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com; peterx@redhat.com;
>jasowang@redhat.com; shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com;
>lulu@redhat.com; suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com; intel-gvt-
>dev@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; linux-
>s390@vger.kernel.org; Hao, Xudong <xudong.hao@intel.com>; Zhao, Yan Y
><yan.y.zhao@intel.com>; Xu, Terrence <terrence.xu@intel.com>; Jiang,
>Yanting <yanting.jiang@intel.com>; Duan, Zhenzhong
><zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>; clegoate@redhat.com
>Subject: [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support
>
>Existing VFIO provides group-centric user APIs for userspace. Userspace opens
>the /dev/vfio/$group_id first before getting device fd and hence getting access
>to device. This is not the desired model for iommufd. Per the conclusion of
>community discussion[1], iommufd provides device-centric kAPIs and requires
>its consumer (like VFIO) to be device-centric user APIs. Such user APIs are used
>to associate device with iommufd and also the I/O address spaces managed
>by the iommufd.
>
>This series first introduces a per device file structure to be prepared for
>further enhancement and refactors the kvm-vfio code to be prepared for
>accepting device file from userspace. After this, adds a mechanism for
>blocking device access before iommufd bind. Then refactors the vfio to be
>able to handle cdev path (e.g. iommufd binding, no-iommufd, [de]attach ioas).
>This refactor includes making the device_open exclusive between the group
>and the cdev path, only allow single device open in cdev path; vfio-iommufd
>code is also refactored to support cdev. e.g. split the vfio_iommufd_bind()
>into two steps. Eventually, adds the cdev support for vfio device and the new
>ioctls, then makes group infrastructure optional as it is not needed when vfio
>device cdev is compiled.
>
>This series is based on some preparation works done to vfio emulated
>devices[2] and vfio pci hot reset enhancements[3].
>
>This series is a prerequisite for iommu nesting for vfio device[4] [5].
>
>The complete code can be found in below branch, simple tests done to the
>legacy group path and the cdev path. Draft QEMU branch can be found at[6]
>However, the noiommu mode test is only done with some hacks in kernel and
>qemu to check if qemu can boot with noiommu devices.
>
>https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/tree/vfio_device_cdev_v11
>(config CONFIG_IOMMUFD=y CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV=y)
>
>base-commit: b8b967d5ec691bddb883ab2abbfb8d632c97052e
>
>[1]
>https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/BN9PR11MB5433B1E4AE5B0480369F97178C189
>@BN9PR11MB5433.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
>[2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230327093351.44505-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/ -
>merged [3] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230513132136.15021-1-
>yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20230511143844.22693-1-
>yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>[5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20230511145110.27707-1-
>yi.l.liu@intel.com/#t
>[6]
>https://github.com/yiliu1765/qemu/tree/iommufd_rfcv4.mig.reset.v4_var3
>
>Change log:
>
>v11:
> - Add back the noiommu determination at vfio device registration patch and
>   put it prior to compiling vfio_group code optionally as compiling vfio_group
>   optionaly is the major reason for it.
> - Fix a typo related to SPAPR (Cédric Le Goater)
> - Add t-b from Shameerali Kolothum Thodi, tested on HiSilicon D06(ARM64)
>platform
>   with a NIC pass-through
>
>v10: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230426150321.454465-1-
>yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> - Drop patch 03 of v9 as vfio_file_is_group() is still needed by pci hot reset
>path
> - Drop 11 of v9 per the change of noiommu support
> - Move patch 18 of v9 to hot-reset series [3]
> - vfio_file_has_device_access() is dropped as no usage now (hot-reset does
>not accept
>   device fd, hence no need for this helper)
> - Minor change to patch 02, mainly make it back to patch v2 of v6 which is
>before
>   splitting hot-reset series
> - Minor change in 10 and 11 due to rebase
> - Functional changes in patch 19, 20 and 21 per the latest noiommu support
>   policy. noiommu device can be bound to valid iommufd now, this is different
>   from the prior policy in which noiommu device is not allowed to be bound to
>   valid iommufd. So may pay more attention on the three patches, previous r-
>b
>   and t-b are dropped for these three patches.
>
>v9: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230401151833.124749-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> - Use smp_load_acquire() in vfio_file_has_device_access() for df-
>>access_granted (Alex)
> - Fix lock init in patch 16 of v8 (Jon Pan-Doh)
> - Split patch 20 of v8 (Alex)
> - Refine noiommu logic in BIND_IOMMUFD (Alex)
> - Remove dev_cookie in BIND_IOMMUFD ioctl (Alex, Jason)
> - Remove static_assert in ATTACH/DETACH ioctl handling (Alex)
> - Remove device->ops->bind_iommufd presence check in
>BIND_IOMMUFD/ATTACH/DETACH handling (Alex)
> - Remove VFIO dependecny for VFIO_CONTAINER as VFIO_GROUP should
>imply it (Alex)
> - Improve the documentation per suggestions from Alex on patch 24 of v8
>(Alex)
> - Remove WARN_ON(df->group) in vfio_device_group_uses_container() of
>patch 11
> - Add r-b from Kevin to patch 18/19 of v8
> - Add r-b from Jason to patch 03/10/11 of v8
> - Add t-b from Yanting Jiang and Nicolin Chen
>
>v8: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230327094047.47215-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> - Add patch 18 to determine noiommu device at vfio_device registration
>(Jason)
> - Add patch 19 to name noiommu device with "noiommu-" prefix to be par
>with
>   group path
> - Add r-b from Kevin
> - Add t-b from Terrence
>
>v7: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230316125534.17216-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> - Split the vfio-pci hot reset changes to be separate patch series (Jason, Kevin)
> - More polish on no-iommufd support (patch 11 - 13) in cdev path (Kevin)
> - iommufd_access_detach() in patch 16 is added by Nic for emulated devices
>(Kevin, Jason)
>
>v6: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230308132903.465159-1-
>yi.l.liu@intel.com/#t
> - Add r-b from Jason on patch 01 - 08 and 13 in v5
> - Based on the prerequisite mini-series which makes vfio emulated devices
>   be prepared to cdev (Jason)
> - Add the approach to pass a set of device fds to do hot reset ownership
>   check, while the zero-length array approach is also kept. (Jason, Kevin, Alex)
> - Drop patch 10 of v5, it is reworked by patch 13 and 17 in v6 (Jason)
> - Store vfio_group pointer in vfio_device_file to check if user is using
>   legacy vfio container (Jason)
> - Drop the is_cdev_device flag (introduced in patch 14 of v5) as the group
>   pointer stored in vfio_device_file can cover it.
> - Add iommu_group check in the cdev no-iommu path patch 24 (Kevin)
> - Add t-b from Terrence, Nicolin and Matthew (thanks for the help, some
>patches
>   are new in this version, so I just added t-b to the patches that are also
>   in v5 and no big change, for others would add in this version).
>
>v5: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230227111135.61728-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> - Add r-b from Kevin on patch 08, 13, 14, 15 and 17.
> - Rename patch 02 to limit the change for KVM facing kAPIs. The vfio pci
>   hot reset path only accepts group file until patch 09. (Kevin)
> - Update comment around smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted) (Yan)
> - Adopt Jason's suggestion on the vfio pci hot reset path, passing zero-length
>   fd array to indicate using bound iommufd_ctx as ownership check. (Jason,
>Kevin)
> - Direct read df->access_granted value in vfio_device_cdev_close() (Kevin, Yan,
>Jason)
> - Wrap the iommufd get/put into a helper to refine the error path of
>   vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(). (Yan)
>
>v4: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230221034812.138051-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> - Add r-b from Kevin on patch 09/10
> - Add a line in devices/vfio.rst to emphasize user should add group/device to
>   KVM prior to invoke open_device op which may be called in the
>VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD
>   or VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD ioctl.
> - Modify VFIO_GROUP/VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV Kconfig dependency (Alex)
> - Select VFIO_GROUP for SPAPR (Jason)
> - Check device fully-opened in PCI hotreset path for device fd (Jason)
> - Set df->access_granted in the caller of vfio_device_open() since
>   the caller may fail in other operations, but df->access_granted
>   does not allow a true to false change. So it should be set only when
>   the open path is really done successfully. (Yan, Kevin)
> - Fix missing iommufd_ctx_put() in the cdev path (Yan)
> - Fix an issue found in testing exclusion between group and cdev path.
>   vfio_device_cdev_close() should check df->access_granted before heading
>   to other operations.
> - Update vfio.rst for iommufd/cdev
>
>v3: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230213151348.56451-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> - Add r-b from Kevin on patch 03, 06, 07, 08.
> - Refine the group and cdev path exclusion. Remove vfio_device:single_open;
>   add vfio_group::cdev_device_open_cnt to achieve exlucsion between group
>   path and cdev path (Kevin, Jason)
> - Fix a bug in the error handling path (Yan Zhao)
> - Address misc remarks from Kevin
>
>v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230206090532.95598-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> - Add r-b from Kevin and Eric on patch 01 02 04.
> - "Split kvm/vfio: Provide struct kvm_device_ops::release() insted
>of ::destroy()"
>   from this series and got applied. (Alex, Kevin, Jason, Mathhew)
> - Add kvm_ref_lock to protect vfio_device_file->kvm instead of reusing
>   dev_set->lock as dead-lock is observed with vfio-ap which would try to
>   acquire kvm_lock. This is opposite lock order with kvm_device_release()
>   which holds kvm_lock first and then hold dev_set->lock. (Kevin)
> - Use a separate ioctl for detaching IOAS. (Alex)
> - Rename vfio_device_file::single_open to be is_cdev_device (Kevin, Alex)
> - Move the vfio device cdev code into device_cdev.c and add a
>VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV
>   kconfig for it. (Kevin, Jason)
>
>v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230117134942.101112-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> - Fix the circular refcount between kvm struct and device file reference.
>(JasonG)
> - Address comments from KevinT
> - Remained the ioctl for detach, needs to Alex's taste
>
>(https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/BN9PR11MB5276BE9F4B0613EE859317028CFF9
>@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/)
>
>rfc: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221219084718.9342-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>
>Thanks,
>	Yi Liu
>
>Nicolin Chen (1):
>  iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API
>
>Yi Liu (22):
>  vfio: Allocate per device file structure
>  vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM
>  vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI
>  kvm/vfio: Rename kvm_vfio_group to prepare for accepting vfio device
>    fd
>  kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace
>  vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close()
>  vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened
>  vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group
>  vfio: Make vfio_device_open() single open for device cdev path
>  vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind()
>  vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps
>  vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file
>  vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices
>  vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices
>  vfio: Name noiommu vfio_device with "noiommu-" prefix
>  vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in
>    unregister
>  vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device
>  vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
>  vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
>  vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev()
>  vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally
>  docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description
>
> Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst             | 140 +++++++++-
> Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vfio.rst       |  47 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c              |   1 +
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/Kconfig                 |   4 +-
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c                |  76 +++++-
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h       |   2 +
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c               |   1 +
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c             |   1 +
> drivers/vfio/Kconfig                          |  25 ++
> drivers/vfio/Makefile                         |   3 +-
> drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c                    | 258 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c             |   1 +
> drivers/vfio/group.c                          | 150 ++++++----
> drivers/vfio/iommufd.c                        | 125 ++++++---
> .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c    |   2 +
> drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/main.c                  |   1 +
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                   |   1 +
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c              |  16 +-
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_amba.c             |   1 +
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform.c         |   1 +
> drivers/vfio/vfio.h                           | 238 ++++++++++++++--
> drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c                      | 225 +++++++++++++--
> include/linux/iommufd.h                       |   1 +
> include/linux/vfio.h                          |  45 ++-
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                      |  13 +-
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h                     |  80 ++++++
> samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c                    |   1 +
> samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c                      |   1 +
> samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c                      |   1 +
> virt/kvm/vfio.c                               | 137 +++++-----
> 30 files changed, 1365 insertions(+), 233 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
>drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
>
>--
>2.34.1

Tested noiommu mode in two ways, both tests passed.
One way is an ixgbe card in noiommu mode passthroughed to guest without doing DMA(need changing qemu to open noiommu device).
The other way is same ixgbe card used in DPDK to receive packages from another server.

Tested-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-23  1:20     ` Liu, Yi L
@ 2023-05-23 15:50       ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-24  2:12         ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-23 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Yi L
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

On Tue, 23 May 2023 01:20:17 +0000
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:16 AM
> > 
> > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:24 -0700
> > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > This adds ioctl for userspace to attach device cdev fd to and detach
> > > from IOAS/hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> > >
> > >     VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT: attach vfio device to IOAS, hw_pagetable
> > > 				   managed by iommufd. Attach can be
> > > 				   undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT
> > > 				   or device fd close.
> > >     VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT: detach vfio device from the current attached
> > > 				   IOAS or hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c     | 18 +++++++++++
> > >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        | 18 +++++++++++
> > >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |  8 +++++
> > >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  5 files changed, 162 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > index 291cc678a18b..3f14edb80a93 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > @@ -174,6 +174,72 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file  
> > *df,  
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > +			     struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > +	struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt attach;
> > > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt, pt_id);
> > > +
> > > +	if (copy_from_user(&attach, arg, minsz))
> > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > +	if (attach.argsz < minsz || attach.flags)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	/* ATTACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > +	if (df->group)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +	ret = vfio_iommufd_attach(device, &attach.pt_id);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		goto out_unlock;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->pt_id, &attach.pt_id,
> > > +			   sizeof(attach.pt_id)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		goto out_detach;
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +
> > > +out_detach:
> > > +	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> > > +out_unlock:
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > +			     struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > +	struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt detach;
> > > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > > +
> > > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt, flags);
> > > +
> > > +	if (copy_from_user(&detach, arg, minsz))
> > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > +	if (detach.argsz < minsz || detach.flags)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	/* DETACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > +	if (df->group)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
> > >  {
> > >  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > index 83575b65ea01..799ea322a7d4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > @@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > >  		vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> > > +{
> > > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > > +		return 0;  
> > 
> > Isn't this an invalid operation for a noiommu cdev, ie. -EINVAL?  We
> > return success and copy back the provided pt_id, why would a user not
> > consider it a bug that they can't use whatever value was there with
> > iommufd?  
> 
> Yes, this is the question I asked in [1]. At that time, it appears to me
> that better to allow it [2]. Maybe it's more suitable to ask it here.

From an API perspective it seems wrong.  We return success without
doing anything.  A user would be right to consider it a bug that the
attach operation works but there's not actually any association to the
IOAS.  Thanks,

Alex


> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/c203f11f-4d9f-cf43-03ab-e41a858bdd92@intel.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/ZFFUyhqID+LtUB%2FD@nvidia.com/
> 
> > > +
> > > +	return vdev->ops->attach_ioas(vdev, pt_id);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > +	if (!vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > > +		vdev->ops->detach_ioas(vdev);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_iommufd_physical_ictx(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > >  {
> > >  	if (vdev->iommufd_device)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > index 8b359a7794be..50553f67600f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ int vfio_iommufd_bind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> > >  void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> > >  int vfio_iommufd_compat_attach_ioas(struct vfio_device *device,
> > >  				    struct iommufd_ctx *ictx);
> > > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id);
> > > +void vfio_iommufd_detach(struct vfio_device *vdev);
> > >  #else
> > >  static inline int
> > >  vfio_iommufd_compat_probe_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device,
> > > @@ -282,6 +284,10 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct  
> > file *filep);  
> > >  void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> > >  long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > >  				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg);
> > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > +			     struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg);
> > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > +			     struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg);
> > >  int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
> > >  void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
> > >  #else
> > > @@ -315,6 +321,18 @@ static inline long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct  
> > vfio_device_file *df,  
> > >  	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static inline int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > +					   struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user  
> > *arg)  
> > > +{
> > > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > +					   struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt  
> > __user *arg)  
> > > +{
> > > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
> > >  {
> > >  	return 0;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > index c9fa39ac4b02..8c3f26b4929b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > @@ -1165,6 +1165,14 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> > >  		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_feature(device, (void __user *)arg);
> > >  		break;
> > >
> > > +	case VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT:
> > > +		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_attach(df, (void __user *)arg);
> > > +		break;
> > > +
> > > +	case VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT:
> > > +		ret = vfio_ioctl_device_detach(df, (void __user *)arg);
> > > +		break;
> > > +
> > >  	default:
> > >  		if (unlikely(!device->ops->ioctl))
> > >  			ret = -EINVAL;
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > index 07c917de31e9..770f5f949929 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > @@ -222,6 +222,58 @@ struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd {
> > >
> > >  #define VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD	_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 20,
> > > + *					struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt)
> > > + *
> > > + * Attach a vfio device to an iommufd address space specified by IOAS
> > > + * id or hw_pagetable (hwpt) id.
> > > + *
> > > + * Available only after a device has been bound to iommufd via
> > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
> > > + *
> > > + * Undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT or device fd close.
> > > + *
> > > + * @argsz:	User filled size of this data.
> > > + * @flags:	Must be 0.
> > > + * @pt_id:	Input the target id which can represent an ioas or a hwpt
> > > + *		allocated via iommufd subsystem.
> > > + *		Output the input ioas id or the attached hwpt id which could
> > > + *		be the specified hwpt itself or a hwpt automatically created
> > > + *		for the specified ioas by kernel during the attachment.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > > + */
> > > +struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt {
> > > +	__u32	argsz;
> > > +	__u32	flags;
> > > +	__u32	pt_id;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT		_IO(VFIO_TYPE,  
> > VFIO_BASE + 20)  
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT - _IOW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 21,
> > > + *					struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt)
> > > + *
> > > + * Detach a vfio device from the iommufd address space it has been
> > > + * attached to. After it, device should be in a blocking DMA state.
> > > + *
> > > + * Available only after a device has been bound to iommufd via
> > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD.  
> > 
> > These "[a]vailable only after" comments are meaningless, if the user
> > has the file descriptor the ioctl is available.  We can say that ATTACH
> > should be used after BIND to associate the device with an address space
> > within the bound iommufd and DETACH removes that association, but the
> > user is welcome to call everything in the wrong order and we need to be
> > prepared for that anyway.  Thanks,  
> 
> Oh, yes. it's available as long as FD is got. But it is expected to fail if
> the order is not met. This should be what the comment really wants
> to deliver. Will have a look at other ioctls as well.
> 
> Regards,
> Yi Liu
> 
> > 
> > Alex
> >   
> > > + *
> > > + * @argsz:	User filled size of this data.
> > > + * @flags:	Must be 0.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > > + */
> > > +struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt {
> > > +	__u32	argsz;
> > > +	__u32	flags;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT		_IO(VFIO_TYPE,  
> > VFIO_BASE + 21)  
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 7,
> > >   *						struct vfio_device_info)  
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
  2023-05-23  1:41     ` Liu, Yi L
@ 2023-05-23 15:51       ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-24  2:20         ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-23 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Yi L
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

On Tue, 23 May 2023 01:41:36 +0000
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:01 AM
> > 
> > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:23 -0700
> > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > This adds ioctl for userspace to bind device cdev fd to iommufd.
> > >
> > >     VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD: bind device to an iommufd, hence gain DMA
> > > 			      control provided by the iommufd. open_device
> > > 			      op is called after bind_iommufd op.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        |  13 ++++
> > >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |   5 ++
> > >  include/linux/vfio.h       |   3 +-
> > >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  |  28 ++++++++
> > >  5 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > index 1c640016a824..291cc678a18b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > >   * Copyright (c) 2023 Intel Corporation.
> > >   */
> > >  #include <linux/vfio.h>
> > > +#include <linux/iommufd.h>
> > >
> > >  #include "vfio.h"
> > >
> > > @@ -44,6 +45,135 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct  
> > file *filep)  
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static void vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > +{
> > > +	spin_lock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> > > +	if (df->kvm)
> > > +		_vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df->device, df->kvm);
> > > +	spin_unlock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * In the time of close, there is no contention with another one
> > > +	 * changing this flag.  So read df->access_granted without lock
> > > +	 * and no smp_load_acquire() is ok.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (!df->access_granted)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +	vfio_device_close(df);
> > > +	vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> > > +	iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
> > > +	device->cdev_opened = false;
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +	vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(int fd)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd;
> > > +	struct fd f;
> > > +
> > > +	f = fdget(fd);
> > > +	if (!f.file)
> > > +		return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
> > > +
> > > +	iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
> > > +
> > > +	fdput(f);
> > > +	return iommufd;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > +				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > +	struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind;
> > > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	static_assert(__same_type(arg->out_devid, df->devid));
> > > +
> > > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd, out_devid);
> > > +
> > > +	if (copy_from_user(&bind, arg, minsz))
> > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > +	if (bind.argsz < minsz || bind.flags || bind.iommufd < 0)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	/* BIND_IOMMUFD only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > +	if (df->group)
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> > > +		return -EPERM;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = vfio_device_block_group(device);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +	/* one device cannot be bound twice */
> > > +	if (df->access_granted) {
> > > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > > +		goto out_unlock;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	df->iommufd = vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(bind.iommufd);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(df->iommufd)) {
> > > +		ret = PTR_ERR(df->iommufd);
> > > +		df->iommufd = NULL;
> > > +		goto out_unlock;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Before the device open, get the KVM pointer currently
> > > +	 * associated with the device file (if there is) and obtain
> > > +	 * a reference.  This reference is held until device closed.
> > > +	 * Save the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df);
> > > +
> > > +	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		goto out_put_kvm;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->out_devid, &df->devid,
> > > +			   sizeof(df->devid)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		goto out_close_device;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Paired with smp_load_acquire() in vfio_device_fops::ioctl/
> > > +	 * read/write/mmap
> > > +	 */
> > > +	smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true);
> > > +	device->cdev_opened = true;
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +
> > > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
> > > +		dev_warn(device->dev, "noiommu device is bound to iommufd by user  
> > "  
> > > +			 "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));  
> > 
> > The noiommu kernel taint only happens in vfio_group_find_or_alloc(), so
> > how does noiommu taint the kernel when !CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP?  
> 
> Yeah, in the cdev path, no taint. I add this just in order to par with the below
> message in the group path.
> 
> vfio_device_open_file()
> {
> 	dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device opened by user "
> 		   "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> }

There needs to be a taint when VFIO_GROUP is disabled.  Thanks,

Alex
 
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +
> > > +out_close_device:
> > > +	vfio_device_close(df);
> > > +out_put_kvm:
> > > +	vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> > > +	iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
> > > +	df->iommufd = NULL;
> > > +out_unlock:
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > +	vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
> > >  {
> > >  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > index 6861f8ebb64d..8b359a7794be 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
> > > @@ -279,6 +279,9 @@ static inline void vfio_device_del(struct vfio_device *device)
> > >
> > >  void vfio_init_device_cdev(struct vfio_device *device);
> > >  int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep);
> > > +void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df);
> > > +long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > +				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg);
> > >  int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class);
> > >  void vfio_cdev_cleanup(void);
> > >  #else
> > > @@ -302,6 +305,16 @@ static inline int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode  
> > *inode,  
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static inline void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > +						  struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd  
> > __user *arg)  
> > > +{
> > > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static inline int vfio_cdev_init(struct class *device_class)
> > >  {
> > >  	return 0;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > index c87cc7afe92c..c9fa39ac4b02 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> > > @@ -574,6 +574,8 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct  
> > file *filep)  
> > >
> > >  	if (df->group)
> > >  		vfio_device_group_close(df);
> > > +	else
> > > +		vfio_device_cdev_close(df);
> > >
> > >  	vfio_device_put_registration(device);
> > >
> > > @@ -1147,6 +1149,9 @@ static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
> > >  	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >
> > > +	if (cmd == VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD)
> > > +		return vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(df, (void __user *)arg);
> > > +
> > >  	/* Paired with smp_store_release() following vfio_device_open() */
> > >  	if (!smp_load_acquire(&df->access_granted))
> > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > index 873275419f13..cf9d082a623c 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
> > >  	struct iommufd_device *iommufd_device;
> > >  	bool iommufd_attached;
> > >  #endif
> > > +	bool cdev_opened:1;
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  /**
> > > @@ -169,7 +170,7 @@ vfio_iommufd_physical_devid(struct vfio_device *vdev)
> > >
> > >  static inline bool vfio_device_cdev_opened(struct vfio_device *device)
> > >  {
> > > -	return false;
> > > +	return device->cdev_opened;
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  /**
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > index 24858b650562..07c917de31e9 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > > @@ -194,6 +194,34 @@ struct vfio_group_status {
> > >
> > >  /* --------------- IOCTLs for DEVICE file descriptors --------------- */
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD - _IOR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19,
> > > + *				   struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd)
> > > + *
> > > + * Bind a vfio_device to the specified iommufd.
> > > + *
> > > + * User is restricted from accessing the device before the binding operation
> > > + * is completed.
> > > + *
> > > + * Unbind is automatically conducted when device fd is closed.
> > > + *
> > > + * @argsz:	 User filled size of this data.
> > > + * @flags:	 Must be 0.
> > > + * @iommufd:	 iommufd to bind.
> > > + * @out_devid:	 The device id generated by this bind. devid is a handle for
> > > + *		 this device/iommufd bond and can be used in IOMMUFD commands.
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > > + */
> > > +struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd {
> > > +	__u32		argsz;
> > > +	__u32		flags;
> > > +	__s32		iommufd;
> > > +	__u32		out_devid;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD	_IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
> > > +  
> > 
> > Why is this preempting the first device ioctl below rather than being
> > added in sequential order?  I'm also not sure what's at device ioctl 18
> > that we started at 19.  VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE is at 17.  Yes, they're
> > hard to keep track of.  Thanks,  
> 
> yes, 17 is the last occupied ioctl offset on device fd. Will correct
> it.
> 
> Regards,
> Yi Liu
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-23 15:50       ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-05-24  2:12         ` Liu, Yi L
  2023-05-24 15:31           ` Alex Williamson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-24  2:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 11:50 PM
> 
> On Tue, 23 May 2023 01:20:17 +0000
> "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:16 AM
> > >
> > > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:24 -0700
> > > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This adds ioctl for userspace to attach device cdev fd to and detach
> > > > from IOAS/hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> > > >
> > > >     VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT: attach vfio device to IOAS, hw_pagetable
> > > > 				   managed by iommufd. Attach can be
> > > > 				   undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT
> > > > 				   or device fd close.
> > > >     VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT: detach vfio device from the current
> attached
> > > > 				   IOAS or hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > > > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c     | 18 +++++++++++
> > > >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        | 18 +++++++++++
> > > >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |  8 +++++
> > > >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  5 files changed, 162 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > > index 291cc678a18b..3f14edb80a93 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > > @@ -174,6 +174,72 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct
> vfio_device_file
> > > *df,
> > > >  	return ret;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > > +			     struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > > +	struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt attach;
> > > > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > > > +	int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt, pt_id);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (copy_from_user(&attach, arg, minsz))
> > > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (attach.argsz < minsz || attach.flags)
> > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* ATTACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > > +	if (df->group)
> > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > +	ret = vfio_iommufd_attach(device, &attach.pt_id);
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto out_unlock;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->pt_id, &attach.pt_id,
> > > > +			   sizeof(attach.pt_id)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto out_detach;
> > > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +out_detach:
> > > > +	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> > > > +out_unlock:
> > > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > +	return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > > +			     struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > > +	struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt detach;
> > > > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > > > +
> > > > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt, flags);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (copy_from_user(&detach, arg, minsz))
> > > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (detach.argsz < minsz || detach.flags)
> > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* DETACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > > +	if (df->group)
> > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > +	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> > > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > index 83575b65ea01..799ea322a7d4 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > @@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > >  		vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > > > +		return 0;
> > >
> > > Isn't this an invalid operation for a noiommu cdev, ie. -EINVAL?  We
> > > return success and copy back the provided pt_id, why would a user not
> > > consider it a bug that they can't use whatever value was there with
> > > iommufd?
> >
> > Yes, this is the question I asked in [1]. At that time, it appears to me
> > that better to allow it [2]. Maybe it's more suitable to ask it here.
> 
> From an API perspective it seems wrong.  We return success without
> doing anything.  A user would be right to consider it a bug that the
> attach operation works but there's not actually any association to the
> IOAS.  Thanks,

The current version is kind of tradeoff based on prior remarks when
I asked the question. As prior comment[2], it appears to me the attach
shall success for noiommu devices as well, but per your remark it seems
not in plan. So anyway, we may just fail the attach/detach for noiommu
devices. Is it?

btw. Should we document it somewhere as well? E.g. noiommu userspace
does not support attach/detach? Userspace should know it is opening
noiommu devices.

Regards,
Yi Liu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
  2023-05-23 15:51       ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-05-24  2:20         ` Liu, Yi L
  2023-05-24  2:39           ` Tian, Kevin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-24  2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 11:51 PM
> 
> On Tue, 23 May 2023 01:41:36 +0000
> "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:01 AM
> > >
> > > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:23 -0700
> > > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This adds ioctl for userspace to bind device cdev fd to iommufd.
> > > >
> > > >     VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD: bind device to an iommufd, hence gain DMA
> > > > 			      control provided by the iommufd. open_device
> > > > 			      op is called after bind_iommufd op.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > > > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        |  13 ++++
> > > >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |   5 ++
> > > >  include/linux/vfio.h       |   3 +-
> > > >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  |  28 ++++++++
> > > >  5 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > > index 1c640016a824..291cc678a18b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> > > >   * Copyright (c) 2023 Intel Corporation.
> > > >   */
> > > >  #include <linux/vfio.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/iommufd.h>
> > > >
> > > >  #include "vfio.h"
> > > >
> > > > @@ -44,6 +45,135 @@ int vfio_device_fops_cdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> > > file *filep)
> > > >  	return ret;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > +static void vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	spin_lock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> > > > +	if (df->kvm)
> > > > +		_vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df->device, df->kvm);
> > > > +	spin_unlock(&df->kvm_ref_lock);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +void vfio_device_cdev_close(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * In the time of close, there is no contention with another one
> > > > +	 * changing this flag.  So read df->access_granted without lock
> > > > +	 * and no smp_load_acquire() is ok.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	if (!df->access_granted)
> > > > +		return;
> > > > +
> > > > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > +	vfio_device_close(df);
> > > > +	vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
> > > > +	iommufd_ctx_put(df->iommufd);
> > > > +	device->cdev_opened = false;
> > > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > +	vfio_device_unblock_group(device);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static struct iommufd_ctx *vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(int fd)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd;
> > > > +	struct fd f;
> > > > +
> > > > +	f = fdget(fd);
> > > > +	if (!f.file)
> > > > +		return ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
> > > > +
> > > > +	iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
> > > > +
> > > > +	fdput(f);
> > > > +	return iommufd;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > > +				    struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd __user *arg)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > > +	struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind;
> > > > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > > > +	int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +	static_assert(__same_type(arg->out_devid, df->devid));
> > > > +
> > > > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd, out_devid);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (copy_from_user(&bind, arg, minsz))
> > > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (bind.argsz < minsz || bind.flags || bind.iommufd < 0)
> > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* BIND_IOMMUFD only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > > +	if (df->group)
> > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> > > > +		return -EPERM;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = vfio_device_block_group(device);
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > +	/* one device cannot be bound twice */
> > > > +	if (df->access_granted) {
> > > > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > +		goto out_unlock;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	df->iommufd = vfio_get_iommufd_from_fd(bind.iommufd);
> > > > +	if (IS_ERR(df->iommufd)) {
> > > > +		ret = PTR_ERR(df->iommufd);
> > > > +		df->iommufd = NULL;
> > > > +		goto out_unlock;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Before the device open, get the KVM pointer currently
> > > > +	 * associated with the device file (if there is) and obtain
> > > > +	 * a reference.  This reference is held until device closed.
> > > > +	 * Save the pointer in the device for use by drivers.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(df);
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = vfio_device_open(df);
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto out_put_kvm;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->out_devid, &df->devid,
> > > > +			   sizeof(df->devid)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > +		goto out_close_device;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Paired with smp_load_acquire() in vfio_device_fops::ioctl/
> > > > +	 * read/write/mmap
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	smp_store_release(&df->access_granted, true);
> > > > +	device->cdev_opened = true;
> > > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(device))
> > > > +		dev_warn(device->dev, "noiommu device is bound to iommufd by user
> > > "
> > > > +			 "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> > >
> > > The noiommu kernel taint only happens in vfio_group_find_or_alloc(), so
> > > how does noiommu taint the kernel when !CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP?
> >
> > Yeah, in the cdev path, no taint. I add this just in order to par with the below
> > message in the group path.
> >
> > vfio_device_open_file()
> > {
> > 	dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device opened by user "
> > 		   "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> > }
> 
> There needs to be a taint when VFIO_GROUP is disabled.  Thanks,
I see. I misunderstood you. You are asking for a taint. 😊

Actually, I've considered it. But it appears to me the taint in
vfio_group_find_or_alloc() is due to vfio allocates fake iommu_group.
This seems to be a taint to kernel. But now, you are suggesting to add
a taint as long as noiommu device is registered to vfio. Is it? If so,
the taint may be added to the new helper that we are discussing in
patch 21 of this series. [1] ? 

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230522170429.2d5ca274.alex.williamson@redhat.com/


Regards,
Yi Liu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
  2023-05-24  2:20         ` Liu, Yi L
@ 2023-05-24  2:39           ` Tian, Kevin
  2023-05-24  2:40             ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Tian, Kevin @ 2023-05-24  2:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Yi L, Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:21 AM
> 
> > >
> > > vfio_device_open_file()
> > > {
> > > 	dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device opened by user "
> > > 		   "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> > > }
> >
> > There needs to be a taint when VFIO_GROUP is disabled.  Thanks,
> I see. I misunderstood you. You are asking for a taint. 😊
> 
> Actually, I've considered it. But it appears to me the taint in
> vfio_group_find_or_alloc() is due to vfio allocates fake iommu_group.
> This seems to be a taint to kernel. But now, you are suggesting to add
> a taint as long as noiommu device is registered to vfio. Is it? If so,

taint is required because the kernel is exposed to user DMA attack
due to lacking of IOMMU protection.

fake iommu_group is just to meet vfio_group requirement.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
  2023-05-24  2:39           ` Tian, Kevin
@ 2023-05-24  2:40             ` Liu, Yi L
  2023-05-24  8:31               ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-24  2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tian, Kevin, Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:39 AM
> 
> > From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:21 AM
> >
> > > >
> > > > vfio_device_open_file()
> > > > {
> > > > 	dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device opened by user "
> > > > 		   "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> > > > }
> > >
> > > There needs to be a taint when VFIO_GROUP is disabled.  Thanks,
> > I see. I misunderstood you. You are asking for a taint. 😊
> >
> > Actually, I've considered it. But it appears to me the taint in
> > vfio_group_find_or_alloc() is due to vfio allocates fake iommu_group.
> > This seems to be a taint to kernel. But now, you are suggesting to add
> > a taint as long as noiommu device is registered to vfio. Is it? If so,
> 
> taint is required because the kernel is exposed to user DMA attack
> due to lacking of IOMMU protection.
> 
> fake iommu_group is just to meet vfio_group requirement.

Got it. thanks.

Regards,
Yi Liu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 21/23] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev()
  2023-05-23  2:13     ` Liu, Yi L
@ 2023-05-24  8:14       ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-24  8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

Hi Alex,

I've two new patches to address the comment in this patch. If
it makes sense then I'll put them in cdev v12.

> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 10:13 AM
>
> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 7:04 AM
> >
> > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:25 -0700
> > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is to make the cdev path and group path consistent for the noiommu
> > > devices registration. If vfio_noiommu is disabled, such registration
> > > should fail. However, this check is vfio_device_set_group() which is part
> > > of the vfio_group code. If the vfio_group code is compiled out, noiommu
> > > devices would be registered even vfio_noiommu is disabled.
> > >
> > > This adds vfio_device_set_noiommu() which can fail and calls it in the
> > > device registration. For now, it never fails as long as
> > > vfio_device_set_group() is successful. But when the vfio_group code is
> > > compiled out, vfio_device_set_noiommu() would fail the noiommu devices
> > > when vfio_noiommu is disabled.
> >
> > I'm lost.  After the next patch we end up with the following when
> > CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP is set:
> >
> > static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
> > {
> >         device->noiommu = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
> >                           device->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
> >         return 0;
> > }
> >
> > I think this is relying on the fact that vfio_device_set_group() which
> > is called immediately prior to this function would have performed the
> > testing for noiommu and failed prior to this function being called and
> > therefore there is no error return here.
> 
> Yes.

Remove the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) check:

From 3e93d33dc426350389a89130557a212cf370fee6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 20:48:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 19/23] vfio: Only check group->type for noiommu test

group->type can be VFIO_NO_IOMMU only when vfio_noiommu option is true.
And vfio_noiommu option can only be true if CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU is enabled.
So checking group->type is enough when testing noiommu.

Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/group.c | 3 +--
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h  | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index c930406cc261..3b56959fcdbb 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -133,8 +133,7 @@ static int vfio_group_ioctl_set_container(struct vfio_group *group,
 
 	iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
 	if (!IS_ERR(iommufd)) {
-		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
-		    group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU)
+		if (group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU)
 			ret = iommufd_vfio_compat_set_no_iommu(iommufd);
 		else
 			ret = iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_create(iommufd);
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index 0f66d0934e91..104c2ee93833 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ void vfio_group_cleanup(void);
 
 static inline bool vfio_device_is_noiommu(struct vfio_device *vdev)
 {
-	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) &&
-	       vdev->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
+	return vdev->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
 }
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_CONTAINER)
-- 
2.34.1

> >
> > Note also here that I think CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU was only being tested
> > here previously so that a smart enough compiler would optimize out the
> > entire function, we can never set a VFIO_NO_IOMMU type when
> > !CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU.
> 
> You are right. VFIO_NO_IOMMU type is only set when vfio_noiommu==true.
> 
> > That's no longer the case if the function is
> > refactored like this.
> >
> > When !CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP:
> >
> > static inline int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
> > {
> >         struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
> >
> >         iommu_group = iommu_group_get(device->dev);
> >         if (!iommu_group) {
> >                 if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) || !vfio_noiommu)
> >                         return -EINVAL;
> >                 device->noiommu = true;
> >         } else {
> >                 iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
> >                 device->noiommu = false;
> >         }
> >
> >         return 0;
> > }
> >
> > Here again, the NOIOMMU config option is irrelevant, vfio_noiommu can
> > only be true if the config option is enabled.  Therefore if there's no
> > IOMMU group and the module option to enable noiommu is not set, return
> > an error.
> 
> Yes. I think I missed the part that the vfio_noiommu option can only be
> true when CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU is enabled. That's why the check
> is "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU) && device->group->type ==
> VFIO_NO_IOMMU;".
> This appears that the two conditions are orthogonal.
> 
> >
> > It's really quite ugly that in one mode we rely on this function to
> > generate the error and in the other mode it happens prior to getting
> > here.
> >
> > The above could be simplified to something like:
> >
> > 	iommu_group = iommu_group_get(device->dev);
> > 	if (!iommu_group && !vfio_iommu)
> > 		return -EINVAL;
> >
> > 	device->noiommu = !iommu_group;
> > 	iommu_group_put(iommu_group); /* Accepts NULL */
> > 	return 0;
> >
> > Which would actually work regardless of CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP, where maybe
> > this could then be moved before vfio_device_set_group() and become the
> > de facto exit point for invalid noiommu configurations and maybe we
> > could remove the test from the group code (with a comment to note that
> > it's been tested prior)?  Thanks,
> 
> Yes, this looks much clearer. I think this new logic must be called before
> vfio_device_set_group(). Otherwise,  iommu_group_get () may return
> the faked groups. Then it would need to work differently per CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP
> configuration.

Below patch adopts your suggestion on noiommu determination.
It also moves the noiommu taint in vfio_device_set_noiommu().

From 757a168acca7e94beec4448fba4600155569d823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 01:55:28 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 20/23] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev()

This moves the noiommu device determination and noiommu taint out of
vfio_group_find_or_alloc().

This is also helpful for compiling out vfio_group infrastructure when
vfio device cdev is added as noiommu determination is common between
the cdev path and group path.

Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/group.c     | 18 +++---------------
 drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/vfio.h     |  1 +
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index 3b56959fcdbb..9ee6e70531d3 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -670,21 +670,6 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
 	struct vfio_group *group;
 
 	iommu_group = iommu_group_get(dev);
-	if (!iommu_group && vfio_noiommu) {
-		/*
-		 * With noiommu enabled, create an IOMMU group for devices that
-		 * don't already have one, implying no IOMMU hardware/driver
-		 * exists.  Taint the kernel because we're about to give a DMA
-		 * capable device to a user without IOMMU protection.
-		 */
-		group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(dev, VFIO_NO_IOMMU);
-		if (!IS_ERR(group)) {
-			add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
-			dev_warn(dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio-noiommu group on device\n");
-		}
-		return group;
-	}
-
 	if (!iommu_group)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
@@ -720,6 +705,9 @@ int vfio_device_set_group(struct vfio_device *device,
 {
 	struct vfio_group *group;
 
+	if (device->noiommu)
+		type = VFIO_NO_IOMMU;
+
 	if (type == VFIO_IOMMU)
 		group = vfio_group_find_or_alloc(device->dev);
 	else
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 20f463088e71..da46e2e74642 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -266,6 +266,18 @@ static int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int vfio_device_set_noiommu(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	struct iommu_group *iommu_group = iommu_group_get(device->dev);
+
+	if (!iommu_group && !vfio_noiommu)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	device->noiommu = !iommu_group;
+	iommu_group_put(iommu_group); /* Accepts NULL */
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
 			       enum vfio_group_type type)
 {
@@ -285,6 +297,10 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
 	if (!device->dev_set)
 		vfio_assign_device_set(device, device);
 
+	ret = vfio_device_set_noiommu(device);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	ret = vfio_device_set_group(device, type);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -303,6 +319,15 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
 
 	vfio_device_group_register(device);
 
+	if (device->noiommu) {
+		/*
+		 * noiommu deivces have no IOMMU hardware/driver.  Taint the
+		 * kernel because we're about to give a DMA capable device to
+		 * a user without IOMMU protection.
+		 */
+		add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
+		dev_warn(device->dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio-noiommu on device\n");
+	}
 	return 0;
 err_out:
 	vfio_device_remove_group(device);
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index e80a8ac86e46..183e620009e7 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct vfio_device {
 	bool iommufd_attached;
 #endif
 	bool cdev_opened:1;
+	bool noiommu:1;
 };
 
 /**
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
  2023-05-24  2:40             ` Liu, Yi L
@ 2023-05-24  8:31               ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-24  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tian, Kevin, Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:41 AM
> 
> > From: Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:39 AM
> >
> > > From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:21 AM
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > vfio_device_open_file()
> > > > > {
> > > > > 	dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device opened by user "
> > > > > 		   "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > > > There needs to be a taint when VFIO_GROUP is disabled.  Thanks,
> > > I see. I misunderstood you. You are asking for a taint. 😊
> > >
> > > Actually, I've considered it. But it appears to me the taint in
> > > vfio_group_find_or_alloc() is due to vfio allocates fake iommu_group.
> > > This seems to be a taint to kernel. But now, you are suggesting to add
> > > a taint as long as noiommu device is registered to vfio. Is it? If so,
> >
> > taint is required because the kernel is exposed to user DMA attack
> > due to lacking of IOMMU protection.
> >
> > fake iommu_group is just to meet vfio_group requirement.
> 
> Got it. thanks.

Please refer to the proposed change in [1]. The noiommu taint is
moved to the end of __vfio_register_dev() rely on the noiommu
flag set by vfio_device_set_noiommu().

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/DS0PR11MB752907D211E3703145503A12C3419@DS0PR11MB7529.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/

Regards,
Yi Liu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-24  2:12         ` Liu, Yi L
@ 2023-05-24 15:31           ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-25  3:03             ` Liu, Yi L
  2023-06-06 14:40             ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-24 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Yi L
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

On Wed, 24 May 2023 02:12:14 +0000
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 11:50 PM
> > 
> > On Tue, 23 May 2023 01:20:17 +0000
> > "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:16 AM
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:24 -0700
> > > > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > > This adds ioctl for userspace to attach device cdev fd to and detach
> > > > > from IOAS/hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> > > > >
> > > > >     VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT: attach vfio device to IOAS, hw_pagetable
> > > > > 				   managed by iommufd. Attach can be
> > > > > 				   undo by VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT
> > > > > 				   or device fd close.
> > > > >     VFIO_DEVICE_DETACH_IOMMUFD_PT: detach vfio device from the current  
> > attached  
> > > > > 				   IOAS or hw_pagetable managed by iommufd.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested-by: Yanting Jiang <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
> > > > > Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c     | 18 +++++++++++
> > > > >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h        | 18 +++++++++++
> > > > >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c   |  8 +++++
> > > > >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  5 files changed, 162 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > > > index 291cc678a18b..3f14edb80a93 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c
> > > > > @@ -174,6 +174,72 @@ long vfio_device_ioctl_bind_iommufd(struct  
> > vfio_device_file  
> > > > *df,  
> > > > >  	return ret;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_attach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > > > +			     struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > > > +	struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt attach;
> > > > > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > > > > +	int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt, pt_id);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (copy_from_user(&attach, arg, minsz))
> > > > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (attach.argsz < minsz || attach.flags)
> > > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	/* ATTACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > > > +	if (df->group)
> > > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > > +	ret = vfio_iommufd_attach(device, &attach.pt_id);
> > > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > > +		goto out_unlock;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	ret = copy_to_user(&arg->pt_id, &attach.pt_id,
> > > > > +			   sizeof(attach.pt_id)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> > > > > +	if (ret)
> > > > > +		goto out_detach;
> > > > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	return 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +out_detach:
> > > > > +	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> > > > > +out_unlock:
> > > > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > > +	return ret;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +int vfio_ioctl_device_detach(struct vfio_device_file *df,
> > > > > +			     struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt __user *arg)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	struct vfio_device *device = df->device;
> > > > > +	struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt detach;
> > > > > +	unsigned long minsz;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_device_detach_iommufd_pt, flags);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (copy_from_user(&detach, arg, minsz))
> > > > > +		return -EFAULT;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (detach.argsz < minsz || detach.flags)
> > > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	/* DETACH only allowed for cdev fds */
> > > > > +	if (df->group)
> > > > > +		return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > > +	vfio_iommufd_detach(device);
> > > > > +	mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static char *vfio_device_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > index 83575b65ea01..799ea322a7d4 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > @@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > > >  		vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
> > > > >  }
> > > > >
> > > > > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > > > > +		return 0;  
> > > >
> > > > Isn't this an invalid operation for a noiommu cdev, ie. -EINVAL?  We
> > > > return success and copy back the provided pt_id, why would a user not
> > > > consider it a bug that they can't use whatever value was there with
> > > > iommufd?  
> > >
> > > Yes, this is the question I asked in [1]. At that time, it appears to me
> > > that better to allow it [2]. Maybe it's more suitable to ask it here.  
> > 
> > From an API perspective it seems wrong.  We return success without
> > doing anything.  A user would be right to consider it a bug that the
> > attach operation works but there's not actually any association to the
> > IOAS.  Thanks,  
> 
> The current version is kind of tradeoff based on prior remarks when
> I asked the question. As prior comment[2], it appears to me the attach
> shall success for noiommu devices as well, but per your remark it seems
> not in plan. So anyway, we may just fail the attach/detach for noiommu
> devices. Is it?

If a user creates an ioas within an iommufd, attaches a device to that
ioas and populates it with mappings, wouldn't the user expect the
device to have access to and honor those mappings?  I think that's the
path we're headed down if we report a successful attach of a noiommu
device to an ioas.

We need to keep in mind that noiommu was meant to be a minimally
intrusive mechanism to provide a dummy vfio IOMMU backend and satisfy
the group requirements, solely for the purpose of making use of the
vfio device interface and without providing any DMA mapping services or
expectations.  IMO, an argument that we need the attach op to succeed in
order to avoid too much disruption in userspace code is nonsense.  On
the contrary, userspace needs to be very aware of this difference and
we shouldn't invest effort trying to make noiommu more convenient to
use.  It's inherently unsafe.

I'm not fond of what a mess noiommu has become with cdev, we're well
beyond the minimal code trickery of the legacy implementation.  I hate
to ask, but could we reiterate our requirements for noiommu as a part of
the native iommufd interface for vfio?  The nested userspace requirement
is gone now that hypervisors have vIOMMU support, so my assumption is
that this is only for bare metal systems without an IOMMU, which
ideally are less and less prevalent.  Are there any noiommu userspaces
that are actually going to adopt the noiommu cdev interface?  What
terrible things happen if noiommu only exists in the vfio group compat
interface to iommufd and at some distant point in the future dies when
that gets disabled?

> btw. Should we document it somewhere as well? E.g. noiommu userspace
> does not support attach/detach? Userspace should know it is opening
> noiommu devices.

Documentation never hurts.  This is such a specialized use case I'm not
sure we've bothered to do much documentation for noiommu previously.
Thanks,

Alex


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-24 15:31           ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-05-25  3:03             ` Liu, Yi L
  2023-05-25 15:59               ` Alex Williamson
  2023-06-06 14:42               ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2023-06-06 14:40             ` Jason Gunthorpe
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-25  3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 11:32 PM
> 
> On Wed, 24 May 2023 02:12:14 +0000
> "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 11:50 PM
> > >
> > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 01:20:17 +0000
> > > "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:16 AM
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:24 -0700
> > > > > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > > index 83575b65ea01..799ea322a7d4 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > > @@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > > > >  		vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > > > > > +		return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > Isn't this an invalid operation for a noiommu cdev, ie. -EINVAL?  We
> > > > > return success and copy back the provided pt_id, why would a user not
> > > > > consider it a bug that they can't use whatever value was there with
> > > > > iommufd?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, this is the question I asked in [1]. At that time, it appears to me
> > > > that better to allow it [2]. Maybe it's more suitable to ask it here.
> > >
> > > From an API perspective it seems wrong.  We return success without
> > > doing anything.  A user would be right to consider it a bug that the
> > > attach operation works but there's not actually any association to the
> > > IOAS.  Thanks,
> >
> > The current version is kind of tradeoff based on prior remarks when
> > I asked the question. As prior comment[2], it appears to me the attach
> > shall success for noiommu devices as well, but per your remark it seems
> > not in plan. So anyway, we may just fail the attach/detach for noiommu
> > devices. Is it?
> 
> If a user creates an ioas within an iommufd, attaches a device to that
> ioas and populates it with mappings, wouldn't the user expect the
> device to have access to and honor those mappings?  I think that's the
> path we're headed down if we report a successful attach of a noiommu
> device to an ioas.

makes sense. Let's just fail attach/detach for noiommu devices.

> 
> We need to keep in mind that noiommu was meant to be a minimally
> intrusive mechanism to provide a dummy vfio IOMMU backend and satisfy
> the group requirements, solely for the purpose of making use of the
> vfio device interface and without providing any DMA mapping services or
> expectations.  IMO, an argument that we need the attach op to succeed in
> order to avoid too much disruption in userspace code is nonsense.  On
> the contrary, userspace needs to be very aware of this difference and
> we shouldn't invest effort trying to make noiommu more convenient to
> use.  It's inherently unsafe.
> 
> I'm not fond of what a mess noiommu has become with cdev, we're well
> beyond the minimal code trickery of the legacy implementation.  I hate
> to ask, but could we reiterate our requirements for noiommu as a part of
> the native iommufd interface for vfio?  The nested userspace requirement
> is gone now that hypervisors have vIOMMU support, so my assumption is
> that this is only for bare metal systems without an IOMMU, which
> ideally are less and less prevalent.  Are there any noiommu userspaces
> that are actually going to adopt the noiommu cdev interface?  What
> terrible things happen if noiommu only exists in the vfio group compat
> interface to iommufd and at some distant point in the future dies when
> that gets disabled?

vIOMMU may introduce some performance deduction if there
are frequent map/unmap. As far as I know, some cloud service
providers are more willing to use noiommu mode within VM.
Besides the performance consideration, using a booting a VM
without vIOMMU is supposed to be more robust. But I'm not
sure if the noiommu userspace will adapt to cdev noiommu.
Perhaps yes if group may be deprecated in future.

> > btw. Should we document it somewhere as well? E.g. noiommu userspace
> > does not support attach/detach? Userspace should know it is opening
> > noiommu devices.
> 
> Documentation never hurts.  This is such a specialized use case I'm not
> sure we've bothered to do much documentation for noiommu previously.

Seems no, I didn't find special documentation for noiommu. Perhaps
a comment in the source code is enough. Depends on your taste.

Regards,
Yi Liu

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-25  3:03             ` Liu, Yi L
@ 2023-05-25 15:59               ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-26  8:38                 ` Liu, Yi L
  2023-06-06 14:42               ` Jason Gunthorpe
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 52+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2023-05-25 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Yi L
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

On Thu, 25 May 2023 03:03:54 +0000
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 11:32 PM
> > 
> > On Wed, 24 May 2023 02:12:14 +0000
> > "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 11:50 PM
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 01:20:17 +0000
> > > > "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:16 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:24 -0700
> > > > > > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > >  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > > > index 83575b65ea01..799ea322a7d4 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > > > @@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > > > > >  		vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
> > > > > > >  }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > > > > > > +		return 0;  
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Isn't this an invalid operation for a noiommu cdev, ie. -EINVAL?  We
> > > > > > return success and copy back the provided pt_id, why would a user not
> > > > > > consider it a bug that they can't use whatever value was there with
> > > > > > iommufd?  
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, this is the question I asked in [1]. At that time, it appears to me
> > > > > that better to allow it [2]. Maybe it's more suitable to ask it here.  
> > > >
> > > > From an API perspective it seems wrong.  We return success without
> > > > doing anything.  A user would be right to consider it a bug that the
> > > > attach operation works but there's not actually any association to the
> > > > IOAS.  Thanks,  
> > >
> > > The current version is kind of tradeoff based on prior remarks when
> > > I asked the question. As prior comment[2], it appears to me the attach
> > > shall success for noiommu devices as well, but per your remark it seems
> > > not in plan. So anyway, we may just fail the attach/detach for noiommu
> > > devices. Is it?  
> > 
> > If a user creates an ioas within an iommufd, attaches a device to that
> > ioas and populates it with mappings, wouldn't the user expect the
> > device to have access to and honor those mappings?  I think that's the
> > path we're headed down if we report a successful attach of a noiommu
> > device to an ioas.  
> 
> makes sense. Let's just fail attach/detach for noiommu devices.
> 
> > 
> > We need to keep in mind that noiommu was meant to be a minimally
> > intrusive mechanism to provide a dummy vfio IOMMU backend and satisfy
> > the group requirements, solely for the purpose of making use of the
> > vfio device interface and without providing any DMA mapping services or
> > expectations.  IMO, an argument that we need the attach op to succeed in
> > order to avoid too much disruption in userspace code is nonsense.  On
> > the contrary, userspace needs to be very aware of this difference and
> > we shouldn't invest effort trying to make noiommu more convenient to
> > use.  It's inherently unsafe.
> > 
> > I'm not fond of what a mess noiommu has become with cdev, we're well
> > beyond the minimal code trickery of the legacy implementation.  I hate
> > to ask, but could we reiterate our requirements for noiommu as a part of
> > the native iommufd interface for vfio?  The nested userspace requirement
> > is gone now that hypervisors have vIOMMU support, so my assumption is
> > that this is only for bare metal systems without an IOMMU, which
> > ideally are less and less prevalent.  Are there any noiommu userspaces
> > that are actually going to adopt the noiommu cdev interface?  What
> > terrible things happen if noiommu only exists in the vfio group compat
> > interface to iommufd and at some distant point in the future dies when
> > that gets disabled?  
> 
> vIOMMU may introduce some performance deduction if there
> are frequent map/unmap.

We use passthrough mode of the vIOMMU to negate that overhead for guest
drivers and vfio drivers have typically learned by now that dynamic
mappings using the vfio type1 mapping API are a bad idea.

> As far as I know, some cloud service
> providers are more willing to use noiommu mode within VM.

Sure, the VM itself is still isolated by the host IOMMU, but it's
clearly an extra maintenance and development burden when we should
instead be encouraging those use cases to use vIOMMU rather than
porting to a different noiommu uAPI.  Even if the host is not exposed,
any sort of security and support best practices in the guest should
favor a vIOMMU solution.

> Besides the performance consideration, using a booting a VM
> without vIOMMU is supposed to be more robust. But I'm not

What claims do you have to support lack of robustness in vIOMMU?  Can
they be fixed?

> sure if the noiommu userspace will adapt to cdev noiommu.
> Perhaps yes if group may be deprecated in future.

Deprecation is going to take a long time.  IMO, the VM use cases should
all be encouraged to adopt a vIOMMU solution rather than port to a new
cdev noiommu interface.  The question then is whether there are ongoing
bare metal noiommu use cases and how long those will drag out the vfio
group deprecation.  We could always add noiommu to the native vfio cdev
interface later if there's still demand.

> > > btw. Should we document it somewhere as well? E.g. noiommu userspace
> > > does not support attach/detach? Userspace should know it is opening
> > > noiommu devices.  
> > 
> > Documentation never hurts.  This is such a specialized use case I'm not
> > sure we've bothered to do much documentation for noiommu previously.  
> 
> Seems no, I didn't find special documentation for noiommu. Perhaps
> a comment in the source code is enough. Depends on your taste.

If we're only continuing the group compat noiommu support, I can't very
well require new documentation.  We have a simple model there, noiommu
devices only support the noiommu container type and provide no mapping
interfaces.  The iommufd interface relative to noiommu seems more
nuanced and probably needs to documentation should we decide to pursue
it. Thanks,

Alex


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-25 15:59               ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-05-26  8:38                 ` Liu, Yi L
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Liu, Yi L @ 2023-05-26  8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: jgg@nvidia.com, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2023 12:00 AM
> 
> On Thu, 25 May 2023 03:03:54 +0000
> "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 11:32 PM
> > >
> > > On Wed, 24 May 2023 02:12:14 +0000
> > > "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 11:50 PM
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 23 May 2023 01:20:17 +0000
> > > > > "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 6:16 AM
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, 13 May 2023 06:28:24 -0700
> > > > > > > Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >  	return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/devices/%s", dev_name(dev));
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > > > > index 83575b65ea01..799ea322a7d4 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/iommufd.c
> > > > > > > > @@ -112,6 +112,24 @@ void vfio_iommufd_unbind(struct vfio_device_file
> *df)
> > > > > > > >  		vdev->ops->unbind_iommufd(vdev);
> > > > > > > >  }
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +int vfio_iommufd_attach(struct vfio_device *vdev, u32 *pt_id)
> > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > +	lockdep_assert_held(&vdev->dev_set->lock);
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > +	if (vfio_device_is_noiommu(vdev))
> > > > > > > > +		return 0;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Isn't this an invalid operation for a noiommu cdev, ie. -EINVAL?  We
> > > > > > > return success and copy back the provided pt_id, why would a user not
> > > > > > > consider it a bug that they can't use whatever value was there with
> > > > > > > iommufd?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, this is the question I asked in [1]. At that time, it appears to me
> > > > > > that better to allow it [2]. Maybe it's more suitable to ask it here.
> > > > >
> > > > > From an API perspective it seems wrong.  We return success without
> > > > > doing anything.  A user would be right to consider it a bug that the
> > > > > attach operation works but there's not actually any association to the
> > > > > IOAS.  Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > The current version is kind of tradeoff based on prior remarks when
> > > > I asked the question. As prior comment[2], it appears to me the attach
> > > > shall success for noiommu devices as well, but per your remark it seems
> > > > not in plan. So anyway, we may just fail the attach/detach for noiommu
> > > > devices. Is it?
> > >
> > > If a user creates an ioas within an iommufd, attaches a device to that
> > > ioas and populates it with mappings, wouldn't the user expect the
> > > device to have access to and honor those mappings?  I think that's the
> > > path we're headed down if we report a successful attach of a noiommu
> > > device to an ioas.
> >
> > makes sense. Let's just fail attach/detach for noiommu devices.
> >
> > >
> > > We need to keep in mind that noiommu was meant to be a minimally
> > > intrusive mechanism to provide a dummy vfio IOMMU backend and satisfy
> > > the group requirements, solely for the purpose of making use of the
> > > vfio device interface and without providing any DMA mapping services or
> > > expectations.  IMO, an argument that we need the attach op to succeed in
> > > order to avoid too much disruption in userspace code is nonsense.  On
> > > the contrary, userspace needs to be very aware of this difference and
> > > we shouldn't invest effort trying to make noiommu more convenient to
> > > use.  It's inherently unsafe.
> > >
> > > I'm not fond of what a mess noiommu has become with cdev, we're well
> > > beyond the minimal code trickery of the legacy implementation.  I hate
> > > to ask, but could we reiterate our requirements for noiommu as a part of
> > > the native iommufd interface for vfio?  The nested userspace requirement
> > > is gone now that hypervisors have vIOMMU support, so my assumption is
> > > that this is only for bare metal systems without an IOMMU, which
> > > ideally are less and less prevalent.  Are there any noiommu userspaces
> > > that are actually going to adopt the noiommu cdev interface?  What
> > > terrible things happen if noiommu only exists in the vfio group compat
> > > interface to iommufd and at some distant point in the future dies when
> > > that gets disabled?
> >
> > vIOMMU may introduce some performance deduction if there
> > are frequent map/unmap.
> 
> We use passthrough mode of the vIOMMU to negate that overhead for guest
> drivers and vfio drivers have typically learned by now that dynamic
> mappings using the vfio type1 mapping API are a bad idea.

Yes, this can avoid this overhead.

> 
> > As far as I know, some cloud service
> > providers are more willing to use noiommu mode within VM.
> 
> Sure, the VM itself is still isolated by the host IOMMU, but it's
> clearly an extra maintenance and development burden when we should
> instead be encouraging those use cases to use vIOMMU rather than
> porting to a different noiommu uAPI.  Even if the host is not exposed,
> any sort of security and support best practices in the guest should
> favor a vIOMMU solution.
> 
> > Besides the performance consideration, using a booting a VM
> > without vIOMMU is supposed to be more robust. But I'm not
> 
> What claims do you have to support lack of robustness in vIOMMU?  Can
> they be fixed?

If no vIOMMU, the Qemu logic is simpler. Hence less chance to have errors.
That's what I heard.

> > sure if the noiommu userspace will adapt to cdev noiommu.
> > Perhaps yes if group may be deprecated in future.
> 
> Deprecation is going to take a long time.  IMO, the VM use cases should
> all be encouraged to adopt a vIOMMU solution rather than port to a new
> cdev noiommu interface.  The question then is whether there are ongoing
> bare metal noiommu use cases and how long those will drag out the vfio
> group deprecation. We could always add noiommu to the native vfio cdev
> interface later if there's still demand.

So we hope there is no noiommu userspace app after deprecating vfio_group.
But if still needed, then add it in cdev. Is it? sounds like a plan as
vfio_noiommu is also not there from vfio day1. 😊

I still want to ask if we have any channel to know if noiommu is strongly
needed in some certain scenariors? If there is a strong need and we don’t
see gap in the current noiommu implementation in the cdev series, would
it be good to have it in cdev day1 instead of adding it in future?

> > > > btw. Should we document it somewhere as well? E.g. noiommu userspace
> > > > does not support attach/detach? Userspace should know it is opening
> > > > noiommu devices.
> > >
> > > Documentation never hurts.  This is such a specialized use case I'm not
> > > sure we've bothered to do much documentation for noiommu previously.
> >
> > Seems no, I didn't find special documentation for noiommu. Perhaps
> > a comment in the source code is enough. Depends on your taste.
> 
> If we're only continuing the group compat noiommu support, I can't very
> well require new documentation.  We have a simple model there, noiommu
> devices only support the noiommu container type and provide no mapping
> interfaces.  The iommufd interface relative to noiommu seems more
> nuanced and probably needs to documentation should we decide to pursue
> it.

Yes. depends on whether we want to pursue it.

Regards,
Yi Liu


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-24 15:31           ` Alex Williamson
  2023-05-25  3:03             ` Liu, Yi L
@ 2023-06-06 14:40             ` Jason Gunthorpe
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2023-06-06 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Liu, Yi L, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:31:42AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:

> If a user creates an ioas within an iommufd, attaches a device to that
> ioas and populates it with mappings, wouldn't the user expect the
> device to have access to and honor those mappings?  I think that's the
> path we're headed down if we report a successful attach of a noiommu
> device to an ioas.

I understand we are going to drop no-iommu from this series, so this
below is not relavent.

But to clarify my general design idea here again

The IOAS contains the mappings that userspace would like to use with
no-iommu. Userspace would use a new IOCTL to pin and return the DMA
addr's of those exact mappings.

So attaching a noiommu to an IOAS is a necessary operation that should
succeed. It doesn't make full API sense until we also get an ioctl to
return the dma_addr_t lists.

What is special about no-iommu is that the mapppings have to go
through the special ioctl API to pin and translate, the IOVA cannot be
used natively as a dma_addr. The IOAS is still used and still related
to the device, it just for pinning and dma_addr generation not HW
isolation.
 
> We need to keep in mind that noiommu was meant to be a minimally
> intrusive mechanism to provide a dummy vfio IOMMU backend and satisfy
> the group requirements, solely for the purpose of making use of the
> vfio device interface and without providing any DMA mapping services or
> expectations.  

Well, no-iommu turned into a total hack job as soon as it wrongly
relied on mlock() and /proc/ files to function. Even within its
defined limitations this is an incorrect way to use the mm and DMA
APIs. Memory under DMA must be locked using pin_user_pages(), mlock is
not a substitution.

I expect this is functionally broken these days, under some workloads,
on certain kernel configurations.

Even if we don't fully implement it, I prefer to imagine a design
where no-iommu is implemented correctly and orient things toward that.

> beyond the minimal code trickery of the legacy implementation.  I hate
> to ask, but could we reiterate our requirements for noiommu as a part of
> the native iommufd interface for vfio?  The nested userspace requirement
> is gone now that hypervisors have vIOMMU support, so my assumption is
> that this is only for bare metal systems without an IOMMU, which
> ideally are less and less prevalent.  

I understood there was some desire for DPDK users to do this for
higher performance on some systems.

> that are actually going to adopt the noiommu cdev interface?  What
> terrible things happen if noiommu only exists in the vfio group compat
> interface to iommufd and at some distant point in the future dies when
> that gets disabled?

I think it is fine, it is only for DPDK and if DPDK people really
really care about this then they can implement it properly someday.

I'm quite happy if we say we will not put no-iommu into the device
cdev until it is put in fully correctly without relying on mlock/etc.

Then the API construction would make alot more sense.

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT
  2023-05-25  3:03             ` Liu, Yi L
  2023-05-25 15:59               ` Alex Williamson
@ 2023-06-06 14:42               ` Jason Gunthorpe
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 52+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2023-06-06 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liu, Yi L
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Tian, Kevin, joro@8bytes.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
	nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, lulu@redhat.com,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao, Xudong, Zhao, Yan Y, Xu, Terrence, Jiang, Yanting,
	Duan, Zhenzhong, clegoate@redhat.com

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 03:03:54AM +0000, Liu, Yi L wrote:

> vIOMMU may introduce some performance deduction if there
> are frequent map/unmap. 

DPDK doesn't do that.

And once you turn on the HW IOMMU you negate alot of the micro
performance wins of bypassing. Maybe there is still some argument
about giant/huge pages or something.

> without vIOMMU is supposed to be more robust. But I'm not
> sure if the noiommu userspace will adapt to cdev noiommu.
> Perhaps yes if group may be deprecated in future.

I think that is more a distro question, and we don't have to answer it
fully now.
 
Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 52+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-06 14:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-13 13:28 [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 01/23] vfio: Allocate per device file structure Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 02/23] vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 03/23] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI Yi Liu
2023-05-22 19:42   ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 04/23] kvm/vfio: Rename kvm_vfio_group to prepare for accepting vfio device fd Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 05/23] kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 06/23] vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close() Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 07/23] vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 08/23] vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 09/23] vfio: Make vfio_device_open() single open for device cdev path Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 10/23] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat probe out of vfio_iommufd_bind() Yi Liu
2023-05-22 20:24   ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-23  0:45     ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 11/23] vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 12/23] vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 13/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices Yi Liu
2023-05-22 20:46   ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-22 20:59     ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-23  1:34       ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 14/23] iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 15/23] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 16/23] vfio: Name noiommu vfio_device with "noiommu-" prefix Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 17/23] vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in unregister Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 18/23] vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 19/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD Yi Liu
2023-05-22 22:01   ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-23  1:41     ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-23 15:51       ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-24  2:20         ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-24  2:39           ` Tian, Kevin
2023-05-24  2:40             ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-24  8:31               ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 20/23] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT Yi Liu
2023-05-22 22:15   ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-23  1:20     ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-23 15:50       ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-24  2:12         ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-24 15:31           ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-25  3:03             ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-25 15:59               ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-26  8:38                 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-06-06 14:42               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-06 14:40             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 21/23] vfio: Determine noiommu device in __vfio_register_dev() Yi Liu
2023-05-22 23:04   ` Alex Williamson
2023-05-23  2:13     ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-24  8:14       ` Liu, Yi L
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 22/23] vfio: Compile vfio_group infrastructure optionally Yi Liu
2023-05-13 13:28 ` [PATCH v11 23/23] docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description Yi Liu
2023-05-18  5:39 ` [PATCH v11 00/23] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Xu, Terrence
2023-05-23  7:42 ` Duan, Zhenzhong

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox