public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: VMX: Retry APIC-access page reload if invalidation is in-progress
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 14:39:11 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZH9vP97MhY66Q1MC@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZH9rRnU8h+gDZZuB@google.com>

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 10:22:14AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks for doing this. I'm not overly familiar with KVM implementation
> > but am familiar with mmu notifiers so read through the KVM usage. Looks
> > like KVM is sort of doing something similar to what mmu_interval_notifiers
> > do and I wonder if some of that could be shared.
> 
> They're very, very similar.  At a glance, KVM likely could be moved over to the
> common interval tree implementation, but it would require a substantial amount of
> work in KVM, and various extensions to the mmu notifiers too.  I definitely wouldn't
> be opposed to converging KVM if someone wants to put in the effort, but at the same
> time I wouldn't recommend that anyone actually do the work as the ROI is likely
> very low.

I looked at it lightly a long time ago and came to sort of the same
conclusion, it might even be a negative for KVM as it isn't quite as
tightly inlined and lock free.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-06 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-02  1:15 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Use "standard" mmu_notifier hook for APIC page Sean Christopherson
2023-06-02  1:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: VMX: Retry APIC-access page reload if invalidation is in-progress Sean Christopherson
2023-06-06  2:11   ` Alistair Popple
2023-06-06 17:22     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-06 17:39       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-06-07  7:40   ` yu.c.zhang
2023-06-07 14:30     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-07 17:23       ` Yu Zhang
2023-06-07 17:53         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-08  7:00           ` Yu Zhang
2023-06-13 19:07             ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-17  3:45               ` Yu Zhang
2023-06-22 23:02                 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-02  1:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: Use standard mmu_notifier invalidate hooks for APIC access page Sean Christopherson
2023-06-06  2:20   ` Alistair Popple
2023-06-02  1:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Trigger APIC-access page reload iff vendor code cares Sean Christopherson
2023-06-05 10:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Use "standard" mmu_notifier hook for APIC page Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-06 16:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-07  0:55 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZH9vP97MhY66Q1MC@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox