Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: x86/mmu: add a new mmu zap helper to indicate memtype changes

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Tue, May 30, 2023, Yan Zhao wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 08:54:15AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> And I combined the __kvm_mmu_honors_guest_mtrrs() into
> kvm_mmu_honors_guest_mtrrs(). Not sure if you like it :)

I would prefer to provide a separater inner helper, mainly so that the common
case callers don't need to pass %false.  I don't love passing bools, but it's
tolerable for a one-off use of an inner helper.

> +/*
> + * Returns if KVM honors guest MTRRs
> + * @override_vm_has_noncoherent_dma: Allow caller to override non-coherent DMA
> + *                                   status returned from
> + *                                   kvm_arch_has_noncoherent_dma()
> + */
> +bool kvm_mmu_honors_guest_mtrrs(struct kvm *kvm,
> +                               bool override_vm_has_noncoherent_dma)
> +{
> +       bool noncoherent_dma = override_vm_has_noncoherent_dma ? true :
> +                              kvm_arch_has_noncoherent_dma(kvm);

The "override" name is confusing, e.g. it won't be clear when it's safe/correct
for a new caller to override kvm_arch_has_noncoherent_dma().  If we go with a
single helper, I could live with:

bool kvm_mmu_honors_guest_mtrrs(struct kvm *kvm, bool stopping_noncoherent_dma)
{
	bool noncoherent_dma = stopping_noncoherent_dma ||
			       kvm_arch_has_noncoherent_dma(kvm);

	...
}

but that makes it awkward to use common code for start+stop assignment, and as
above there are three "normal" callers that would have to pass magic %false
values regardless of the name.