From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, chao.gao@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
David.Laight@aculab.com, robert.hu@linux.intel.com,
guang.zeng@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/9] KVM: x86: Add & use kvm_vcpu_is_legal_cr3() to check CR3's legality
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:03:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZLqeUXerpNlri7Px@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e84129b1-603b-a6c4-ade5-8cf529929675@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023, Binbin Wu wrote:
>
>
> On 7/21/2023 7:53 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 10:41:24PM +0800,
> > Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Add and use kvm_vcpu_is_legal_cr3() to check CR3's legality to provide
> > > a clear distinction b/t CR3 and GPA checks. So that kvm_vcpu_is_legal_cr3()
> > > can be adjusted according to new feature(s).
> > >
> > > No functional change intended.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 5 +++++
> > > arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 4 ++--
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 4 ++--
> > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++--
> > > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> > > index f61a2106ba90..8b26d946f3e3 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> > > @@ -283,4 +283,9 @@ static __always_inline bool guest_can_use(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > return vcpu->arch.governed_features.enabled & kvm_governed_feature_bit(x86_feature);
> > > }
> > > +static inline bool kvm_vcpu_is_legal_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3)
> > > +{
> > > + return kvm_vcpu_is_legal_gpa(vcpu, cr3);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > The remaining user of kvm_vcpu_is_illegal_gpa() is one left. Can we remove it
> > by replacing !kvm_vcpu_is_legal_gpa()?
>
> There are still two callsites of kvm_vcpu_is_illegal_gpa() left (basing on
> Linux 6.5-rc2), in handle_ept_violation() and nested_vmx_check_eptp().
> But they could be replaced by !kvm_vcpu_is_legal_gpa() and then remove
> kvm_vcpu_is_illegal_gpa().
> I am neutral to this.
I'm largely neutral on this as well, though I do like the idea of having only
"legal" APIs. I think it makes sense to throw together a patch, we can always
ignore the patch if end we up deciding to keep kvm_vcpu_is_illegal_gpa().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-19 14:41 [PATCH v10 0/9] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Binbin Wu
2023-07-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] KVM: x86/mmu: Use GENMASK_ULL() to define __PT_BASE_ADDR_MASK Binbin Wu
2023-08-16 21:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-28 4:06 ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-31 19:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] KVM: x86: Add & use kvm_vcpu_is_legal_cr3() to check CR3's legality Binbin Wu
2023-07-20 23:53 ` Isaku Yamahata
2023-07-21 2:20 ` Binbin Wu
2023-07-21 15:03 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-07-24 2:07 ` Binbin Wu
2023-07-25 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] KVM: x86: Use KVM-governed feature framework to track "LAM enabled" Binbin Wu
2023-08-16 3:46 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-16 7:08 ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-16 9:47 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-16 21:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-16 23:03 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-17 1:28 ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-17 19:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR4.LAM_SUP Binbin Wu
2023-08-16 21:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] KVM: x86: Virtualize CR3.LAM_{U48,U57} Binbin Wu
2023-08-16 21:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] KVM: x86: Introduce get_untagged_addr() in kvm_x86_ops and call it in emulator Binbin Wu
2023-07-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] KVM: VMX: Implement and wire get_untagged_addr() for LAM Binbin Wu
2023-08-16 22:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-17 9:51 ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-17 14:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] KVM: x86: Untag address for vmexit handlers when LAM applicable Binbin Wu
2023-08-16 21:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-16 22:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-19 14:41 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] KVM: x86: Expose LAM feature to userspace VMM Binbin Wu
2023-08-16 21:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-17 1:59 ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-15 2:05 ` [PATCH v10 0/9] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Binbin Wu
2023-08-15 23:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-16 22:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-17 9:17 ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-18 4:31 ` Binbin Wu
2023-08-18 13:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-25 14:18 ` Zeng Guang
2023-08-31 20:24 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZLqeUXerpNlri7Px@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).