From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C152BC001DF for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 17:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232041AbjHDRYi (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:24:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51754 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231156AbjHDRYh (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:24:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67568469C for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2023 10:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1bba48b0bd2so16698215ad.3 for ; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 10:24:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1691169876; x=1691774676; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3dCgovGjA3i88/DRKbmpMbX8JfFD5s33+3P385ru820=; b=lxd4JId2NSaFGzdUAtrXrGl9h3sikKfNJPKpQMkKrgJ3ByruhE8NRNd3S3sTDxOuEQ FVioVLFZHOeNQtuvWJUm5VHidGl2pwfRVLFcLvas5Ma6nIZoW+s5dhCPhtQkifiOZv3/ mxHS/DAEasR1wGYpSc4l8xCRe/iM81qcbswIfQpr/obcQZexr7djCONcRnztYzKzr4nG IhDLPXkbR2sSr978ajy4RCNoATz0yt6oS05TDk9Ir9wDSR7+RlUmtsPXrCwZU4gYbz6e kbhfGMw3XVoT1iQv06aGZk9Wdb0o/M2kIVruOwtefAYMgNm2GDkwPmLSbZupTaqcl/0Q eacA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691169876; x=1691774676; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=3dCgovGjA3i88/DRKbmpMbX8JfFD5s33+3P385ru820=; b=FDg/TzdvNOxf7/NfziiA+l2vK63xfOXwBs1y67HzxEV/yTpoOeDfBhvGLnYVIyFRIN /BVzy4V2nNE7JZa56kwf4ZbyuqM145k3uwfOuvG1DMFiIjGcZrDloFl+kb69RT6SOM43 a6+HK4jSgi+cCh6hjQh51c5x/74hXQDMpT9earIQSY4T3E8y8GcBwK+38HBVon50fnYp OHMYp+YgS7c/5xXvdqv639N6uQ8ExWuiCQTr6B3UraWzYG/5icnJorVqGT7+DkIn2i4n oGFYE41gQakO6J6T5c2ECofcOpph2+LPfBxJVPwm2zVYvog4lvx3RNDEJiHBrCERb8aA sxmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyuBWkFBZhmofg7uBHq8fXuC5L37Jc3+D9hAr2/CG5IqoC3hGLV v2zNfS/2BPnP68t+ArPwAcCnHQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHEHW+Qgppuc3dxGAxj+yZ3geOnx7bPe8p1hSmHW7alqhLh0JyVgZwg7UOjVpy+x29pn7xmSw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e80c:b0:1b8:59f0:c748 with SMTP id u12-20020a170902e80c00b001b859f0c748mr2466696plg.2.1691169875886; Fri, 04 Aug 2023 10:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ghost ([50.221.140.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jd9-20020a170903260900b001bb54abfc07sm2004306plb.252.2023.08.04.10.24.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Aug 2023 10:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 10:24:33 -0700 From: Charlie Jenkins To: Andrew Jones Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Peter Zijlstra , Josh Poimboeuf , Jason Baron , Steven Rostedt , Ard Biesheuvel , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Luke Nelson , Xi Wang , Nam Cao Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] RISC-V: Refactor instructions Message-ID: References: <20230803-master-refactor-instructions-v4-v1-0-2128e61fa4ff@rivosinc.com> <20230804-2c57bddd6e87fdebc20ff9d5@orel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230804-2c57bddd6e87fdebc20ff9d5@orel> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 12:28:28PM +0300, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 07:10:25PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > > There are numerous systems in the kernel that rely on directly > > modifying, creating, and reading instructions. Many of these systems > > have rewritten code to do this. This patch will delegate all instruction > > handling into insn.h and reg.h. All of the compressed instructions, RVI, > > Zicsr, M, A instructions are included, as well as a subset of the F,D,Q > > extensions. > > > > --- > > This is modifying code that https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230731183925.152145-1-namcaov@gmail.com/ > > is also touching. > > > > --- > > Testing: > > > > There are a lot of subsystems touched and I have not tested every > > individual instruction. I did a lot of copy-pasting from the RISC-V spec > > so opcodes and such should be correct > > How about we create macros which generate each of the functions an > instruction needs, e.g. riscv_insn_is_*(), etc. based on the output of > [1]. I know basically nothing about that project, but it looks like it > creates most the defines this series is creating from what we [hope] to > be an authoritative source. I also assume that if we don't like the > current output format, then we could probably post patches to the project > to get the format we want. For example, we could maybe propose an "lc" > format for "Linux C". That's a great idea, I didn't realize that existed! > > I'd also recommend only importing the generated defines and generating > the functions that will actually have immediate consumers or are part of > a set of defines that have immediate consumers. Each consumer of new > instructions will be responsible for generating and importing the defines > and adding the respective macro invocations to generate the functions. > This series can also take that approach, i.e. convert one set of > instructions at a time, each in a separate patch. Since I was hand-writing everything and copying it wasn't too much effort to just copy all of the instructions from a group. However, from a testing standpoint it makes sense to exclude instructions not yet in use. > > [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-opcodes > > Thanks, > drew > > > > , but the construction of every > > instruction is not fully tested. > > > > vector: Compiled and booted > > > > jump_label: Ensured static keys function as expected. > > > > kgdb: Attempted to run the provided tests but they failed even without > > my changes > > > > module: Loaded and unloaded modules > > > > patch.c: Ensured kernel booted > > > > kprobes: Used a kprobing module to probe jalr, auipc, and branch > > instructions > > > > nommu misaligned addresses: Kernel boots > > > > kvm: Ran KVM selftests > > > > bpf: Kernel boots. Most of the instructions are exclusively used by BPF > > but I am unsure of the best way of testing BPF. > > > > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins > > > > --- > > Charlie Jenkins (10): > > RISC-V: Expand instruction definitions > > RISC-V: vector: Refactor instructions > > RISC-V: Refactor jump label instructions > > RISC-V: KGDB: Refactor instructions > > RISC-V: module: Refactor instructions > > RISC-V: Refactor patch instructions > > RISC-V: nommu: Refactor instructions > > RISC-V: kvm: Refactor instructions > > RISC-V: bpf: Refactor instructions > > RISC-V: Refactor bug and traps instructions > > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/bug.h | 18 +- > > arch/riscv/include/asm/insn.h | 2744 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > arch/riscv/include/asm/reg.h | 88 + > > arch/riscv/kernel/jump_label.c | 13 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/kgdb.c | 13 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/module.c | 80 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c | 3 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 13 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.c | 100 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c | 5 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 9 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 218 +-- > > arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c | 5 +- > > arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_insn.c | 281 +-- > > arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit.h | 707 +------- > > 15 files changed, 2825 insertions(+), 1472 deletions(-) > > --- > > base-commit: 5d0c230f1de8c7515b6567d9afba1f196fb4e2f4 > > change-id: 20230801-master-refactor-instructions-v4-433aa040da03 > > -- > > - Charlie > > > > > > -- > > kvm-riscv mailing list > > kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kvm-riscv