From: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: Documentation: Add the missing description for tdp_mmu_root_count into kvm_mmu_page
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 18:41:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMgAZMp148BRrazJ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZJsFKjbaCKk+fFkv@google.com>
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> > Add the description of tdp_mmu_root_count into kvm_mmu_page description.
> > tdp_mmu_root_count is an atomic counter used only in TDP MMU. Its usage and
> > meaning is slightly different with root_counter in shadow MMU. Update the
> > doc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> > index 5cd6cd5e8926..97d695207e11 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> > @@ -231,6 +231,11 @@ Shadow pages contain the following information:
> > A counter keeping track of how many hardware registers (guest cr3 or
> > pdptrs) are now pointing at the page. While this counter is nonzero, the
> > page cannot be destroyed. See role.invalid.
> > + tdp_mmu_root_count:
> > + An atomic reference counter in TDP MMU root page that allows for parallel
> > + accesses.
>
> I find the "parallel accesses" simultaneously redundant and confusing. The fact
> that's it's an atomic implies that there are concurrent accesses. And need for
> an atomic is really just a minor note, i.e. shouldn't be the focus of the
> documentation.
>
> On a related topic, the description for "root_count" is stale now that KVM keeps
> references to roots.
>
> What if we take this opportunity to unify the documentation?
>
> root_count / tdp_mmu_rount_count:
>
> A reference counter for root shadow pages. vCPUs elevate the refcount when
> getting a shadow page that will be used as a root, i.e. will be loaded into
> hardware directly (CR3, PDPTRs, nCR3 EPTP). Root pages cannnot be freed
> while their refcount is non-zero. The TDP MMU uses an atomic refcount as
> vCPUs can acquire references while holding mmu_lock for read. See
> role.invalid and Root Pages.
Ok, I think this one is reasonable and this clarifies that this field
only works for root pages.
>
> And then add a section specifically for root pages? I think trying to cram
> everything important about root pages into the description for their refcount
> will be difficult and kludgy. E.g. this doc should also provide an explanation of
> previous roots.
>
> Root Pages
> ==========
>
> Key talking points:
>
> - Definition of a root page
> - Lifecycle of roots for both the shadow MMU and TDP MMU
> - Previous root tracking, and why only KVM doesn'y track previous roots when
> using PAE paging
> - The importance of preserving roots that are currently not referenced by any
> vCPU, i.e. why TDP MMU roots are initialized with a refcount of '2'
> - Why shadow MMU roots don't gift a reference to the MMU itself, i.e. why they
> naturally survive their refcount going to zero
>
I am not sure if I can add the whole section in this commit. Maybe
I can push it back separately into a different series. For root_count, a
brief introduction of root pages should be good enough, which is explain
in your suggestion: page that "will be loaded into hardware directly
(CR3, PDPTRs, nCR3 EPTP)".
>
> > Accessing the page requires lifting the counter value. The
> > + initial value is set to 2 indicating one reference from vCPU and one
> > + from TDP MMU itself. Note this field is a union with root_count.
> > parent_ptes:
> > The reverse mapping for the pte/ptes pointing at this page's spt. If
> > parent_ptes bit 0 is zero, only one spte points at this page and
> > --
> > 2.41.0.162.gfafddb0af9-goog
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-31 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-26 18:20 [PATCH v2 0/6] Update document description for kvm_mmu_page and kvm_mmu_page_role Mingwei Zhang
2023-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: Documentation: Add the missing description for guest_mode in kvm_mmu_page_role Mingwei Zhang
2023-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: Documentation: Update the field name gfns and its description in kvm_mmu_page Mingwei Zhang
2023-06-26 21:49 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-07-31 17:54 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-07-31 18:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-31 18:59 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: Documentation: Add the missing description for ptep " Mingwei Zhang
2023-06-26 21:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-06-26 22:20 ` Huang, Kai
2023-06-27 15:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-31 18:09 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: Documentation: Add the missing description for tdp_mmu_root_count into kvm_mmu_page Mingwei Zhang
2023-06-26 22:21 ` Huang, Kai
2023-06-27 15:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-31 18:41 ` Mingwei Zhang [this message]
2023-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: Documentation: Add the missing description for mmu_valid_gen " Mingwei Zhang
2023-06-27 16:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-31 22:02 ` Mingwei Zhang
2023-06-26 18:20 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: Documentation: Add the missing description for tdp_mmu_page " Mingwei Zhang
2023-06-26 22:23 ` Huang, Kai
2023-06-27 16:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-07-31 22:28 ` Mingwei Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMgAZMp148BRrazJ@google.com \
--to=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).