From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vfio: align capability structures
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:01:30 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZN5getPSq1stluMt@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230809203144.2880050-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 04:31:44PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO, VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO, and
> VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO ioctls fill in an info struct followed by capability
> structs:
>
> +------+---------+---------+-----+
> | info | caps[0] | caps[1] | ... |
> +------+---------+---------+-----+
>
> Both the info and capability struct sizes are not always multiples of
> sizeof(u64), leaving u64 fields in later capability structs misaligned.
>
> Userspace applications currently need to handle misalignment manually in
> order to support CPU architectures and programming languages with strict
> alignment requirements.
>
> Make life easier for userspace by ensuring alignment in the kernel. This
> is done by padding info struct definitions and by copying out zeroes
> after capability structs that are not aligned.
>
> The new layout is as follows:
>
> +------+---------+---+---------+-----+
> | info | caps[0] | 0 | caps[1] | ... |
> +------+---------+---+---------+-----+
>
> In this example caps[0] has a size that is not multiples of sizeof(u64),
> so zero padding is added to align the subsequent structure.
>
> Adding zero padding between structs does not break the uapi. The memory
> layout is specified by the info.cap_offset and caps[i].next fields
> filled in by the kernel. Applications use these field values to locate
> structs and are therefore unaffected by the addition of zero padding.
>
> Note that code that copies out info structs with padding is updated to
> always zero the struct and copy out as many bytes as userspace
> requested. This makes the code shorter and avoids potential information
> leaks by ensuring padding is initialized.
>
> Originally-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Also align capability structs in drivers/iommu/iommufd/vfio_compat.c
> [Jason]
>
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 2 ++
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/vfio_compat.c | 2 ++
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 11 ++---------
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 11 ++---------
> drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 6 ++++++
> 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-17 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-09 20:31 [PATCH v3] vfio: align capability structures Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-10 2:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-08-16 18:35 ` Alex Williamson
2023-08-17 18:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-08-17 18:33 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZN5getPSq1stluMt@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox