public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Jinrong Liang <ljr.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:54:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZN6lKvN2xvQOSnnz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814115108.45741-4-cloudliang@tencent.com>

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023, Jinrong Liang wrote:
> Add test case for AMD Guest PerfMonV2. Also test Intel
> MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS and MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>
> ---
>  .../kvm/x86_64/pmu_basic_functionality_test.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_basic_functionality_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_basic_functionality_test.c
> index cb2a7ad5c504..02bd1fe3900b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_basic_functionality_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_basic_functionality_test.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,9 @@ static uint64_t run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t *ucall_arg)
>  
>  static void guest_measure_loop(uint64_t event_code)
>  {
> +	uint64_t global_ovf_ctrl_msr, global_status_msr, global_ctrl_msr;
>  	uint8_t nr_gp_counters, pmu_version = 1;
> +	uint8_t gp_counter_bit_width = 48;
>  	uint64_t event_sel_msr;
>  	uint32_t counter_msr;
>  	unsigned int i;
> @@ -68,6 +70,12 @@ static void guest_measure_loop(uint64_t event_code)
>  		pmu_version = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION);
>  		event_sel_msr = MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0;
>  
> +		if (pmu_version > 1) {
> +			global_ovf_ctrl_msr = MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL;
> +			global_status_msr = MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS;
> +			global_ctrl_msr = MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
> +		}
> +
>  		if (rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES) & PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES)
>  			counter_msr = MSR_IA32_PMC0;
>  		else
> @@ -76,6 +84,17 @@ static void guest_measure_loop(uint64_t event_code)
>  		nr_gp_counters = AMD64_NR_COUNTERS;
>  		event_sel_msr = MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0;
>  		counter_msr = MSR_K7_PERFCTR0;
> +
> +		if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_EXT_CORE) &&
> +		    this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_PERFMON_V2)) {
> +			nr_gp_counters = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_AMD_PMU_NR_CORE_COUNTERS);
> +			global_ovf_ctrl_msr = MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS_CLR;
> +			global_status_msr = MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS;
> +			global_ctrl_msr = MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_CTL;
> +			event_sel_msr = MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0;
> +			counter_msr = MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR0;
> +			pmu_version = 2;
> +		}

Please use an if-else when the two things are completely exclusive, i.e. don't
set "defaults" and then override them.

>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_gp_counters; i++) {
> @@ -84,14 +103,39 @@ static void guest_measure_loop(uint64_t event_code)
>  		      ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE | event_code);
>  
>  		if (pmu_version > 1) {
> -			wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, BIT_ULL(i));
> +			wrmsr(global_ctrl_msr, BIT_ULL(i));
>  			__asm__ __volatile__("loop ." : "+c"((int){NUM_BRANCHES}));
> -			wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0);
> +			wrmsr(global_ctrl_msr, 0);
>  			GUEST_SYNC(_rdpmc(i));
>  		} else {
>  			__asm__ __volatile__("loop ." : "+c"((int){NUM_BRANCHES}));
>  			GUEST_SYNC(_rdpmc(i));
>  		}

This is extremely difficult to follow.  I think the same thing to do is to split
this up into helpers, e.g. send pmu_version > 1 into one path, and pmu_version <= 1
into an entirely different path.

E.g. something like this?

static void guest_measure_loop(uint64_t event_code)
{
	uint64_t global_ovf_ctrl_msr, global_status_msr, global_ctrl_msr;
	uint8_t nr_gp_counters, pmu_version;
	uint8_t gp_counter_bit_width;
	uint64_t event_sel_msr;
	uint32_t counter_msr;
	unsigned int i;

	if (host_cpu_is_intel)
		pmu_version = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION);
	else if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE) &&
		 this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2)) {
		pmu_version = 2;
	} else {
		pmu_version = 1;
	}

	if (pmu_version <= 1) {
		guest_measure_pmu_legacy(...);
		return;
	}

	if (host_cpu_is_intel) {
		nr_gp_counters = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS);
		global_ovf_ctrl_msr = MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL;
		global_status_msr = MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS;
		global_ctrl_msr = MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
		gp_counter_bit_width = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_GP_COUNTERS_BIT_WIDTH);

		if (rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES) & PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES)
			counter_msr = MSR_IA32_PMC0;
		else
			counter_msr = MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0;
	} else {
		nr_gp_counters = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_AMD_PMU_NR_CORE_COUNTERS);
		global_ovf_ctrl_msr = MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS_CLR;
		global_status_msr = MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS;
		global_ctrl_msr = MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_CTL;
		event_sel_msr = MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0;
		counter_msr = MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR0;
		gp_counter_bit_width = 48;
	}

	for (i = 0; i < nr_gp_counters; i++) {
		wrmsr(counter_msr + i, 0);
		wrmsr(event_sel_msr + i, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS |
		      ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE | event_code);

		wrmsr(global_ctrl_msr, BIT_ULL(i));
		__asm__ __volatile__("loop ." : "+c"((int){NUM_BRANCHES}));
		wrmsr(global_ctrl_msr, 0);
		counter = _rdpmc(i);
		GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(this_pmu_has(...), !!counter);

		if ( _rdpmc(i)) {
			wrmsr(global_ctrl_msr, 0);
			wrmsr(counter_msr + i, 0);
			__asm__ __volatile__("loop ." : "+c"((int){NUM_BRANCHES}));
			GUEST_ASSERT(!_rdpmc(i));

			wrmsr(global_ctrl_msr, BIT_ULL(i));
			__asm__ __volatile__("loop ." : "+c"((int){NUM_BRANCHES}));
			GUEST_ASSERT(_rdpmc(i));

			wrmsr(global_ctrl_msr, 0);
			wrmsr(counter_msr + i, (1ULL << gp_counter_bit_width) - 2);
			wrmsr(global_ctrl_msr, BIT_ULL(i));
			__asm__ __volatile__("loop ." : "+c"((int){NUM_BRANCHES}));
			GUEST_ASSERT(rdmsr(global_status_msr) & BIT_ULL(i));

			wrmsr(global_ctrl_msr, 0);
			wrmsr(global_ovf_ctrl_msr, BIT_ULL(i));
			GUEST_ASSERT(!(rdmsr(global_status_msr) & BIT_ULL(i)));
		}
	}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-17 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-14 11:50 [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: selftests: Test the consistency of the PMU's CPUID and its features Jinrong Liang
2023-08-14 11:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties Jinrong Liang
2023-08-14 11:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h for PMU events and common masks Jinrong Liang
2023-08-17 22:32   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-21  8:56   ` Like Xu
2023-08-21  9:07     ` Jinrong Liang
2023-08-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters Jinrong Liang
2023-08-17 22:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-17 22:54   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-08-21 11:45     ` Jinrong Liang
2023-08-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters Jinrong Liang
2023-08-17 22:56   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters Jinrong Liang
2023-08-17 23:00   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-17 23:18     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters Jinrong Liang
2023-08-17 23:04   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: selftests: Test Intel supported fixed counters bit mask Jinrong Liang
2023-08-17 23:19   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of PMU MSRs with Intel PMU version Jinrong Liang
2023-08-17 23:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: selftests: Add x86 feature and properties for AMD PMU in processor.h Jinrong Liang
2023-08-17 23:26   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-08-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: selftests: Test AMD PMU events on legacy four performance counters Jinrong Liang
2023-08-14 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: selftests: Test AMD Guest PerfMonV2 Jinrong Liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZN6lKvN2xvQOSnnz@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
    --cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=likexu@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ljr.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox