Re: [PATCH v7 04/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Setup fixed counters' eventsel during PMU initialization

Jim Mattson
2023-11-08T01:28:53Z

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 4:31 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> Set the eventsel for all fixed counters during PMU initialization, the
> eventsel is hardcoded and consumed if and only if the counter is supported,
> i.e. there is no reason to redo the setup every time the PMU is refreshed.
>
> Configuring all KVM-supported fixed counter also eliminates a potential
> pitfall if/when KVM supports discontiguous fixed counters, in which case
> configuring only nr_arch_fixed_counters will be insufficient (ignoring the
> fact that KVM will need many other changes to support discontiguous fixed
> counters).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 14 ++++----------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> index c4f2c6a268e7..5fc5a62af428 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> * Note, reference cycles is counted using a perf-defined "psuedo-encoding",
> * as there is no architectural general purpose encoding for reference cycles.
> */
> -static void setup_fixed_pmc_eventsel(struct kvm_pmu *pmu)
> +static u64 intel_get_fixed_pmc_eventsel(int index)
> {
> const struct {
> u8 eventsel;
> @@ -419,17 +419,11 @@ static void setup_fixed_pmc_eventsel(struct kvm_pmu *pmu)
> [1] = { 0x3c, 0x00 }, /* CPU Cycles/ PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES. */
> [2] = { 0x00, 0x03 }, /* Reference Cycles / PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES*/
> };
> - int i;
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(fixed_pmc_events) != KVM_PMC_MAX_FIXED);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters; i++) {
> - int index = array_index_nospec(i, KVM_PMC_MAX_FIXED);
> - struct kvm_pmc *pmc = &pmu->fixed_counters[index];
> -
> - pmc->eventsel = (fixed_pmc_events[index].unit_mask << 8) |
> - fixed_pmc_events[index].eventsel;
> - }
> + return (fixed_pmc_events[index].unit_mask << 8) |
> + fixed_pmc_events[index].eventsel;

Can I just say that it's really confusing that the value returned by
intel_get_fixed_pmc_eventsel() is the concatenation of an 8-bit "unit
mask" and an 8-bit "eventsel"?