From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 011201632C8; Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744447192; cv=none; b=lB1HzILEcoom3D75wmzz9gsIGQQcnaMowftV473C8rOAGSkuUFhtWY/fArxnb5YsXTq3l63SLaAWh9h3MTXuI0Cgeg112kUAq8hlYT0HNBNhl5HAwv6KsokRZ+bj+X4I5uCHupeiOPR1a1u2LZYESirb9M4fPZZ/rV/v4hcZfGk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744447192; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p+NZrCyufs8TawZDNBCmnM+bhj0M44SjnbBW1hof8qc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZU+2X/nL7zWGgkibv3A3r9ZJ9m38ZlEuF0UizG6OUe8+2zHhyDxRT4Rys0meJWwb8aSovJ4n2j1rXdFG4Ok3SgnFy5qbXqAxfeI7b6ua8I5t/ufeAku3ZZHbAjhkx5PP4oIrMIJY1BVJLDT4hX0+S1pJy2Op/fCK2Ztrv++Y/ew= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VoHQnj6K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VoHQnj6K" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6781AC4CEE3; Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:39:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744447191; bh=p+NZrCyufs8TawZDNBCmnM+bhj0M44SjnbBW1hof8qc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VoHQnj6Kz1+zTykA2Zo8USYmi4bibd9QxIcHCdiQtRC/HXjtWsoRhcMg56hAuq2YD Mo4c8F7GMQ/YiDW68+k01BEJmmLTlXYryaJW2VSAw/MZyPsfpmrlNgcLK46RDOn1ec 4mYBFvyg2FD2f+s80Y7vgQ6R87oNpKYxIJNJkHJdDXj/ehLJgZSzZpOocMVKMG3vzZ rTtxJ4Avq0HfRzrKtME3FMrL/n654xeTE824ZfRJM44uAOPcROZA4u/TDv82WGjJXL 3FfA0Fbct0CxOGxXkrj92Zplq1i2084r92weItalBK9eK2S4B0QFQc8C4EUj2XwpXy 9VLnQRfbYbHJA== Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 10:39:44 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Dave Hansen Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , Andy Shevchenko , Matthew Wilcox , Sean Christopherson , Davide Ciminaghi , Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86: remove HIGHMEM64G support Message-ID: References: <20241204103042.1904639-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20241204103042.1904639-6-arnd@kernel.org> <08b63835-121d-4adc-8f03-e68f0b0cabdf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <08b63835-121d-4adc-8f03-e68f0b0cabdf@intel.com> * Dave Hansen wrote: > Has anyone run into any problems on 6.15-rc1 with this stuff? > > 0xf75fe000 is the mem_map[] entry for the first page >4GB. It > obviously wasn't allocated, thus the oops. Looks like the memblock > for the >4GB memory didn't get removed although the pgdats seem > correct. > > I'll dig into it some more. Just wanted to make sure there wasn't a > fix out there already. Not that I'm aware of. > The way I'm triggering this is booting qemu with a 32-bit PAE kernel, > and "-m 4096" (or more). That's a new regression indeed. Thanks, Ingo