From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Lazily allocate LPI translation cache
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:13:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbJ6hvr8rKFllW1e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8634ul90l9.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:19:46AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 20:49:05 +0000, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Caching the translation implies having an extra reference
> > + * to the interrupt, so drop the potential reference on what
> > + * was in the cache, and increment it on the new interrupt.
> > + */
> > + if (victim && victim->irq)
> > + vgic_put_irq(kvm, victim->irq);
>
> The games you play with 'victim' are a bit odd. I'd rather have it
> initialised to NULL, and be trusted to have a valid irq if non-NULL.
>
> Is there something special I'm missing?
I pulled some shenanigans use the same cleanup path to free the new
cache entry in the case of a race. At that point the new cache entry
is initialized to 0 and doesn't have a valid pointer to an irq.
I thought this was a fun trick, but in retrospect it just makes it hard
to follow. I'll just explicitly free the new entry in the case of a
detected race and do away with the weirdness.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-25 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 20:48 [PATCH 00/15] KVM: arm64: Improvements to GICv3 LPI injection Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:48 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Store LPIs in an xarray Oliver Upton
2024-02-05 6:05 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-01-24 20:48 ` [PATCH 02/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Use xarray to find LPI in vgic_get_lpi() Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:48 ` [PATCH 03/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Iterate the xarray to find pending LPIs Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:48 ` [PATCH 04/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Walk the LPI xarray in vgic_copy_lpi_list() Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 9:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 9:24 ` Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:48 ` [PATCH 05/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Get rid of the LPI linked-list Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 9:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 06/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Use atomics to count LPIs Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 07/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Free LPI vgic_irq structs in an RCU-safe manner Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 08/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Rely on RCU protection in vgic_get_lpi() Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 09/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Ensure the irq refcount is nonzero when taking a ref Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 10:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 10/15] KVM: arm64: vgic: Don't acquire the lpi_list_lock in vgic_put_irq() Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 11/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Lazily allocate LPI translation cache Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 10:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 15:13 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 12/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Pick cache victim based on usage count Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 9:22 ` Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 10:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 15:34 ` Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 18:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 13/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Protect cached vgic_irq pointers with RCU Oliver Upton
2024-01-29 1:03 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 14/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Treat the LPI translation cache as an rculist Oliver Upton
2024-01-24 20:49 ` [PATCH 15/15] KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Rely on RCU to protect translation cache reads Oliver Upton
2024-01-25 11:02 ` [PATCH 00/15] KVM: arm64: Improvements to GICv3 LPI injection Marc Zyngier
2024-01-25 15:47 ` Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbJ6hvr8rKFllW1e@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox