From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Cc: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/pmu: Reset perf_capabilities in vcpu to 0 if PDCM is disabled
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:33:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbP7BTvdZ1-b3MmE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZbGn8lAj4XxiecFn@google.com>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> > > I think this makes a lot of confusions on migration where VMM on the source
> > > believes that a non-zero value from KVM_GET_MSRS is valid and the VMM on the
> > > target will find it not true.
> >
> > Yes, but seeing a non-zero value is a KVM bug that should be fixed.
> >
> How about adding an entry in vmx_get_msr() for
> MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES and check pmu_version? This basically pairs
> with the implementation in vmx_set_msr() for MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES.
> Doing so allows KVM_GET_MSRS return 0 for the MSR instead of returning
> the initial permitted value.
Hrm, I don't hate it as a stopgap. But if we are the only people that are affected,
because again I'm pretty sure QEMU is fine, I would rather we just fix things in
our VMM and/or internal kernel.
Long term, I want some form of fix for the initialization code, even if that means
adding a quirk to let userspace opt out of KVM setting default values for platform
MSRs.
Side topic, vmx_set_msr() should check X86_FEATURE_PDCM, not just the PMU version.
> The benefit is that it is not enforcing the VMM to explicitly set the
> value. In fact, there are several platform MSRs which has initial value
> that VMM may rely on instead of explicitly setting.
> MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES is only one of them.
Yeah, and all of those are broken. AFAICT, the bad behavior got introduced for
MSR_PLATFORM_INFO, and then people kept copy+pasting that broken pattern :-(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-26 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 0:38 [PATCH 0/2] minor fix on perf_capabilities in KVM/x86 Mingwei Zhang
2024-01-24 0:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/pmu: Reset perf_capabilities in vcpu to 0 if PDCM is disabled Mingwei Zhang
2024-01-24 15:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-01-24 21:04 ` Aaron Lewis
2024-01-24 21:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-01-24 22:24 ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-01-24 22:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-01-25 0:14 ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-01-26 18:33 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-01-26 19:30 ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-01-26 19:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-01-29 14:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-01-29 14:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-01-31 19:43 ` Mingwei Zhang
2024-01-24 0:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86/pmu: Remove vcpu_get_perf_capabilities() Mingwei Zhang
2024-01-24 15:52 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbP7BTvdZ1-b3MmE@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox