public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Jan Richter <jarichte@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Compare wall time from xen shinfo against KVM_GET_CLOCK
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 08:06:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbfM8peFYU-jY9-o@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877cjs8q8d.fsf@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > xen_shinfo_test is observed to be flaky failing sporadically with
> > "VM time too old". With min_ts/max_ts debug print added:
> >
> > Wall clock (v 3269818) 1704906491.986255664
> > Time info 1: v 1282712 tsc 33530585736 time 14014430025 mul 3587552223 shift 4294967295 flags 1
> > Time info 2: v 1282712 tsc 33530585736 time 14014430025 mul 3587552223 shift 4294967295 flags 1
> > min_ts: 1704906491.986312153
> > max_ts: 1704906506.001006963
> > ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
> >   x86_64/xen_shinfo_test.c:1003: cmp_timespec(&min_ts, &vm_ts) <= 0
> >   pid=32724 tid=32724 errno=4 - Interrupted system call
> >      1	0x00000000004030ad: main at xen_shinfo_test.c:1003
> >      2	0x00007fca6b23feaf: ?? ??:0
> >      3	0x00007fca6b23ff5f: ?? ??:0
> >      4	0x0000000000405e04: _start at ??:?
> >   VM time too old
> >
> > The test compares wall clock data from shinfo (which is the output of
> > kvm_get_wall_clock_epoch()) against clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME) in the
> > host system before the VM is created. In the example above, it compares
> >
> >  shinfo: 1704906491.986255664 vs min_ts: 1704906491.986312153
> >
> > and fails as the later is greater than the former.  While this sounds like
> > a sane test, it doesn't pass reality check: kvm_get_wall_clock_epoch()
> > calculates guest's epoch (realtime when the guest was created) by
> > subtracting kvmclock from the current realtime and the calculation happens
> > when shinfo is setup. The problem is that kvmclock is a raw clock and
> > realtime clock is affected by NTP. This means that if realtime ticks with a
> > slightly reduced frequency, "guest's epoch" calculated by
> > kvm_get_wall_clock_epoch() will actually tick backwards! This is not a big
> > issue from guest's perspective as the guest can't really observe this but
> > this epoch can't be compared with a fixed clock_gettime() on the host.
> >
> > Replace the check with comparing wall clock data from shinfo to
> > KVM_GET_CLOCK. The later gives both realtime and kvmclock so guest's epoch
> > can be calculated by subtraction. Note, the computed epoch may still differ
> > a few nanoseconds from shinfo as different TSC is used and there are
> > rounding errors but 100 nanoseconds margin should be enough to cover
> > it (famous last words).
> >
> > Reported-by: Jan Richter <jarichte@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> > ---

David, any objection?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-29 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-11 13:59 [PATCH] KVM: selftests: Compare wall time from xen shinfo against KVM_GET_CLOCK Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-01-29  9:04 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-01-29 16:06   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-01-31  0:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-01 17:01   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-02-02 23:27     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-01-31 16:34 ` David Woodhouse
2024-02-01 10:19   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2024-02-01 16:02     ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZbfM8peFYU-jY9-o@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=jarichte@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox