From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AECE31369AD for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708025209; cv=none; b=c6KE9VO4SboGyVeZBl5h/qT6pNbSPCGzc5SW2BvIpbR16u6luKygL+h2BtuXJHAjxQ2egkM8vDFtnD9HTDyM/ITrt8usmrG2pPUHzau1USnqP0ZqWTgOyhrAcjQfYEBiW5SZlTjLUina/FSUCWEdaChAiESmhh0S1oBaJjefACM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708025209; c=relaxed/simple; bh=g4gXRysjrS/kTYtCYP5fJsXncbyru7gzlRYm/zwv35E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=W7/6UmzjaNX4FuXmkWr76WA+/JwGu2hOUvChw6i9qyxSZc6C/u2EUEhKp320O3C0v1L9Dy+nM74+DhQEZVXeYGhIxwa/q6CDX1CuL/O9IuOIX/XmrA9Vg6LxMhiS+WUXQ5Bxndq+vR54ECDNWh90+wXFkZH+T49mJk3LfHYzPhw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=KbQMmF8V; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="KbQMmF8V" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1708025206; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=WSM2q6F8oVeBLvSk9HF07rvPb1zaTwpR9ptolNDGCHY=; b=KbQMmF8VgAHzNvgSHmytTtfI8ssbC5OC8eKTF+rV6RaVbf6irU6z21ATHdfVfz8FDub2Kf 1rnxHQvcHPj7RBP9l6WKpMa8ElYUlIbmlfExXQUyTFB3wc8wWfqD8vsWL84aNAWikr0jC8 lUIgFkcm6aEfqkCAT1nc6iwAq+ybG/g= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-388-xecKsAMlMmyXGwzhHfmc4Q-1; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:26:40 -0500 X-MC-Unique: xecKsAMlMmyXGwzhHfmc4Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0783C1C05AD4; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.8]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B42E611D1803; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 41FJQZ3G1235764 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:26:35 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 41FJQWEK1235763; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:26:32 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:26:32 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Uros Bizjak , Nick Desaulniers , Sean Christopherson , "Andrew Pinski (QUIC)" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Masahiro Yamada , Peter Zijlstra , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: Explicitly disable asm goto w/ outputs on gcc-11 (and earlier) Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.3 On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:17:44AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > but the manual addition of 'volatile' is unconditional. That is just fine. The extra keyword is not wrong, it is just redundant with fixed compilers, where it doesn't change anything in the behavior. Jakub