Re: [PATCH 0/8] KVM: cleanup linux/kvm.h

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:43 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > More cleanups of KVM's main header:
> > >
> > > * remove thoroughly obsolete APIs
> > >
> > > * move architecture-dependent stuff to uapi/asm/kvm.h
> > >
> > > * small cleanups to __KVM_HAVE_* symbols
> >
> > Do you have any thoughts on how/when you're going to apply this?  The kvm.h code
> > movement is likely going to generate conflicts for any new uAPI, e.g. I know Paul's
> > Xen series at least conflicts.
> 
> It also conflicts (and was partly motivated by) the SEV API cleanups
> that I am going to post soon.
> 
> > A topic branch is probably overkill.  Maybe getting this into kvm/next sooner
> > than later so that kvm/next can be used as a base will suffice?
> 
> I can do both, a topic branch is free. But if you think this is in the
> "if it compiles, apply it", then I can take that as Acked-by and apply
> it today or tomorrow.

Looks like you already created and merged a topic branch, but for giggles:

Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>