From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta0.migadu.com (out-180.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C121B63109 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707861157; cv=none; b=rikOxFoNa057aNXh7tis0b/r1MbbUUO3F5qC2UpFRvuhKCX54CdEQ+opSEaZCWDpirD154YSgdmFT6NpQx7rqVdCK1fJpYbaqy7cMgDfk1xZPuTMlrbjfuKRAN0FGFfMQy51GpsyKVMlBw0OGkiS9S4g8yTv4O7TpeRUTQkrBvo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707861157; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fhShqoILCUk+2VsKNFG31/0McM3osyT1MIpcWS7u0lQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cVzUXd2u0Ed6erGIkDWBM1St6434c6tiMK6dpM64pMpM5hnBSeE0284OAPAwEN4D5d7y1xhxeVpvCfO1sBOLKi0OeI+wbcmivhOny3deZKayb8cWOGPS5sONSvogbAU8fvnoJCFiA7OSdplT6H9Ec3ali70v20PxdibvQtshaUQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=GYGxW80H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="GYGxW80H" Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:52:28 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1707861152; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qycvjDD+0X9R6EvP7TIAray+KO8uJwU/ICZWA0GAqCk=; b=GYGxW80Hs8t3lzO+RAjC5AP04+SzHPyZlUN7nOOEovnBK9FLaGHFjZiZQWxRzzt+x4tSxQ oS++jd2TVFAv18PtPrJRR6qEpBCzJcm0Bb9uE5CImm/79U0UxxiyisDpfqu59CSXssNtY2 /pZyRmFGAwpIyLZUvQe/8Ih4XCijJlA= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/23] KVM: arm64: vgic: Store LPIs in an xarray Message-ID: References: <20240213093250.3960069-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> <20240213093250.3960069-3-oliver.upton@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240213093250.3960069-3-oliver.upton@linux.dev> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:32:39AM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote: [...] > @@ -87,10 +93,20 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid, > goto out_unlock; > } > > + ret = xa_err(xa_store(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq, 0)); > + if (ret) { > + xa_release(&dist->lpi_xa, intid); > + kfree(irq); > + goto out_unlock; > + } > + > list_add_tail(&irq->lpi_list, &dist->lpi_list_head); > dist->lpi_list_count++; > > out_unlock: > + if (ret) > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > + > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); Hah, I need to get my head checked. This is *still* wrong! --- diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c index 0265cd1f2d6e..5579660abf7a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -104,11 +104,11 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid, dist->lpi_list_count++; out_unlock: + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); + if (ret) return ERR_PTR(ret); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_list_lock, flags); - /* * We "cache" the configuration table entries in our struct vgic_irq's. * However we only have those structs for mapped IRQs, so we read in -- Thanks, Oliver