From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Rework marking folios dirty/accessed
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 10:31:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg7j2D6WFqcPaXFB@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42dbf562-5eab-4f82-ad77-5ee5b8c79285@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 04.04.24 00:19, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Hmm, we essentially already have an mmu_notifier today, since secondary MMUs need
> > to be invalidated before consuming dirty status. Isn't the end result essentially
> > a sane FOLL_TOUCH?
>
> Likely. As stated in my first mail, FOLL_TOUCH is a bit of a mess right now.
>
> Having something that makes sure the writable PTE/PMD is dirty (or
> alternatively sets it dirty), paired with MMU notifiers notifying on any
> mkclean would be one option that would leave handling how to handle dirtying
> of folios completely to the core. It would behave just like a CPU writing to
> the page table, which would set the pte dirty.
>
> Of course, if frequent clearing of the dirty PTE/PMD bit would be a problem
> (like we discussed for the accessed bit), that would not be an option. But
> from what I recall, only clearing the PTE/PMD dirty bit is rather rare.
And AFAICT, all cases already invalidate secondary MMUs anyways, so if anything
it would probably be a net positive, e.g. the notification could more precisely
say that SPTEs need to be read-only, not blasted away completely.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-20 0:50 [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Rework marking folios dirty/accessed Sean Christopherson
2024-03-20 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip the "try unsync" path iff the old SPTE was a leaf SPTE Sean Christopherson
2024-03-20 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Mark folio dirty when creating SPTE, not when zapping/modifying Sean Christopherson
2024-03-20 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Mark page/folio accessed only when zapping leaf SPTEs Sean Christopherson
2024-03-20 0:50 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't force flush if SPTE update clears Accessed bit Sean Christopherson
2024-03-20 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Rework marking folios dirty/accessed David Hildenbrand
2024-04-02 17:38 ` David Matlack
2024-04-02 18:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-03 0:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-03 21:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-03 22:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-04 15:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-04 17:31 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-04-04 18:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-04 22:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-05 6:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-05 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-05 10:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-04-05 13:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-05 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zg7j2D6WFqcPaXFB@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox