Re: [PATCH v19 110/130] KVM: TDX: Handle TDX PV MMIO hypercall

Isaku Yamahata
2024-07-16T22:25:53Z

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 02:54:09PM +0800,
Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 2/26/2024 4:26 PM, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> >
> > Export kvm_io_bus_read and kvm_mmio tracepoint and wire up TDX PV MMIO
> > hypercall to the KVM backend functions.
> >
> > kvm_io_bus_read/write() searches KVM device emulated in kernel of the given
> > MMIO address and emulates the MMIO. As TDX PV MMIO also needs it, export
> > kvm_io_bus_read(). kvm_io_bus_write() is already exported. TDX PV MMIO
> > emulates some of MMIO itself. To add trace point consistently with x86
> > kvm, export kvm_mmio tracepoint.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 +
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +
> > 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> > index 55fc6cc6c816..389bb95d2af0 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> > @@ -1217,6 +1217,118 @@ static int tdx_emulate_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > +static int tdx_complete_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long val = 0;
> > + gpa_t gpa;
> > + int size;
> > +
> > + KVM_BUG_ON(vcpu->mmio_needed != 1, vcpu->kvm);
> > + vcpu->mmio_needed = 0;
> mmio_needed is used by instruction emulator to setup the complete callback.
> Since TDX handle MMIO in a PV way, mmio_needed is not needed here.

Ok, we don't need to update mmio_needed.

> > +
> > + if (!vcpu->mmio_is_write) {
> It's also needed by instruction emulator, we can use
> vcpu->run->mmio.is_write instead.

No because vcpu->run->mmio is shared with user space. KVM need to stash
it independently.

>
> > + gpa = vcpu->mmio_fragments[0].gpa;
> > + size = vcpu->mmio_fragments[0].len;
>
> Since MMIO cross page boundary is not allowed according to the input checks
> from TDVMCALL, these mmio_fragments[] is not needed.
> Just use vcpu->run->mmio.phys_addr and vcpu->run->mmio.len?

ditto.

> > +
> > + memcpy(&val, vcpu->run->mmio.data, size);
> > + tdvmcall_set_return_val(vcpu, val);
> > + trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ, size, gpa, &val);
> > + }
>
> Tracepoint for KVM_TRACE_MMIO_WRITE is missing when it is handled in
> userspace.

tdx_mmio_write() has it before existing to the user space. It matches with
how write_mmio() behaves in x86.c.

Hmm, to match with other code, we should remove
trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ) and keep KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ_UNSATISFIED
in tdx_emulate_mmio(). That's how read_prepare() and read_exit_mmio() behaves.

For MMIO read
- When kernel can handle the MMIO, KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ with data.
- When exiting to the user space, KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ_UNSATISFIED before
the exit. No trace after the user space handled the MMIO.

For MMIO write
- KVM_TRACE_MMIO_WRITE before handling it.

> Also, the return code is only set when the emulation is done in kernel, but
> not set when it's handled in userspace.
>
> > + return 1;
> > +}
>
> How about the fixup as following:
>
> @@ -1173,19 +1173,18 @@ static int tdx_emulate_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> static int tdx_complete_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { unsigned long val = 0;
> - gpa_t gpa; - int size; - - vcpu->mmio_needed = 0; - - if
> (!vcpu->mmio_is_write) { - gpa = vcpu->mmio_fragments[0].gpa; - size =
> vcpu->mmio_fragments[0].len; + gpa_t gpa = vcpu->run->mmio.phys_addr; + int
> size = vcpu->run->mmio.len; + if (vcpu->run->mmio.is_write) { +
> trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_WRITE, size, gpa, &val); + } else {
> memcpy(&val, vcpu->run->mmio.data, size); tdvmcall_set_return_val(vcpu,
> val); trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ, size, gpa, &val); } + +
> tdvmcall_set_return_code(vcpu, TDVMCALL_SUCCESS); return 1; }
>
>
>
> > +
> > +static inline int tdx_mmio_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, int size,
> > + unsigned long val)
> > +{
> > + if (kvm_iodevice_write(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.apic->dev, gpa, size, &val) &&
> > + kvm_io_bus_write(vcpu, KVM_MMIO_BUS, gpa, size, &val))
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_WRITE, size, gpa, &val);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int tdx_mmio_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, int size)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long val;
> > +
> > + if (kvm_iodevice_read(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.apic->dev, gpa, size, &val) &&
> > + kvm_io_bus_read(vcpu, KVM_MMIO_BUS, gpa, size, &val))
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + tdvmcall_set_return_val(vcpu, val);
> > + trace_kvm_mmio(KVM_TRACE_MMIO_READ, size, gpa, &val);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int tdx_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> > + int size, write, r;
> > + unsigned long val;
> > + gpa_t gpa;
> > +
> > + KVM_BUG_ON(vcpu->mmio_needed, vcpu->kvm);
> > +
> [...]
> > +
> > + /* Request the device emulation to userspace device model. */
> > + vcpu->mmio_needed = 1;
> > + vcpu->mmio_is_write = write;
> Then they can be dropped.

We may drop mmio_needed. mmio_is_write is needed as above.

> > + vcpu->arch.complete_userspace_io = tdx_complete_mmio;
> > +
> > + vcpu->run->mmio.phys_addr = gpa;
> > + vcpu->run->mmio.len = size;
> > + vcpu->run->mmio.is_write = write;
> > + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MMIO;
> > +
> > + if (write) {
> > + memcpy(vcpu->run->mmio.data, &val, size);
> > + } else {
> > + vcpu->mmio_fragments[0].gpa = gpa;
> > + vcpu->mmio_fragments[0].len = size;
> These two lines can be dropped as well.

ditto.
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>