public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Federico Parola <federico.parola@polito.it>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce kvm_tdp_map_page() to populate guest memory
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:04:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh90aFh2xr+nEcCQ@chao-email> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b866a0ae7147f96571c439e75429a03dcb659b6.1712785629.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:07:31PM -0700, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote:
>From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
>
>Introduce a helper function to call the KVM fault handler.  It allows a new
>ioctl to invoke the KVM fault handler to populate without seeing RET_PF_*
>enums or other KVM MMU internal definitions because RET_PF_* are internal
>to x86 KVM MMU.  The implementation is restricted to two-dimensional paging
>for simplicity.  The shadow paging uses GVA for faulting instead of L1 GPA.
>It makes the API difficult to use.
>
>Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
>---
>v2:
>- Make the helper function two-dimensional paging specific. (David)
>- Return error when vcpu is in guest mode. (David)
>- Rename goal_level to level in kvm_tdp_mmu_map_page(). (Sean)
>- Update return code conversion. Don't check pfn.
>  RET_PF_EMULATE => EINVAL, RET_PF_CONTINUE => EIO (Sean)
>- Add WARN_ON_ONCE on RET_PF_CONTINUE and RET_PF_INVALID. (Sean)
>- Drop unnecessary EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). (Sean)
>---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h     |  3 +++
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
>index e8b620a85627..51ff4f67e115 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
>@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ static inline void kvm_mmu_refresh_passthrough_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> 	__kvm_mmu_refresh_passthrough_bits(vcpu, mmu);
> }
> 
>+int kvm_tdp_map_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u64 error_code,
>+		     u8 *level);
>+
> /*
>  * Check if a given access (described through the I/D, W/R and U/S bits of a
>  * page fault error code pfec) causes a permission fault with the given PTE
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>index 91dd4c44b7d8..a34f4af44cbd 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>@@ -4687,6 +4687,38 @@ int kvm_tdp_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> 	return direct_page_fault(vcpu, fault);
> }
> 
>+int kvm_tdp_map_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u64 error_code,
>+		     u8 *level)
>+{
>+	int r;
>+
>+	/* Restrict to TDP page fault. */

need to explain why. (just as you do in the changelog)

>+	if (vcpu->arch.mmu->page_fault != kvm_tdp_page_fault)

page fault handlers (i.e., vcpu->arch.mmu->page_fault()) will be called
finally. why not let page fault handlers reject the request to get rid of
this ad-hoc check? We just need to plumb a flag indicating this is a
pre-population request into the handlers. I think this way is clearer.

What do you think?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-17  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-10 22:07 [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: Guest Memory Pre-Population API isaku.yamahata
2024-04-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] KVM: Document KVM_MAP_MEMORY ioctl isaku.yamahata
2024-04-15 23:27   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-15 23:47     ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-04-17 11:56     ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: Add KVM_MAP_MEMORY vcpu ioctl to pre-populate guest memory isaku.yamahata
2024-04-16 14:20   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Extract __kvm_mmu_do_page_fault() isaku.yamahata
2024-04-16  8:22   ` Chao Gao
2024-04-16 23:43     ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-04-16 14:36   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-16 23:52     ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-04-17 15:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Make __kvm_mmu_do_page_fault() return mapped level isaku.yamahata
2024-04-16 14:40   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-16 23:59     ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-04-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Introduce kvm_tdp_map_page() to populate guest memory isaku.yamahata
2024-04-16 14:46   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-17 18:39     ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-04-17  7:04   ` Chao Gao [this message]
2024-04-17 18:44     ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-04-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] KVM: x86: Implement kvm_arch_vcpu_map_memory() isaku.yamahata
2024-04-16 15:12   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-17  7:20   ` Chao Gao
2024-04-17 12:18   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: x86: Always populate L1 GPA for KVM_MAP_MEMORY isaku.yamahata
2024-04-15 19:12   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-15 21:17     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-15 21:36       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-15 22:59         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-16  1:49       ` Isaku Yamahata
2024-04-16 14:22         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-16 21:41       ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-16 23:00         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-17 10:28           ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-15 19:37   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-16 17:11   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] KVM: x86: Add a hook in kvm_arch_vcpu_map_memory() isaku.yamahata
2024-04-16 14:57   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-04-17 12:26   ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: SVM: Implement pre_mmu_map_page() to refuse KVM_MAP_MEMORY isaku.yamahata
2024-04-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: selftests: x86: Add test for KVM_MAP_MEMORY isaku.yamahata

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zh90aFh2xr+nEcCQ@chao-email \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=federico.parola@polito.it \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox