From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-180.mta1.migadu.com (out-180.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E9315FD15 for ; Tue, 7 May 2024 14:49:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715093355; cv=none; b=caN1PQnNlistz+XNHrhefc/Duqja6+t+41HnOnnXhZ8rdkovMPofew18r2e9u++NKdMVOFL+BGXW1cvNIALlul4zqElxbVxC/0W2SDGAjcM9J0NZqagkw5K9o/skPFWELk0NzugJQ0cTNfseRtm7Dn+0FJtEc2xkDa7UgETLokE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715093355; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+pN9162UviCuz7peFbRpfdTcSTh1AIlmGxocrXqavm4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tdsec8sYmagB0ZeQJkHxQvSCJZGwnQjLMa9H/QxIviMu5pfJJgw7px+bnVDeSqr87QpLueryxpvYq8Y0T7fU+aBhBbO0yoLuu+pr2Sx+fPAorF7ElDoVk3e2Z94bRN5Fsol2aoT/AgIUw4m2KdIifUswdwn2mWGTdb7cDoNmrmQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=gYABk+YV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="gYABk+YV" Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 14:49:06 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1715093351; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=379ckmIQo78wMttlgmZPaMlSsF8YL1GtmZvMW1rK+pA=; b=gYABk+YVOg0KcQleerHWTUo3y6JJ6enbSO7Fr2W1tHSiZmbbJPOa/7dmho1GCuHNEawWBq m02NeSWf3xpliVA9tfualVnS+CLbYsaeMKHwtxtVJPNDMbL7Wp/2uDP007s4+5wdvXAYdZ CXSzzXADB7UnBb0bqN3TRtev71EWjYM= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: Eric Auger Cc: Shaoqin Huang , Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Paolo Bonzini , Shuah Khan , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test Message-ID: References: <20240409030320.182591-1-shahuang@redhat.com> <20240409030320.182591-3-shahuang@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Hi, On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 10:45:24AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > On 4/9/24 05:03, Shaoqin Huang wrote: > > +#define GICD_BASE_GPA 0x8000000ULL > > +#define GICR_BASE_GPA 0x80A0000ULL > in v4 Oliver suggested "Shouldn't a standardized layout of the GIC > frames go with the rest of the GIC stuff?" > Just a heads up, commit 1505bc70f80d ("KVM: selftests: Standardise layout of GIC frames") will do exactly this, which is currently on /next. -- Thanks, Oliver