public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, chao.gao@intel.com,
	 xiaoyao.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: x86: Prioritize getting max_gfn from GuestPhysBits
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 07:09:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjuHrGROhuBylm4x@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240508064205.15301-1-tao1.su@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, May 08, 2024, Tao Su wrote:
> Use the max mappable GPA via GuestPhysBits advertised by KVM to calculate
> max_gfn. Currently some selftests (e.g. access_tracking_perf_test,
> dirty_log_test...) add RAM regions close to max_gfn, so guest may access
> GPA beyond its mappable range and cause infinite loop.
> 
> Prioritize obtaining pa_bits from the GuestPhysBits field advertised by
> KVM, so max_gfn can be limited to the mappable range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> This patch is based on https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/b628cb523c65
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c     | 4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> index 81ce37ec407d..ff99f66d81a0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_cpu_property {
>  #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_EXT_LEAF		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000000, 0, EAX, 0, 31)
>  #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 0, 7)
>  #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_VIRT_ADDR		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 8, 15)
> +#define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_GUEST_PHY_ADDR		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 16, 23)
>  #define X86_PROPERTY_SEV_C_BIT			KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x8000001F, 0, EBX, 0, 5)
>  #define X86_PROPERTY_PHYS_ADDR_REDUCTION	KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x8000001F, 0, EBX, 6, 11)
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> index 74a4c736c9ae..6c69f1dfeed2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
> @@ -1074,7 +1074,9 @@ void kvm_get_cpu_address_width(unsigned int *pa_bits, unsigned int *va_bits)
>  		*pa_bits = kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAE) ? 36 : 32;
>  		*va_bits = 32;
>  	} else {
> -		*pa_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR);
> +		*pa_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_GUEST_PHY_ADDR);
> +		if (*pa_bits == 0)
> +			*pa_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR);

This is the wrong place to incorporaate the max mappable GPA.  The pa_bits field
should reflect the "real" MAXPHYADDR, it's vm->max_gfn that needs to be adjusted,
and x86 selftests already overrides vm_compute_max_gfn() specifically to deal with
goofy edge cases like this.

>  		*va_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_VIRT_ADDR);
>  	}
>  }
> 
> base-commit: dccb07f2914cdab2ac3a5b6c98406f765acab803
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-08 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-08  6:42 [PATCH] KVM: selftests: x86: Prioritize getting max_gfn from GuestPhysBits Tao Su
2024-05-08 14:09 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-05-09  5:12   ` Tao Su

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZjuHrGROhuBylm4x@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tao1.su@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox