From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<xiaoyao.li@intel.com>, <yi1.lai@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: selftests: x86: Prioritize getting max_gfn from GuestPhysBits
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 09:44:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZkFwgGYV84TztUxD@chao-email> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240510020346.12528-1-tao1.su@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:03:46AM +0800, Tao Su wrote:
>Use the max mappable GPA via GuestPhysBits advertised by KVM to calculate
>max_gfn. Currently some selftests (e.g. access_tracking_perf_test,
>dirty_log_test...) add RAM regions close to max_gfn, so guest may access
>GPA beyond its mappable range and cause infinite loop.
>
>Adjust max_gfn in vm_compute_max_gfn() since x86 selftests already
>overrides vm_compute_max_gfn() specifically to deal with goofy edge cases.
>
>Signed-off-by: Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com>
>Tested-by: Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>
>---
>This patch is based on https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/b628cb523c65
>
>Changelog:
>v1 -> v2:
> - Only adjust vm->max_gfn in vm_compute_max_gfn()
> - Add Yi Lai's Tested-by
>
>v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240508064205.15301-1-tao1.su@linux.intel.com/
>---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
>index 81ce37ec407d..ff99f66d81a0 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
>+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
>@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_cpu_property {
> #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_EXT_LEAF KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000000, 0, EAX, 0, 31)
> #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_PHY_ADDR KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 0, 7)
> #define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_VIRT_ADDR KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 8, 15)
>+#define X86_PROPERTY_MAX_GUEST_PHY_ADDR KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x80000008, 0, EAX, 16, 23)
> #define X86_PROPERTY_SEV_C_BIT KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x8000001F, 0, EBX, 0, 5)
> #define X86_PROPERTY_PHYS_ADDR_REDUCTION KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0x8000001F, 0, EBX, 6, 11)
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
>index 74a4c736c9ae..aa9966ead543 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
>+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
>@@ -1293,10 +1293,16 @@ const struct kvm_cpuid2 *vcpu_get_supported_hv_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> unsigned long vm_compute_max_gfn(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> {
> const unsigned long num_ht_pages = 12 << (30 - vm->page_shift); /* 12 GiB */
>- unsigned long ht_gfn, max_gfn, max_pfn;
>+ unsigned long ht_gfn, max_gfn, max_pfn, max_bits = 0;
nit: max_bits has only 8 bits. so max_bits should be uint8_t.
> uint8_t maxphyaddr;
>
>- max_gfn = (1ULL << (vm->pa_bits - vm->page_shift)) - 1;
>+ if (kvm_cpu_has_p(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_GUEST_PHY_ADDR))
>+ max_bits = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_MAX_GUEST_PHY_ADDR);
>+
>+ if (!max_bits)
>+ max_bits = vm->pa_bits;
>+
>+ max_gfn = (1ULL << (max_bits - vm->page_shift)) - 1;
>
> /* Avoid reserved HyperTransport region on AMD processors. */
> if (!host_cpu_is_amd)
>
>base-commit: 448b3fe5a0eab5b625a7e15c67c7972169e47ff8
>--
>2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-13 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-10 2:03 [PATCH v2] KVM: selftests: x86: Prioritize getting max_gfn from GuestPhysBits Tao Su
2024-05-11 7:08 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-11 9:13 ` Tao Su
2024-05-13 1:44 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2024-05-13 2:00 ` Tao Su
2024-05-13 2:48 ` Chao Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZkFwgGYV84TztUxD@chao-email \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tao1.su@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox