From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/reboot: Unconditionally define cpu_emergency_virt_cb typedef
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 09:01:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZkI5WApAR6iqCgil@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5dfc9eb860a587d1864371874bbf267fa0aa7922.camel@intel.com>
On Mon, May 13, 2024, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 16:39 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Define cpu_emergency_virt_cb even if the kernel is being built without KVM
> > support so that KVM can reference the typedef in asm/kvm_host.h without
> > needing yet more #ifdefs.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h
> > index 6536873f8fc0..d0ef2a678d66 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/reboot.h
> > @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ void __noreturn machine_real_restart(unsigned int type);
> > #define MRR_BIOS 0
> > #define MRR_APM 1
> >
> > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_INTEL) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_AMD)
> > typedef void (cpu_emergency_virt_cb)(void);
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_INTEL) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_AMD)
> > void cpu_emergency_register_virt_callback(cpu_emergency_virt_cb *callback);
> > void cpu_emergency_unregister_virt_callback(cpu_emergency_virt_cb *callback);
> > void cpu_emergency_disable_virtualization(void);
>
> It looks a little it weird. If other file wants to include
> <asm/kvm_host.h> (directly or via <linux/kvm_host.h>) unconditionally then
> in general I think <asm/kvm_host.h> or <linux/kvm_host.h> should
> have something like:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM
>
> void func(void);
> ...
>
> #else
>
> static inline void func(void) {}
>
> #endif
>
> But it seems neither <asm/kvm_host.h> nor <linux/kvm_host.h> has this
> pattern.
>
> I tried to build with !CONFIG_KVM with patch 2 in this series, and I got
> below error:
Well, yeah.
> In file included from ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:45,
> from arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:17:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h:1617:9: error: unknown type name
> ‘cpu_emergency_virt_cb’
> 1617 | cpu_emergency_virt_cb *emergency_disable;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> Looking at the code, it seems it is because intel_guest_get_msrs() needs
> 'struct kvm_pmu' (e.g., it accesses the members of 'struct kvm_pmu'). But
> it doesn't look the relevant code should be compiled when !CONFIG_KVM.
>
> So looks a better way is to explicitly use #ifdef CONFIG_KVM around the
> relevant code in the arch/x86/events/intel/core.c?
Eh, there's no right or wrong way to handle code that is conditionally compiled.
There are always tradeoffs and pros/cons, e.g. the number of #ifdefs, the amount
of effective code validation for all configs, readability, etc.
E.g. if there is only one user of a function that conditionally exists, then
having the caller handle the situation might be cleaner. But if there are
multiple callers, then providing a stub is usually preferable.
IMO, the real problem is that perf pokes into KVM _at all_. Same for VFIO.
The perf usage is especially egregious, as there is zero reason perf should need
KVM internals[1]. VFIO requires a bit more effort, but I'm fairly confident that
Jason's file-based approach[2] will yield clean, robust code that minimizes the
number of #ifdefs required.
I'm planning/hoping to get back to that series in the next few weeks. As for
this small series, I prefer to unconditionally define the typedef, as it requires
no additional #ifdefs, and there are no meaningful downsides to letting the
typedef exist for all kernel builds.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230916003118.2540661-21-seanjc@google.com
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZXkVSKULLivrMkBl@google.com
> And it seems vfio does it in vfio_main.c:
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> #endif
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
> void vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device,
> struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> ...
> }
> ...
> #endif
>
>
> The only remaining weird thing is 'struct kvm *kvm' is still used
> unconditionally in vfio_main.c, but I think the reason it builds fine with
> !CONFIG_KVM is because <linux/vfio.h> declares it explicitly:
>
> struct kvm;
> struct iommufd_ctx;
> ...
>
> So it seems to me that this patch around 'cpu_emergency_virt_cb' is more
> like a workaround of existing non-perfect <linux/kvm_host.h> and/or
> <asm/kvm_host.h>?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-13 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-25 23:39 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Register cpuhp/syscore callbacks when enabling virt Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 23:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/reboot: Unconditionally define cpu_emergency_virt_cb typedef Sean Christopherson
2024-05-13 12:50 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-13 16:01 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-05-13 22:44 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-14 22:41 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-21 20:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-21 21:43 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-21 23:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 23:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: Register emergency virt callback in common code, via kvm_x86_ops Sean Christopherson
2024-04-26 8:52 ` Chao Gao
2024-04-26 17:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-13 12:55 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-13 16:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 23:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Register cpuhp and syscore callbacks when enabling hardware Sean Christopherson
2024-04-26 8:32 ` Chao Gao
2024-04-26 17:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-07 16:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-09 12:10 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-13 12:56 ` Huang, Kai
2024-04-25 23:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: Rename functions related to enabling virtualization hardware Sean Christopherson
2024-05-13 12:59 ` Huang, Kai
2024-05-13 16:20 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZkI5WApAR6iqCgil@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).