From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-181.mta1.migadu.com (out-181.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3213DAD21 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 02:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.181 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719627237; cv=none; b=YOhs6gidciZlWdMRR5op0VQLj/62YVFqYrMIgT7Mo4yjV8HN9zSU6sYFMorMCQdznMAR8HS4VcJER7RCEHcSQW9wZ/RKlazAaLuYc1xCIRSmebo3hAPi6G/gcllFK9iF7zHEcbF0Vs0TzLXqUyPxfFonDzEwZih0YrvS0ZWAzW4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719627237; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VjlQWayZ0a1t13wS5samrwVIhFTK5Imu4pJ0D2waseo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lXcRRGWvZH8n3k0W4GIgkyAIde1PUJ0apoa0B6Y/+1eeVfC5i8QRulFGfgWNyaL068mRd/MW9dwbassOKEpR4j535lJS3ZqdHhC8E1YM97HIP+7EwRtPhtPb14qXjI6yRmLO24OTNqmgZAuwNX7ORMq7DE1/5ZL8Kh/ZBYSg6kc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=Jrv9xb8L; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.181 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="Jrv9xb8L" X-Envelope-To: yuzenghui@huawei.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1719627233; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dsMiJ/DfctyapYO4Kt94I2y8UbU+q2nlWIvz9jErSoY=; b=Jrv9xb8LaHCeQqBJ+StqsJnNwRSAP+i/EttSuvma7TC6sYuTl6+eeyFb41m8+T2UplvTiP g1cNtvZX/3vCD7ZmzpJvnBFjMamOgkd+9G+3RXB1wU89NrDIVgF+2hFaPuiAbtgMG3d0Zd EAcNmJQax7Ky3Gqx0aBCGs/OVUUlwqo= X-Envelope-To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev X-Envelope-To: maz@kernel.org X-Envelope-To: james.morse@arm.com X-Envelope-To: suzuki.poulose@arm.com X-Envelope-To: kvm@vger.kernel.org X-Envelope-To: pbonzini@redhat.com Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 02:13:48 +0000 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Oliver Upton To: Zenghui Yu Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Marc Zyngier , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Include documentation in KVM/arm64 entry Message-ID: References: <20240628222147.3153682-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev> <63685fc4-38fb-f938-959d-2c1f96cff6b1@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63685fc4-38fb-f938-959d-2c1f96cff6b1@huawei.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 09:32:53AM +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote: > On 2024/6/29 6:21, Oliver Upton wrote: > > Ensure updates to the KVM/arm64 documentation get sent to the right > > place. > > > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index aacccb376c28..05d71b852857 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -12078,6 +12078,7 @@ L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) > > L: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev > > S: Maintained > > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm.git > > +F: Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/ > > F: arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm* > > F: arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm* > > F: arch/arm64/kvm/ > > Should we include the vgic documentation (in > Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/) as well? They're indeed KVM/arm64 > stuff. Heh, yet another fine example for why I shouldn't send patches on a Friday evening :) Yes, we'll want to fold those in too, thanks for spotting this. -- Thanks, Oliver