From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
"Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
"Zhenyu Wang" <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
"Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
"Yongwei Ma" <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Introduce SMP Cache Topology
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:33:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zp4LUSXlwXqI880x@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240704031603.1744546-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Hi Daniel and Markus,
A gentle ping. Would you kindly have a look at this version of the API
design? If it could meet your satisfaction, I’ll continue iterating.
Thanks,
Zhao
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 11:15:55AM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:15:55 +0800
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 0/8] Introduce SMP Cache Topology
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since the previous RFC v2, I've reimplemented smp-cache object based on
> Daniel's comment (thanks Daniel!), which is both flexible to support
> current cache topology requirements and extensible.
>
> So, I officially convert the RFC to PATCH.
>
> Background on smp cache topology can be found in the previous RFC v2
> cover letter:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240530101539.768484-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com/
>
> The following content focuses on this series implementation of the
> smp-cache object.
>
>
> About smp-cache
> ===============
>
> In fact, the smp-cache object introduced in this series is a bit
> different from Daniel's original suggestion. Instead of being integrated
> into -smp, it is created explicitly via -object, and the smp-cache
> property is added to -machine to link to this object.
>
> An example is as follows:
>
> -object '{"qom-type":"smp-cache","id":"cache0","caches":[{"name":"l1d","topo":"core"},{"name":"l1i","topo":"core"},{"name":"l2","topo":"module"},{"name":"l3","topo":"socket"}]}'
> -machine smp-cache=cache0
>
>
> Such the design change is based on the following 2 reasons:
> * Defining the cache with a JSON list is very extensible and can
> support more cache properties.
>
> * But -smp, as the sugar of machine property "smp", is based on keyval
> format, and doesn't support options with JSON format. Thus it's not
> possible to add a JSON format based option to -smp/-machine for now.
>
> So, I decoupled the creation of the smp-cache object from the -machine
> to make both -machine and -object happy!
>
>
> Welcome your feedback!
>
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Zhao
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> Main changes since RFC v2:
> * Dropped cpu-topology.h and cpu-topology.c since QAPI has the helper
> (CpuTopologyLevel_str) to convert enum to string. (Markus)
> * Fixed text format in machine.json (CpuTopologyLevel naming, 2 spaces
> between sentences). (Markus)
> * Added a new level "default" to de-compatibilize some arch-specific
> topo settings. (Daniel)
> * Moved CpuTopologyLevel to qapi/machine-common.json, at where the
> cache enumeration and smp-cache object would be added.
> - If smp-cache object is defined in qapi/machine.json, storage-daemon
> will complain about the qmp cmds in qapi/machine.json during
> compiling.
> * Referred to Daniel's suggestion to introduce cache JSON list, though
> as a standalone object since -smp/-machine can't support JSON.
> * Linked machine's smp_cache to smp-cache object instead of a builtin
> structure. This is to get around the fact that the keyval format of
> -machine can't support JSON.
> * Wrapped the cache topology level access into a helper.
> * Split as a separate commit to just include compatibility checking and
> topology checking.
> * Allow setting "default" topology level even though the cache
> isn't supported by machine. (Daniel)
> * Rewrote the document of smp-cache object.
>
> Main changes since RFC v1:
> * Split CpuTopology renaimg out of this RFC.
> * Use QAPI to enumerate CPU topology levels.
> * Drop string_to_cpu_topo() since QAPI will help to parse the topo
> levels.
> * Set has_*_cache field in machine_get_smp(). (JeeHeng)
> * Use "*_cache=topo_level" as -smp example as the original "level"
> term for a cache has a totally different meaning. (Jonathan)
> ---
> Zhao Liu (8):
> hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic
> qapi/qom: Introduce smp-cache object
> hw/core: Add smp cache topology for machine
> hw/core: Check smp cache topology support for machine
> i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology
> i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration
> i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine
> qemu-options: Add the description of smp-cache object
>
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +
> hw/core/machine-smp.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/core/machine.c | 22 ++++++++
> hw/core/meson.build | 1 +
> hw/core/smp-cache.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/i386/pc.c | 4 ++
> include/hw/boards.h | 11 +++-
> include/hw/core/smp-cache.h | 27 ++++++++++
> include/hw/i386/topology.h | 18 +------
> qapi/machine-common.json | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> qapi/qapi-schema.json | 4 +-
> qapi/qom.json | 3 ++
> qemu-options.hx | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++
> target/i386/cpu.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> target/i386/cpu.h | 4 +-
> 15 files changed, 478 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 hw/core/smp-cache.c
> create mode 100644 include/hw/core/smp-cache.h
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-22 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-04 3:15 [PATCH 0/8] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
2024-07-22 11:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-22 13:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-22 14:01 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-23 10:14 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-23 14:40 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] qapi/qom: Introduce smp-cache object Zhao Liu
2024-07-09 10:13 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-22 13:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-22 14:30 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-24 11:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-24 12:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-07-24 14:03 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-24 15:10 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-24 14:55 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-25 8:51 ` Markus Armbruster
[not found] ` <20240725115059.000016c5@Huawei.com>
2024-07-25 10:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-25 11:58 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-25 11:56 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] hw/core: Add smp cache topology for machine Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support " Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:16 ` [PATCH 5/8] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:16 ` [PATCH 6/8] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:16 ` [PATCH 7/8] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:16 ` [PATCH 8/8] qemu-options: Add the description of smp-cache object Zhao Liu
2024-07-22 13:37 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-22 14:42 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-24 12:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-24 14:21 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-25 9:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-08-01 9:37 ` Zhao Liu
2024-08-01 11:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-08-02 7:58 ` Zhao Liu
2024-08-09 12:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-08-12 9:24 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-22 7:33 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-07-22 7:49 ` [PATCH 0/8] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zp4LUSXlwXqI880x@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox