public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,  Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: use vmx_segment_cache_clear
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:07:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZpbhItUq-p_emFUT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240716022014.240960-2-mlevitsk@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> In prepare_vmcs02_rare, call vmx_segment_cache_clear, instead
> of setting the segment_cache.bitmask directly.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 5 +++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c    | 4 ----
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h    | 5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 643935a0f70ab..d3ca1a772ae67 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -2469,6 +2469,9 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_rare(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
>  
>  	if (!hv_evmcs || !(hv_evmcs->hv_clean_fields &
>  			   HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_GUEST_GRP2)) {
> +
> +		vmx_segment_cache_clear(vmx);
> +
>  		vmcs_write16(GUEST_ES_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_es_selector);
>  		vmcs_write16(GUEST_CS_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_cs_selector);
>  		vmcs_write16(GUEST_SS_SELECTOR, vmcs12->guest_ss_selector);
> @@ -2505,8 +2508,6 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_rare(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
>  		vmcs_writel(GUEST_TR_BASE, vmcs12->guest_tr_base);
>  		vmcs_writel(GUEST_GDTR_BASE, vmcs12->guest_gdtr_base);
>  		vmcs_writel(GUEST_IDTR_BASE, vmcs12->guest_idtr_base);
> -
> -		vmx->segment_cache.bitmask = 0;

This actually exacerbates the bug that you're trying fix in patch 2.  Clearing
segment_cache.bitmask _after_ writing the relevant state limits the stale data
to only the accessor that's running in IRQ context (kvm_arch_vcpu_put()).

Clearing segment_cache.bitmask _before_ writing the relevant statement means
that kvm_arch_vcpu_put() _and_ all future readers will be exposed to the stale
data, because the stale data cached by kvm_arch_vcpu_put() won't mark it invalid.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-16 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-16  2:20 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix for a very old KVM bug in the segment cache Maxim Levitsky
2024-07-16  2:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: use vmx_segment_cache_clear Maxim Levitsky
2024-07-16 21:07   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-07-24 18:18     ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-07-16  2:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: VMX: disable preemption when touching segment fields Maxim Levitsky
2024-07-16 22:36   ` Sean Christopherson
2024-07-25 12:59     ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-07-25 17:37       ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZpbhItUq-p_emFUT@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox