From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Kishen Maloor <kishen.maloor@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, lprosek@redhat.com,
mlevitsk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Simplify SMM entry/exit flows in nested guest mode
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:30:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zr9wlwcwcNNm77iU@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240715225654.32614-1-kishen.maloor@intel.com>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024, Kishen Maloor wrote:
> This change aims to resolve a TODO documented in commit 5d76b1f8c793
> ("KVM: nVMX: Rename nested.vmcs01_* fields to nested.pre_vmenter_*"):
>
> /*
> * TODO: Implement custom flows for forcing the vCPU out/in of L2 on
> * SMI and RSM. Using the common VM-Exit + VM-Enter routines is wrong
> * SMI and RSM only modify state that is saved and restored via SMRAM.
Sorry, but this does not implement what the TODO suggest. Specifically, it touches
_far_ more state than what is saved/restored in SMRAM. Implementing custom SMI+RSM
handling will require an annoying amount of coding, which is why it hasn't been
done yet.
> * E.g. most MSRs are left untouched, but many are modified by VM-Exit
> * and VM-Enter, and thus L2's values may be corrupted on SMI+RSM.
> */
>
...
> +int nested_vmx_leave_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + enum vm_entry_failure_code entry_failure_code;
> + struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
> + struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
> +
> + kvm_service_local_tlb_flush_requests(vcpu);
> +
> + vmx_switch_vmcs(vcpu, &vmx->nested.vmcs02);
> +
> + prepare_vmcs02_early(vmx, &vmx->vmcs01, vmcs12);
> +
> + if (prepare_vmcs02(vcpu, vmcs12, false, &entry_failure_code)) {
> + vmx_switch_vmcs(vcpu, &vmx->vmcs01);
> + nested_vmx_restore_host_state(vcpu);
This is blatantly wrong, a failure during RSM results in shutdown. And I'm 99%
certain that restoring "critical VMX state" can't fail, i.e. this path shouldn't
exist at all.
Per the SDM, critical state is saved in a uarch-specific location, i.e. it can't
be accessed by software and thus isn't validated on RSM. And interestingly,
CR0/4 fixed bits are _forced_, not validated:
set to their fixed values any bits in CR0 and CR4 whose values must be fixed
in VMX operation (see Section 24.8);
Ditto for CS/SS RPL vs. DPL.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-16 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 22:56 [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Simplify SMM entry/exit flows in nested guest mode Kishen Maloor
2024-08-16 15:30 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zr9wlwcwcNNm77iU@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kishen.maloor@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lprosek@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox