public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
	"Alireza Sanaee" <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
	"Zhenyu Wang" <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
	"Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
	"Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 10:36:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxHJri+rgdGKf/0L@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxEte1KBwWuCdkb1@redhat.com>

Hi Daniel,

> > -/*
> > - * CPUTopoLevel is the general i386 topology hierarchical representation,
> > - * ordered by increasing hierarchical relationship.
> > - * Its enumeration value is not bound to the type value of Intel (CPUID[0x1F])
> > - * or AMD (CPUID[0x80000026]).
> > - */
> > -enum CPUTopoLevel {
> > -    CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID,
> > -    CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT,
> > -    CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE,
> > -    CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MODULE,
> > -    CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE,
> > -    CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE,
> > -    CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX,
> > -};
> > -
> 
> snip
> 
> > @@ -18,3 +18,47 @@
> >  ##
> >  { 'enum': 'S390CpuEntitlement',
> >    'data': [ 'auto', 'low', 'medium', 'high' ] }
> > +
> > +##
> > +# @CpuTopologyLevel:
> > +#
> > +# An enumeration of CPU topology levels.
> > +#
> > +# @invalid: Invalid topology level.
> 
> Previously all topology levels were internal to QEMU, and IIUC
> this CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID appears to have been a special
> value to indicate  the cache was absent ?

Now I haven't support this logic.
x86 CPU has a "l3-cache" property, and maybe that property can be
implemented or replaced by the "invalid" level support you mentioned.

> Now we're exposing this directly to the user as a settable
> option. We need to explain what effect setting 'invalid'
> has on the CPU cache config.

If user set "invalid", QEMU will report the error message:

qemu-system-x86_64: Invalid cache topology level: invalid. The topology should match valid CPU topology level

Do you think this error message is sufficient?

Thanks,
Zhao


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-18  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-12 10:44 [PATCH v3 0/7] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
     [not found]   ` <20241017095227.00006d85@Huawei.com>
2024-10-17 13:20     ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-17 14:51       ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 15:30   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18  2:36     ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-10-18  7:55       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18  9:01         ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 16:19   ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2024-10-18  4:26     ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support " Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 15:27   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18  3:57     ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-18  7:58       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18  9:03         ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 13:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-17 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Jonathan Cameron
     [not found] ` <20241017141402.0000135b@Huawei.com>
2024-10-17 15:01   ` Zhao Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZxHJri+rgdGKf/0L@intel.com \
    --to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox