From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Sia Jee Heng" <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
"Alireza Sanaee" <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
"Zhenyu Wang" <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
"Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
"Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 10:36:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxHJri+rgdGKf/0L@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxEte1KBwWuCdkb1@redhat.com>
Hi Daniel,
> > -/*
> > - * CPUTopoLevel is the general i386 topology hierarchical representation,
> > - * ordered by increasing hierarchical relationship.
> > - * Its enumeration value is not bound to the type value of Intel (CPUID[0x1F])
> > - * or AMD (CPUID[0x80000026]).
> > - */
> > -enum CPUTopoLevel {
> > - CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID,
> > - CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT,
> > - CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_CORE,
> > - CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MODULE,
> > - CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE,
> > - CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_PACKAGE,
> > - CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX,
> > -};
> > -
>
> snip
>
> > @@ -18,3 +18,47 @@
> > ##
> > { 'enum': 'S390CpuEntitlement',
> > 'data': [ 'auto', 'low', 'medium', 'high' ] }
> > +
> > +##
> > +# @CpuTopologyLevel:
> > +#
> > +# An enumeration of CPU topology levels.
> > +#
> > +# @invalid: Invalid topology level.
>
> Previously all topology levels were internal to QEMU, and IIUC
> this CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_INVALID appears to have been a special
> value to indicate the cache was absent ?
Now I haven't support this logic.
x86 CPU has a "l3-cache" property, and maybe that property can be
implemented or replaced by the "invalid" level support you mentioned.
> Now we're exposing this directly to the user as a settable
> option. We need to explain what effect setting 'invalid'
> has on the CPU cache config.
If user set "invalid", QEMU will report the error message:
qemu-system-x86_64: Invalid cache topology level: invalid. The topology should match valid CPU topology level
Do you think this error message is sufficient?
Thanks,
Zhao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-18 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 10:44 [PATCH v3 0/7] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
[not found] ` <20241017095227.00006d85@Huawei.com>
2024-10-17 13:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-17 14:51 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 15:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18 2:36 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-10-18 7:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18 9:01 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 16:19 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2024-10-18 4:26 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] qapi/qom: Define cache enumeration and properties for machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support " Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 15:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18 3:57 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-18 7:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-10-18 9:03 ` Zhao Liu
2024-10-12 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] i386/cpu: add has_caches flag to check smp_cache configuration Zhao Liu
2024-10-17 13:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-10-17 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Jonathan Cameron
[not found] ` <20241017141402.0000135b@Huawei.com>
2024-10-17 15:01 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxHJri+rgdGKf/0L@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox