From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn and kvm_age_gfn
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:45:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zy6UefSlo8vwHxew@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADrL8HU3KzDxrLsxD1+578zG6E__AjK3TMCfs-nQAnqFTZM2vQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024, James Houghton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:22 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on a27e0515592ec9ca28e0d027f42568c47b314784]
> >
> > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/James-Houghton/KVM-Remove-kvm_handle_hva_range-helper-functions/20241106-025133
> > base: a27e0515592ec9ca28e0d027f42568c47b314784
> > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241105184333.2305744-5-jthoughton%40google.com
> > patch subject: [PATCH v8 04/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn and kvm_age_gfn
> > config: x86_64-rhel-8.3 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241106/202411061526.RAuCXKJh-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241106/202411061526.RAuCXKJh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411061526.RAuCXKJh-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c: In function 'kvm_tdp_mmu_age_spte':
> > >> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:1189:23: warning: ignoring return value of '__tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic' declared with attribute 'warn_unused_result' [-Wunused-result]
> > 1189 | (void)__tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(iter, new_spte);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
>
> Well, I saw this compiler warning in my latest rebase and thought the
> `(void)` would fix it. I guess the next best way to fix it would be to
> assign to an `int __maybe_unused`. I'll do for a v9, or Sean if you're
> going to take the series (maybe? :)), go ahead and apply whatever fix
> you like.
Heh, actually, the compiler is correct. Ignoring the return value is a bug.
KVM should instead return immediately, as falling through to the tracepoint will
log bogus information. E.g. will show a !PRESENT SPTE, instead of whatever the
current SPTE actually is (iter->old_spte will have been updating to the current
value of the SPTE).
trace_kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_changed(iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->level,
iter->old_spte, new_spte);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index f5b4f1060fff..cc8ae998b7c8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1186,7 +1186,8 @@ static void kvm_tdp_mmu_age_spte(struct tdp_iter *iter)
* It is safe for the following cmpxchg to fail. Leave the
* Accessed bit set, as the spte is most likely young anyway.
*/
- (void)__tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(iter, new_spte);
+ if (__tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(iter, new_spte))
+ return;
}
trace_kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_changed(iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->level,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-08 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-05 18:43 [PATCH v8 00/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Age sptes locklessly James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] KVM: Remove kvm_handle_hva_range helper functions James Houghton
2025-01-10 22:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-27 19:50 ` James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] KVM: Add lockless memslot walk to KVM James Houghton
2025-01-10 22:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-27 19:51 ` James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out spte atomic bit clearing routine James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:45 ` Yu Zhao
2025-01-10 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-27 19:51 ` James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn and kvm_age_gfn James Houghton
2024-11-06 8:22 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-08 3:00 ` James Houghton
2024-11-08 22:45 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-11-11 14:45 ` James Houghton
2025-01-10 22:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-27 19:52 ` James Houghton
2025-01-27 19:57 ` James Houghton
2025-01-27 20:09 ` James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Rearrange kvm_{test_,}age_gfn James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:46 ` Yu Zhao
2025-01-10 22:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-27 19:58 ` James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Only check gfn age in shadow MMU if indirect_shadow_pages > 0 James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:49 ` Yu Zhao
2025-01-10 23:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-27 19:58 ` James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor low level rmap helpers to prep for walking w/o mmu_lock James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Add infrastructure to allow walking rmaps outside of mmu_lock James Houghton
2025-01-10 23:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-27 21:42 ` James Houghton
2025-01-27 21:52 ` James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Add support for lockless walks of rmap SPTEs James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Support rmap walks without holding mmu_lock when aging gfns James Houghton
2024-11-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] KVM: selftests: Add multi-gen LRU aging to access_tracking_perf_test James Houghton
2025-01-11 0:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-03 22:46 ` James Houghton
2025-01-11 0:21 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-11-05 19:21 ` [PATCH v8 00/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Age sptes locklessly Yu Zhao
2024-11-05 19:28 ` Yu Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zy6UefSlo8vwHxew@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).