From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 855F8C2FB for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730726773; cv=none; b=NkkEWrApHRBfIcwV6ShoGiz3jzQoY1QYZ2B7KuRJBBJsaBIAM0x11KA2XJQLXZfSlLlOmbEY9lZDtMocPAoHBOcUjGNMuY66Cg+x9nm17HSpR/zjzdV4OhJvSsOpYo9tDVmNJit8aUoV+W6/3m8UrTmjlVMOnZonu6WQ6EyMp80= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730726773; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7VEBP+NmFy6er0IkJMuDyZ7/UsPBRGSDCt2+JrIwiOE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fB8TOlycV2UbLmGFXUoaDFLjGjvw7T/osBzreljUy0cNYzKeRWzIMg/yvJbreAoBnIu1yH0Ne4sleQJsu5mGWbMEAW45GVaCAUbN+rkWG/Vc7dh1dwAJu0hxlBNpHrTUGthOGGmOyvzOAlUYDMk/FiPlfQBgma36y4pRuctwNBM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=eJepfHr5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="eJepfHr5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1730726772; x=1762262772; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=7VEBP+NmFy6er0IkJMuDyZ7/UsPBRGSDCt2+JrIwiOE=; b=eJepfHr5PjiYV2K0jdcPpkX4LLrBm7Cx92zxfHbYiufvD4RV03/8TCVS 4QtdJ5YkrhIF+G4V74N0p5dagAyLyOIza4gU/5m/YLAnmcWYO4kWMbsNe vTZ7e10V9Z9ywbXNQUtDDzdsHofQscTlQwInvztlkVu94Y7yy0JBooI67 cI7V7ngKW3uY0WMVEEj8l+kAALEcClnF6INGAmnr8vW/7lDaczGlmNBgx j32FyMvnvtyE0UWhIkdxe8fYOG7r/4wNb6gHK9N32Szn51NwjGd8PRBYI gnSyN1BEM/6FYN0IR4+m8memMDHpFygyphCO4DW8P+rFow4rjmSUCYwnb g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TToCIqFYQT2wx5957M8jLA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BfplXr4tTwy+SoIi8HNoDQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11246"; a="30528583" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,257,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="30528583" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2024 05:26:12 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hcSzQxmHTnibkYfho1nGjw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OtModQK9TdC/6G1TsguaBQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,257,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="83772091" Received: from linux.bj.intel.com ([10.238.157.71]) by orviesa006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2024 05:26:10 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:21:02 +0800 From: Tao Su To: Borislav Petkov Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, chao.gao@intel.com, xiaoyao.li@intel.com, jiaan.lu@intel.com, xuelian.guo@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Advertise CPUID for new instructions in Clearwater Forest Message-ID: References: <20241104063559.727228-1-tao1.su@linux.intel.com> <20241104065147.GAZyhvAyYCD0GdSMD5@fat_crate.local> <20241104095834.GBZyiaytJCvXylJgc2@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241104095834.GBZyiaytJCvXylJgc2@fat_crate.local> On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:58:34AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 03:04:41PM +0800, Tao Su wrote: > > Would it be better if I attach rev, chapter and section? > > Put enough information from the document so that one can find it doing a web > search. So that even if the vendor URL changes, a search engine will index it > shortly after again. > Sure, I agree with you. > > I mainly referred to the previous patch set [*] which is very similar to > > this one. > > That patch set is doing more than just adding bits although I still would've > merged patches 3-8 as they're simply adding feature bits and are obvious. > Got it. > > If you think a patch is better, I can send a v2 with only one > > patch. > > Yes please. Will do, thanks!